Composition of motivation profiles at work using latent analysis: theory and evidence

References

• Campbell JP. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology In: Dunnette M, Hough L, editors. Handbook of Industrial & Organizational Psychology. Consulting Psychologists. Palo Alto; 1990.Vol.1. 687–732.
   Google Scholar
• Wen Z. Four-factor model of job performance. J Capital Normal Univ. 2005;(5):105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder CC. Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. Psychology Press NJ:Prentice-Hall;2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang Y, Song Y, Gong Z. The different relations of extrinsic, introjected, identified regulation and intrinsic motivation on employees’ performance: empirical studies following self-determination theory. Manage Decis. 2016;54(10):2393–2412. doi:10.1108/MD-01-2016-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestner R, Losier GF. Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated a closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation In: Deci EL, Ryan RM, editors. Handbook of Self-determination Theory Research. New York, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2002:101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Rogstadius J, Kostakos V, Kittur A, Smus B, Laredo J, Vukovic M. An assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task performance in crowdsourcing markets. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; 7; 2011; Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain: DBLP.
   Google Scholar
• Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(4):980. doi:10.1037/a003566124491020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, Deci EL. Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educ Psychol. 2006;41(1):19–31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekler ED, Brühlmann F, Tuch AN, Opwis K. Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Comput Human Behav. 2017;1(71):525–534. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(4):331–362. doi:10.1002/job.v26:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Forest J, Vansteenkiste M, et al. The multidimensional work motivation scale: validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. Eur J Work Organizational Psychol. 2015;24(2):178–196. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griner LA, Smith CA. Contributions of motivational orientation to appraisal and emotion. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2000;26(6):727–740. doi:10.1177/0146167200268007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo W, Hanges PJ. Latent class procedures: applications to organizational research. Organizational Res Methods. 2011;14(1):24–31. doi:10.1177/1094428110383988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer R, Chen G, & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.). Work Motivation: Past, Present and Future. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. J Res Pers. 1985;19(2):109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilal FG, Zhang J, Paul J. The role of self-determination theory in marketing science: an integrative review and agenda for research. Eur Manage J. 2019;37(1):29–44. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2018.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Forest J, Gilbert, M. H. , Aube, C. , & Malorni, A. The motivation at work scale: validation evidence in two languages. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(4):628–646. doi:10.1177/0013164409355698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestner R, Losier GF. Distinguishing Three Ways of Being Highly Motivated: A Closer Look at Introjection, Identification, and Intrinsic Motivation. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.2002.101–121
   Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Deci EL. Self‐determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(4):331–362. doi:10.1002/job.v26:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt, V. H. , Vet, H. C. D. , & Beek, A. J. V. D. Measuring individual work performance: identifying and selecting indicators. Work. 2014;48(2):229–238. doi:10.3233/WOR-13165923803443
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borman WC, Motowidlo SM. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance In: Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Borman and associates(eds.); 1993:71.
   Google Scholar
• Pulakos ED, Arad S, Donovan MA, Plamondon KE. Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. J Appl Psychol. 2002;85(4):612–624. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(2):327–347. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotundo M, Sackett PR. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(1):66. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.6611916217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal RS. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(6):1241. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.124116316277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allworth E, Hesketh B. Construct‐oriented biodata: capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. Int J Sel Assess. 1999;7(2):97. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton KD, Lydon JE,  D”Alessandro, D. U. , & Koestner, R. . The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91(4):750. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.75017014297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Connell JP, & Ryan, R. M. Self-determination in a work organization. J Appl Psychol. 1989;74(4):580. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysvik A, Kuvaas B. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: the moderating role of achievement goals. Br J Social Psychol. 2013;52(3):412–430. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02090.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, & Ford, M.T. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(4):980. doi:10.1037/a003566124491020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Koestner R, & Ryan, RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(6):627. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.62710589297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Gupta N. Let the evidence speak again! Financial incentives are more effective than we thought. Human Res Manage J. 2015;25(3):281–293. doi:10.1111/hrmj.2015.25.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J. Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: evidence from Korea. Acad Manage J. 2003;46(6):703–714. doi:10.5465/30040662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. The structure and function of collective constructs: implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad Manage Rev. 1999;24(2):249–265. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Trautwein, U. , & Morin, A. J. S. Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Struct Equation Model. 2009;16(2):191–225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeck AVD, Lens W, De Witte, H. , & Van Coillie, H. Unraveling the importance of the quantity and the quality of workers’ motivation for well-being: a person-centered perspective. J Vocat Behav. 2013;82(1):69–78. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran CM, Diefendorff JM, Kim, TY. , & Liu, ZQ. A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. J Vocat Behav. 2012;81(3):354–363. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Morin AJS. A person-centered approach to commitment research: theory, research, and methodology. J Organ Behav. 2016;37(4):n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/job.2085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin AJ, Maã Ano C, Marsh, HW., Janosz, M., & Nagengast, B. The longitudinal interplay of adolescents’ self-esteem and body image: a conditional autoregressive latent trajectory analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(2):157–201. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.54673126741327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt JK, Magidson J. Latent Class Cluster Analyses. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 2002.89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Graves LM, Cullen KL, Lester HF, Ruderman MN, Gentry WA. Managerial motivational profiles: composition, antecedents, and consequences. J Vocat Behav. 2015;87(87):32–42. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard J, Gagné M, Morin AJ, Van den Broeck A. Motivation profiles at work: a self-determination theory approach. J Vocat Behav. 2016;95–96:74–89. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel AS, Daniels MA, Diefendorff JM, et al. Emotional labor actors: a latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies.[J]. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(3):863–879. doi:10.1037/a003740825068812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilal FG, Zhang J, Gilal NG, Gilal RG. Association between a parent’s brand passion and a child’s brand passion: a moderated moderated-mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:91–102. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S16175529695938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equation Model A Multi J. 2007;14(4):535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jesus SN, Rus CL, Lens W, Imaginário S. Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: a meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010. Creat Res J. 2013;25(1):80–84. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.752235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL. The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1972;8(2):217–229. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(72)90047-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resour Manage Rev. 1993;3(3):185–201. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
   Google Scholar
• Guay F, Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C. On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motiv Emot. 2000;24(3):175–213. doi:10.1023/A:1005614228250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons J, Dewitte S, Lens W. The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn! Br J Educ Psychol. 2004;74(3):343–360. doi:10.1348/000709904155231415296544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steers RM, Mowday RT, Shapiro DL. The future of work motivation theory. Acad Manage Rev. 2004;29(3):379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He C, Gu J, Wu W. Social media use in the career development of graduate students: the mediating role of internship effectiveness and the moderating role of Zhongyong. Higher Educ. 2017;74(6):1033–1051. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0107-8
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zhang P, Zhao J. Confucian culture still matters: the benefits of Zhongyong thinking (Doctrine of the mean) for mental health. J Cross-cultual Psychol. 2016;47(8):1097–1113. doi:10.1177/0022022116658260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Chan D. Mixture latent Markov modeling: identifying and predicting unobserved heterogeneity in longitudinal qualitative status change. Organizational Res Methods. 2011;14(3):411–431. doi:10.1177/1094428109357107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar