A Network Analysis of the Association Between Intergroup Contact and Intergroup Relations

References

• Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;90(5):751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright SC, Aron A, Mclaughlinvolpe T, Ropp SA. The extended contact effect: knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73(1):73–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathi S, Guerra R, Di Bernardo GA, Vezzali L. Spontaneous imagined contact and intergroup relations: quality matters. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2020;50(1):124–142. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagci SC, Piyale ZE, Sen E, Yildirim O. Beyond shifting intergroup attitudes: intergroup contact’s association with socio-cognitive skills and group-based ideologies. J Theoret Soc Psychol. 2019;3(3):176–188. doi:10.1002/jts5.45
   Google Scholar
• Drury L, Hutchison P, Abrams D. Direct and extended intergenerational contact and young people’s attitudes towards older adults. Brit J Soc Psychol. 2016;55(3):522–543. doi:10.1111/bjso.12146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R, Eller A, Leeds S, Stace K. Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: a longitudinal study. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2007;37(4):692–703. doi:10.1002/ejsp.384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagefka H, Gonzalez R, Brown R, Lay S, Manzi J, Didier N. To know you is to love you: effects of intergroup contact and knowledge on intergroup anxiety and prejudice among indigenous Chileans. Int J Psychol. 2017;52(4):308–315. doi:10.1002/ijop.12229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voci A, Hewstone M. Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: the mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Process Interg. 2003;6(1):37–54. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR, Wagner U, Christ O. Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int J Intercult Rel. 2011;35(3):271–280. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási AL. The network takeover. Nat Phys. 2012;8(1):14–16. doi:10.1038/nphys2188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor P, Gil-Berrozpe GJ, Julián L, Ana ST, Cuesta MJ. The symptom and domain structure of psychotic disorders: a network analysis approach. Schizophrenia Bull Open. 2020;1(1). doi:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaa008
   Google Scholar
• Allport GW. The nature of prejudice. J Negro His. 1954;52(3):20–48.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew TF. Advancing intergroup contact theory: comments on the issue’s articles. J Soc Issues. 2021;77(1):258–273. doi:10.1111/josi.12423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridge RD, Montoya JA. Favorable contact during volunteer service: reducing prejudice toward Mexicans in the American Southwest. J Commun Appl Soc. 2013;23(6):466–480. doi:10.1002/casp.2144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawagi AL, Mak AS. Cultural inclusiveness contributing to international students’ intercultural attitudes: mediating role of intergroup contact variables. J Commun Appl Soc. 2015;25(4):340–354. doi:10.1002/casp.2218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brankovic M, Zezelj I, Turjacanin V. How knowing others makes us more inclusive: social identity inclusiveness mediates the effects of contact on out-group acceptance. J Theoret Soc Psychol. 2020;4(3):95–106. doi:10.1002/jts5.60
   Google Scholar
• Mcglothlin H, Killen M. Children’s perceptions of intergroup and intragroup similarity and the role of social experience. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2005;26(6):680–698. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2005.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang F, Shi K, Zhou M, Stathi S, Vezzali L. Can interethnic contact between majority (Han) and minority (Uyghur) people in China influence sense of Chinese national Community? The role of positive and negative direct, extended and vicarious intergroup contact. Int J Intercult Rel. 2020;77:125–139. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward LE, Tropp LR, Hornsey MJ, Barlow FK. Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2017;43(3):347–364. doi:10.1177/0146167216685291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao Y, Zhao Y, Xiao Z, Liang F, Wang W, Li B. Fusion of ”You and Me”: cultural mixing promotes intergroup psychological compatibility. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2020;51(5):353–369. doi:10.1177/0022022120924129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Huang F, Stathi S, Vezzali L. Positive and negative intergroup contact and willingness to engage in intergroup interactions among majority (Han) and minority (Uyghur) group members in China: the moderating role of social dominance orientation. Int J Intercult Rel. 2020;75:132–140. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vezzali L, Stathi S, Crisp RJ, Capozza D. Comparing direct and imagined intergroup contact among children: effects on outgroup stereotypes and helping intentions. Int J Intercult Rel. 2015;49:46–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MR, Hewstone M. Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability and out-group attitude-an integrative model. Pers Soc Psychol B. 1993;19(6):700–710. doi:10.1177/0146167293196005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberson CL, Haag SC. Contact, perspective taking, and anxiety as predictors of stereotype endorsement, explicit attitudes, and implicit attitudes. Group Process Interg. 2007;10(2):179–201. doi:10.1177/1368430207074726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausch N, Hewstone M, Roy R. The relationships between contact, status and prejudice: an integrated threat theory analysis of Hindu-Muslim relations in India. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;19(2):83–94. doi:10.1002/casp.984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez Fernández AB, Lombardero Posada X, Aguiar Fernández FX, Murcia Álvarez E, González Fernández A. Professional preference for mental illness: the role of contact, empathy, and stigma in Spanish social work undergraduates. Health Soc Care Community. 2021:1–12. doi:10.1111/hsc.13479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston BM, Glasford DE. Intergroup contact and helping: how quality contact and empathy shape outgroup helping. Group Process Interg. 2018;21(8):1185–1201. doi:10.1177/1368430217711770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom D, Cramer A. Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. In: Nolenhoeksema S, editor. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews; 2013:91–121.
   Google Scholar
• Epskamp S. Network Psychometrics [dissertation]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Robinaugh DJ, Hoekstra RHA, Toner ER, Borsboom D. The network approach to psychopathology: a review of the literature 2008–2018 and an agenda for future research. Psychol Med. 2020;50(3):353–366. doi:10.1017/S0033291719003404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus DK, Preszler J, Zeigler-Hill V. A network of dark personality traits: What lies at the heart of darkness? J Res Pers. 2018;73:56–62. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcnally RJ. Can network analysis transform psychopathology? Behav Res Ther. 2016;86(SI):95–104. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Algesheimer R, Tessone CJ. A comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks. Sci Rep. 2016;6. doi:10.1038/srep30750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman M, Girvan M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E. 2004;69(22). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker PM, Hewstone M. A developmental investigation of other-race contact and the own-race face effect. Brit J Dev Psychol. 2006;24(3):451–463. doi:10.1348/026151005X51239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Xiuling S, Hong L, Changquan L. The own - race effect of Uygur college students in face recognition: the influence of inter - group contact experience. J Psychol Sci. 2014;37(3):683–688.
   Google Scholar
• Ng YL, Kulik CT, Bordia P. The moderating role of intergroup contact in race composition, perceived similarity, and applicant attraction relationships. J Bus Psychol. 2016;31(3):415–431. doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9419-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannou M, Al Ramiah A, Hewstone M. An experimental comparison of direct and indirect intergroup contact. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018;76:393–403. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh HJ, Ozkaya E, Larose R. How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;30:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce PL, Amato PR. A taxonomy of helping – a multidimensional scale analysis. Soc Psychol Q. 1980;43(4):363–371. doi:10.2307/3033956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolini S, Wright SC, Dys-Steenbergen O, Favara I. Self-expansion and intergroup contact: expectancies and motives to self-expand lead to greater interest in outgroup contact and more positive intergroup relations. J Soc Issues. 2016;72(3SI):450–471. doi:10.1111/josi.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Pellegrini M, Wu A. Identification of bridging centrality in complex networks. IEEE Access. 2019;7:93123–93130. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epskamp S, Fried EI. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods. 2018;23(4):617–634. doi:10.1037/met0000167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PJ. Networktools: tools for identifying important nodes in networks (R Package Version 1.1.1.); 2018. Available from: https://cloud.r-project.org/. Accessed April 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jones PJMR. Bridge centrality: a network approach to understanding Bridge centrality: a network approach to understanding comorbidity. Multivariate Behav Res. 2019:1–15. doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1614898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics. 2008;9(3):432–441. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani RJ. Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1996;73(1):273–282. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Chen Z. Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika. 2008;95(3):759–771. doi:10.1093/biomet/asn034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foygel R, Drton M. Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2010;1(23):2020–2028.
   Google Scholar
• Fried EI, Eidhof MB, Palic S, et al. Replicability and generalizability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) networks: a cross-cultural multisite study of PTSD symptoms in four trauma patient samples. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6(3):335–351. doi:10.1177/2167702617745092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D. qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(4):1–18. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Lai X, Xue Y, Zhang C, Wang Y. A network analysis of problematic smartphone use symptoms in a student sample. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(4):1032–1043. doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslbeck JMB, Waldorp LJ. How well do network models predict observations? On the importance of predictability in network models. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50(2):853–861. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0910-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichardt J, Bornholdt S. Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys Rev E. 2006;74(1). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.74.016110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtge J, Theron L, van Rensburg A, Cowden RG, Govender K, Ungar M. Investigating the interrelations between systems of support in 13-to 18-year-old adolescents: a network analysis of resilience promoting systems in a high and middle-income country. Child Dev. 2021;92(2):586–599. doi:10.1111/cdev.13483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):5–13. doi:10.1002/wps.20375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Borkulo CDWL Comparing network structures on three aspects: a permutation test; 2016. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.29455.38569.
   Google Scholar
• Marinucci M, Maunder R, Sanchez K, et al. Intimate intergroup contact across the lifespan. J Soc Issues. 2021;77(1SI):64–85. doi:10.1111/josi.12399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuochi G, Voci A, Boin J, Hewstone M. Close to me: the importance of closeness versus superficiality in explaining the positive-negative contact asymmetry. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2020;50(4):766–782. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies K, Tropp LR, Aron A, Pettigrew TF, Wright SC. Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(4):332–351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong - desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human - motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(3):497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavey L, Greitemeyer T, Sparks P. Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011;37(7):905–917. doi:10.1177/0146167211405994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RM, Draper M, Lee S. Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: testing a mediator model. J Couns Psychol. 2001;48(3):310–318. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lista JA, Price MK. The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: evidence from a natural field experiment. J Econ Behav Organ. 2009;69(2):160–169. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierksma J. Costs of helping only influence children’s intention to help ethnic out-group peers. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018;173:85–99. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczensky L, Pink S. What drives ethnic homophily? A relational approach on how ethnic identification moderates preferences for same-ethnic friends. Am Sociol Rev. 2019;84(3):394–419. doi:10.1177/0003122419846849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF, Anastasio PA, Bachman BA, Rust MC. Reducing intergroup bias: the common ingroup identity model. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 1993;4(1):1–26. doi:10.1080/14792779343000004
   Google Scholar
• Guan T, Luo N, Wang L. Ethnic identity, Chinese national identity, and intergroup attitudes of adolescents from an ethnic autonomous region in China. Identity. 2021;1–15. doi:10.1080/15283488.2021.1919114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An XJ, Yang WY, Zhu S, Wang XZ. The relationship between ethnic identity and national identity of ethnic middle school students in southwest China: the chain mediating role of self-esteem and multi-cultural ideology: taking Chuxiong prefecture of Yunnan province as an example. J Res Educ Ethn Minorities. 2018;29(6):111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng SH, Han YC, Li X. Research on the status quo of Chinese national identity of high school students in ethnic minority areas. Theory Res. 2016;8:68–69.
   Google Scholar
• Paluck EL, Green SA, Green DP. The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behav Public Policy. 2018:1–30. doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.25
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Love A, Schellhaas FMH, Hewstone M. Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Process Interg. 2017;20(5):606–620. doi:10.1177/1368430217712052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firat M, Ataca B. Does perceived cultural distance mediate the relationship between intergroup contact and support for refugee rights? A preliminary investigation. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2021. doi:10.1002/casp.2536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar