Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation

Mohammed AlKhars1 Department of Management & Marketing, College of Industrial Management, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, [email protected]Correspondence[email protected]

Nicholas Evangelopoulos2 Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, G. Brint Ryan College of Business, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

Robert Pavur2 Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, G. Brint Ryan College of Business, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

Shailesh Kulkarni2 Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, G. Brint Ryan College of Business, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

Pages 263-276 | Published online: 10 Apr 2019

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF View EPUB EPUB

References

LochCHWuYBehavioral operations managementFound Trends® Technol Inform Operat Manage200713121232
Google Scholar
SuXBounded rationality in Newsvendor modelsM&SOM2008104566589
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SchweitzerMECachonGPDecision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: experimental evidenceManage Sci2000463404420
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BostianAJAHoltCASmithAMNewsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: adaptive learning in a laboratory experimentM&SOM2008104590608
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BoltonGEKatokELearning by doing in the Newsvendor problem: a laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedbackM&SOM2008103519538
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BloomfieldRJKulpSLDurability, transit lags, and optimality of inventory management decisionsProd Oper Manag2013224826842
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KatokEThomasDDavisAInventory service-level agreements as coordination mechanisms: the effect of review periodsM&SOM2008104609624
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RudiNDrakeDObservation bias: the impact of demand censoring on newsvendor level and adjustment behaviorManag Sci201460513341345
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BoudreauJHoppWMcClainJOThomasLJOn the interface between operations and human resources managementM&SOM200353179202
Google Scholar
ChopraSLovejoyWYanoCFive decades of operations management and the prospects aheadManag Sci2004501814
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BendolyEDonohueKSchultzKLBehavior in operations management: assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptionsJ Oper Manage2006246737752
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GinoFPisanoGToward a theory of behavioral operationsM&SOM2008104676691
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BendolyECrosonRGoncalvesPSchultzKBodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operationsProd Oper Manag2010194434452
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CrosonRSchultzKSiemsenEYeoMLBehavioral operations: the state of the fieldJ Oper Manag2013311-215
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KatsikopoulosKVGigerenzerGBehavioral operations management: a blind spot and a research programJ Supply Chain Manag201349137
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TverskyAKahnemanDJudgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biasesScience197418541571124113117835457
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AncaraniADi MauroCD’UrsoDA human experiment on inventory decisions under supply uncertaintyIntl J Prod Econ201314216173
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EvansJSBTStanovichKEDual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debatePerspect Psychol Sci20138322324126172965
PubMedGoogle Scholar
FrederickSCognitive reflection and decision makingJ Econ Perspect20051942542
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SodhiMSTangCSGuiding the next generation of doctoral students in operations managementInt J Prod Econ20141502836
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HahnUWarrenPAPerceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than fourPsychol Rev2009116245446119348550
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MooreDASchatzDThe three faces of overconfidenceSoc Personal Psychol Compass2017118e12331
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FischhoffBDebiasingJudgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesKahnemanDSlovicPTverskyACambridge, UKCambridge University Press1982422444
Google Scholar
MorewedgeCKYoonHScopellitiISymborskiCWKorrisJHKassamKSDebiasing decisions: improved decision making with a single training interventionPolicy Insights Behav Brain Sci201521129140
Google Scholar
NisbettREFongGTLehmanDRChengPWTeaching reasoningScience198723848276256313672116
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KaufmannLMichelACarterCRDebiasing strategies in supply management decision-makingJ Bus Logist200930185106
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GrafLKönigAEndersAHungenbergHDebiasing competitive irrationality: how managers can be prevented from trading off absolute for relative profitEur Manage J2012304386403
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DunbarNEJensenMLMillerCHMitigating cognitive bias through the use of serious games: effects of feedbackInternational Conference on Persuasive TechnologySpringer, Cham201492105
Google Scholar
MoritzBBHillAVDonohueKLIndividual differences in the news-vendor problem: behavior and cognitive reflectionJ Oper Manag2013311-27285
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CesariniDJohannessonMMagnussonPKEWallaceBThe behavioral genetics of behavioral anomaliesManag Sci20125812134
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CrosonRDonohueKExperimental economics and supply-chain managementInterfaces20023257482
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SimpsonNHancockPPractical Operations ManagementNaperville, ILHercher Publishing Incorporated2013
Google Scholar
KahnemanDThinking, Fast and SlowNew York, NYFarrar, Straus and Giroux2013
Google Scholar
BlaisA-RWeberEUA domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populationsJudgment Decis Making2006113347
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
MacKenzieISHuman-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research PerspectiveBurlington, MAMorgan Kaufmann2013175176
Google Scholar
ArkesHRGigerenzerGHertwigRHow bad is incoherence?Decision2016312039
Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date