Acting on Leader’s Emotions: How and When Emotion Recognition Ability Motivates Voice?

References

• Li C, Liang J, Farh JL. Speaking up when water is murky: an uncertainty-based model linking perceived organizational politics to employee voice. J Manage. 2020;46(3):443–469. doi:10.1177/0149206318798025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Barnes CM, Yam KC, Guarana CL, Wang L. Don’t like it when you need it the most: examining the effect of manager ego depletion on managerial voice endorsement. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(8):869–882. doi:10.1002/job.2370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wu LZ, Liu D, Kwan HK, Liu J. Insiders maintain voice: a psychological safety model of organizational politics. Asia Pac J Manag. 2014;31(3):853–874. doi:10.1007/s10490-013-9371-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Liu Y, Hua C, Lo H, Yeh Y. Too unsafe to voice? Authoritarian leadership and employee voice in Chinese organizations. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2020;58(4):527–554. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss M, Morrison EW. Speaking up and moving up: how voice can enhance employees’ social status. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(1):5–19. doi:10.1002/job.2262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcclean E, Martin SR, Emich K, Woodruff T. The social consequences of voice: an examination of voice type and gender on status and subsequent leader emergence. Acad Manag Ann. 2018;61(5):1869–1891. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt A, Barclay LJ. Comparing integral and incidental emotions: testing insights from emotions as social information theory and attribution theory. J Appl Psychol. 2017;102(5):732–752. doi:10.1037/apl0000174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Elfenbein HA, Sinha R, Bottom WP. The effects of emotional expressions in negotiation: a meta-analysis and future directions for research. Hum Perform. 2020;33(4):331–353. doi:10.1080/08959285.2020.1783667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CF, Rees L, Levesque LL, Ornstein S. Shooting from the hip: a habit perspective of voice. Acad Manage Rev. 2018;43(3):470–486. doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard Business Review. Having a leader with high EQ is the most enviable, envious and hateful; 2018. Available from: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/yWmIkpms9PnZYqWRKpYNlA. Accessed December 14, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Peralta CF, Saldanha MF, Lopes PN. Emotional expression at work: the effects of strategically expressing anger and positive emotions in the context of ongoing relationships. Hum Relat. 2020;73(11):1471–1503. doi:10.1177/0018726719871995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moin MF. The link between perceptions of leader emotion regulation and followers organizational commitment. J Manag Dev. 2018;37(2):178–187. doi:10.1108/jmd-01-2017-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CS, Law KS. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: an exploratory study. Leadersh Q. 2002;13(3):243–274. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA. How emotions regulate social life: the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18(3):184–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meindl JR. The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: a social constructionist approach. Leadersh Q. 1995;6(3):329–341. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90012-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Xin KR. Birds of a feather: leader-member demographic similarity and organizational attachment in Mexico. Leadersh Q. 1997;8(4):433–450. doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(97)90023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL. Gender, status, and leadership. J Curr Soc Issues. 2001;57(4):637–655. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00233
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D. The Attraction Paradigm. NY, USA: Ac-ademic Pres; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Richard OC, Mckay PF, Garg S, Pustovit S. The impact of supervisor-subordinate racial-ethnic and gender dissimilarity on mentoring quality and turnover intentions: do positive affectivity and communal culture matter? Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;30(22):3138–3165. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1344288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccoll-Kennedy JR, Anderson RD. Subordinate-manager gender combination and perceived leadership style influence on emotions, self-esteem and organizational commitment. J Bus Res. 2005;58(2):115–125. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00112-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin M, Newton DW, Lepine JA. A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Pers Psychol. 2017;70(1):11–71. doi:10.1111/peps.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan J, Li C, Xu Y, Wu CH. Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: a Pygmalion mechanism. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(5):650–670. doi:10.1002/job.2157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Jia R, Seufert JH, Wang X, Luo J. Ambidextrous leadership and radical innovative capability: the moderating role of leader support. Creativity Innov Manag. 2020;29(4):621–633. doi:10.1111/caim.12402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Acad Manag Ann. 2012;55(1):71–92. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Finkenauer C, Blaker NM, Heerdink MW. Prosocial norm violations fuel power affordance. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(4):937–942. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zhang Y, Liu CH. How does leader other-emotion appraisal influence employees? The multilevel dual affective mechanisms. Small Group Res. 2017;48(1):93–114. doi:10.1177/1046496416678663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TJ, Wu YJ. Innovative work behaviors, employee engagement, and surface acting: a delineation of supervisor-employee emotional contagion effects. Manag Decis. 2019;57(11):3200–3216. doi:10.1108/MD-02-2018-0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR. An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: the emotions as social information model. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2010;42:45–96. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)42002-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Wheeler-Smith SL, Kamdar D. Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(1):183–191. doi:10.1037/a0020744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzenhfer L, Brosi P, Sprrle M, Welpe IM. Leader pride and gratitude differentially impact follower trust. J Manag Psychol. 2017;32(6):445–459. doi:10.1108/jmp-08-2016-0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosing K, Frese M, Bausch A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: ambidextrous leadership. Leadersh Q. 2011;22(5):956–974. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo B, Zheng S, Ji H, Liang L. Ambidextrous leadership and TMT-member ambidextrous behavior: the role of TMT behavioral integration and TMT risk propensity. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2018;29(2):338–359. doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1194871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorinkova NM, Pearsall MJ, Sims HP. Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Acad Manag Ann. 2013;56(2):573–596. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Wang X. Transactional leadership and dynamic capabilities: the mediating effect of regulatory focus. Manag Decis. 2019;57(9):2284–2306. doi:10.1108/md-11-2017-1151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch JE, Bommer WH, Dulebohn JH, Wu D. Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. J Manage. 2018;44(2):501–529. doi:10.1177/0149206316665461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Zhang Z, Jia M. Does servant leadership affect employees’ emotional labor? A social information-processing perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2019;159(2):507–518. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3816-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluwafemi TB, Mitchelmore S, Nikolopoulos K. Leading innovation: empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs. J Bus Res. 2020;119:195–208. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng KY, Van Dyne L, Ang S. Speaking out and speaking up in multicultural settings: a two-study examination of cultural intelligence and voice behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2019;151:150–159. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capezio A, Wang L, Restubog SLD, Garcia PRJM, Lu VN. To flatter or to assert? Gendered reactions to Machiavellian leaders. J Bus Ethics. 2017;141(1):1–11. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2723-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvate PR, Galilea GW, Todescat I. The queen bee: a myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(5):533–548. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanaj K, Hollenbeck JR. Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: the role of gender and countervailing biases. Acad Manag Ann. 2015;58(5):1476–1494. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major DA, Morganson VJ, Bolen HM. Predictors of occupational and organizational commitment in information technology: exploring gender differences and similarities. J Bus Psychol. 2013;28(3):301–314. doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9282-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan CM. Relational demography within groups: past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Res Pers Hum Resour Manage. 2000;19:131–173. doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(00)19005-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Luo J. Linking emotional appraisal ability congruence of leader-followers with employee voice: the roles of perceived insider status and gender similarity. Acta Psychol Sin. 2020;52(9):1121–1131. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01121
   Google Scholar
• Graves LM, Powell GN. Sex similarity, quality of the employment interview and recruiters’ evaluation of actual applicants. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1996;69(3):243–261. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matta F, Van Dyne L. Understanding the disparate behavioral consequences of LMX differentiation: the role of social comparison emotions. Acad Manage Rev. 2020;45(1):154–180. doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gils S, Van Quaquebeke N, Borkowski J, Van Knippenberg D. Respectful leadership: reducing performance challenges posed by leader role incongruence and gender dissimilarity. Hum Relat. 2018;71(12):1590–1610. doi:10.1177/0018726718754992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian J, Yang F, Wang B, Huang C, Song B. When workplace ostracism leads to burnout: the roles of job self-determination and future time orientation. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;30(17):2465–2481. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1326395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris ER. The risks and rewards of speaking up: managerial responses to employee voice. Acad Manag Ann. 2012;55(4):851–875. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar