The Relationship Between Employee’s Status Perception and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Psychological Path of Work Vitality

References

• Morrison EW, Phelps CC. Taking charge at work: extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad Manage J. 1999;42(4):403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant JM. Proactive behavior in organizations. J Manage. 2000;26(3):435–462. doi:10.1177/014920630002600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Williams HM, Turner N. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):636. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam KC, Klotz AC, He W, Reynolds SJ. From good soldiers to psychologically entitled: examining when and why citizenship behavior leads to deviance. Acad Manage J. 2017;60(1):373–396. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett N, Lemoine J. What VUCA really means for you. Harv Bus Rev. 2014;92:1/2.
   Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ, Lockhart D, Hoobler J. Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(4):789. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ, Taylor EC. Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Acad Manage J. 2003;46(1):97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ D, Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S. Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, California; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Foote DA, Tang TLP. Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Manage Decision. 2008;46:933–947. doi:10.1108/00251740810882680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee RW, Yeung AC, Cheng TE. The impact of employee satisfaction on quality and profitability in high-contact service industries. J Operations Manage. 2008;26(5):651–668. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Albrecht SL, Leiter MP. Work engagement: further reflections on the state of play. Eur J Work Organizational Psychol. 2011;20(1):74–88. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2010.546711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulin M, Ferguson RJ, Bergeron J. Service climate and organizational commitment: the importance of customer linkages. J Bus Res. 2006;59(8):906–915. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Zhang M, Li H. Performance appraisal process and organizational citizenship behavior. J Managerial Psychol. 2012;27:732–752. doi:10.1108/02683941211259548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Dineen BR, Fang R, Vellella RF. Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Acad Manage J. 2009;52(5):1016–1033. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.44635525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomoya MG, Pingol MB, Teng-Calleja M. Antecedents of job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors among agency-hired blue-collar contractual workers in the Philippines. Philipp. J. Psychol. 2015;48(1):1-27.
   Google Scholar
• López-Domínguez M, Enache M, Sallan JM, Simo P. Transformational leadership as an antecedent of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. J Bus Res. 2013;66(10):2147–2152. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Klotz AC. The paradox of the unethical organizational citizen: the link between organizational citizenship behavior and unethical behavior at work. Current Opinion Psychol. 2015;6:45–49. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhang ZY, Tian XM. Can self‐sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion. J Organ Behav. 2016;37(5):758–781. doi:10.1002/job.2068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandyne L, Cummings LL, Parks JM. Extra-role behaviors-in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Res Organizational Behav. 1995;17:215–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Paine JB, Bachrach DG. Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J Manage. 2000;26(3):513–563. doi:10.1177/014920630002600307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister DJ, Kamdar D, Morrison EW, Turban DB. Disentangling role perceptions: how perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(5):1200. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Oh I-S, Wang J, Stoverink AC. A bigger piece of the pie: the relative importance of affiliative and change-oriented citizenship and task performance in predicting overall job performance. Human Resource Manage Rev. 2017;27(1):97–107. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Chiaburu DS, Kirkman BL. Cross-level influences of empowering leadership on citizenship behavior: organizational support climate as a double-edged sword. J Manage. 2017;43(4):1076–1102. doi:10.1177/0149206314546193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Chiang -JT-J, Fehr R, Xu M, Wang S. How do leaders react when treated unfairly? Leader narcissism and self-interested behavior in response to unfair treatment. J Appl Psychol. 2017;102(11):1590. doi:10.1037/apl0000237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X-A, Li N, Tb H. Putting non-work ties to work: the case of guanxi in supervisor–subordinate relationships. Leadersh Q. 2015;26(1):37–54. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen O, Gao L. Supervisory responsiveness and employee self-perceived status and voice behavior. J Manage. 2015;41(7):1854–1872. doi:10.1177/0149206312471386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D, Kring AM. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(1):116. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-R, Peterson RS, Phillips DJ, Podolny JM, Ridgeway CL. Introduction to the special issue: bringing status to the table—attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Informs. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1986;4(3):359–373. doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen-Salem A, Walumbwa FO, Hsu -CI-C, Misati E, Babalola MT, Kim K. Unmasking the creative self-efficacy–creative performance relationship: the roles of thriving at work, perceived work significance, and task interdependence. Int J Human Resource Manage. 2020;1–27. doi:10.1080/09585192.2019.1710721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G, Sutcliffe K, Dutton J, Sonenshein S, Grant AM. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Sci. 2005;16(5):537–549. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath C, Spreitzer G, Gibson C, Garnett FG. Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(2):250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychologist. 1989;44(9):1175. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Hildreth JAD, Howland L. Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychol Bull. 2015;141(3):574. doi:10.1037/a0038781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguid MM, Loyd DL, Tolbert PS. The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: a value threat approach. Organization Sci. 2012;23(2):386–401. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer D, Tyler TR. Am I respected or not?: inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Soc Justice Res. 2005;18(2):121–153. doi:10.1007/s11211-005-7366-3
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Srivastava S, Beer JS, Spataro SE, Chatman JA. Knowing your place: self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91(6):1094. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Chen Y-R. What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organization Sci. 2011;22(4):1040–1060. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD. 8 social hierarchy: the self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad Manage Ann. 2008;2(1):351–398. doi:10.5465/19416520802211628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens D, Sutton R. Meetings as Status Contests: negotiating order in on-going workgroups. 2001. Groups Work Adv Theory Res. 299–316. M. Turner, ed.
   Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Liu Z, Diefendorff JM. Leader–member exchange and job performance: the effects of taking charge and organizational tenure. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(2):216–231. doi:10.1002/job.1971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T-Y LZ. Taking charge and employee outcomes: the moderating effect of emotional competence. Int J Human Resource Manage. 2017;28(5):775–793. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1109537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood R, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14(3):361–384. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galperin BL, Bennett RJ, Aquino K. Status differentiation and the protean self: a social-cognitive model of unethical behavior in organizations. J Business Ethics. 2011;98(3):407–424. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0556-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson MN, Dahling JJ. Perceived social status and learning experiences in social cognitive career theory. J Vocat Behav. 2012;80(2):351–361. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller JB, Hester K, Barnett T, Frey L, Relyea C, Beu D. Perceived external prestige and internal respect: new insights into the organizational identification process. Human Relations. 2006;59(6):815–846. doi:10.1177/0018726706067148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng C, Liao S, Liu Z. When does status turn into proactive helping behavior? The moderating role of cooperative/competitive behavior intention. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2702. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Turnley WH. Measuring impression management in organizations: a scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Res Methods. 1999;2(2):187–206. doi:10.1177/109442819922005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary EG, Snyder M. The motivations to volunteer: theoretical and practical considerations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1999;8(5):156–159. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak MA. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2006;314(5805):1560–1563. doi:10.1126/science.1133755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lount JRB, Pettit NC. The social context of trust: the role of status. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2012;117(1):15–23. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Fatas E, Haruvy E, Lagos F. The impact of relative position and returns on sacrifice and reciprocity: an experimental study using individual decisions. Soc Choice Welfare. 2015;45(3):489–511. doi:10.1007/s00355-014-0818-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Willer R, Kilduff GJ, Brown CE. The origins of deference: when do people prefer lower status? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012;102(5):1077. doi:10.1037/a0027409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad Manage J. 2003;46(5):539–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torelli CJ, Leslie LM, Stoner JL, Puente R. Cultural determinants of status: implications for workplace evaluations and behaviors. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2014;123(1):34–48. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark R, Carmeli A. Alive and creating: the mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. J Organizational Behav. 2009;30(6):785–804. doi:10.1002/job.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Frederick C. On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. J Pers. 1997;65(3):529–565. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Heaphy ED. The power of high-quality connections. Positive Organizational Scholarship Foundations New Discipline. 2003;3:263–278.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman F. Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism. Oxford University Press on Demand; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton J, Frost P, Kanov J, Lilius J, Maitlis S, Worline M. Helping your workplace heal. Leading in Trying Times website, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI; 2005. Available from: http://www.bus.umich.edu/FacultyResearch/Research/TryingTimes/Heal.htm. Accessed September 7, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Reis HT, Gable SL. Toward a positive psychology of relationships. In: Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2003:129-159.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan R, Bernstein J. Vitality. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. 2004:273–290.
   Google Scholar
• Shraga O, Shirom A. The construct validity of vigor and its antecedents: a qualitative study. Human Relations. 2009;62(2):271–291. doi:10.1177/0018726708100360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirom A. Vigor as a positive affect at work: conceptualizing vigor, its relations with related constructs, and its antecedents and consequences. Rev General Psychol. 2011;15(1):50–64. doi:10.1037/a0021853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirom A. Burnout and health: expanding our knowledge. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress. 2009;25(4):281-285.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine AK, Rudolph CW, Zacher H. Thriving at work: a meta‐analysis. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(9–10):973–999. doi:10.1002/job.2375
   Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Collins CG. Taking stock: integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. J Manage. 2010;36(3):633–662. doi:10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl Psychol. 2001;50(3):337–421. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius J, Pratto F. Social dominance theory: anew synthesis. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto F, Sidanius J, Levin S. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: taking stock and looking forward. Eur Rev Social Psychol. 2006;17(1):271–320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson G, Rush J, MacInnis CC. A joke is just a joke (except when it isn’t): cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99(4):660. doi:10.1037/a0019627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman MR. The velvet glove: paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Univ of California Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(4):741. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley H, Sidanius J. Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: a social dominance perspective. Group Processes Intergroup Relations. 2005;8(2):187–203. doi:10.1177/1368430205051067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick DT, Griskevicius V, Neuberg SL, Schaller M. Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010;5(3):292–314. doi:10.1177/1745691610369469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maner JK, Mead NL. The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99(3):482. doi:10.1037/a0018559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner JK, Case CR. Dominance and prestige: dual strategies for navigating social hierarchies. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2016;54:129–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(2):265. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam G, Zyphur MJ. Power, voice, and hierarchy: exploring the antecedents of speaking up in groups. Group Dynamics Theory, Res Practice. 2005;9(2):93. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lange AH, Van Yperen NW, Van der Heijden BI, Bal PM. Dominant achievement goals of older workers and their relationship with motivation-related outcomes. J Vocat Behav. 2010;77(1):118–125. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy T, Lynn R. A multifactorial approach to achievement motivation: the development of a comprehensive measure. J Occup Psychol. 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instruments; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G, Porath CL, Gibson CB. Toward human sustainability: how to enable more thriving at work. Organ Dyn. 2012;41(2):155–162. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HW, Bradburn J, Johnson RE, Lin S-HJ, Chang C-HD. The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: a daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work. J Appl Psychol. 2019;104(2):197. doi:10.1037/apl0000346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER. Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Acad Manage J. 2007;50(4):869–884. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalshoven K, van Dijk H, Boon C. Why and when does ethical leadership evoke unethical follower behavior? J Managerial Psychol. 2016;31(2):500–515. doi:10.1108/JMP-10-2014-0314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Becerra‐Fernandez I. An empirical study of the effect of knowledge management processes at individual, group, and organizational levels. Decision Sci. 2003;34(2):225–260. doi:10.1111/1540-5915.02329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. NY: Guilford Press New York; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter NC, Berry CM, Houston L. A meta‐analytic comparison of self‐reported and other‐reported organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(4):547–574. doi:10.1002/job.1909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otaye-Ebede L, Shaffakat S, Foster S. A multilevel model examining the relationships between workplace spirituality, ethical climate and outcomes: a social cognitive theory perspective. J Business Ethics. 2020;166(3):611–626. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04133-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar