An empirical investigation on the relationship between a high-performance work system and employee performance: measuring a mediation model through partial least squares–structural equation modeling

References

• Boxall P, MackyK. High-performance work systems and organisational performance: bridging theory and practice. Asia Pacific J Hum Resour. 2007;45(3):261–270. doi:10.1177/1038411107082273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramony M. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Hum Resour Manage. 2009;48(5):745–768. doi:10.1002/hrm.v48:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colakoglu S, Lepak DP, Hong Y. Measuring HRM effectiveness: considering multiple stakeholders in a global context. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2006;16(2):209–218. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Jiang K, Lepak DP, Han K, Hong Y, Kim A, Winkler AL. Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: relating human resource management to employee performance. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2012;22(2):73–85. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley B, Allen BC, Sargent LD. High performance work systems and employee experience of work in the service sector: the case of aged care. Br J Ind Relations. 2007;45(3):607–633. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrnrooth M, Björkman I. An integrative HRM process theorization: beyond signalling effects and mutual gains. J Manag Stud. 2012;49(September):1109–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi R, Chen G, Lepak DP. Through the looking glass of a social system: cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Pers Psychol. 2009;62(1):1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Voorde K, Beijer S. The role of employee HR attributions in the relationship between high-performance work systems and employee outcomes. Hum Resour Manag J. 2015;25(1):62–78. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koser M, Rasool SF. High performance work system is the accelerator of the best fit and integrated hr-practices to achieve the goal of productivity : a case of textile sector. Glob Manag J Acad Corp Stud.2018;8(1):10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Morris JL. High-performance work systems and organizational performance: testing the mediation role of employee outcomes using evidence from PR China. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2014;25(1):68–90. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.781524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Akhtar MN, Bal PM, Zhang Y, Talat U. How do high-performance work systems affect individual outcomes: a multilevel perspective. Front Psychol. 2018;9:586. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0058629743875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasir M, Imran R, Irshad MK. Mediating role of organizational climate in the relationship between transformational leadership, its facets and organizational performance. Actual Probl Econ. 2013;145(7):559–569.
   Google Scholar
• Danford A, Richardson M, Stewart P, Tailby S, Upchurch M. Partnership, high performance work systems and quality of working life. New Techol Work Employment. 2008;23.:151–166. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2008.00210.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest DE. Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers. Hum Resour Manag J. 2011;21(1):3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00164.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dany F, Guedri Z, Hatt F. New insights into the link between HRM integration and organizational performance: the moderating role of influence distribution between HRM specialists and line managers. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2008;19(11):2095–2112. doi:10.1080/09585190802404320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell J, Kinnie N. HRM and business performance In The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wright P, Nishii L, Paauwe J, Guest D, Wright P. HRM & Performance: Achievements & Challenges. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shen M, Liu H, Kawahara D, Kurohashi S. Chinese morphological analysis with character-level POS tagging. Proc 52nd Annu Meet Assoc Comput Linguist (Short Pap). 2014;2:253–258.
   Google Scholar
• Ostroff C, Bowen DE. Reflections on the 2014-decade award: is there strength in the construct of HR system reflections on the 2014-decade award. Acad Manag Rev. 2015;41(2):196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharatos A, Barling J, Iverson RD. High-performance work systems and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(1):77–93. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.7715641891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korff J, Biemann T, Voelpel SC. Human resource management systems and work attitudes: the mediating role of future time perspective. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(1):45–67. doi:10.1002/job.2110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff C, Bowen DE. Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. In: Klein KK, Kozlowski SW, editors. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000:211–266.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500–507. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F. Perceived organizational support In: Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2011:25–60.
   Google Scholar
• Alfes K, Shantz AD, Truss C, Soane EC. The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: A moderated mediation model. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24(2):330–351. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.679950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Ma Z, Meng Y. High-performance work systems and employee engagement: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific J Hum Resour. 2018;56(3):341–359. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi SM, Liao J, Shaho HMN. The Impact of High Performance Work System (HPWS) on employee productivity as related to organizational identity and job engagement Shirzad. Eur J Bus Manag. 2014;6(39):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow P, Cooper C. Organizational effectiveness, people and performance: new challenges, new research agendas. J Organ Eff People Perform. 2014;1(1):2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Guest D. Employee engagement: a sceptical analysis. J Organ Eff People Perform. 2014;1(2):141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht S, Sparrow P, Balain S. Engaging HR Strategists: Do the Logics Match the Realities? Handbook of Employee Engagement. In: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2010:263-296. doi:10.4337/9781849806374.00033.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall P. High-performance work systems: what, why, how and for whom? Asia Pacific J Hum Resour. 2012;50(2):169–186. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7941.2011.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira LB, Da Silva FFRA. The effects of high performance work systems and leader-member exchange quality on employee engagement: evidence from a brazilian non-profit organization. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;55.:1023–1030. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.092
   Google Scholar
• Katou AA, Budhwar PS. Testing competing HRM-performance linkage models : evidence from the Greek manufacturing sector. Eur J Int Manag. 2010;4(5):464–487. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2010.034962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huselid MA. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad Manag J. 1995;38(3):635–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal U, Datta S, Bhargava S. The relationship between human resource practices, psychological contract and employee engagement – implications for managing talent. IIMB Manag Rev. 2007;19(3):313–325.
   Google Scholar
• Locke EA. The nature and causes of job satisfaction In: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Wuhan: Scientific Research Publishing; 1976:1297–1349.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001;86(2):278–321. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen DE, Ostroff C. Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Acad Manag Rev. 2004;29(2):203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman AL, Civian JT, Shannon LL, Jeffrey Hill E, Brennan RT. The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work–life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community Work Fam. 2008;11(2):183–197. doi:10.1080/13668800802050350
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed MA, Shahzad K, Conroy C, Nadeem S, Siddique MU. Exploring the role of employee voice between high-performance work system and organizational innovation in small and medium enterprises. J Small Bus Enterp Dev. 2017;24(4):670–688. doi:10.1108/JSBED-11-2016-0185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall PF, Purcell J. Strategy and Human Resource Management. London: Macmillan International Higher Education; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pak J, Kim S. Team manager’s implementation, high performance work systems intensity, and performance: a multilevel investigation. J Manage. 2018;44(7):2690–2715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu N, Ma Q, Bosak J, Flood P. Exploring the relationships between HPWS, organizational ambidexterity and firm performance in Chinese professional service firms. J Chinese Hum Resour Manag. 2015;6(1):52–70. doi:10.1108/JCHRM-09-2014-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans WR, Davis WD. High-performance work systems and organizational performance: the mediating role of internal social structure. J Manage. 2005;31(5):758–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen DG, Shore LM, Griffeth RW. The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. J Manage. 2003;29(1):99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao H, Toya K, Lepak DP, Hong Y. Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):371–391. doi:10.1037/a001350419271796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape ED, Redman T. Industrial relations climate and union commitment: an evaluation of workplace-level effects. Ind Relat (Berkeley). 2012;51(1):11–28. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232X.2011.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhang J, Thomas CL, Yu J, Spitzmueller C. Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: the role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organizational support. J Vocat Behav. 2017;101:90–103. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi R, Lepak DP, Wang H, Takeuchi K. An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(4):1069–1083. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.106917638466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeder S, Knorr U, Hilb M. Human resource management practices and psychological contracts in Swiss firms: an employer perspective. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2012;23(15):3178–3195. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.637066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehoe RR, Collins CJ. Human resource management and unit performance in knowledge-intensive work. J Appl Psychol. 2017;102(8):1222–1236. doi:10.1037/apl000021628383943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker BE, Huselid MA. Strategic human resources management: where do we go from here? J Manage. 2006;32(6):898–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeidat B, Al-Sarayrah S, Tarhini A, Al-Dmour RH, Al-Salti Z, Sweis R. Cultural influence on strategic human resource management practices: a jordanian case study. Int Bus Res. 2016;9(10):94. doi:10.5539/ibr.v9n10p94
   Google Scholar
• Combs JG, Liu Y, Hall A, Ketchen D. How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Pers Psychol. 2006;59:501–528. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdi K, Clegg C, Patterson M, et al. The impact of human resource and operational management practices on company productivity: A longitudinal study. Pers Psychol. 2008;61(3):467–501. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle R, Den Hartog DN, Weibel A, et al. Erratum to trust in the employer: the role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2011;22(5):1069–1092. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2011; 22(8):1823. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.556782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright PM, Nishii LH. Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: integrating multiple levels of analysis. CAHRS Work Pap Ser. 2007;468. Available from: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com.pk/&httpsredir=1&article=1469&context=cahrswp. Accessed May 17, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Donate MJ, Guadamillas F. An empirical study on the relationships between knowledge management, knowledge-oriented human resource practices and innovation. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2015;13(2):134–148. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2013.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posthuma RA, Campion MC, Masimova M, Campion MA. A high performance work practices taxonomy. J Manage. 2013;39(5):1184–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman BE. A theory of the firm’s demand for HRM practices. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2010;21(5):615–636. doi:10.1080/09585191003658797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner TM, Wright PM, Moynihan LM. The impact of motivation, empowerment, and skill-enhancing practices on aggregate voluntary turnover: the mediating effect of collective affective commitment. Pers Psychol. 2011;64(2):315–350. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naz S. Effect of HR practices on employee wellbeing: A case of telecom sector of Pakistan. Inter J of Manag Res and Eme Sci.2011;1(1):37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne S, Shore L, Liden R. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Acad Manag J. 1997;40(1):82–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Bartlett CA. Linking organizational context and managerial action: the dimensions of quality of management. Strateg Manag J. 1994;15(2 S):91–112. doi:10.1002/smj.4250151007
   Google Scholar
• Robinson SL, Kraatz MS, Rousseau DM. Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Acad Manag J. 1994;37(1):137–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J. The human equation: building profits by putting people first. Acad Manag Perspect. 1998;12:93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung MFY, Law MCC. Relationships of organizational justice and organizational identification: the mediating effects of perceived organizational support in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Bus Rev. 2008;14(2):213–231. doi:10.1080/13602380701430879
   Google Scholar
• Chew YT, Wong SK. Effects of career mentoring experience and perceived organizational support on employee commitment and intentions to leave: a study among hotel workers in Malaysia. Int J Manag. 2008;25(3):692–779.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett MF, Chiaburu DS, Shapiro DL, Li N. Revisiting how and when perceived organizational support enhances taking charge. J Manage. 2015;41(7):1805–1826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muse LA, Stamper CL. Perceived organizational support: evidence for a mediated association with work performance. J Manag Issues. 2007;19(4):517–535–459.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 1976;38(5):300–314.981490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Wayne SJ. Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(5):774–780.8253631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg MS. A theory of indebtedness In: Social Exchange. Boston, MA: Springer Publishers US; 1980:3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Blau H. Power and exchange in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• DeConinck JB. The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees’ level of trust. J Bus Res. 2010;63(12):1349–1355. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, Adis CS. Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J Manage. 2017;43(6):1854–1884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynch P. Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(5):812–820.9337610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo RA, Noonan KA. Human resource practices as communications and the psychological contract. Hum Resour Manage. 1994;33(3):447–462. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HS, Yoon HH. The effects of emotional intelligence on counterproductive work behaviors and organizational citizen behaviors among food and beverage employees in a deluxe hotel. Int J Hosp Manag. 2012;31(2):369–378. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg AL. Work values and job rewards: a theory of job satisfaction. Am Sociol Rev. 1977;42(1):124. doi:10.2307/2117735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer D. Job satisfaction and the secondary headteacher: the creation of a model of job satisfaction. Sch Leadersh Manag. 1997;17(1):57–68. doi:10.1080/13632439770168
   Google Scholar
• Wright TA, Cropanzano R. Well-being, satisfaction and job performance: another look at the happy/productive worker thesis. Acad Manag Proc. 1997;1997(1):364–368. doi:10.5465/ambpp.1997.4988986
   Google Scholar
• Wong CS, Hui C, Law KS. A longitudinal study of the job perception-job satisfaction relationship: A test of the three alternative specifications. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1998;71(2):127–146. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1998.tb00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanden Berghe J. Job satisfaction and job performance at the work place [doctoral thesis]. Helsinki: Arcada University of Applied Sciences Ltd.; 2011;1-51.
   Google Scholar
• Wu P-C, Chaturvedi S. The role of procedural justice and power distance in the relationship between high performance work systems and employee attitudes: A multilevel perspective. J Manage. 2009;35(5):1228–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould-Williams J. The effects of “High Commitment” HRM practices on employee attitude: the views of public sector workers. Public Adm. 2004;82(1):63–81. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hartog DN, Boselie P, Paauwe J. Performance Management: a Model and Research Agenda. Applied psychology. 2004;53(4), 556–569.
   Google Scholar
• Delery JE, Shaw JD. The strategic management of people in work organizations: review, synthesis, and extension. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag. 2001;20:165–197.
   Google Scholar
• Becker BE, Huselid MA, Pickus PS, Spratt MF. HR as a source of shareholder value: research and recommendations. Hum Resour Manage. 1997;36(1):39–47. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoreishi FS, Zahirrodine AR, Assarian F, Moosavi SGA, Zare Zadeh Mehrizi M. Evaluation of emotional intelligence and job satisfaction in employees of kashan hospitals. Nurs midwifery Stud. 2014;3(1):e11977. doi:10.17795/nmsjournal1197725414889
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falkenburg K, Schyns B. Work satisfaction, organizational commitment and withdrawal behaviours. Manag Res News. 2007;30(10):708–723. doi:10.1108/01409170710823430
   Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Bono JE, Thoresen CJ, Patton GK. The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(3):376–402.11393302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinoka G, Perera N, Khatibi A, Navaratna N, Chinna K. Job satisfaction and job performance among factory employees in apparel sector. Asian J Manag Sci Educ. 2014;3(1):96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Velnampy T. Job attitude and employees performance of public sector organizations in Jaffna District, Sri Lanka. GITAM J Manag. 2008;6(2):66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Petty MM, McGee GW, Cavender JW. A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Acad Manag Rev. 1984;9(4):712–721. doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iaffaldano MT, Muchinsky PM. Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1985;97:251–273. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell DF, O’Reilly CA. Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. J Appl Psychol. 1990;75(6):648–657. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paauwe J, Richardson R. Introduction. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 1997;8(3):257–262. doi:10.1080/095851997341621
   Google Scholar
• Guest D. Human resource management, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: building the worker into hrm. J Ind Relations. 2002;44(3):335–358. doi:10.1111/1472-9296.00053
   Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Albrecht SL, Leiter MP. Key questions regarding work engagement. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2011;20(1):4–28. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke FL, Cooper B, Bartram T, Wang J, Mei H. Mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, employee resilience and engagement: a study of the banking industry in China. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2016;1–22. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1137618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins S, Delbridge R. Context matters: examining “soft” and “hard” approaches to employee engagement in two workplaces. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24(14):2670–2691. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.770780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manag J. 1990;33(4):692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macey WH, Schneider B. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind Organ Psychol. 2008;1(1):3–30. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gon Alez-Ro VA, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3:71–92. doi:10.1023/A:1015630930326
   Google Scholar
• Teh P, Sun H. Knowledge sharing, job attitudes and organisational citizenship behaviour. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2012;112(1):64–82. doi:10.1108/02635571211193644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton P, Nankervis A. Linking strategic HRM, performance management and organizational effectiveness: perceptions of managers in Singapore. Asia Pacific Bus Rev. 2011;17(1):67–84. doi:10.1080/13602381003790382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton P, Pham HT. Managing employee performance in an emerging economy: perceptions of Vietnamese managers. Asia Pacific Bus Rev. 2014;20(2):269–285. doi:10.1080/13602381.2013.825975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht SL, Bakker AB, Gruman JA, Macey WH, Saks AM. Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage. J Organ Eff People Perform. 2015;2(1):7–35.
   Google Scholar
• Rich BL, Lepine JA, Crawford ER. Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Acad Manag J. 2010;53(3):617–635. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH. Ashforth & Humhrey, 1995.pdf. Hum Relations. 1995;48(2):97–125. doi:10.1177/001872679504800201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumruk R. Why managers are crucial to increasing engagement: identifying steps managers can take to engage their workforce. Strateg HR Rev. 2006;5(2):24–27. doi:10.1108/14754390680000863
   Google Scholar
• Miles RH. Beyond the age of Dilbert: accelerating corporate transformations by rapidly engaging all employees. Organ Dyn. 2001;29(4):313–321. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, James PS. Antecedents and consequence of work engagement: A literature review. Int J Appl Bus Econ Res. 2016;14(12):8635–8656.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25(3):293–315. doi:10.1002/job.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress. 2008;22(3):187–200. doi:10.1080/02678370802393649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Heuven E. Emotional dissonance, burnout, and in-role performance among nurses and police officers. Int J Stress Manag. 2006;13(4):423–440. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.13.4.423
   Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev Int. 2008;13(3):209–223. doi:10.1108/13620430810870476
   Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D. Work motivation and performance: a social identity perspective. Appl Psychol An Int Rev. 2000;49(3):357. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatepe OM. High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance: the mediation of work engagement. Int J Hosp Manag. 2013;32:132–140. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boselie P, Dietz G, Boon C. Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Hum Resour Manag J. 2005;15(3):67–94. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x
   Google Scholar
• Wright P, Purcell J, Boxall P. The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management. Oxford University Press Inc., New york ; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tregaskis O, Daniels K, Glover L, Butler P, Meyer M. High performance work practices and firm performance: a longitudinal case study. Br J Manag. 2013;24(2):225–244. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Duysters G, Cloodt M. The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. Int Entrep Manag J. 2014;10(3):623–641. doi:10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Tetrick LE, Shore TH, Barksdale K. Construct validity of measures of becker’s side bet theory. J Vocat Behav. 2000;57(3):428–444. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman RH, Blakely GL, Niehoff BP. Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Acad Manag J. 1998;41(3):351–357. doi:10.5465/256913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Rotman JL. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J Manag Psychol. 2006;21(7):600–619. doi:10.1108/02683940610690169
   Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. Social exchange theory : an interdisciplinary review social exchange theory : an interdisciplinary review. J Manage. 2005;31(6):874–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2010;11:3.
   Google Scholar
• Hakanen JJ, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Burnout and work engagement among teachers. J Sch Psychol. 2006;43(6):495–513. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen O, Van Yperen NW. Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Acad Manag J. 2004;47(3):368–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a Silver Bullet. J Mark Theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015;43(1):115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrustB. Effect to the random model A predictive approach. Biometrika. 2013;61(1):101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1974;36:111–147.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed R, Mussawar S, Lodhi RN, Iqbal A, Nayab HH, Yaseen S. Factors affecting the performance of employees at work place in the banking sector of Pakistan. academia.edu. 2013;17(9):1200–1208. doi:10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.17.09.12256
   Google Scholar
• Liu F, Chow IHS, Gong Y, Wang H. Mediating links between HRM bundle and individual innovative behavior. J Manag Organ. 2016;25(1)157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Du Y, Zhang L, Tekleab AG. Job strains, job control, and POS on employee performance: an interactionist perspective. J Bus Res. 2018;82:213–219. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Chas R, Neira-Fontela E, Varela-Neira C. High-performance work systems and job satisfaction: a multilevel model. J Manag Psychol. 2016;31(2):451–466. doi:10.1108/JMP-04-2013-0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar