Research on the Influence of Paradoxical Leadership on Compulsory Organizational Citizenship Behavior

References

• Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S. Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: a constitutive approach. Acad Manag Ann. 2016;10(1):65–171. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P. Short on time: intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ Sci. 2015;26(2):531–549. doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Han YL. Paradoxical leader behavior in long-term corporate development: antecedents and consequences. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2019;155:42–54. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han Y-L, et al. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: antecedents and consequences. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(2):538–566. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2012.0995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng W, Li H. The influence mechanism of paradoxical leadership on employees’ proactive behavior: the role of team internal network strength and supervisor-subordinate Guanxi. Foreign Econ Manag. 2018;40(07):142–154.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Long YF, Peng J. The dark side of positive leadership: a review and prospect. Adv Psychol Sci. 2019;27(6):1123–1140. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01123
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot E. Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. J Bus Psychol. 2007;21(3):377–405. doi:10.1007/S10869-006-9034-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Beehr TA. Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2017;24(4):466–478. doi:10.1177/1548051817702078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves LM, Sarkis J. The role of employees’ leadership perceptions, values, and motivation in employees’ provenvironmental behaviors. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:576–587. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, et al. Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors: a review and recommendations for future research. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(S1):S87–S119. doi:10.1002/JOB.1911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu MY, Peng ZL. Destructive leadership, supervisor pressure and compulsory organization citizenship behaviors: the moderating role of leader-member exchange. Manage Rev. 2018;30(10):141–152.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner B. A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. J Educ Psychol. 1979;71(1):3–25. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Launier R. Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In: Pervin LA, Lewis M, editors. Perspectives in Interactional Psychology. Boston, MA: Springer; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Lam LW, Wen SS. Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: a self-evaluative perspective. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(1):112–127. doi:10.1002/JOB.1861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer MD, Dhensa-Kahlon RK, Colquitt JA, Ro⁃dell JB, Outlaw R, Long DM. Uneasy lies the head that bears the trust: the effects of feeling trusted on emotional exhaustion. Acad Manage J. 2014;58(6):1637–1657. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2014.0246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HI. Is trust certain to be welcome: the two routs of feeling trusted on its outcome. Bus Manag J. 2018;40(06):69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Liao H, Liu D, Loi R. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Acad Manage J. 2010;53(5):1090–1109. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper DT, Martin R. Beyond personal leader-member exchange quality: the effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadersh Q. 2008;19(1):20–30. doi:10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang DD, Qian ZC. Leader-member exchange and employee engagement: the roles of differentiated leader-member exchange and self-efficacy. Sci Sci Manag. 2017;38(04):172–180.
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot E. Compulsory citizenship behavior in organizations: theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome. J Theory Soc Behav. 2006;36(1):77–93. doi:10.1111/J.1468-5914.2006.00297.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkan SE, Turgut TA. Research about the relationship of psychological safety and organizational politics perception with compulsory citizenship behavior and the pressures behind compulsory citizenship behavior. Res J Bus Manag. 2015;2(2):185–203. doi:10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2015211506
   Google Scholar
• Spector PE, Fox S. Counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: are they opposite forms of active behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2010;59(1):21–39. doi:10.1111/J.1464-0597.2009.00414.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao HD. Can unwillingness produce desired results?—influence of compulsory citizenship behavior on job performance. Res Econ Manag. 2014;11:71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ, Hoobler J, Duffy MK, Ensley MD. Moderators of the relationship between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(3):455–465. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao HD. Multi-level formation mechanisms of employees’ compulsory citizenship behaviors. Adv Psychol Sci. 2014;22(8):1218–1225. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01218
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Yu GL. The contingent effects of abusive supervision on compulsory citizenship behavior: a Study of Moderators. Nankai Bus Rev. 2013;16(04):13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbei SA, Boerner S. A double-edged sword: transformational leadership and individual creativity. Br J Manag. 2013;24(1):54–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00786.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppila O, Tempelaar MP. The social-cognitive underpinnings of employees’ ambidextrous behaviour and the supportive role of group managers’ leadership. J Manag Stud. 2016;53(6):1019–1044. doi:10.1111/JOMS.12192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZH. How does paradoxical leadership enhance individual ambidexterity? The composite multiple mediating role of psychological safety and thriving at work. Foreign Econ Manag. 2018;40(03):107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Li Q, She Z, Yang B, et al. Promoting innovative performance in multidisciplinary teams: the roles of paradoxical leadership and team perspective taking. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1083. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2018.01083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Nijstad BA, Täuber S. Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: the double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2019;55:7–19. doi:10.1016/J.OBHDP.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Riggio RE. Transformational Leadership. Mahwah[M], NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wang HL, Zhang QJ. The cost of feeling trusted: the study on the effects of feeling trusted from supervisor, role overload, job stress and emotional exhaustion. Manage World. 2016;8:110–125+136+187–188.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Mo SJ, Shi JQ. Research on the process mechanism of ethical leadership to improve employees’ job performance and satisfaction in high-stress work situation. Manage World. 2015;8:120–131.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Chu XP, Ni J. The role exchange between the leader and the subordinate, the cognition of insiders’ status and the behavior of organizational citizens. Manage World. 2009;1:97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Grandey AA. Emotion regulation in the workplace: a new way to conceptualize emotional labor. J Occup Health Psychol. 1999;5(1):95–110. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95
   Google Scholar
• Lam LW, Peng KZ, Wong C-S, et al. Is more feedback seeking always better? Leader-member exchange moderates the relationship between feedback-seeking behavior and performance. J Manage. 2017;43(7):2195–2217. doi:10.1177/0149206315581661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandura TA, Graen GB. Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. J Appl Psychol. 1984;69(3):428–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Qu Q. Differentiation in leader-member exchange: a hierarchical linear modeling approach. Leadersh Q. 2010;21(5):733–744. doi:10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo SJ, Packard JS, Manning MR. Occupational stress. Its causes and consequences for job performance. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(4):618–629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matta FK, Scott BA, Koopman J, Conlon DE. Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(6):1686–1708. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2014.0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen ZL, Chang L, Kit-Tai H, Liu HY. Testing and application of the mediating effects. Acta Psychol Sin. 2004;5:614–620.
   Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J Appl Psychol. 1984;69(1):85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar