Applying a Yin–Yang Perspective to the Theory of Paradox: A Review of Chinese Management

References

• Cheng C-Y. The ‘C’ theory: a Chinese philosophical approach to management and decision-making. J Chin Philos. 1992;19(2):125–153. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.1992.tb00115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C-Y. The C-theory: on Chinese philosophical approach to decision making, leadership and management. Int J Bus Syst Res. 2010;4(5/6):510–540. doi:10.1504/ijbsr.2010.035073
   Google Scholar
• Li PP. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: the geocentric implications of Yin-Yang balance. Asia Pac J Manag. 2012;29(4):849–872. doi:10.1007/s10490-011-9250-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li PP. The unique value of yin-yang balancing: a critical response. Manag Organ Rev. 2014;10(2):321–332. doi:10.1017/s1740877600004228
   Google Scholar
• Xie PH, Wei NJ. Paths exploration for Chinese indigenous management research. Chin J Manag. 2012;9(9):1255–1262.
   Google Scholar
• Du R, Ai SZ, Brugha CM. Integrating Taoist Yin-Yang thinking with Western nomology: a moderating model of trust in conflict management. Chin Manag Stud. 2011;5(1):55–67. doi:10.1108/17506141111118453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin L, Li PP, Roelfsema H. The traditional Chinese philosophies in inter-cultural leadership: the case of Chinese expatriate managers in the Dutch context. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2018;25(2):299–336. doi:10.1108/CCSM-01-2017-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang T. From ‘onion’ to ‘ocean’: paradox and change in national cultures. Int Stud Manag Organ. 2005;35(4):71–90. doi:10.2307/40397646
   Google Scholar
• Fang T. Yin Yang: a new perspective on culture. Manag Organ Rev. 2012;8(1):25–50. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x
   Google Scholar
• Li PP, Yang ZY. Integration of Chinese and Western philosophies. Chin J Manag. 2017;14(1):26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley C, Oh I. Trends in Chinese management and business: change, confucianism, leadership, knowledge & innovation. Asia Pac Bus Rev. 2020;26(1):1–8. doi:10.1080/13602381.2019.1698707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu FM, Jing RT, Yin SJ. The dilemma and access of Chinese indigenous management research. Chin J Manag. 2013;10(12):1717–1724.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng C-Y. The C Theory: Chinese Philosophy of Management. Beijing: China Renmin University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Lewis MW. Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manag Rev. 2011;36(2):381–403. doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MW. Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. Acad Manag Rev. 2000;25(4):760–776. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.3707712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faure GO, Fang T. Changing Chinese values: keeping up with paradoxes. Int Bus Rev. 2008;17(2):194–207. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li PP. Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: how to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2016;23(1):42–77. doi:10.1108/CCSM-10-2015-0137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su ZX. Management paradox and Yin Yang balancing. Tsinghua Bus Rev. 2017;11:28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Erez M, Jarvenpaa S, Lewis MW, Tracey P. Adding complexity to theories of paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change: introduction to organization studies special issue on paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change. Organ Stud. 2017;38(3–4):303–317. doi:10.1177/0170840617693560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford JD, Backoff RW. Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In: Quinn RE, Cameron KS, editors. Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger; 1988:81–121.
   Google Scholar
• March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci. 1991;2(1):71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu ZR. Explanation of Zhou Yi Yin Yang. Changchun: Jilin Wenshi Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Chen GM. Bian (change): a perceptual discourses of I Ching. Intercult Commun Stud. 2008;17(4):7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Fang T, Faure GO. Chinese communication characteristics: a yin-yang perspective. Int J Intercult Relat. 2011;35(3):320–333. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An R, He GH, Chen GM. Intercultural communication influence of confucius institutes: a Yin-Yang perspective. China Media Res. 2018;14(4):37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Langevin HM, Badger GJ, Povolny BK, et al. Yin Scores and Yang Scores: a new method for quantitative diagnostic evaluation in traditional Chinese medicine research. J Altern Compl Med. 2004;10(2):389–395. doi:10.1089/107555304323062392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WR, Zhang L. YinYang bipolar logic and bipolar fuzzy logic. Inf Sci. 2004;165(3–4):265–287. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2003.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin T, Shi Y, Rowley C, Meng J. Confucian business model canvas in the Asia Pacific: a Yin-Yang harmony cognition to value creation and innovation. Asia Pac Bus Rev. 2020. doi:10.1080/13602381.2020.1795481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Worm V, Xie P. Is Yin-Yang superior for paradox research? Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2018;25(3):501–514. doi:10.1108/CCSM-06-2016-0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding G. Components and process in social science explanation: is there a role for yin yang balancing? Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2017;24(1):154–166. doi:10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Zheng Q, Tung R, Ralston D. Competing in complex cross-cultural world. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2016;23(2):386–392. doi:10.1108/CCSM-01-2016-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel GWF. Logic. Yizhi Y, editor. Beijing: Beijing press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Chen GM. A Yin-Yang theory of human communication. China Media Res. 2018;14(4):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr N. The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature. 1928;121(3050):580–590. doi:10.1038/121580a0
   Google Scholar
• Jing R, Van de Ven A. A Yin-Yang model of organizational change: the case of CBG. Manag Organ Rev. 2014;10(1):55–80. doi:10.1111/more.12045
   Google Scholar
• Lin D, Lu J, Li PP, Liu X. Balancing formality and informality in business exchanges as a duality: a comparative case study of returnee and local entrepreneurs in China. Manag Organ Rev. 2015;11(2):315–342. doi:10.1017/mor.2014.2
   Google Scholar
• Li X. Can Yin-Yang guide Chinese indigenous management research? Manag Organ Rev. 2014;10(1):7–27. doi:10.1111/more.12042
   Google Scholar
• Chin T, Rowley C, Redding G, Wang S. Chinese strategic thinking on competitive conflict: insights from Yin-Yang harmony cognition. Int J Confl Manag. 2018;29(5):683–704. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-09-2017-0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Miller D. West meets East: toward an ambicultural approach to management. Acad Manag Perspect. 2010;24(4):17–24. doi:10.5465/amp.2010.24.4.3651479.a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauluzzo R, Guarda M, Pretto L, Fang T. Managing paradoxes, dilemmas, and change: a case study to apply the Yin Yang wisdom in western organizational settings. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2018;25(2):257–275. doi:10.1108/CCSM-08-2017-0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GM. Zhong (centrality), self-competence, and social/communication competence: a Chinese perspective. Intercult Commun Stud. 2016;25(1):17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CC. Yin-yang dialectics and communitarianism in cross-cultural management research. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2018;25(3):492–500. doi:10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang J, Fan W. Yin yang and company growth: a case study of a coal company of Shanxi in China. Chin Manag Stud. 2011;5(4):380–393. doi:10.1108/17506141111183154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Reade C. The role of Yin-Yang leadership and cosmopolitan followership in fostering employee commitment in China: a paradox perspective. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2018;25(2):276–298. doi:10.1108/CCSM-12-2016-0216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horak S, Long CP. Dissolving the paradox: toward a Yin–Yang perspective on the power and trust antagonism in collaborative business relationships. Supply Chain Manag. 2018;23(6):573–590. doi:10.1108/SCM-01-2018-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron B, Kramer RM, Salamon LM. Government and the Third Sector: Emerging Relationships in Welfare States. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon LM. Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bi JW. The Revolution of Social Groups: An Economic Analysis of the Development of Social Groups in China. Shandong: People’s Publishing House; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhe XY, Sun BY. Association development and organizational system reconstruction. Manag World. 1992;2:192–202.
   Google Scholar
• Li X. The danger of Chinese exceptionalism. Manag Organ Rev. 2016;12(4):815–816. doi:10.1017/mor.2016.41
   Google Scholar