The Impact of Team Knowledge Heterogeneity on Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification: A Moderated Mediation Model

References

• Yin C. The influence of entrepreneurial network on the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities–The mediating role of resource acquisition and entrepreneurial learning. (Master degree). Chongqing Technology and Business University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Xia H. Impact of entrepreneurial team heterogeneity on creative entrepreneurial performance: a double moderators model. Sci Technol Process Policy. 2018;35(13):145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Ceptureanu SI, Ceptureanu EG, Cristescu MP, Dhesi G. Analysis of social media impact on opportunity recognition. A social networks and entrepreneurial alertness mixed approach. Entropy. 2020;22(3):343. doi:10.3390/e22030343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Lee S. Identifying new business opportunities from competitor intelligence: an integrated use of patent and trademark databases. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;119:170–183. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy PJ. A 2× 2 conceptual foundation for entrepreneurial discovery theory. Entrep Theory Pract. 2011;35(2):359–374. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Lyngsie J, Zahra SA. The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strateg Manag J. 2013;34(12):1453–1471. doi:10.1002/smj.2135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong CD. Exploring the link between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: the moderating role of educational fields. Educ Train. 2021;ahead-of-print. doi:10.1108/ET-05-2021-0173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doanh DC, Bernat T. Factors related to the intention of starting a business: a study among students in Vietnam. Problemy Zarzadzania. 2019;17(6):133–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Thi Loan LT, Doanh DC, Thang HN, Viet Nga NT, Van PT, Hoa,PT. Entrepreneurial behaviour: the effects of the fear and anxiety of Covid-19 and business opportunity recognition. Entrepreneurial Bus Econ Rev. 2021;9(3):7–23. doi:10.15678/EBER.2021.090301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar M, Clauss T, Issah WB. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance in emerging markets: the mediating role of opportunity recognition. Rev Manag Sci. 2021;4:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan A, Braun R. In the eye of the beholder: how regulatory focus and self-efficacy interact in influencing opportunity recognition. J Bus Ventur. 2012;27(6):622–636. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD. From minds to markets: how human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. J Manage. 2012;38(5):1421–1449. doi:10.1177/0149206310386228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentz J, Sautet F, Storr V. Prior-knowledge and opportunity identification. Small Bus Econ. 2013;41(2):461–478. doi:10.1007/s11187-012-9437-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Q, Zhang C. An analysis of the transmission mechanism from. social network to individual entrepreneurial intentions. Manage Rev. 2017;29(04):59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Carter SM, Greer CR. Strategic leadership: values, styles, and organizational performance. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2013;20(4):375–393. doi:10.1177/1548051812471724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinckmann J, Hoegl M. Effects of initial teamwork capability and initial relational capability on the development of new technology‐based firms. Strateg Entrepreneurship J. 2011;5(1):37–57. doi:10.1002/sej.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz AC, Hmieleski KM, Bradley BH, Busenitz LW. New venture teams: a review of the literature and roadmap for future research. J Manage. 2014;40(1):226–255. doi:10.1177/0149206313493325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junping Y, Shiyun B, Peipei C, Duo X. Impact of entrepreneurial team heterogeneity on opportunity recognition: the intermediary role of social network. J Zhejiang Univ Sci. 2019;42(4):337–343.
   Google Scholar
• Mao Q. The relationship of heterogeneity, innovation atmosphere and the. innovation performance of venture teams. (Master degree). Southwestern University Of Finance And Economics; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jie L. Research on the mechanisms of knowledge heterogeneity on. creativity of knowledge teams: an interactive cognition perspective. (Doctor degree). Zhejiang University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lin N. Social networks and status attainment. Annu Rev Sociol. 1999;25(1):467–487. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins ET. Promotion and prevention as a motivational duality: implications for evaluative processes; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Zhiming WU, Xin WU, Yanru WU, Rui LI. The influence of regulatory focus of supervisors and subordinates on the performance of the subordinates. Sci Sci Manage. 2013;34(7):173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA, Nichol A. Robinson’s economics of imperfect competition. J Polit Econ. 1934;42(2):249–259. doi:10.1086/254595
   Google Scholar
• Ardichvili A, Cardozo R, Ray S. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J Bus Ventur. 2003;18(1):105–123. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xudong N. Research on the mechanism of knowledge heterogeneity to team. innovation. Enterp Soc. 2010;08:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Garrone P, Grilli L, Mrkajic B. The energy-efficient transformation of EU business enterprises: adapting policies to contextual factors. Energy Policy. 2017;109:49–58. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santillan C, Horwitz SK. Application of collaboration technology to manage diversity in global virtual teams: the thinklet-based CE approach. In: Handbook of Research on Race, Gender, and the Fight for Equality. IGI Global; 2016:240–266.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strateg Manag J. 2002;23(3):275–284. doi:10.1002/smj.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez SA, Busenitz LW. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. J Manage. 2001;27(6):755–775. doi:10.1177/014920630102700609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmann T, Stöckmann C, Meves Y, Kensbock JM. When members of entrepreneurial teams differ: linking diversity in individual-level entrepreneurial orientation to team performance. Small Bus Econ. 2017;48(4):843–859. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9818-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham J, Anderson AR. Inspired or foolhardy: sensemaking, confidence and entrepreneurs’ decision-making. Group Decis Negot. 2018;27(3):393–415. doi:10.1007/s10726-018-9563-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares-Gärtner M, Pereira PJ, Brandão E. Heterogeneous beliefs and optimal ownership in entrepreneurial financing decisions. Quant Finance. 2018;18(11):1947–1958. doi:10.1080/14697688.2018.1432882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang J. The Influence of social network and TMT on entrepreneur’s opportunity recognition capability evidence from private SMEs. Sci Technol Manage Res. 2016;36(15):173–179.
   Google Scholar
• Duong CD, Le TL. ADHD symptoms and entrepreneurial intention among Vietnamese college students: an empirical study. J Entrep Emerg Econ. 2021;ahead-of-print(ahead–of–print). doi:10.1108/JEEE-02-2021-0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagavatula S, Elfring T, Van Tilburg A, Van De Bunt GG. How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India’s handloom industry. J Bus Ventur. 2010;25(3):245–260. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baughn CC, Cao JS, Le LTM, Lim VA, Neupert KE. Normative, social and cognitive predictors of entrepreneurial interest in China, Vietnam and the Philippines. J Dev Entrep. 2006;11(01):57–77. doi:10.1142/S108494670600026X
   Google Scholar
• Filser M, Tiberius V, Kraus S, Zeitlhofer T, Kailer N, Müller A. Opportunity recognition: conversational foundations and pathways ahead. Entrep Res J. 2020. doi:10.1515/erj-2020-0124
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(2):242–266. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetto A, Klier M, Richter A, Zolitschka JF. “Thanks for sharing”—Identifying users’ roles based on knowledge contribution in enterprise social networks. Comput Netw. 2018;135:275–288. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt RS. The network structure of social capital. Res Organ Behav. 2000;22:345–423. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou N, Yang J, Dai W. A cross-level research on the impact of team heterogeneity and external social capital on employee innovative performance. Chin J Manage. 2016;13(02):212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Wu T, Wang Z. Entrepreneurial action, information acquisition and new venture performance in the internet context: evidence from the Apple application platform. Stud Sci Educ. 2016;34(02):260–267.
   Google Scholar
• Brendl CM, Higgins ET. Principles of judging valence: what makes events positive or negative? In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Elsevier; 1996:95–160.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace C, Chen G. A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self‐regulation, and performance. Pers Psychol. 2006;59(3):529–557. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs A, Besson D, Louart P, Durant R, Taylor‐Bianco A, Schermerhorn J. Self‐regulation, strategic leadership and paradox in organizational change. J Organ Chang Manag. 2006;19:457–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanaj K, Chang C-H, Johnson RE. Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(5):998. doi:10.1037/a0027723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, McMullen JS, Neubert MJ, Yi X. The influence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativity. J Bus Ventur. 2008;23(5):587–602. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Long L. Statistical remedies for common method biases. Adv Psychol Sci. 2004;12(6):942–950.
   Google Scholar
• Klein HJ, Mulvey PW. Two investigations of the relationships among group goals, goal commitment, cohesion, and performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1995;61(1):44–53. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanin D, Rosenfield R, Mahto RV, Singhal C. Barriers to entrepreneurship: opportunity recognition vs. opportunity pursuit. Rev Manag Sci. 2021;1–21. doi:10.1007/s11846-021-00477-6
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg H, Rehnfors A. Transnational entrepreneurship: opportunity identification and venture creation. J Int Entrep. 2018;16(2):150–175. doi:10.1007/s10843-018-0228-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson AR, Miller CJ. “Class matters”: human and social capital in the entrepreneurial process. J Socio Econ. 2003;32(1):17–36. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00009-X
   Google Scholar