Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study

References

• Michelon P, Zacks JM. Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Percept Psychophys. 2006;68(2):327–337. doi:10.3758/BF03193680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway JR, Lee D, Ojaghi M, Catmur C, Bird G. Submentalizing or mentalizing in a Level 1 perspective-taking task: a cloak and goggles test. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017;43(3):454–465. doi:10.1037/xhp0000319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal T, Steffel M, Epley N. Perspective mistaking: accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018;114(4):547–571. doi:10.1037/pspa0000115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell JH, Everett BA, Croft K, Flavell ER. Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: further evidence for the Level 1-Level 2 distinction. Dev Psychol. 1981;17(1):99–103. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masangkay ZS, McCluskey KA, McIntyre CW, Sims-Knight J, Vaughn BE, Flavell JH. The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others. Child Dev. 1974;45(2):357. doi:10.2307/1127956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surtees ADR, Apperly IA. Egocentrism and Automatic Perspective Taking in Children and Adults: egocentrism and Automatic Perspective Taking. Child Dev. 2012;83(2):452–460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01730.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd AR, Cameron CD, Simpson AJ. Dissociating processes underlying level-1 visual perspective taking in adults. Cognition. 2017;159:97–101. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M. Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav. 2000;59(4):771–785. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Baillargeon R. Do 12.5-month-old infants consider what objects others can see when interpreting their actions? Cognition. 2007;105(3):489–512. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodian B, Thoermer C, Metz U. Now I see it but you don’t: 14-month-olds can represent another person’s visual perspective. Dev Sci. 2007;10(2):199–204. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00580.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song H, Baillargeon R. Infants’ reasoning about others’ false perceptions. Dev Psychol. 2008;44(6):1789–1795. doi:10.1037/a0013774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson D, Apperly IA, Braithwaite JJ, Andrews BJ, Bodley Scott SE. Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010;36(5):1255–1266. doi:10.1037/a0018729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlanetto T, Becchio C, Samson D, Apperly I. Altercentric interference in level 1 visual perspective taking reflects the ascription of mental states, not submentalizing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016;42(2):158–163. doi:10.1037/xhp0000138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi AW, Apperly IA, Samson D. Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: evidence from a dual-task study of adults. Cognition. 2010;117(2):230–236. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi AW, Monk RL, Samson D, Apperly IA. Does interference between self and other perspectives in theory of mind tasks reflect a common underlying process? Evidence from individual differences in theory of mind and inhibitory control. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020;27(1):178–190. doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01656-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18(4):177–185. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirioux B, Mercier MR, Jorland G, Berthoz A, Blanke O. Mental Imagery of Self-Location during Spontaneous and Active Self-Other Interactions: an Electrical Neuroimaging Study. J Neurosci. 2010;30(21):7202–7214. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3403-09.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper SP. The Negative Priming Effect: inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects. Quarterly J Exp Psychol Section A. 1985;37(4):571–590. doi:10.1080/14640748508400920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Li X, Xu P, Mao T. Why students are biased by heuristics: examining the role of inhibitory control, conflict detection, and working memory in the case of overusing proportionality. Cogn Dev. 2020;53:100850. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Li X, Xu P, Chen Y. Inhibiting intuitive rules in a geometry comparison task: do age level and math achievement matter? J Exp Child Psychol. 2019;186:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Li X, Xu P, Zhong L, Lei Y. The role of inhibitory control in overcoming English written-verb inflection errors: evidence from Chinese ESL learners. Curr Psychol. 2019. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00482-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubin A, Vidal J, Lanoë C, Houdé O, Borst G. Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems: a developmental negative priming study. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(3):701–708. doi:10.1037/a0032625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubin A, Rossi S, Lanoë C, Vidal J, Houdé O, Borst G. Expertise, inhibitory control and arithmetic word problems: a negative priming study in mathematics experts. Learn Instruction. 2016;45:40–48. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roell M, Viarouge A, Houdé O, Borst G. Inhibition of the whole number bias in decimal number comparison: a developmental negative priming study. J Exp Child Psychol. 2019;177:240–247. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aïte A, Berthoz A, Vidal J, et al. Taking a Third-Person Perspective Requires Inhibitory Control: evidence From a Developmental Negative Priming Study. Child Dev. 2016;87(6):1825–1840. doi:10.1111/cdev.12558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houdé O, Borst G. Measuring inhibitory control in children and adults: brain imaging and mental chronometry. Front Psychol. 2014;5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houdé O. Inhibition and cognitive development: object, number, categorization, and reasoning. Cogn Dev. 2000;15(1):63–73. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00015-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper SP. Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views. Quarterly J Exp Psychol Section A. 2001;54(2):321–343. doi:10.1080/713755969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna B, Padmanabhan A, O’Hearn K. What has fMRI told us about the Development of Cognitive Control through Adolescence? Brain Cogn. 2010;72(1):101–113. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Li X. The overuse of proportional reasoning and its cognitive mechanism: a developmental negative priming study. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2017;49(6):745. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00745
   Google Scholar
• Fritz J, Dreisbach G. The Time Course of the Aversive Conflict Signal. Exp Psychol. 2015;62(1):30–39. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbig BE, Pohl RF. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009;35(5):1296–1305. doi:10.1037/a0016565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apperly IA, Butterfill SA. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychol Rev. 2009;116(4):953–970. doi:10.1037/a0016923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M. Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Anim Behav. 2005;69(1):11–18. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H. Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci. 2005;28(5):675–691. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescentini C, Fabbro F, Urgesi C. Mental spatial transformations of objects and bodies: different developmental trajectories in children from 7 to 11 years of age. Dev Psychol. 2014;50(2):370–383. doi:10.1037/a0033627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronholm PC, Flynn M, Edmonds CJ, Gardner MR. Empathic and non-empathic routes to visuospatial perspective-taking. Conscious Cogn. 2012;21(1):494–500. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel EA, Piaget J. The Child’s Conception of Number. Br J Educ Stud. 1953;1(2):183. doi:10.2307/3118763
   Google Scholar
• Piaget J. Piaget’s Theory. In: Inhelder B, Chipman HH, Zwingmann C editors. Piaget and His School. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1976:11–23. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler DH, Inhelder B, Piaget J. The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. Mathematical Gazette. 1965;49(368):220. doi:10.2307/3612335
   Google Scholar
• Borst G, Poirel N, Pineau A, Cassotti M, Houdé O. Inhibitory control in number-conservation and class-inclusion tasks: a neo-Piagetian inter-task priming study. Cogn Dev. 2012;27(3):283–298. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler RS. Cognitive variability. Dev Sci. 2007;10(1):104–109. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00571.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler RS. How Does Change Occur: a Microgenetic Study of Number Conservation. Cogn Psychol. 1995;28(3):225–273. doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff J, Branning P, Marois R. fMRI Evidence for a Dual Process Account of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making. PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2635. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiesteban I, Catmur C, Hopkins SC, Bird G, Heyes C. Avatars and arrows: implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014;40(3):929–937. doi:10.1037/a0035175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiesteban I, Kaur S, Bird G, Catmur C. Attentional processes, not implicit mentalizing, mediate performance in a perspective-taking task: evidence from stimulation of the temporoparietal junction. NeuroImage. 2017;155:305–311. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole GG, Atkinson M, Le ATD, Smith DT. Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others? Acta Psychologica. 2016;164:165–168. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson HJ, Apperly I, Cane JE. Eye tracking reveals the cost of switching between self and other perspectives in a visual perspective-taking task. Quarterly J Exp Psychol. 2017;70(8):1646–1660. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1199716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoë C, Vidal J, Lubin A, Houdé O, Borst G. Inhibitory control is needed to overcome written verb inflection errors: evidence from a developmental negative priming study. Cogn Dev. 2016;37:18–27. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard VE, Neumann E. Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies: assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults. Dev Psychol. 2009;45(1):272–283. doi:10.1037/a0014168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton AF, Brindley R, Frith U. Visual perspective taking impairment in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Cognition. 2009;113(1):37–44. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick A, Baumeler D. The relation between spatial perspective taking and inhibitory control in 6-year-old children. Psychol Res. 2017;81(4):730–739. doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0785-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Keysar B, Epley N. Reflexively mindblind: using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010;46(3):551–556. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardlow L. Individual differences in speakers’ perspective taking: the roles of executive control and working memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20(4):766–772. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0396-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipp AM, Kalinich C, Koch I, Schubotz RI. Mixing costs and switch costs when switching stimulus dimensions in serial predictions. Psychol Res. 2008;72(4):405–414. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0150-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long MR, Horton WS, Rohde H, Sorace A. Individual differences in switching and inhibition predict perspective-taking across the lifespan. Cognition. 2018;170:25–30. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odic D, Hock H, Halberda J. Hysteresis affects approximate number discrimination in young children. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014;143(1):255–265. doi:10.1037/a0030825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zancada-Menendez C, Sampedro-Piquero P, Lopez L, McNamara TP. Age and gender differences in spatial perspective taking. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016;28(2):289–296. doi:10.1007/s40520-015-0399-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar