Managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction: what do patients prefer? A discrete choice experiment of patient preferences for transanal irrigation and standard bowel management

Beenish Nafees1 Health Outcomes Research, Nafees Consulting Limited, London, UKCorrespondence[email protected]

Andrew J Lloyd2 Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, ICON plc, Oxford, UK

Rachel S Ballinger2 Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, ICON plc, Oxford, UK

Anton Emmanuel3 Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University College Hospital, London, UK

Pages 195-204 | Published online: 17 Feb 2016

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

KroghKNielsenJDjurhuusJCMosdalCSabroeSLaurbergSColorectal function in patients with spinal cord lesionsDis Colon Rectum19974010123312399336119
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChiaYWFowlerCJKammMAHenryMMLemieuxMCSwashMPrevalence of bowel dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis and bladder dysfunctionJ Neurol199524221051087707085
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RaoSSTutejaAKVellemaTKempfJStessmanMDyssynergic defecation: demographics, symptoms, stool patterns, and quality of lifeJ Clin Gastroentrerol2004388680685
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GlickmanSKammMABowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patientsLancet19963479016165116538642958
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LynchACWongCAnthonyADobbsBRFrizelleFABowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a description of bowel function in a spinal cord-injured population and comparison with age and gender matched controlsSpinal Cord2000381271772311175370
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LiuCWHuangCCYangYHChenSCWengMCHuangMHRelationship between neurogenic bowel dysfunction and health-related quality of life in persons with spinal cord injuryJ Rehabil Med2009411354019197567
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CoggraveMNortonCWilson-BartnettJManagement of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in the community after spinal cord injury: a postal survey in the United KingdomSpinal Cord200947432333319015665
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Del PopoloGMosielloGPilatiCTreatment of neurogenic bowel dysfunction using transanal irrigation: a multicenter Italian studySpinal Cord200846751752218317488
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical ExcellenceFaecal Incontinence: The Management of Faecal Incontinence in AdultsLondonNICE2007 Available from: www.nice.org.uk/CG49Accessed August 1, 2014
Google Scholar
CoggraveMTransanal irrigation after spinal cord injuryNurs Times2007103444618078218
PubMedGoogle Scholar
ChristensenPBazzocchiGCoggraveMOutcome of transanal irrigation for bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injuryJ Spinal Cord Med200831556019086714
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ShandlingBGilmourRFThe enema continence catheter in spina bifida: successful bowel managementJ Pediatr Surg19872232712733550032
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EirePFCivesRVGagoMCFaecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: the best conservative treatmentSpinal Cord1998367747769848485
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChristensenPAndreasenJEhlersLCost-effectiveness of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management for spinal cord injury patientsSpinal Cord20094713814318679401
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EmmanuelAVKroghKBazzocchiGConsensus review of best practice of transanal irrigation in adultsSpinal Cord2013511073273823958927
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RyanMGerardKUsing discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflectionsAppl Health Econ Health Policy200321556414619274
PubMedGoogle Scholar
ChristensenPKroghKBuntzenSPayandehFLaurbergSLong-term outcome and safety of transanal irrigation for constipation and fecal incontinenceDis Colon Rectum200952228629219279425
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EuroQol GroupEuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of lifeHealth Policy19901619920810109801
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VaizeyCJCarapetiECahillJAKammMAProspective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systemsGut199944177809862829
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AgachanFChenTPfeiferJReissmanPWexnerSDA constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patientsDis Colon Rectum19963966816858646957
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HosmerDWLemeshowSApplied Logistic RegressionNew YorkWiley1989
Google Scholar
PinderBLloydAJNafeesBElkinEPMarleyJPatient preferences and willingness to pay for innovations in intermittent self-cathetersPatient Prefer Adherence2015938138825834407
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PreziosiGRaptisDAStorrieJRaeburnAFowlerCJEmmanuelABowel biofeedback treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis and bowel symptomsDis Colon Rectum20115491114112121825891
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BlackNPatient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcareBMJ (Clin Res Ed)2013346f167
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JohnsonFRMohamedAFÖzdemirSMarshallDAPhillipsKAHow does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments?Health Econ201120332333020217834
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction: what do patients prefer? A discrete choice experiment of patient preferences for transanal irrigation and standard bowel management

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction: what do patients prefer? A discrete choice experiment of patient preferences for transanal irrigation and standard bowel management

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date