A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions

References

• Dakhi O, Irfan D. Blended learning: a 21st century learning model at college. Int J Multi Sci. 2020;1(08):50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski S. What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends. 2019;63(5):564–569. doi:10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai CL, Hwang GJ. A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Comput Educ. 2016;100:126–140. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seraji F, Attaran M, Azizi SM. Blended learning researches in Iran: several fundamental criticisms. Digit Educ Rev. 2019;(36):190–206. doi:10.1344/der.2019.36.190-206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang LC, Worthington AC, Hu M. Cost economies in the provision of higher education for international students: Australian evidence. High Educ. 2016;74(4):717–734. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0078-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczyk BR. Introducing social work to HyFlex blended learning: a student-centered approach. J Teach Soc Work. 2019;39(4):414–428. doi:10.1080/08841233.2019.1652226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk CJ, Graham CR. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Owston R, York DN, Malhotra T. Blended learning in large enrolment courses: student perceptions across four different instructional models. Australas J Educ Technol. 2019;35(5):29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seraji F. What differences? Thematic analyses of blended learning researches in Iran. Open Learn. 2020;1–18. doi:10.1080/02680513.2020.1803820
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2004;7(2):95–105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Brame CJ, Perez KE. Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):1–6. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Samarraie H, Saeed N. A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Comput Educ. 2018;124:77–91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt L. Timing is flipping everything: a case study in law that suggests student engagement depends on when the flipped classroom is introduced. Compass J Learn Teach. 2017;10(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Quarato S. Is the Flipped Classroom Pedagogy Effective for All Students? [Unpublished Certificate of Advanced Study Thesis]. Sacred Heart University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen L. Five reasons I’m not flipping over the flipped classroom. Technol Learn. 2011;32:46.
   Google Scholar
• Huang R, Tlili A, Wang H, et al. Emergence of the online-merge-offline (OMO) learning wave in the post-COVID-19 era: a pilot study. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3512. doi:10.3390/su13063512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachmadtullah R, Marianus Subandowo R, Humaira MA, Aliyyah RR, Samsudin A, Nurtanto M. Use of blended learning with moodle: study effectiveness in elementary school teacher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2020;29(7):3272–3277.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO, ILO. Supporting teachers in back-to-school efforts. Guidance for policy-makers. International task force on teachers for education 2030; 2020. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373479. Accessed September 21, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CY, Lai CL, Hwang GJ. Trends and research issues of mobile learning studies in nursing education: a review of academic publications from 1971 to 2016. Comput Educ. 2018;116:28–48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höffler TN, Leutner D. Instructional animation versus static pictures: a meta-analysis. Learn Instruct. 2007;17(6):722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlili A, Lin V, Chen NS, Huang R. A systematic review on robot-assisted special education from the activity theory perspective. Educ Technol Soc. 2020;23(3):95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahapay MB. Rethinking education in the new normal post-COVID-19 era: a curriculum studies perspective. Aquademia. 2020;4:2. doi:10.29333/aquademia/8315
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham B, Brereton P. A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Info Softw Technol. 2013;55(12):2049–2075. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcolino MS, Oliveira JAQ, D’Agostino M, Ribeiro AL, Alkmim MBM, Novillo-Ortiz D. The impact of mHealth interventions: systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2018;6(1):e23. doi:10.2196/mhealth.8873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahlevan-Sharif S, Mura P, Wijesinghe SN. A systematic review of systematic reviews in tourism. J Hospital Tour Manag. 2019;39:158–165. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Gil R, Correa D. Transparency in previous literature reviews about blended learning in higher education. Educ Info Technol. 2021;26:1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–341. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing AW, Alakangas S. Google scholar, scopus and the web of science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics. 2016;106(2):787–804. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HR, Choi CH, Jo E. A methodological quality assessment of meta-analysis studies in dance therapy using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2. Healthcare. 2020;8(4):446. doi:10.3390/healthcare8040446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu YC, Ho HNJ, Tsai CC, et al. Research trends in technology based learning from 2000 to 2009: a content analysis of publications in selected journals. J Educ Technol Soc. 2012;15(2):354–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HC, Hwang GJ. Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: a review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interact Learn Environ. 2018. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang QF, Lin CJ, Hwang GJ. Research focuses and findings of flipping mathematics classes: a review of journal publications based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interact Learn Environ. 2019. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1637351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keengwe J, Kang KK. Blended learning in teacher preparation programs: a literature review. Int J Info Commun Technol Educ. 2012;8(2):81–93. doi:10.4018/jicte.2012040107
   Google Scholar
• Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e216–e221. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.642831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja R, Nagasubramani PC. Impact of modern technology in education. J Appl Adv Res. 2018;3(1):33–35. doi:10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.165
   Google Scholar
• Sar A, Misra SN. An empirical study to examine the components of technology-enabled distance education affecting students’ perception. Mater Today. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.781
   Google Scholar
• Owston R. Blended learning policy and implementation: introduction to the special issue. Internet High Educ. 2013;18:1–3. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun L. The policy and strategy for blended learning in a Chinese open university. In: Cheung SKS, Fong J, Kwok LF, Li K, Kwan R, editors. Hybrid Learning. Springer;2012. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32018-7_32
   Google Scholar
• Birgili B, Seggie FN, Oğuz E. The trends and outcomes of flipped learning research between 2012 and 2018: a descriptive content analysis. J Comput Educ. 2021;8:1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Han X, Yang J. Revisiting the blended learning literature: using a complex adaptive systems framework. Educ Technol Soc. 2015;18(2):380–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler R, Soler JR, Araya I. Subjects in the blended learning model design. Theoretical-methodological elements. Procedia. 2017;237:771–777. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.120
   Google Scholar
• Walker S, Dwyer T, Moxham L, Broadbent M, Sander T. Facilitator versus preceptor: which offers the best support to undergraduate nursing students? Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(5):530–535. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeonja C, Eunju S, Oh E. Effects of teaching communication skills using a video clip on a smart phone on communication competence and emotional intelligence in nursing students. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2015;29(2):90–95. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2014.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens R, De Wever B, Voet M. Four key challenges to the design of BLENDED learning: a systematic literature review. Educ Res Rev. 2017;22:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GMIT. Blended and online learning policies. Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology; 2018. Available from: https://www.gmit.ie/sites/default/files/public/directorate-communications/docs/strategic-plan-revision-2013-16.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• University of the West Indies. Blended learning policies. blended-learning-policy.aspx (uwi.edu). October 9, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson LR, Graham CR, Spring KJ, Drysdale JS. An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Dist Educ. 2012;33(3):381–413. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.723166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drysdale JS, Graham CR, Spring KJ, Halverson LR. An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet High Educ. 2013;17:90–100. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH. Self-regulated learning and performance: an introduction and an overview. In: Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH, editors. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge; 2011:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Owston RD, Sinclair M, Wideman H. Blended learning for professional development: an evaluation of a program for middle school mathematics and science teachers. Teach Coll Rec. 2008;110(5):1033–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young A, Lewis CW. Teacher education programmes delivered at a distance: an examination of distance student perceptions. J Teach Teach Educ. 2008;24(3):601–609. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper HM. Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-By-Step Approach. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper HM, Hedges LV, Valentine JC. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. 2nd ed. Russell Sage Foundation; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1–34. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e4807. doi:10.2196/jmir.4807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle KK, Chambers BD, Anderson PM, Firpo‐Triplett R, Waterman EA. Blended learning for sexual health education: evidence base, promising practices, and potential challenges. J Schl Health. 2019;89(10):847–859. doi:10.1111/josh.12821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alammary A, Edward K-L. Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krismadinata K, Verawardina U, Jalinus N, et al. Blended learning as instructional model in VOCATIONAL education: literature review. Univers J Educ Res. 2020;8(11B):5801–5815. doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.082214
   Google Scholar
• Denden M, Tlili A, Burgos D, et al. Framework for teacher support during remote teaching in a crisis: Covid-19, as a case study. In Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context. Springer; 2020:147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Tips for teaching procedural skills. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(S2). doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02284-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Practices that support effective STEM education. In: Successful STEM Education: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon NA. Flexible learning in computer science. N Direct Teach Phys Sci. 2016;(11). doi:10.29311/ndtps.v0i11.575
   Google Scholar
• Majuri J, Koivisto J, Hamari J. Gamification of education and learning: a review of empirical literature. In The 2nd International GamiFIN Conference; Pori, Finland; 2018:21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer S, Elen J. In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Educ Info Technol. 2016;22(4):1395–1454. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li BZ, Cao NW, Ren CX, Chu XJ, Zhou HY, Guo B. Flipped classroom improves nursing students’ theoretical learning in China: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presti CR. The flipped learning approach in nursing education: a literature review. J Nurs Educ. 2016;55(5):252–257. doi:10.3928/01484834-20160414-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne E, Rands H, Frommolt V, Kain V, Plugge M, Mitchell M. Investigation of blended learning video resources to teach health students clinical skills: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;63:101–107. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan Z, Akdag-Cimen B. Flipped classroom in English language teaching: a systematic review. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2019;33(5–6):590–606. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaman M, Graf D. Evaluation of an international blended learning cooperation project in biology teacher education. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2010;9(2):87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Atmacasoy A, Aksu M. Blended learning at pre-service teacher education in Turkey: a systematic review. Educ Info Technol. 2018;23(6):2399–2422. doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9723-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, Abdullah NA. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: a systematic review. Comput Educ. 2020;144:103701. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma RB, Vota WS. ICT in developing countries: policies, implementation, and impact. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer; 2014:885–894.
   Google Scholar
• Ho WY. A review of blended synchronous learning. Int J Soc Media Interact Learn Environ. 2017;5(4):278–291. doi:10.1504/IJSMILE.2017.090977
   Google Scholar
• Chan RH, Quek CL. Benefits, challenges and strategies of implementing blended learning in tertiary institutes. Int J Soc Media Interact Learn Environ. 2014;2(3):285–300. doi:10.1504/IJSMILE.2014.064215
   Google Scholar
• Blau I, Shamir-Inbal T, Avdiel O. How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? Internet High Educ. 2020;45:100722. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denden M, Tlili A, Essalmi F, Jemni M. Students’ learning performance in a gamified and self-determined learning environment. In 2020 International Multi-Conference on: “Organization of Knowledge and Advanced Technologies”(OCTA); IEEE; 2020:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tlili A, Denden M, Essalmi F, Jemni M, Huang R, Chang TW. Personality effects on students’ intrinsic motivation in a gamified learning environment. In 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT); IEEE; 2019: 2161, 100–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ekici M. A systematic review of the use of gamification in flipped learning. Educ Info Technol. 2021;26:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar