830
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Peer Phubbing and Chinese College Students’ Smartphone Addiction During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Boredom Proneness and the Moderating Role of Refusal Self-Efficacy

, &
Pages 1725-1736 | Published online: 18 Oct 2021

References

  • Glass LM, Glass RJ. Social contact networks for the spread of pandemic influenza in children and teenagers. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):1–15. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-61
  • Elhai JD, Yang H, McKay D, Asmundson GJG. COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:576–582. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.080
  • King DL, Delfabbro PH, Billieux J, Potenza MN. Problematic online gaming and the COVID-19 pandemic. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(2):184–186. doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00016
  • Dubey MJ, Ghosh R, Chatterjee S, Biswas P, Chatterjee S, Dubey S. COVID-19 and addiction. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):817–823. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.008
  • Volkow ND. Collision of the COVID-19 and addiction epidemics. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(1):61–62. doi:10.7326/m20-1212
  • Montag C, Sindermann C, Becker B, Panksepp J. An affective neuroscience framework for the molecular study of internet addiction. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1906. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01906
  • Lin Y-H, Chang L-R, Lee Y-H, Tseng H-W, Kuo TB, Chen S-H. Development and validation of the smartphone addiction inventory (SPAI). PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098312
  • Elhai JD, Levine JC, Hall BJ. The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: a review of the literature and conceptual frameworks. J Anxiety Disord. 2019;62:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.11.005
  • Mok J-Y, Choi S-W, Kim D-J, et al. Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:817–828. doi:10.2147/NDT.S59293
  • Kocsis RN. Book review: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: fifth edition (DSM-5). Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013;57(12):1546–1548. doi:10.1177/0306624X13511040
  • Namwongsa S, Puntumetakul R, Neubert MS, Boucaut R. Effect of neck flexion angles on neck muscle activity among smartphone users with and without neck pain. Ergonomics. 2019;62(12):1524–1533. doi:10.1080/00140139.2019.1661525
  • Rainie L, Zickuhr K. Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Res Center. 2015;26:948–958.
  • Ugur NG, Koc T. Time for digital detox: misuse of mobile technology and phubbing. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2015;195:1022–1031. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.491
  • Chotpitayasunondh V, Douglas KM. How “phubbing” becomes the norm: the antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Comput Human Behav. 2016;63:9–18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
  • Karadağ E, Tosuntaş ŞB, Erzen E, et al. Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: a structural equation model. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(2):60–74. doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.005
  • Liu R-D, Wang J, Gu D, et al. The effect of parental phubbing on teenager’s mobile phone dependency behaviors: the mediation role of subjective norm and dependency intention. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:1059. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S224133
  • Karadağ E, Tosuntaş Ş, Erzen E, et al. The virtual world’s current addiction: phubbing. Addicta. 2016;3(2):250–269. doi:10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0013
  • Roberts JA, David ME. Put down your phone and listen to me: how boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Comput Human Behav. 2017;75:206–217. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.021
  • Roberts JA, David ME. My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Comput Human Behav. 2016;54:134–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
  • Pancani L, Gerosa T, Gui M, Riva P. “Mom, dad, look at me”: the development of the Parental Phubbing Scale. J Soc Pers Relat. 2020;2:. doi:10.1177/0265407520964866
  • Haigh A. Stop phubbing; 2015. Available from: https://bit.ly/3bBlQnM. Accessed October 12, 2021.
  • Hao L, Lv Q, Zhang X, Jiang Q, Ping L. Avatar identification mediates the relationship between peer phubbing and mobile game addiction. Soc Behav Personal. 2020;48(10):1–15. doi:10.2224/sbp.9384
  • Hirschi T. Causes of Delinquency. Transaction publishers; 2002.
  • Hazan C, Zeifman D. Sex and the Psychological Tether. Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1994.
  • Biolcati R, Mancini G, Trombini E. Proneness to boredom and risk behaviors during adolescents’ free time. Psychol Rep. 2018;121(2):303–323. doi:10.1177/0033294117724447
  • Farmer R, Sundberg ND. Boredom proneness–the development and correlates of a new scale. J Pers Assess. 1986;50(1):4–17. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2
  • De Chenne TK. Boredom as a clinical issue. Psychotherapy. 1988;25(1):71–81. doi:10.1037/h0085325
  • David ME, Roberts JA. Phubbed and alone: phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. J Assoc Cons Res. 2017;2(2):155–163. doi:10.1086/690940
  • Elhai JD, McKay D, Yang H, Minaya C, Montag C, Asmundson GJG. Health anxiety related to problematic smartphone use and gaming disorder severity during COVID-19: fear of missing out as a mediator. Human Behav Emerg Technol. 2021;3(1):137–146. doi:10.1002/hbe2.227
  • McDaniel B, Coyne S. “Technoference”: the Interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychol Popular Media Cult. 2014;5. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065.
  • Zhang Y, Li S, Yu G. The longitudinal relationship between boredom proneness and mobile phone addiction: evidence from a cross-lagged model. Curr Psychol. 2021;2. doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01333-8.
  • Elhai JD, Vasquez JK, Lustgarten SD, Levine JC, Hall BJ. Proneness to boredom mediates relationships between problematic smartphone use With depression and anxiety severity. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2017;36(6):707–720. doi:10.1177/0894439317741087
  • Zhan Z, Wei Q, Hong J-C. Cellphone addiction during the Covid-19 outbreak: how online social anxiety and cyber danger belief mediate the influence of personality. Comput Human Behav. 2021;121:106790. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106790
  • Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice-Hall; 1986.
  • Hawker CO, Merkouris SS, Youssef GJ, Dowling NA. Exploring the associations between gambling cravings, self-efficacy, and gambling episodes: an Ecological Momentary Assessment study. Addict Behav. 2021;112:106574. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106574
  • Jenzer T, Egerton GA, Read JP. Learning from drinking experiences in college: a test of reciprocal determinism with drinking refusal self-efficacy. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021;35(1):85–92. doi:10.1037/adb0000675
  • Luthar SS, Crossman EJ, Small PJ. Resilience and adversity. Handb Child Psychol Develop Sci. 2015;1–40. doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy307
  • Lin MP, Ko HC, Wu JYW. The role of positive/negative outcome expectancy and refusal self-efficacy of Internet use on Internet addiction among college students in Taiwan. CyberPsychol Behav. 2008;11(4):451–457. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0121
  • Li Y, Li G-X, Yu M-L, Liu C-L, Qu Y-T, Wu H. Association between anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use among Chinese university students: the mediating/moderating role of self-efficacy. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:164. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.581367
  • Golestan S, Abdullah HB. Self-efficacy: as moderator of the relation between family factors and adolescent cigarette smoking behavior. Asian Soc Sci. 2015;11(28):65. doi:10.5539/ass.v11n28p65
  • Jang SA, Rimal RN, Cho N. Normative influences and alcohol consumption: the role of drinking refusal self-efficacy. Health Commun. 2013;28(5):443–451. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.691455
  • Ehret PJ, Ghaidarov TM, LaBrie JW. Can you say no? Examining the relationship between drinking refusal self-efficacy and protective behavioral strategy use on alcohol outcomes. Addict Behav. 2013;38(4):1898–1904. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.022
  • Xu H, Huang Y, Hui X, Wang T, Liang X. Study on the relationship among peer phubbing, resistance efficacy and mobile phone addiction in high school students in two general high schools in Henan province. Med Soc. 2020;33(7):94–97. doi:10.13723/j.yxysh.2020.07.022
  • Xu Y, Su S-B, Lin D-H. Adolescent new media dependence behavior: the roles of parental factors and refusal self-efficacy. Psychol Develop Educ. 2012;28(4):421–427. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2012.04.012
  • Wills TA, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Murry VM, Brody GH. Family communication and religiosity related to substance use and sexual behavior in early adolescence: a test for pathways through self-control and prototype perceptions. Psychol Addict Behav. 2003;17(4):312–323. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.17.4.312
  • Gen Y. The relationship between boredom proneness, refusal self-efficacy, and new media dependence behavior of university students. China J Health Psychol. 2019;27(3):427–431. doi:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2019.03.028
  • Wang H, Zhang S, Liu X, Jiang Y, Liu Y. Leisure boredom and tobacco and alcohol use: refusal self-efficacy as a mediator and moderator. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2018;26(4):757–762. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.04.027
  • Xu Y, Su S, Lin D. Adolescent new media dependence behavior: the roles of parental factors and refusal self-efficacy. Psychol Develop Educ. 2012;28(4):421–427. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2012.04.012
  • Huang H, Niu L, Zhou C, Wu H. Reliability and validity of mobile phone addiction index for Chinese college students. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2014;22(5):835–838. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.05.062
  • Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. J Child Media. 2008;2(2):93–113. doi:10.1080/17482790802078565
  • Zhang Y, Li S, Yu G. The relationship between loneliness and mobile phone addiction: a meta-analysis. Advan Psychol Sci. 2020;28(11):1836–1852. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01836
  • Li H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Shan H, Li Y. Mediating effect of anxiety on relationship between core self- evaluation and mobile phone dependence in college students. Chin Mental Health J. 2018;32(8):700–704.
  • Li X, Xin T, Shan W, et al. Reliability and validity of the boredom proneness scale-short form in university students. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2016;24(6):1029–1033. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.06.014
  • Vodanovich SJ, Wallace JC, Kass SJ. A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the boredom proneness scale: evidence for a two-factor short form. J Pers Assess. 2005;85(3):295–303. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_05
  • Zhang Y, Li S, Yu G. The association between boredom proneness and college students’ cognitive failures: the moderating and mediating role of effortful control. Psychol Develop Educ. 2020;36(4):430–439.
  • Yu P, Fu Y, Jin W, Zhao M, Wang Z. Effect to boredom tendencies on life satisfaction: a moderated mediation model. China J Health Psychol. 2021;29(1):141–146. doi:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2021.01.026
  • Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. Guilford Press; 2011.
  • Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. Methodology in the Social Sciences. The Guilford Press; 2013.
  • Boniel-Nissim M, Sasson H. Bullying victimization and poor relationships with parents as risk factors of problematic internet use in adolescence. Comput Human Behav. 2018;88:176–183. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.041
  • Billieux J. Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model. Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2012;8:299–307. doi:10.2174/157340012803520522
  • Lepp A, Li J, Barkley JE. College students’ cell phone use and attachment to parents and peers. Comput Human Behav. 2016;64:401–408. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.021
  • Hong F, Chiu S, Huang D. A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(6):2152–2159. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020
  • Kim J-H, Seo M, David P. Alleviating depression only to become problematic mobile phone users: can face-to-face communication be the antidote? Comput Human Behav. 2015;51:440–447. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.030
  • Mercer-Lynn KB, Bar RJ, Eastwood JD. Causes of boredom: the person, the situation, or both? Pers Individ Dif. 2014;56:122–126. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.034
  • Westgate EC, Wilson TD. Boring thoughts and bored minds: the MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Psychol Rev. 2018;125(5):689–713. doi:10.1037/rev0000097
  • Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass; 2000.
  • Zuckerman M, Eysenck SB, Eysenck HJ. Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978;46(1):139–149. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139
  • Yang X-J, Liu Q-Q, Lian S-L, Zhou Z-K. Are bored minds more likely to be addicted? The relationship between boredom proneness and problematic mobile phone use. Addict Behav. 2020;108:106426. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106426
  • Chou W-J, Chang Y-P, Yen C-F. Boredom proneness and its correlation with Internet addiction and Internet activities in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(8):467–474. doi:10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.016
  • Wegmann E, Ostendorf S, Brand M. Is it beneficial to use internet-communication for escaping from boredom? Boredom proneness interacts with cue-induced craving and avoidance expectancies in explaining symptoms of internet-communication disorder. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195742
  • Rimal RN, Real K. How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: a test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communic Res. 2005;32(3):389–414. doi:10.1177/0093650205275385
  • Ling W, Yaacob S. Peer relationship satisfaction, self-efficacy, and adolescents’ suicidal ideation in Selangor, Malaysia. J Manage Res. 2015;7:286. doi:10.5296/jmr.v7i2.6958
  • Stone LB, Hankin BL, Gibb BE, Abela JRZ. Co-rumination predicts the onset of depressive disorders during adolescence. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011;120(3):752–757. doi:10.1037/a0023384
  • Rose AJ, Schwartz-Mette RA, Glick GC, Smith RL, Luebbe AM. An observational study of co-rumination in adolescent friendships. Dev Psychol. 2014;50(9):2199–2209. doi:10.1037/a0037465
  • Boren JP. Co-rumination partially mediates the relationship between social support and emotional exhaustion among graduate students. Commun Q. 2013;61(3):253–267. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.751436
  • Li D, Zhang W, Li X, Li N, Ye B. Gratitude and suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Chinese adolescents: direct, mediated, and moderated effects. J Adolesc. 2012;35(1):55–66. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.06.005
  • Wang Y, Li D, Sun W, Zhao L, Lai X, Zhou Y. Parent-child attachment and prosocial behavior among junior high school students: moderated mediation effect. Acta Psychol Sin. 2017;49(5):663. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00663
  • Wang Q, Xiao T, Liu H, Hui W. The relationship between parental rejection and Internet addiction in left-behind children: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Develop Educ. 2019;35(6):749–758. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.06.12
  • Ye B, Yang Q, Hu Z. Effect of gratitude on adolescents’academic achievement: moderated mediating effect. Psychol Develop Educ. 2013;29(2):192–199. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2013.02.009
  • Zhao J, Ye B, Ma T. Positive information of COVID-19 and anxiety: a moderated mediation model of risk perception and intolerance of uncertainty. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:715929. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.715929