Reliability Evidence for the Gibson Assessment of Cognitive Skills (GACS): A Brief Tool for Screening Cognitive Skills Across the Lifespan

References

• Geisinger KF. Empirical considerations on intelligence testing and models of intelligence: updates for educational measurement professionals. Appl Meas Educ. 2019;32(3):193–197. doi:10.1080/08957347.2019.1619564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson NF, Floyd RG, Kranzler JH, Eckert TL, Fefer SA, Morgan GB. Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: findings from the 2017 national survey. J Sch Psychol. 2019;72:29–48. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods IL, Floyd RG, Singh LJ, Layton HK, Norfolk PA, Farmer RL. What is in a name? A historical review of intelligence test score labels. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2019;37(6):692–705. doi:10.1177/0734282918786651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindermann H, Becker D, Coyle TR. Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: intelligence research, experts’ background, controversial issues, and the media. J Intell. 2020;78:101406. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajda J. Current research of theories and models of intelligence. Curriculum Teach. 2019;34(1):87–108. doi:10.7459/ct/34.1.07
   Google Scholar
• Lee Meeuw Kjoe PR, van Rentergem JA, Vermeulen IE, Schagen SB. How to correct for computer experience in online cognitive testing? J Assessment. 2020;107319112091109. doi:10.1177/1073191120911098
   Google Scholar
• Kessels RPC. Improving precision in neuropsychological assessment: bridging the gap between classic paper-and-pencil tests and paradigms from cognitive neuroscience. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;33(2):357–368. doi:10.1080/13854046.2018.1518489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howieson D. Current limitations of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;33(2):200–208. doi:10.1080/13854046.2018.1552762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt JM, Keyes KM, McLaughlin KA, Kaufman AS. The flynn effect for fluid IQ may not generalize to all ages or ability levels: a population-based study of 10,000 US adolescents. J Intell. 2019;77:101385. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider WJ, McGrew KS. The cattell-horn-carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In: Flanagan DP, McDonough EM, editors. Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. 4th. New York: Guildford Press:73–163;2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood AB, Farmer RL. The cognitive assessment course: two decades later. Psychol Sch. 2019. doi:10.1002/pits.22298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant K, Peña E, Peña A, Bedore LM, Muñoz MR. Not all nonverbal tasks are equally nonverbal: comparing two tasks in bilingual kindergartners with and without developmental language disorder. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;0331. doi:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caemmerer JM, Keith TZ, Reynolds MR. Beyond individual intelligence tests: application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. J Intell. 2020;79:101433. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs K, Conway AR. A unified cognitive/differential approach to human intelligence: implications for IQ testing. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2019;8(3):255–272. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucina JM, Howardson GN, Woodcock-Johnson III, Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC), and Differential Ability Scales (DAS) support carroll but not Cattell-horn. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(8):1001–1015. doi:10.1037/pas0000389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conzelmann K, Sub HM. Auditory intelligence: theoretical considerations and empirical findings. Learn Ind Diff. 2015;40:27–40. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman DF. Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 7 (Cogat7). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott CD. Differential Abilities Scales - Second Edition: Introductory and Technical Handbook. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri JA. Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT3). Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Otis AS, Lennon RT. Otis-Lennon School Ability Test. 8th ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Roid GH. Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D, Kaplan E. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. 5th ed. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Schrank FA, McGrew KS, Mather N. Woodcock-Johnson IV. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL. Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 4th ed. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL. Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. 2nd ed. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW. Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales. 2nd ed. Odessa, FL: PAR, Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S. NEPSY-II. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Naglieri JA, Das JP, Goldstein S. Cognitive Assessment System. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR, Fanjiang G. Mini-Mental State Examination: User’s Guide. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson K. Gibson Assessment of Cognitive Skills. Colorado Springs, CO: LearningRx; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Moore AL, Miller TM. Reliability and validity of the revised gibson test of cognitive skills, a computer-based test battery for assessing cognition across the lifespan. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:25–35. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S152781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxley-Paquette E. Testing a Structural Equation Model of Language-Based Cognitive Fitness [Doctoral dissertation]. Walden University ScholarWorks. 2013. Available from: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2544&context=dissertations. Accessed December 29, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Moore AL. Technical Report: Gibson Cognitive Test Battery. Colorado Springs, CO: Gibson Institute of Cognitive Research; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Moore AL, Miller TM, Ledbetter C. Gibson Assessment of Cognitive Skills: Technical Manual (Rev.). Colorado Springs, CO: Gibson Institute of Cognitive Research; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• American Education Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. J Educ Behav Stat. 2002;27(4):335–340. doi:10.3102/10769986027004335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom D, Raiford S, Breaux K, Zhu J, Weiss L. The wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-fourth edition, wechsler intelligences scale for children-fifth edition, and wechsler individual achievement test-third edition. In: Flanagan DP, McDonough EM, editors. Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. 4th ed. NY: Guilford Press; 2018:245–282.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman E, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; CANTAB; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS vital signs. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21(7):623–643. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar