Innovation Onset: A Moderated Mediation Model of High-Involvement Work Practices and Employees' Innovative Work Behavior

References

• Zhiqiang M, Khan HS, Chughtai MS, Mingxing L. Re-engineering the human resource strategies amid and post-pandemic crisis: probing into the moderated mediation model of the high-performance work practices and employee’s outcomes. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram T, Lei S, Haider MJ. The impact of relational leadership on employee innovative work behavior in IT industry of China. Arab Econ and Bus J. 2016;11(2):153–161. doi:10.1016/j.aebj.2016.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Lányi B. The influence of personality traits of start-up entrepreneurs on the innovative market presence in the medical biotechnology and health care industry. Paper presented at: Marketing From Information to Decision; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Xu S, Zhang B. Thriving at work: how a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. J Appl Behav Sci. 2020;56(3):347–366. doi:10.1177/0021886319888267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knezović E, Drkić A. Innovative work behavior in SMEs: the role of transformational leadership. Empl Relat. 2020;43:398–415. doi:10.1108/ER-03-2020-0124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsar B, Al-Ghazali BM, Cheema S, Javed F. Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. Eur J Innov Manag. 2020. doi:10.1108/EJIM-01-2020-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cangialosi N, Odoardi C, Battistelli A. Learning climate and innovative work behavior, the mediating role of the learning potential of the workplace. Vocat Learn. 2020;13:263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odoardi C, Montani F, Boudrias J-S, Battistelli A. Linking managerial practices and leadership style to innovative work behavior. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2015;36(5):545–569. doi:10.1108/LODJ-10-2013-0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman A, Neesham C, Manville G, Tse HH. Examining the influence of servant and entrepreneurial leadership on the work outcomes of employees in social enterprises. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2018;29(20):2905–2926. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1359792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilha CK, Gomes G. Innovation culture and performance in innovation of products and processes: a study in companies of textile industry. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação. 2016;13(4):285–294. doi:10.1016/j.rai.2016.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Lukes M, Stephan U. Measuring employee innovation: a review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res. 2017;23(1):136–158. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhanHS, Zhiqiang M, Siddiqui SH, Khan MAS. Be aware not reactive: testing a mediated-moderation model of dark triad and perceived victimization via self-regulatory approach. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2141. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan HS, Zhiqiang M, Musah -A-AI, Udimal TB. Impact of perceived organisational politics on job attitudes in health sector of Pakistan: the moderating role of Islamic work ethic. Middle East J Manag. 2019;6(6):767–791. doi:10.1504/MEJM.2019.102842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West MA, Farr JL. Innovation at work. In: West MA, Farr JL, editors. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psycological and Organizational Strategies. New York: John Wiley; 1990:3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Scott SG, Bruce RA. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag Ann. 1994;37(3):580–607.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res Organ Behav. 1988;10(1):123–167.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Gao M, Panaccio A. A self‐determination approach to understanding individual values as an interaction condition on employees’ innovative work behavior in the high‐tech industry. J Creat Behav. 2021;55(1):183–198. doi:10.1002/jocb.444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsar B, Masood M, Umrani WA. The role of job crafting and knowledge sharing on the effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Pers Rev. 2019;48(5):1186–1208. doi:10.1108/PR-04-2018-0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide AE, Saether EA, Aspelund A. An investigation of leaders’ motivation, intellectual leadership, and sustainability strategy in relation to Norwegian manufacturers’ performance. J Clean Prod. 2020;254:120053. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riana IG, Suparna G, Suwandana IGM, Kot S, Rajiani I. Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance. Probl Perspect Manag. 2020;18(1):107. doi:10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JM, Patel PC, Messersmith JG. High-performance work systems and job control: consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. J Manage. 2013;39(6):1699–1724. doi:10.1177/0149206311419663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alikaj A, Ning W, Wu B. Proactive personality and creative behavior: examining the role of thriving at work and high-involvement HR practices. J Bus Psychol. 2020;36:857–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Wang J. The influence of high-involvement human resources practices on proactive behavior. Paper presented at: E3S Web of Conferences; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler E. Far from the fad in-crowd: research on employee involvement and total quality management. People Manag. 1996;2(21):38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Veiga JF. Putting people first for organizational success. Acad Manag Exec. 1999;13(2):37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson MG, West MA, Wall TD. Integrated manufacturing, empowerment, and company performance. J Organ Behav. 2004;25(5):641–665. doi:10.1002/job.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Z, Gu Q, Cooke FL. The effects of high‐involvement work systems and shared leadership on team creativity: a multilevel investigation. Hum Resour Manage. 2020;59(2):201–213. doi:10.1002/hrm.21988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall P, Hutchison A, Wassenaar B. How do high-involvement work processes influence employee outcomes? An examination of the mediating roles of skill utilisation and intrinsic motivation. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2015;26(13):1737–1752. doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.962070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto IM, Pérez-Santana MP. Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices. Pers Rev. 2014;43(2):184–208. doi:10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamunomiebi A, Barasin E. Organizational trustworthiness and employee innovative work behaviour. Glob J Manag Bus Res. 2020;20(3):16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum E, Bailey T, Berg P, Kalleberg AL, Bailey TA. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca: NY Cornell University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards P, Wright M. High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: the strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships. Int J Human Res Manag. 2001;12(4):568–585. doi:10.1080/713769651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler EE. High-Involvement Management. 1st ed. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan CM, Vandenberg RJ, Richardson HA. Employee involvement climate and organizational effectiveness. Hum Resour Manage. 2005;44(4):471–488. doi:10.1002/hrm.20085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae J, Lawler JJ. Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Acad Manage J. 2000;43(3):502–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Jeong I, Bae J. Do high-involvement HRM practices matter for worker creativity? A cross-level approach. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2018;29(2):260–285. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1137612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledow R, Frese M. A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship to performance. Pers Psychol. 2009;62(2):229–258. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese M, Kring W, Soose A, Zempel J. Personal initiative at work: differences between East and West Germany. Acad Manag Ann. 1996;39(1):37–63.
   Google Scholar
• Frese M, Fay D. Personal initiative: an active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Res Organ Behav. 2001;23:133–187. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallén F, Domínguez-Escrig E, Lapiedra R, Chiva R. Does leader humility matter? Effects on altruism and innovation. Manag Decis. 2019;58(5):967–981. doi:10.1108/MD-11-2018-1180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou F, Wu YJ. How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2018;39(3):375–387. doi:10.1108/LODJ-07-2017-0181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens BP, Johnson MD, Mitchell TR. Expressed humility in organizations: implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organ Sci. 2013;24(5):1517–1538. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens BP, Hekman DR. Modeling how to grow: an inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Acad Manag Ann. 2012;55(4):787–818. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalina P. “Humble, hungry and smart?” A cautionary tale for inclusive healthcare leaders. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2020;35(5):1267–1269. doi:10.1002/hpm.2990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqshbandi MM, Tabche I. The interplay of leadership, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning culture in open innovation: testing a moderated mediation model. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;133:156–167. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese M, Garst H, Fay D. Making things happen: reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(4):1084–1102. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraub EM, Michel A, Shemla M, Sonntag K. The roles of leader emotion management and team conflict for team members’ personal initiative: a multilevel perspective. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2014;23(2):263–276. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.728700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohly S, Sonnentag S, Pluntke F. Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(3):257–279. doi:10.1002/job.376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(3):518–528. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisbona A, Las-Hayas A, Palací FJ, Bernabé M, Morales FJ, Haslam A. Team efficiency in organizations: a group perspective on initiative. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):1926. doi:10.3390/ijerph17061926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;45(2):357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. Calif Manage Rev. 1997;40(1):39–58. doi:10.2307/41165921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R. Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Acad Manag Ann. 1999;42(6):630–640.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Schatzel EA, Moneta GB, Kramer SJ. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: perceived leader support. Leadersh Q. 2004;15(1):5–32. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag Ann. 1996;39:5.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall P, Huo M-L, Macky K, Winterton J. High-involvement work processes and systems: a review of theory, distribution, outcomes, and tensions. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag. 2019;37:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kee DMH, Rubel MRB. Technology adaptation is on its way: the role of high involvement work practice. Int J Bus Innov Res. 2021;25(1):35–50. doi:10.1504/IJBIR.2021.115011
   Google Scholar
• Boxall P, Huo ML. Fostering the high‐involvement model of human resource management: what have we learnt and what challenges do we face? Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2021. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Allen MMC, Raziq MM, Ur Rehman W. Converging HRM practices? A comparison of high performance work system practices in MNC subsidiaries and domestic firms in Pakistan. Empl Relat. 2019;41(5):931–948. doi:10.1108/ER-01-2018-0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasir M, Majid A. High-involvement HRM practices and innovative work behavior among production-line workers: mediating role of employee’s functional flexibility. Empl Relat. 2020;42(4):883–902. doi:10.1108/ER-02-2018-0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrukh M, Ansari NY, Raza A, Meng F, Wang H. High-performance work practices do much, but HERO does more: an empirical investigation of employees’ innovative behavior from the hospitality industry. Eur J Innov Manag. 2021. doi:10.1108/EJIM-11-2020-0448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Pillemer J. Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. J Creat Behav. 2012;46(1):3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Liao H, Raub S, Han JH. What it takes to get proactive: an integrative multilevel model of the antecedents of personal initiative. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(5):687–701. doi:10.1037/apl0000064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie JP. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: evidence from New Zealand. Acad Manag J. 2001;44(1):180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins CJ, Smith KG. Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Acad Manage J. 2006;49(3):544–560. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.21794671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn R, Rosen B. Total quality and human resources management: lessons learned from Baldrige Award-winning companies. Acad Manag Perspect. 1993;7(3):49–66. doi:10.5465/ame.1993.9411302347
   Google Scholar
• Bou JC, Beltrán I. Total quality management, high-commitment human resource strategy and firm performance: an empirical study. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2005;16(1):71–86. doi:10.1080/1478336042000309875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler EE. From job‐based to competency‐based organizations. J Organ Behav. 1994;15(1):3–15. doi:10.1002/job.4030150103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L-Y, Aryee S, Law KS. High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Acad Manag Ann. 2007;50(3):558–577. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525821
   Google Scholar
• Paré G, Tremblay M. The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals’ turnover intentions. Group Organ Manag. 2007;32(3):326–357. doi:10.1177/1059601106286875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Bustelo D, Avella L. The effectiveness of high-involvement work practices in manufacturing firms: does context matter? J Manag Organ. 2019;25(2):303–330. doi:10.1017/jmo.2016.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai C-T, Tseng WW. A research agenda of transformational leadership and innovative behavior for the hospitality industry: an integrated multilevel model. Paper presented at: In Annual International Council on Hotels Restaurants and Institutional Education Conference; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM. Affect and creativity at work. Adm Sci Q. 2005;50(3):367–403. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong J, Den Hartog D. Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity Innov Manag. 2010;19(1):23–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Woodman RW. Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations. Acad Manag Ann. 2010;53:323–342. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasinghe V, Gamage A. High‐involvement work practices, quality results, and the role of HR function. TQM J. 2011;23(5):516–530. doi:10.1108/17542731111157626
   Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Bartol KM, Zhang ZX, Li C. Enhancing employee creativity via individual skill development and team knowledge sharing: influences of dual‐focused transformational leadership. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(3):439–458. doi:10.1002/job.2134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Esch E, Wei LQ, Chiang FF. High-performance human resource practices and firm performance: the mediating role of employees’ competencies and the moderating role of climate for creativity. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2018;29(10):1683–1708. doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1206031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshan G, Kashif M, Khanum F, Khuhro MA, Akram U. High involvement work practices often lead to burnout, but thanks to humble leadership. J Manag Dev. 2021;40(6):503–525. doi:10.1108/JMD-10-2020-0311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilroy S, Bosak J, Flood PC, Peccei R. Time to recover: the moderating role of psychological detachment in the link between perceptions of high-involvement work practices and burnout. J Bus Res. 2020;108:52–61. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Yu H, Qu Q. High involvement work systems and organizational performance: the role of knowledge combination capability and interaction orientation. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2021;32(7):1566–1590. doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1539863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färber AS, Nazneen Islam R. Information and communication technology professionals’ perceptions of high-involvement work practices and their work engagement-an investigation of the roles of work-life balance and psychological job demands. Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Maden C. Linking high involvement human resource practices to employee proactivity. Pers Rev. 2015;44(5):720–738. doi:10.1108/PR-01-2014-0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macky K, Boxall P. High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: a study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2008;46(1):38–55. doi:10.1177/1038411107086542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmendia A, Elorza U, Aritzeta A, Madinabeitia‐Olabarria D. High‐involvement HRM, job satisfaction and productivity: a two wave longitudinal study of a Spanish retail company. Hum Resour Manag J. 2021;31(1):341–357. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner T, Cross C. Do high-involvement work practices affect employee earnings in union and non-union settings in the Irish private sector? Pers Rev. 2018;47(2):425–440. doi:10.1108/PR-10-2016-0269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Jin H, Chen T. Linking proactive personality to creative performance: the role of job crafting and high‐involvement work systems. J Creat Behav. 2020;54(1):196–210. doi:10.1002/jocb.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay M. How, why, and when high-involvement work systems are related to OCB: a multilevel examination of the mediating role of POS and of the moderating role of organizational structures. Group Organ Manag. 2019;44(3):611–651. doi:10.1177/1059601117736684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhang Z, Chun D. How does mobile workplace stress affect employee innovative behavior? The role of work–family conflict and employee engagement. Behav Sci. 2022;12(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Vranjes I, Notelaers G, Salin D. Putting workplace bullying in context: the role of high-involvement work practices in the relationship between job demands, job resources, and bullying exposure. J Occup Health Psychol. 2021. doi:10.1037/ocp0000315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilroy S, Bosak J, Chênevert D, Flood PC, Hill K. Reducing burnout among nurses: the role of high-involvement work practices and colleague support. Health Care Manage Rev. 2021. doi:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilroy S, Flood PC, Bosak J, Chênevert D. Perceptions of high‐involvement work practices and burnout: the mediating role of job demands. Hum Resour Manag J. 2016;26(4):408–424. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilroy S, Flood PC, Bosak J, Chênevert D. Perceptions of high‐involvement work practices, person‐organization fit, and burnout: a time‐lagged study of health care employees. Hum Resour Manage. 2017;56(5):821–835. doi:10.1002/hrm.21803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor SR, Khalil Ur Rahman M. The effect of high involvement work system on employee counterproductive work behavior: a mediating role of psychological capital. NICE Res J. 2021:86–106. doi:10.51239/nrjss.v14i1.259
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang M, Van Jaarsveld DD, Lee GK, Ma DG. From employee-experienced high-involvement work system to innovation: an emergence-based human resource management framework. Acad Manag Ann. 2018;61(5):2000–2019. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.1101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Singh S. Leadership and creative performance behaviors in R&D laboratories: examining the mediating role of justice perceptions. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2015;22(1):21–36. doi:10.1177/1548051813517002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell C, Ichiho R, Anderson V. Understanding level 5 leaders: the ethical perspectives of leadership humility. J Manag Dev. 2017;36(5):724–732. doi:10.1108/JMD-09-2016-0184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou AY, Tsui AS, Kinicki AJ, Waldman DA, Xiao Z, Song LJ. Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Adm Sci Q. 2014;59(1):34–72. doi:10.1177/0001839213520131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin X, Chen C, Yam KC, Huang M, Ju D. The double-edged sword of leader humility: investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(7):693–714. doi:10.1037/apl0000456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata CP, Hayes-Jones LC. The consequences of humility for leaders: a double-edged sword. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2019;152:47–63. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abele AE, Cuddy AJ, Judd CM, Yzerbyt VY. Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment. Vol. 38. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2008:1063–1065.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Liu W, Jia L. How humble leadership influences the innovation of technology standards: a moderated mediation model. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5448. doi:10.3390/su11195448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeung C-W, Yoon HJ. Leader humility and psychological empowerment: investigating contingencies. J Manag Psychol. 2016;31(7):1122–1136. doi:10.1108/JMP-07-2015-0270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Liu B, Zhang L, Qian S. Can leader “humility” spark employee “proactivity”? The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2018;39(3):326–339. doi:10.1108/LODJ-10-2017-0307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Song P. Multi-level effects of humble leadership on employees’ work well-being: the roles of psychological safety and error management climate. Front Psychol. 2020;11:3150. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Zhang S, Shen Y. Humble leadership and employee resilience: exploring the mediating mechanism of work-related promotion focus and perceived insider identity. Front Psychol. 2019;10:673. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Feng J, Liu X, Yao J. Leader humility, team job crafting and team creativity: the moderating role of leader–leader exchange. Hum Resour Manag J. 2021;31(1):326–340. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Owens BP, Li JJ, Shi L. Exploring the affective impact, boundary conditions, and antecedents of leader humility. J Appl Psychol. 2018;103(9):1019–1038. doi:10.1037/apl0000314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Luo W, Zhang J, Guo Y. More humility, less counterproductive work behaviors? The role of interpersonal justice and trust. Front Bus Res China. 2019;13(1):1–18. doi:10.1186/s11782-019-0069-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet O, Lapalme M-È, Simard G, Tremblay M. High involvement management practices as leadership enhancers. Int J Manpow. 2015;36(7):1058–1071. doi:10.1108/IJM-10-2013-0243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu C-Y, Balkundi P, Owens BP, Tesluk PE. Shaping positive and negative ties to improve team effectiveness: the roles of leader humility and team helping norms. Hum Relat. 2020:0018726720968135. doi:10.1177/0018726720968135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binnewies C, Gromer M. Creativity and innovation at work: the role of work characteristics and personal initiative. Psicothema. 2012;24(1):100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali M, Zhang L, Zhang Z, et al. Can leaders’ humility enhance project management effectiveness? Interactive effect of top management support. Sustainability. 2021;13(17):9526. doi:10.3390/su13179526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu C-YC, Owens BP, Tesluk PE. Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: the role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(12):1705–1720. doi:10.1037/apl0000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma C, Ganegoda DB, Chen ZX, Jiang X, Dong C. Effects of perceived overqualification on career distress and career planning: mediating role of career identity and moderating role of leader humility. Hum Resour Manage. 2020;59(6):521–536. doi:10.1002/hrm.22009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan HS, Zhiqiang M, Musah AAI, Antwi HA, Sarpong PB. Pompous narcissism predicts ethical behaviours at workplace: the moderating role of emotional intelligence. Am J Multidiscip Res. 2017;5(2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rooks G, Sserwanga A, Frese M. Unpacking the personal initiative–performance relationship: a multi‐group analysis of innovation by Ugandan rural and urban entrepreneurs. Appl Psychol. 2016;65(1):99–131. doi:10.1111/apps.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Zhao Y. The effect of job autonomy on psychological well-being: the mediating role of personal initiative. Open J Soc Sci. 2018;6(11):234–248. doi:10.4236/jss.2018.611017
   Google Scholar
• Kagan I, Hendel T, Savitsky B. Personal initiative and work environment as predictors of job satisfaction among nurses: cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00615-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JP, Whitman DS, Viswesvaran C. Employee proactivity in organizations: a comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;83(2):275–300. doi:10.1348/096317910X502359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng TW, Eby LT, Sorensen KL, Feldman DC. Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta‐analysis. Pers Psychol. 2005;58(2):367–408. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigt-Rohrbeck J, Linneberg MS. Democratizing innovation processes: personal initiative in bottom-up eco-innovation. Eur J Innov Manag. 2019;22(5):821–844. doi:10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacher H, Schmitt A, Jimmieson NL, Rudolph CW. Dynamic effects of personal initiative on engagement and exhaustion: the role of mood, autonomy, and support. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(1):38–58. doi:10.1002/job.2277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappalà S, Toscano F, Polevaya MV, Kamneva EV. Personal initiative, passive‐avoidant leadership and support for innovation as antecedents of nurses’ idea generation and idea implementation. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021;53(1):96–105. doi:10.1111/jnu.12615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nsereko I, Balunywa WJ, Ntamu DN, Munene J, Babirye H. Personal initiative, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and social entrepreneurial venture creation. Small Enterprise Res. 2021;28(3):329–349. doi:10.1080/13215906.2021.1946131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensmann M, Frese M. Who stays proactive after entrepreneurship training? N eed for cognition, personal initiative maintenance, and well‐being. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(1):20–37. doi:10.1002/job.2333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisbona A, Palaci F, Salanova M, Frese M. The effects of work engagement and self-efficacy on personal initiative and performance. Psicothema. 2018;30(1):89–96. doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemzadeh Alishahi A. Mediating role of perceived control in the impact of personal qualities on job stress among hospital staff. Int J Hosp Res. 2014;3(1):37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mykolenko O, Ippolitova I, Doroshenko H, Strapchuk S. The impact of entrepreneurship education and cultural context on entrepreneurial intentions of Ukrainian students: the mediating role of attitudes and perceived control. High Educ Ski Work-Based Learn. 2021. doi:10.1108/HESWBL-08-2020-0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Delaney-Klinger K, Hemingway MA. The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(2):399–406. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan HS, Ma Z, Chughtai MS, Li M. Investigation of cascading effects of perceiving a calling on occupational burnout: a mediated moderation model. Curr Psychol. 2021:1–11. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02431-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim M, Baig SA, Amjad F, Nazam M, Akram MU. Impact of supply chain management practices on organizational performance and moderating role of innovation culture: a case of Pakistan textile industry. Paper presented at: International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ali A, Khan M, Ishaq A, et al. Pakistan textiles can bounce back vigorously. Int Rev Manag Mark. 2020;10(2):30–40. doi:10.32479/irmm.9377
   Google Scholar
• Memon JA, Aziz A, Qayyum M. The rise and fall of Pakistan’s textile industry: an analytical view. Eur J Bus Manag. 2020;12(12):136–142.
   Google Scholar
• Safeer AA, He Y, Abrar M, Ullah A. Diagnostics of the challenges and potential solutions to improve export competitiveness in international markets: the case of Pakistani readymade garments industry. J Competitive. 2019;11(3):128–143. doi:10.7441/joc.2019.03.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjum A, Sabir HM, Hussain MS, Hussain MS. Effort-enhancing HR practices and innovative work behavior: role of employee empowerment. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2016;6(10):2222–6990. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i10/2362
   Google Scholar
• Brasil M, Abreu M, Silva J, Leocádio AL. Relationship between eco-innovations and the impact on business performance: an empirical survey research on the Brazilian textile industry. Revista de Administração. 2016;51:276–287. doi:10.1016/j.rausp.2016.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Zia-Ur-Rehman M, Baig SA, Abrar M, et al. The impact of intellectual capital, organizational capabilities and innovation on firm performance of textile sector: a moderating effect of GSP plus. Ind Textila. 2019;70(6):572–578. doi:10.35530/IT.070.06.1632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafi M, Yang Y, Khan Z, Vertical YA. Co-operation in creative micro-enterprises: a case study of textile crafts of Matiari district, Pakistan. Sustainability. 2019;11(3):920–936. doi:10.3390/su11030920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman D. A single factor test of common method variance. J Psychol. 1967;35(1967):359–378.
   Google Scholar
• Robitschek C. Personal growth initiative: the construct and its measure. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 1998;30(4):183–198. doi:10.1080/07481756.1998.12068941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Wu G, Xie H. Impacts of leadership on project-based organizational innovation performance: the mediator of knowledge sharing and moderator of social capital. Sustainability. 2017;9(10):1–22. doi:10.3390/su9101893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin Barry J, Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ramayah T, Lee JWC, In JBC. Network collaboration and performance in the tourism sector. Serv Bus. 2011;5(4):411–428. doi:10.1007/s11628-011-0120-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Statistical learning. In: An Introduction to Statistical Learning. New York: Springer; 2013:15–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Market Theor Pract. 2011;19(2):139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci. 1988;16(1):74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Perry Hinton D, Hinton PR, McMurray I, Brownlow C. SPSS Explained. Routledge; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grégoire Y, Fisher RJ. The effects of relationship quality on customer retaliation. Mark Lett. 2006;17(1):31–46. doi:10.1007/s11002-006-3796-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: basic concepts and recent issues. In: Okzaki S, editor. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields. Berlin: Springer; 2012:256–272.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Burns RP, Burns R. Business Research Methods and Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage Publications; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Joanna Samul W. Spiritual dimensions in leadership: a comparative analysis of Polish and Bhutanese managers. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:847–856. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S311456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang N, Qiu S, Yang S, Deng R. Ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: mediation of trust and psychological well-being. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:655–664. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S311856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang F, Cao L. Linking employee resilience with organizational resilience: the roles of coping mechanism and managerial resilience. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1063–1075. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S318632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer; 2010:655–690.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas W, Wu W. Organizational justice, leader humility, and service employees’ innovative behavior in a collectivistic culture: the case of Pakistan. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios. 2021;23(1):153–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens BP, Hekman DR. How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Acad Manag Ann. 2016;59(3):1088–1111. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra TRI, Harmen H, Suryani AI, Fadilah I. The effect of work engagement and self-efficacy on individual performance mediated by personal initiative: study in students. Paper presented at: Proceedings Aceh Global Conference-Business, Economics, and Sustainable Development Trends; Banda Aceh, Indonesia; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby CS, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory in human resource development: new directions and practical considerations. Adv Dev Human Res. 2018;20(2):133–147. doi:10.1177/1523422318756954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar