Pragmatic abilities in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: development of Pragmatic Abilities Questionnaire based on the Rasch rating scale model

References

• Adams C, Baxendale J, Lloyd J, Aldred C. Pragmatic language impairment: case studies of social and  pragmatic language therapy. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2005; 21(3):227–50. doi:10.1191/0265659005ct2900a.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings L. Pragmatic disorders. In: Capone A (Ed.), perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology, Vol 3.  Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media; 2014:177–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hwa-Froelich DA. Social communication theoretical foundations and introduction In: Hwa-Froeilch DA (Ed.), Social Communication Development and Disorders. Psychology Press; 2014:17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hyter YD. Pragmatic assessment and intervention in children In: Cummings L (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics, Vol 11. Cham: Springer; 2017:493–526.
   Google Scholar
• Airenti G. Pragmatic development In: Cummings L (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics, Vol 11 Cham: Springer; 2017:3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Baixauli-Fortea I, Miranda Casas A, Berenguer-Forner C, Colomer-Diago C, Roselló-Miranda B. Pragmatic competence of children with autism spectrum disorder. Impact of theory of mind, verbal working memory, ADHD symptoms, and structural language. Appl Neuropsychol. 2019;8(2):101–112. doi:10.1080/21622965.2017.1392861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying Sng C, Carter M, Stephenson J. A systematic review of the comparative pragmatic differences in conversational skills of individuals with autism. Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2018;3(2):1–24. doi:10.1177/2396941518803806
   Google Scholar
• Bauminger‐Zviely N, Karin E, Kimhi Y, Agam‐Ben‐Artzi G. Spontaneous peer conversation in preschoolers with high‐functioning autism spectrum disorder versus typical development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55(4):363–373. doi:10.1111/jcpp.1215824304222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis M, Lazenby AL, Lockyer L. Inferential language in high-function children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31(1):47–54.11439753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager‐Flusberg H, Anderson M. The development of contingent discourse ability in autistic children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1991;32(7):1123–1134.1838537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg H, Paul R, Lord C. Language and communication in autism In: F Volkmar, R Paul, A Klin, & D Cohen. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Vol 1 Diagnosis, Development, Neurobiology and Behavior. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005:335–364.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas MS, Van Duuren M, Purser HR, Mareschal D, Ansari D, Karmiloff-Smith A. The development of metaphorical language comprehension in typical development and in Williams syndrome. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010;106(2–3):99–114. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.00720236654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin GE, Lee M, Losh M. Intellectual disability In: Cummings L (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics, Vol 11. Cham: Springer; 2017:109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Geurts HM, Verté S, Oosterlaan J, et al. Can the children’s communication checklist differentiate between children with autism, children with ADHD, and normal controls? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45(8):1437–1453. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00850.x15482504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim OH, Kaiser AP. Language characteristics of children with ADHD. Commun Disord Q. 2000;21(3):154–165. doi:10.1177/152574010002100304
   Google Scholar
• Mathers ME. Aspects of language in children with ADHD: applying functional analyses to explore language use. J Atten Disord. 2006;9(3):523–533. doi:10.1177/108705470528243716481669
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam KH, Ho CS. Pragmatic skills in Chinese dyslexic children: evidence from a parental checklist. Asia Pac J Dev Differences. 2014;1(1):4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lapadat JC. Pragmatic language skills of students with language and/or learning disabilities: a quantitative synthesis. J Learn Disabil. 1991;24(3):147–158. doi:10.1177/0022219491024003032026956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathinos DA. Communicative competence of children with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 1988;21(7):437–443. doi:10.1177/0022219488021007093171391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathinos DA. Conversational engagement of children with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 1991;24(7):439–446. doi:10.1177/0022219491024007101895013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCord JS, Haynes WO. Discourse errors in students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers: molar versus molecular views. J Learn Disabil. 1988;21(4):237–243. doi:10.1177/0022219488021004113373124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripich DN, Griffith PL. Narrative abilities of children with learning disabilities and nondisabled children: story structure, cohesion, and propositions. J Learn Disabil. 1988;21(3):165–173. doi:10.1177/0022219488021003093351386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsos N, Roqueta CA, Estevan RA, Cummins C. Are children with specific language impairment competent with the pragmatics and logic of quantification? Cognition. 2011;119(1):43–57. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.00421237449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder N, Leinonen E, Schulz J. Cognitive approach to assessing pragmatic language comprehension in children with specific language impairment. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;43(4):427–447. doi:10.1080/1368282070163320718584419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury CF, Gemmell T, Paul R. Pragmatics abilities in narrative production: a cross-disorder comparison. J Child Lang. 2014;41(3):485–510. doi:10.1017/S030500091300007X23632039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Arlington: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The International classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11). Available from: www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision/en. Accessed 912, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian J. An approach to developing conversational competence In: DN Ripich & FM Spinelli (Eds.), School Discourse Problems. San Diego: College Hill Press; 1985:231–255.
   Google Scholar
• Girolametto L. Development of a parent report measure for profiling the conversational skills of preschool children. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(4):25–33. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0604.25
   Google Scholar
• Prutting CA, Kittchner DM. A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987;52(2):105–119.3573742
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cordier R, Munro N, Wilkes-Gillan S, Speyer R, Pearce WM. Reliability and validity of the Pragmatics Observational Measure (POM): a new observational measure of pragmatic language for children. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(7):1588–1598. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.05024769431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams C. Assessment and intervention for children with pragmatic language impairment In: Hwa-Froelich DA (Ed.), Social Communication Development and Disorders. New York: Psychology Press; 2015:141–170.
   Google Scholar
• Adams C, Gaile J, Freed J, Lockton E Targeted Observation of Pragmatics in Children’s Conversation (TOPICC). Available from: research.bmh.manchester.ac.uk/scip/topicc.pdf. Accessed 1014, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Norbury CF. Practitioner review: social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55(3):204–216. doi:10.1111/jcpp.1215424117874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop DV. The Children’s Communication Checklist: CCC-2. London: Harcourt Assessment; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rapin I, Allen D. Developmental Language Disorders: Nosologic Considerations. In: Krik U (Ed.), Neuropsychology of Language, Reading, and Spelling. New York: Academic Press; 1983:155–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hwa-Froelich DA, Vigil DC. Three aspects of cultural influence on communication: a literature review. Commun Disord Q. 2004;25(3):107–118. doi:10.1177/15257401040250030201
   Google Scholar
• Carter JA, Lees JA, Murira GM, Gona J, Neville BG, Newton CR. Issues in the development of cross‐cultural assessments of speech and language for children. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005;40(4):385–401. doi:10.1080/1368282050005730116195197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelaars MP, Embrechts MT. Pragmatic language impairment In: Cummings L (Ed.), Research in Clinical Pragmatics, Vol 11. Cham: Springer; 2017:29–57.
   Google Scholar
• The American speech language hearing association. Available from: www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/ASHA/Practice_Portal/Clinical_Topics/Social_Communication_Disorders_in_School-Age_Children/Components-of-Social-Communication.pdf. Accessed 211, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dehqan A, Yadegari F, Asgary A, Scherer RC, Dabirmoghadam P. Development and validation of an Iranian Voice Quality of Life Profile (IVQLP) based on a classic and Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM). J Voice. 2017;31(1):113–119. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone WJ, Staver JR, Yale MS. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labelling Claims. Washington DC; 2009 Available from https://www.fda.gov/media/77832/download. Accessed May 12, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Messick S. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educ Meas. 1995;14(4):5–8. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. A User’s Guide to Winsteps–Ministep. Rasch Model Computer Programs. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps. com; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi S, Safari T, Hamtiyan M, Khalili Z. Diagnostic Guideline for Autism (gilliam Persian Version). Isfahan: Jahade Daneshgaahi Isfahan; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Asgary A, Azkhosh M. Adaptation and Validation of the Stanford– Binet Intelligence Scales- Fifth Edition (SB5). Tehran: University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences and Cognitive Sciences & Technologies Council; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Minaei A. Adaptation and Standardization of the Test of TOLD-P: 3 for Farsi Speaking Children of Tehran. Tehran: Exceptional children’s research institute; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zarifian T. Persian Version of Phonetic and Phonological Diagnostic Test Suite. Tehran: University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt LE, Hammer CS, Yont KM, Tomblin JB. Language sampling for kindergarten children with and without SLI: mean length of utterance, IPSYN, and NDW. J Commun Disord. 2005;38(3):197–213. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.10.00215748724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadrossadat SJ, Hooshyari Z, Zamani R, Sadrossadat L. Determination of psychometrics indices of SNAP-IV rating scale in parent execution. J Rehabil. 2009;3(31):59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sadrossadat L, Hooshyari Z, Sadrossadat SJ, Mohammadi MR, Rouzbahani A, Shirmardi A. Determination of psychometrics indices of SNAP-IV rating scale in teachers execution. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2010;28(110):484–494.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi F, Zarifian T, Kazemi Y, Shirazi T. Adaptation of the revised questionnaire on the establishment of communication-second edition of the children’s communication checklist with persian language and determining its psychometric properties. Res Rehabil Sci. 2014;10(2):281–291.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educ Today. 1991;11(6):461–466.1775125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Analyzing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J. 2008;204(8):429. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.29218438371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salkind NJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Research Design. California: Sage Publications; 2010 .
   Google Scholar
• Boone WJ, Dolan E. Rasch analysis for instrument development: why, when, and how. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):rm4. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-04-014827856555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckes T. Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement. Analyzing and Evaluating Rater-Mediated Assessments. 2nd Revised and Updated Edition. Series: Language Testing and Assessment, Vol 22. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin: Peter Lang Edition; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 3th ed. Routledge: Taylor & Francis group ; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M, editors. Rasch Models in Health. London and Hoboken: ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson M. Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. New Jercy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. Rasch Models for Measurement. In Lewise-Beck MS (Ed.), Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Green R. Statistical Analyses for Language Testers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Yu CH, Popp SO, DiGangi S, Jannasch-Pennell A. Assessing unidimensionality: a comparison of Rasch modeling, parallel analysis, and TETRAD. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(14):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hagell P. Testing rating scale unidimensionality using the principal component analysis (PCA)/t-test protocol with the Rasch model: the primacy of theory over statistics. Open J Stat. 2014;4(6):456–465. doi:10.4236/ojs.2014.46044
   Google Scholar
• Falissard B. The unidimensionality of a psychiatric scale: a statistical point of view. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1999;8(3):162–167. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0657
   Google Scholar
• Thomas ML. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review. Assessment. 2011;18(3):291–307. doi:10.1177/107319111037479720644081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsamo M, Giampaglia G, Saggino A. Building a new Rasch-based self-report inventory of depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:153–165. doi:10.2147/NDT.S5342524511231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burro R, Savardi U, Annunziata MA, De Paoli P, Bianchi I. The perceived severity of a disease and the impact of the vocabulary used to convey information: using rasch scaling in a simulated oncological scenario. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:2553–2573. doi:10.2147/PPA.S17595730573952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar