How and When Telework Improves Job Performance During COVID-19? Job Crafting as Mediator and Performance Goal Orientation as Moderator

References

• Golden TD, Veiga JF, Dino RN. The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(6):1412–1421. doi:10.1037/a0012722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Cheng Y, Ye L, Zhou MY, Wang MW, Chen J. Is home isolation appropriate for preventing the spread of COVID-19? Public Health. 2020;183:4–5. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney CE, Elias SM. Flex-time as a moderator of the job stress-work motivation relationship. Pers Rev. 2010;39(4):487–502. doi:10.1108/00483481011045434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(6):1524–1541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden TD, Veiga JF. The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. Leadersh Q. 2008;19(1):77–88. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekonnen T. Examining the Effect of Teleworking on Employees’ Job Performance. Minneapolis, MN: Walden University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Harrison DA, Delaney-Klinger K. Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting’s effects on performance via ideals and job resources. Pers Psychol. 2014;68(2):353–393. doi:10.1111/peps.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelliher C, Anderson D. For better or for worse? An analysis of how flexible working practices influence employees’ perceptions of job quality. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2008;19(3):419–431. doi:10.1080/09585190801895502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen BAC, van Triest SP, Coers M, Wtenweerde N. Managing flexible work arrangements: teleworking and output controls. Eur Manag J. 2018;36(6):727–735. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2018.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNall LA, Masuda AD, Nicklin JM. Flexible work arrangements, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: the mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. J Psychol. 2009;144(1):61–81. doi:10.1080/00223980903356073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines S. New technologies and old ways of working in the home of the self-employed teleworker. New Technol Work Employ. 2002;17(2):89–101. doi:10.1111/1468-005x.00096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskin L, Devos V. Paradoxes from the Individualization of Human Resource Management: the Case of Telework. J Bus Ethics. 2005;62(1):13–24. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-8710-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Park TY, Mehng SA. Flexible work practices: a source of career premiums or penalties? Acad Manage J. 2012;55(6):1407–1428. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Shin B, Higa K. Telework vs. central work: a comparative view of knowledge accessibility. Decis Support Syst. 2007;43(3):687–700. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl Psychol. 2001;50(3):337–421. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE. Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26(2):179–201. doi:10.2307/259118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli P, Keller J. Classifying work in the new economy. Acad Manage Rev. 2013;38(4):575–596. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psych. 2018;5:103–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Thrash TM. Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(5):804–818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Zhou J. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Acad Manage J. 2009;52(2):280–293. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.37308035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JRB, Neveu JP, Paustian-Underdahl SC, Westman M. Getting to the “COR.”. J Manag. 2014;40(5):1334–1364. doi:10.1177/0149206314527130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psych. 2018;5:103. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):513–524. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong SH, Huang Y, Chang CH. Supporting interdependent telework employees: a moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(12):1408–1422. doi:10.1037/apl0000843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan X, Frenkel SJ. Explaining supervisor–subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens. Hum Relat. 2019;72(11):1752–1775. doi:10.1177/0018726718813718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink J, Bos-Nehles A, de Leede J. How employees’ pro-activity translates high-commitment HRM systems into work engagement: the mediating role of job crafting. Hum Resour Manage. 2020;31(22):2893–2918. doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1475402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Lamond D, Standen P. Teleworking: frameworks for organizational research. J Manage Stud. 2001;38(8):1151–1185. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega G. Managing Teleworkers and Telecommuting Strategies. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ito JK, Brotheridge CM. Resources, coping strategies, and emotional exhaustion: a conservation of resources perspective. J Vocat Behav. 2003;63(3):490–509. doi:10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00033-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner KL, Roloff ME. Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: when less contact is beneficial. J Appl Commun Res. 2010;38(4):336–361. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D. Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy – performance relationship. J Manage Psychol. 2014;29(5):490–507. doi:10.1108/jmp-05-2012-0148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Tims M, Derks D. Proactive personality and job performance: the role of job crafting and work engagement. Hum Relat. 2012;65(10):1359–1378. doi:10.1177/0018726712453471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong QH, Napier NK. Acculturation and global mindsponge: an emerging market perspective. Int J Intercult Rel. 2015;49:354–367. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Huang JC, Farh JL. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad Manage J. 2009;52(4):765–778. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Potočnik K, Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J Manage. 2014;40(5):1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonneke D, Evangelia D, Sonja R. The value of job crafting for work engagement, task performance, and career satisfaction: longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2019;28(3):300–314. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2019.1576632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh V, Singh M. A burnout model of job crafting: multiple mediator effects on job performance. IIMB Manag Rev. 2018;30(4):305–315. doi:10.1016/j.iimb.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tims M, Derks D, Bakker AB. Job crafting and its relationships with person–job fit and meaningfulness: a three-wave study. J Vocat Behav. 2016;92:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu TT. Linking authentic leadership to salespeople’s service performance: the roles of job crafting and human resource flexibility. Ind Mark Manage. 2020;84:89–104. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rofcanin Y, Berber A, Koch S, Sevinc L. Job crafting and I-deals: a study testing the nomological network of proactive behaviors. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2015;27(22):2695–2726. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1091370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Halbesleben JRB. Productive and counterproductive job crafting: a daily diary study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20(4):457–469. doi:10.1037/a0039002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabiu A, Pangil F, Othman SZ. Does training, job autonomy and career planning predict employees’ adaptive performance? Glob Bus Rev. 2020;21(3):713–724. doi:10.1177/0972150918779159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling NA, Khazon S, Meyer RD, Burrus CJ. Situational strength as a moderator of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analytic examination. J Bus Psychol. 2015;30(1):89–104. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9340-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Naz S, Khan MAS, Kusi B, Murad M. An empirical investigation on the relationship between a high-performance work system and employee performance: measuring a mediation model through partial least squares–structural equation modeling. Psychol Res Behav Ma. 2019;12:397–416. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S195533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier NK, Vuong QH. Serendipity as a Strategic Advantage? Strategic Manage. 2013;1:175–199.
   Google Scholar
• Porath CL, Bateman TS. Self-regulation: from goal orientation to job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(1):185–192. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti R, Barnes BR, Berthon P, Pitt L, Monkhouse LL. Goal orientation effects on behavior and performance: evidence from international sales agents in the Middle East. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2014;25(2):317–340. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.826915
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J. Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: interactive effects on creative performance. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(2):261–276. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Chen C, Sacramento CA. How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(3):624–641. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.61968124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong QH, Napier NK. Making creativity: the value of multiple filters in the innovation process. Int J Transit Inno Syst. 2014;3(4):294–327. doi:10.1504/ijtis.2014.068306
   Google Scholar
• Solís M. Moderators of telework effects on the work-family conflict and on worker performance. Eur J Manag Bus Econ. 2017;26(1):21–34. doi:10.1108/ejmbe-07-2017-002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittersø J, Akselsen S, Evjemo B, Julsrud TE, Yttri B, Bergvik SJ. Impacts of home-based telework on quality of life for employees and their partners. quantitative and qualitative results from a European survey. J Happiness Stud. 2003;4(2):201–233. doi:10.1023/a:1024490621548
   Google Scholar
• Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D. Development and validation of the job crafting scale. J Vocat Behav. 2012;80(1):173–186. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Cummings LL. A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(3):390–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZX, Tsui AS, Farh JL. Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: relationships to employee performance in China. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(3):339–356. doi:10.1348/096317902320369749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Jin H, Chen T. Linking proactive personality to creative performance: the role of job crafting and high-involvement work systems. J Creat Behav. 2020;54(1):196–210. doi:10.1002/jocb.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viet PQ, Tuan TA. The Impact of Proactive Personality on Job Performance through Job Crafting: the Case of Vietcombank in Ho Chi Minh City. Bus Econ Res. 2018;8(3):149–163. doi:10.5296/ber.v8i3.13513
   Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Crant JM, Kraimer ML. Proactive personality and career success. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(3):416–427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman TS, Crant JM. The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates. J Organ Behav. 1993;14(2):103–118. doi:10.1002/job.4030140202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Useche SA, Alonso F, Cendales B, Llamazares J. More than just “stressful”? Testing the mediating role of fatigue on the relationship between job stress and occupational crashes of long-haul truck drivers. Psychol Res Behav Ma. 2021;14:1211–1221. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S305687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen DJQ, Lim VKG. Strength in adversity: the influence of psychological capital on job search. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(6):811–839. doi:10.1002/job.1814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Rai A. The moderating effects of supplier portfolio characteristics on the competitive performance impacts of supplier-facing process capabilities. J Oper Manag. 2012;30(1–2):85–98. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng JC, Chen CY, Teng HY, Yen CH. Tour leaders’ job crafting and job outcomes: the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Tour Manag Perspect. 2016;20:19–29. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici E, Boon C, Den Hartog DN. The moderating role of HR practices on the career adaptability–job crafting relationship: a study among employee–manager dyads. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2021;32(6):1339–1367. doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1522656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan W, Liu L, Wang X. How user-driven innovation and employee intrapreneurship promote platform enterprise performance. Manage Decis. 2020;58(12):2705–2723. doi:10.1108/MD-06-2019-0701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan W, Liu L. Intrapreneurship in the digital era: driven by big data and human resource management? Chin Manag Stud. 2021;15(4):843–875. doi:10.1108/CMS-07-2020-0282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar