Cognitive Style Differences in Attention Distribution Regarding Calligraphic Perception

References

• Shen X. Origin of Chinese Characters. Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H. The cognition and development of traditional calligraphy art. J Shandong Univ. 2004;(3):120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Liu R. Understanding of calligraphy in running script. Chin Calligraphy News. 2018;(2).
   Google Scholar
• Shen S. On the mainstream status of running script in contemporary calligraphy. J Huzhou Teachers Coll. 1995;(4):70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cupchik GC, Vartanian O, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ. Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain Cogn. 2009;70(1):84–91. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbus AL. Eye Movements and Vision. New York: Plenum Press; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Tatler BW, Wade NJ, Kwan H, Findlay JM, Velichkovsky BM. Yarbus, eye movements, and vision. IPerception. 2010;1(1):7–27. doi:10.1068/i0382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne DE. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Hemisphere. 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Konecni VJ. Determinants of aesthetic preference and effects of exposure to aesthetic stimuli: social emotional, and cognitive factors. Prog Exp Pers Res. 1979;9:149–197. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04555.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritterfeld U. Social heuristics in interior design preferences. J Environ Psychol. 2002;22(4):369–386. doi:10.1006/jevp.2002.0276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarese JM, Miller RJ. Artistic preferences and cognitive: perceptual style. Stud Art Educ. 1979;20(2):45. doi:10.2307/1319541
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou LW. Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59(1):617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou LW. Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci. 1999;22(4):577–660. doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Dumontheil I, Gilbert SJ. The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(7):290–298. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone EA, Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science. 2004;306(5695):443–447. doi:10.1126/science.1100301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport GW. Personality: a psychological interpretation. Am J Sociol. 1937;45(1):48–50.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Guo L. Research progress on cognitive style. Psychol Sci. 2001;24(3):326–329.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong SJ, Mahmud A. Experiential learning and the acquisition of managerial tacit knowledge. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2008;7(2):189–208. doi:10.5465/amle.2008.32712617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford MD, Licuanan B. Leading for innovation: conclusions, issues, and directions. Leadersh Q. 2004;15(1):171. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisande MA, Páramo MF, Tinajero C, Almeida LS. Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: an analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema. 2007;19(4):572–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkin HA, Goodenough DR. Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. Psychol Issues. 1981;51:1–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirth W, Matthes J, Schemer C, Kissling AK. I see what you don’t see the role of individual differences in field dependence-independence as a predictor of product placement recall and brand liking. J Advert. 2011;40(4):85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest JB, GhezelAyagh H, Kush AK. Dynamic simulation of a direct carbonate fuel cell power plant. Fuel Cell Semin Organ Committee. 1996. doi:10.2172/460168
   Google Scholar
• Yu G, Hou R. Question asking, cognitive style and creativity cultivation in school education. Educ Sci. 2012;20(4):54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nisiforou E, Laghos A. Field dependence–independence and eye movement patterns: investigating users’ differences through an eye tracking study. Interact Comput. 2015;28(4):407–420. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwv015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X. Understanding of the psychological significance of eye movement research methods. Chin Outside Sch Educ. 2012;(12):94.
   Google Scholar
• Yan G, Xiong J, Zang C, Yu L, Cui L, Bai X. Review of major eye movement indicators in reading research. Adv Psychol Sci. 2013;21(4):589–605. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00589
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ye W. Review of eye movement indicators in current reading research. Psychol Behav Res. 2006;4(3):236–240.
   Google Scholar
• Koga K. Intercultural experiments as a research tool in the study of cognitive skill acquisition: Japanese character recognition and eye movements in non-Japanese subjects. Adv Psychol. 1989;58:279–291.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer T, Von Mühlenen A, Müller HJ. What do eye movements reveal about the role of memory in visual search? Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007;60(7):924–935. doi:10.1080/17470210600831119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto D, Heinke D, Humphreys GW, Blanco MJ. Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005;31(2):248–261. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto D, Humphreys GW, Heinke D. Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Res. 2006;46(6–7):1010–1018. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer K, Rasch T, Schnotz W. Effects of animation’s speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learn Instr. 2010;20(2):136–145. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Nyström N, Andersson R, Dewhurst R, Jarodzka H, Van de Weijer J. Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton C, Staub A, Rayner K. Eye movements in reading words and sentences. Eye Movements Reading Words Sentences. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff AW, Radach R. Definition and Computation of Oculomotor Measures in the Study of Cognitive Processes. Eye Guidance Reading Scene Percept. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• He Z The effect of different BMI on food cue attentional bias under emotional induction (Doctoral dissertation). 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin JD. Lexical processing during saccadic eye movements. Cogn Psychol. 1998;36(1):1–27. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin DE, Brockmole JR. Suppressing where but not what: the effect of saccades on dorsal- and ventral-stream visual processing. Psychol Sci. 2010;15(7):467–473. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00703.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin D, Carlson-Radvansky E, Laura A. Cognitive suppression during saccadic eye movements. Psychol Sci (Wiley-Blackwell). 1996;7:83–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zheng R, Song H. Instructions for the Graphical Test of Cognitive Modes. 1981
   Google Scholar
• Kepner MD, Neimark ED. Test-retest reliability and differential patterns of score change on the group embedded figures test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984;46(6):1405–1413. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ouyang L. The effect of different cognitive styles of college students on the level of figure reasoning—also on the role of personality in the cognitive process. Psychol Sci. 2004;(2). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2004.02.041
   Google Scholar
• Zhao N, Yang H. Experimental study on field independence-dependency characteristics of cognitive style of college students. Sports Sci Technol. 2016;(5). doi:10.14038/j.cnki.tykj.2016.05.020
   Google Scholar
• SR Research Ltd. Data Viewer: 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu X. Psychological analysis in the process of calligraphy appreciation. Grand View of Fine Arts. 2010;(9):226–227. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2953.2010.09.119
   Google Scholar
• Goode PE, Goddard PH, Pascual-Leone J. Event-related potentials index cognitive style differences during a serial-order recall task. Int J Psychophysiol. 2002;43(2):0–140. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00158-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J. The Influence of Cognitive Style on Cognitive Processing (Doctoral Dissertation). Zhejiang University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Li S. Research on the Brain Mechanism of Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Individuals in the Process of Information Processing (Doctoral Dissertation). Shandong Normal University; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Xie H. The cultural, human, social and international nature of Chinese calligraphy. China Dev. 2011;11(6):78–82. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2404.2011.06.014
   Google Scholar
• Wang S. The brain of the museum: the theory and application of embodied cognition in multi-sensory aesthetic perception. Museum Res. 2016;(4):12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cai L. Eye Movement Study on Visual Processing of Individuals with Different Field Cognition Styles (Doctoral Dissertation). Hunan Normal University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cao W, Che X, Qi L, Liu H. Eye movement experiment of the main position layout of the picture and its enlightenment to the construction of network video resources. J Dist Educ. 2013;(5). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0008.2013.05.013
   Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Hu W, Jia X. The influence of cognitive inhibition on artistic creativity: the moderating effect of cognitive style. Psychol Dev Educ. 2015;(3):287–295.
   Google Scholar
• Song G, Han S. Field dependence – a comparison of interference suppression in independent cognitive mode. Psychol Behav Stud. 2007;5(2):100–104.
   Google Scholar