2,124
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Environmentally Specific Servant Leadership and Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior: Mediating Role of Green Self Efficacy

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 305-316 | Published online: 14 Feb 2022

References

  • Li W, Bhutto TA, Xuhui W, Maitlo Q, Zafar AU, Bhutto NA. Unlocking employees’ green creativity: the effects of green transformational leadership, green intrinsic, and extrinsic motivation. J Clean Prod. 2020;255:120229. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120229
  • Ahmad N, Ullah Z, Arshad MZ, Waqas Kamran H, Scholz M, Han H. Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: the mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021;27:1138–1148. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.034
  • Afsar B, Umrani WA. Corporate social responsibility and pro‐environmental behavior at workplace: the role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2020;27(1):109–125. doi:10.1002/csr.1777
  • Paillé P, Mejía-Morelos JH. Antecedents of pro-environmental behaviours at work: the moderating influence of psychological contract breach. J Environ Psychol. 2014;38:124–131. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.004
  • Graves LM, Sarkis J, Gold N. Employee proenvironmental behavior in Russia: the roles of top management commitment, managerial leadership, and employee motives. RESOUR CONSERV RECY. 2019;140:54–64. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.007
  • Graves LM, Sarkis J, Zhu Q. How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. J Environ Psychol. 2013;35:81–91. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.002
  • Ying M, Faraz NA, Ahmed F, Raza A. How does servant leadership foster employees’ voluntary green behavior? A sequential mediation model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1792. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051792
  • Raza A, Farrukh M, Iqbal MK, Farhan M, Wu Y. Corporate social responsibility and employees’ voluntary pro‐environmental behavior: the role of organizational pride and employee engagement. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2021;28(3):1104–1116. doi:10.1002/csr.2109
  • Robertson JL, Barling J. Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro‐environmental behaviors. J Organ Behav. 2013;34(2):176–194. doi:10.1002/job.1820
  • Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Zhao H, Henderson D. Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadersh Q. 2008;19(2):161–177. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
  • Faraz NA, Mughal MF, Ahmed F, Raza A, Iqbal MK. The impact of servant leadership on employees’ innovative work behaviour-mediating role of psychological empowerment. Int J Manag Sci Bus Adm. 2019;5(11):45.
  • Luu TT. Building employees’ organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: the role of environmentally-specific servant leadership and a moderated mediation mechanism. Int J Contemp Hosp Manage. 2018;31(1):406–426. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-07-2017-0425
  • Faraz NA, Ahmed F, Ying M, Mehmood SA. The interplay of green servant leadership, self‐efficacy, and intrinsic motivation in predicting employees’ pro‐environmental behavior. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2021;28:1171–1184.
  • Kura KM. Linking environmentally specific transformational leadership and environmental concern to green behaviour at work. Glob Bus Rev. 2016;17(3S):1S–14S. doi:10.1177/0972150916631069
  • Eva N, Robin M, Sendjaya S, van Dierendonck D, Liden RC. Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research: the leadership quarterly yearly review for 2019. Leadersh Q. 2019;30(1):111–132. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
  • Brière M, Le Roy J, Meier O. Linking servant leadership to positive deviant behavior: the mediating role of self‐determination theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2020;51(2):65–78. doi:10.1111/jasp.12716
  • Van Dierendonck D, Stam D, Boersma P, De Windt N, Alkema J. Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. Leadersh Q. 2014;25(3):544–562. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.014
  • Tuan LT. Environmentally-specific servant leadership and green creativity among tourism employees: dual mediation paths. J Sustain Tour. 2020;28(1):86–109. doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1675674
  • Bandura A. Self‐Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: WH Freeman and Company; 1997.
  • Yang J, Liu H, Gu J. A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity: the roles of self-efficacy and power distance. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2017;38(5):610–629.
  • Malik MAR, Butt AN, Choi JN. Rewards and employee creative performance: moderating effects of creative self‐efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(1):59–74. doi:10.1002/job.1943
  • Norton TA, Parker SL, Zacher H, Ashkanasy NM. Employee green behavior: a theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organ Environ. 2015;28(1):103–125. doi:10.1177/1086026615575773
  • Mittal S, Dhar RL. Effect of green transformational leadership on green creativity: a study of tourist hotels. Tour Manag. 2016;57:118–127. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.05.007
  • Chen Y-S, Chang C-H. The determinants of green product development performance: green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creatiVITY. J Bus Ethics. 2013;116(1):107–119. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x
  • Chen Y-S, Chang C-H, Lin Y-H. Green Transformational leadership and green performance: the mediation effects of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Sustainability. 2014;6(10):6604–6621. doi:10.3390/su6106604
  • Tuan LT. Effects of environmentally-specific servant leadership on green performance via green climate and green crafting. Asia Pac J Manag. 2019;38:925–953. doi:10.1007/s10490-019-09687-9
  • Mukonza C, Swarts I Examining the role of green transformational leadership on promoting green organizational behavior. Contemporary Multicultural Orientations and Practices for Global Leadership: IGI Global; 2019. p. 200–224.
  • Wang X, Zhou K, Liu W. Value Congruence: a study of green transformational leadership and employee green behavior. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1–8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01946
  • Gurmani JK, Khan NU, Khalique M, Yasir M, Obaid A, Sabri NAA. Do environmental transformational leadership predicts organizational citizenship behavior towards environment in hospitality industry: using structural equation modelling approach. Sustainability. 2021;13(10):5594. doi:10.3390/su13105594
  • Khan MAS, Jianguo D, Ali M, Saleem S, Usman M. Interrelations between ethical leadership, green psychological climate, and organizational environmental citizenship behavior: a moderated mediation model. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1977. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01977
  • Spears LC, Lawrence M. Focus on Leadership: Servant-Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
  • Greenleaf RK. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press; 1977:1–37.
  • Luu TT. Integrating green strategy and green human resource practices to trigger individual and organizational green performance: the role of environmentally-specific servant leadership. J Sustain Tour. 2020;28(8):1193–1222. doi:10.1080/09669582.2020.1729165
  • Afsar B, Cheema S, Javed F. Activating employee’s pro‐environmental behaviors: the role of CSR, organizational identification, and environmentally specific servant leadership. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2018;25(5):904–911. doi:10.1002/csr.1506
  • Tuan LT. Activating tourists’ citizenship behavior for the environment: the roles of CSR and frontline employees’ citizenship behavior for the environment. J Sustain Tour. 2018;26(7):1178–1203. doi:10.1080/09669582.2017.1330337
  • Bandura A. The Nature and Structure of Self-Efficacy. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: WH Freeman and Company; 1997:37–78.
  • Choi JN. Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: the mediating role of psychological processes. Creat Res J. 2004;16(2–3):187–199. doi:10.1080/10400419.2004.9651452
  • Chen YS, Chang C-H, Yeh S-L, Cheng H-I. Green shared vision and green creativity: the mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Qual Quant. 2015;49(3):1169–1184. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0041-8
  • Guo L, Xu Y, Liu G, Wang T. Understanding firm performance on green sustainable practices through managers’ ascribed responsibility and waste management: green self-efficacy as moderator. Sustainability. 2019;11(18):4976. doi:10.3390/su11184976
  • Chen Z, Zhu J, Zhou M. How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(2):511. doi:10.1037/a0038036
  • Bande B, Fernández-Ferrín P, Varela-Neira C, Otero-Neira C. Exploring the relationship among servant leadership, intrinsic motivation and performance in an industrial sales setting. J Bus Ind Mark. 2016;31(2):219–231. doi:10.1108/JBIM-03-2014-0046
  • Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. NJ, USA: Englewood Cliffs; 1986.
  • Ali Y, Rasheed Z, Muhammad N, Yousaf S. Energy optimization in the wake of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). J Control Decis. 2018;5(2):129–147. doi:10.1080/23307706.2017.1353929
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Robertson JL, Barling J. Toward a new measure of organizational environmental citizenship behavior. J Bus Res. 2017;75:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.007
  • Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. Eur J Mark. 2019;53(4):566–584. doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665
  • Sharma PN, Shmueli G, Sarstedt M, Danks N, Ray S. Prediction‐oriented model selection in partial least squares path modeling. Decis Sci. 2021;52(3):567–607. doi:10.1111/deci.12329
  • Ali I, Ali M, Leal-Rodríguez AL, Albort-Morant G. The role of knowledge spillovers and cultural intelligence in enhancing expatriate employees’ individual and team creativity. J Bus Res. 2019;101(1):561–573. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.012
  • Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. 2019;31(1):2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hair JJF, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res. 2020;109:101–110. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
  • Nitzl C, Roldan JL, Cepeda G. Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2016;116(9):1849–1864. doi:10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage Publications; 2016.
  • Wells VK, Gregory-Smith D, Manika D. Introduction to the Research Handbook on Employee Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Research Handbook on Employee Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2018.