457
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Paradoxical Effects of the Contagion of Service-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior

, , &
Pages 405-424 | Published online: 22 Feb 2022

References

  • Ma E, Qu H. Social exchanges as motivators of hotel employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: the proposition and application of a new three-dimensional framework. Int J Hosp Manag. 2011;30(3):680–688. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.12.003
  • Feng CL, Ma RZ, Jiang L. The impact of service innovation on firm performance: a meta-analysis. J Serv Manag. 2021;32(3):289–314. doi:10.1108/JOSM-03-2019-0089
  • Bettencourt L, Brown S. Contact employees: relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. J Retail. 1997;73:39–61. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90014-2
  • Hur WM, Shin Y, Moon TW. Linking motivation, emotional labor, and service performance from a self-determination perspective. J Serv Res. 2020;1094670520975204. doi:10.1177/1094670520975204
  • Chen W-J. The model of service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior among international tourist hotels. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2016;29:24–32. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2016.05.002
  • Kloutsiniotis PV, Mihail DM. The effects of high performance work systems in employees’ service-oriented OCB. Int J Hosp Manag. 2020;90:102610. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102610
  • Fu H, Li Y, Duan Y. Does employee-perceived reputation contribute to citizenship behavior? Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2014;26(4):593–609. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-02-2013-0082
  • Liang YW. The relationships among work values, burnout, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2012;24(2):251–268. doi:10.1108/09596111211206169
  • Karatepe OM, Yavas U, Babakus E. The effects of customer orientation and job resources on frontline employees’ job outcomes. Serv Mark Q. 2007;29(1):61–79. doi:10.1300/J396v29n01_04
  • Chen C-T, Hu HHS, King B. Shaping the organizational citizenship behavior or workplace deviance: key determining factors in the hospitality workforce. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2018;35:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.01.003
  • Tang YY, Tsaur SH. Supervisory support climate and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in hospitality. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2016;28(10):2331–2349. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-09-2014-0432
  • Tuan LT, Rowley C, Masli E, Le V, Nhi LTP. Nurturing service -oriented organizational citizenship behavior among tourism employees through leader humility. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2021;46:456–467. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.02.001
  • Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Blume BD. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(1):122–141. doi:10.1037/a0013079
  • Raub S. Does bureaucracy kill individual initiative? The impact of structure on organizational citizenship behavior in the hospitality industry. Int J Hosp Manag. 2008;27(2):179–186. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.07.018
  • Zhou X, Fan L, Cheng C, Fan Y. When and why do good people not do good deeds? Third-party observers’ unfavorable reactions to negative workplace gossip. J Bus Ethics. 2021;171:599–617.
  • Qin X, Chen C, Yam KC, Huang M, Ju D. The double-edged sword of leader humility: investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(7):693–712. doi:10.1037/apl0000456
  • Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev. 1985;92(4):548–573. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
  • Kelley H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In: Levine D, editor. Nebraska Symposium of Motivation. Vol. 14. Chicago: University of Nebraska Press; 1967:192–238.
  • Weiner B. A theory of motivation for some classroom experience. J Educ Psychol. 1979;71(1):3–25. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3
  • Weiner B. Reflections on the history of attribution theory and research: people, personalities, publications, problems. Soc Psychol. 2008;39(3):151–156. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.151
  • Banki S. Is a good deed constructive regardless of intent? Organization citizenship behavior, motive, and group outcomes. Small Group Res. 2010;41(3):354–375. doi:10.1177/1046496410364065
  • Bowler WM, Halbesleben JRB, Paul JRB. If you’re close with the leader, you must be a brownnose: the role of leader–member relationships in follower, leader, and coworker attributions of organizational citizenship behavior motives. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20(4):309–316. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.04.001
  • Allen T, Rush M. The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: a field study and a laboratory experiment. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(2):247–260. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.247
  • Feldman J. Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal. J Appl Psychol. 1981;66(2):127–148. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.127
  • Heider F. Perceiving the other person. In: Tagiuri R, Petrullo L, editors. Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1958:22–26.
  • Martinko M, Harvey P, Douglas S. The role, function, and contribution of attribution theory to leadership: a review. Leadership Q. 2007;18(6):561–585. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.004
  • Weiner B, Kukla A. An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970;15(1):1–20. doi:10.1037/h0029211
  • Klein J, Dawar N. Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in product harm crisis. Int J Res Mark. 2004;21(3):203–217. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.003
  • Snell R, Wong Y. Differentiating good soldiers from good actors. J Manag Stud. 2007;44:883–909. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00699.x
  • Donai M, Johns G, Raja U. Good soldier or good actor? Supervisor accuracy in distinguishing between selfless and self-serving OCB motives. J Bus Psychol. 2016;31:23–32.
  • De Stobbeleir KEM, Ashford S, Sully de Luque M. Proactivity with image in mind: how employee and manager characteristics affect evaluations of proactive behaviours. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;83(2):347–369. doi:10.1348/096317909X479529
  • Bolino MC. Citizenship and impression management: good soldiers or good actors? Acad Manage Rev. 1999;24(1):82–98. doi:10.2307/259038
  • Impression management: a literature review and two-component model [press release]. US: American Psychological Association; 1990.
  • Eastman KK. In the eyes of the beholder: an attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad Manage J. 1994;37(5):1379–1391.
  • Grant A, Parker S, Collins C. Getting credit for proactive behavior: supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Pers Psychol. 2009;62(1):31–55. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x
  • Wong P, Weiner B. Why people ask “Why” questions and the heuristics of attributional search. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981;40(4):650–663. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.650
  • Bettencourt L, Gwinner K, Meuter M. A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(1):29–41. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.29
  • Shukla A. Soldier or actor? Int J Organ Anal. 2019;27(1):94–108. doi:10.1108/IJOA-08-2017-1214
  • Donia MBL, Johns G, Raja U, Khalil Ben Ayed A. Getting credit for OCBs: potential costs of being a good actor vs. a good soldier. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2018;27(2):188–203. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2017.1418328
  • Lanaj K, Johnson RE, Lee SM. Benefits of transformational behaviors for leaders: a daily investigation of leader behaviors and need fulfillment. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(2):237–251. doi:10.1037/apl0000052
  • Johnson RE, Venus M, Lanaj K, Mao C, Chang C-H. Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(6):1262–1272. doi:10.1037/a0029043
  • Bolino MC, Klotz AC, Turnley WH, Harvey J. Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behav. 2013;34(4):542–559. doi:10.1002/job.1847
  • Cheung M, Peng Z, Wong C-S. Supervisor attribution of subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior motives. J Manag Psychol. 2014;29(8):922–937. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2012-0338
  • Parke MR, Tangirala S, Hussain I. Creating organizational citizens: how and when supervisor- versus peer-led role interventions change organizational citizenship behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106:1714–1733.
  • Moeran B. Tricks of the trade: the performance and interpretation of authenticity. J Manag Stud. 2005;42(5):901–922. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00526.x
  • Meindl JR. On leadership: an alternative to conventional wisdom. Res Organ Behav. 1990;12:159–203.
  • Vonk R. Self-serving interpretations of flattery: why ingratiation works. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(4):515–526. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.515
  • Takaku S. Reducing road rage: an application of the dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;36(10):2362–2378. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00107.x
  • Karadenizova Z, Dahle K-P. Analyze This! Thematic analysis: hostility, attribution of intent, and interpersonal perception bias. J Interpers Violence. 2017;36(3–4):1068–1091. doi:10.1177/0886260517739890
  • Greenbaum R, Mawritz M, Piccolo R. When leaders fail to “Walk the Talk”. J Manage. 2012;41(3):929–956. doi:10.1177/0149206312442386
  • Cha SE, Edmondson AC. When values backfire: leadership, attribution, and disenchantment in a values-driven organization. Leadership Q. 2006;17(1):57–78. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.10.006
  • Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara G, Pastorelli C. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(2):364–374. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
  • Moore C, Detert J, Trevino L, Baker V, Mayer D. Why employees do bad things: moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Pers Psychol. 2012;65(1):1–48. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x
  • Kish-Gephart J, Detert J, Treviño LK, Baker V, Martin S. Situational moral disengagement: can the effects of self-interest be mitigated? J Bus Ethics. 2014;125(2):267–285. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1909-6
  • Sun L-Y, Aryee S, Law K. High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(3):558–577. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525821
  • Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. J Cogn Psychother. 1997;13(2):158–166. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  • Wu J, Liden RC, Liao C, Wayne SJ. Does manager servant leadership lead to follower serving behaviors? It depends on follower self-interest. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(1):152–167. doi:10.1037/apl0000500
  • Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Ann Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  • Judge T, Bono J. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(1):80–92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
  • Otaye-Ebede L, Shaffakat S, Foster S. A multilevel model examining the relationships between workplace spirituality, ethical climate and outcomes: a social cognitive theory perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2020;166(3):611–626. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04133-8
  • Tang T-W, Tang -Y-Y. Promoting service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors in hotels: the role of high-performance human resource practices and organizational social climates. Int J Hosp Manag. 2012;31(3):885–895. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.10.007
  • Tung VWS, Chen PJ, Schuckert M. Managing customer citizenship behaviour: the moderating roles of employee responsiveness and organizational reassurance. Tour Manag. 2017;59:23–35. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.010
  • Hoover JD, Giambatista RC, Belkin LY. Eyes on, hands on: vicarious observational learning as an enhancement of direct experience. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2012;11(4):591–608. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0102
  • Myers CG. Coactive vicarious learning: toward a relational theory of vicarious learning in organizations. Acad Manage Rev. 2017;43(4):610–634. doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0202
  • Zimmerman BJ, Bell JA. “Observer verbalization and abstraction in vicarious rule learning, generalization, and retention”: Erratum. Dev Psychol. 1973;8(3):340. doi:10.1037/h0020254
  • Greve HR. Learning theory: the pandemic research challenge. J Manag Stud. 2020;57(8):1759–1762. doi:10.1111/joms.12631
  • Zhang Z, Liang Q, Li J. Understanding managerial response to employee voice: a social persuasion perspective. Int J Manpow. 2020;41(3):273–288. doi:10.1108/IJM-05-2018-0156
  • Spector PE, Fox S. Theorizing about the deviant citizen: an attributional explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20(2):132–143. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.06.002
  • De Dreu C, Nauta A. Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(4):913–926. doi:10.1037/a0014494
  • Parker SK, Bindl UK, Strauss K. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J Manage. 2010;36(4):827–856. doi:10.1177/0149206310363732
  • Liden R, Wayne S, Zhao H, Henderson D. Servant leadership: development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadership Q. 2008;19(2):161–177. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
  • Ng TWH, Lucianetti L, Hsu DY, Yim FHK, Sorensen KL. You speak, I speak: the social-cognitive mechanisms of voice contagion. J Manag Stud. 2021;58(6):1569–1608. doi:10.1111/joms.12698
  • Schwarz N, Clore G. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;45(3):513–523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
  • Gremler DD. The critical incident technique in service research. J Serv Res. 2004;7(1):65–89. doi:10.1177/1094670504266138
  • Viergever RF. The critical incident technique: method or methodology? Qual Health Res. 2019;29(7):1065–1079. doi:10.1177/1049732318813112
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
  • Dineen BR, Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC. Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):622–635. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.622
  • Rioux SM, Penner LA. The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: a motivational analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(6):1306–1314. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306
  • Jia Y, Yan J, Liu T, Huang J. How does internal and external CSR affect employees’ work engagement? Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms and boundary conditions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:2476. doi:10.3390/ijerph16142476
  • Kowal J, Keplinger A, Mäkiö J. Organizational citizenship behavior of IT professionals: lessons from Poland and Germany. Inf Technol Dev. 2019;25(2):227–249. doi:10.1080/02681102.2018.1508402
  • Kowal J, Keplinger A. Characteristics of human potentiality and organizational behavior among IT users in Poland. An exploratory study. Ekonometria Econometrics. 2015;3:49.
  • Kowal J, Gurba A. Mobbing and burnout in emerging knowledge economies: an exploratory study in Poland. Paper presented at: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); January 5–8; 2016.
  • Jia Y, Wang T, Xiao K, Guo C. How to reduce opportunism through contractual governance in the cross-cultural supply chain context: evidence from Chinese exporters. Ind Mark Manag. 2020;91:323–337. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.09.014
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Tehseen S, Ramayah T, Sajilan S. Testing and controlling for common method variance: a review of available methods. J Manage Sci. 2017;4(2):142–168. doi:10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage. 1986;12(4):531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
  • Keplinger A, Kowal J, Mäkiö J Gender and organizational citizenship behavior of information technology users in Poland and Germany. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Twenty-second Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), San Diego, California, USA, 2016.
  • Drasgow F, Levine MV, Tsien S, Williams B, Mead AD. Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Appl Psychol Meas. 1995;19(2):143–166. doi:10.1177/014662169501900203
  • Kowal J, Roztocki N. Do organizational ethics improve IT job satisfaction in the visegrád group countries? Insights from Poland. J Glob Inf Technol Manag. 2015;18(2):127–145. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2015.1052687
  • Hayes AF, Matthes J. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(3):924–936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  • Kowal J, Paliwoda-Pękosz G. ICT for global competitiveness and economic growth in emerging economies: economic, cultural, and social innovations for human capital in transition economies. Inf Syst Manag. 2017;34(4):304–307. doi:10.1080/10580530.2017.1366215
  • Hayes A. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(1):1–22. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
  • Spiller SA, Fitzsimons GJ, Lynch JG, Mcclelland GH. Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: simple effects tests in moderated regression. J Market Res. 2013;50(2):277–288. doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0420
  • Kang J, Jang J. Fostering service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior through reducing role stressors. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2019;31(9):3567–3582. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-12-2018-1018
  • Breidenthal AP, Liu D, Bai Y, Mao Y. The dark side of creativity: coworker envy and ostracism as a response to employee creativity. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020;161:242–254. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.08.001
  • Mao Y, He J, Yang D. The dark sides of engaging in creative processes: coworker envy, workplace ostracism, and incivility. Asia Pac J Manag. 2021;38:1261–1281.
  • Scott KL, Zagenczyk TJ, Li S, Gardner WL, Cogliser C, Laverie D. Social network ties and organizational citizenship behavior: evidence of a curvilinear relationship. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2018;27(6):752–763.
  • Morrison E. Employee voice and silence. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1:173–197. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
  • Dalal RS. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(6):1241–1255. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241
  • Kwantes CT, Karam CM, Kuo BCH, Towson S. Culture’s influence on the perception of OCB as in-role or extra-role. Int J Intercult Relat. 2008;32(3):229–243. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.01.007
  • Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Podsakoff N. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2010;63(1):539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Chiniara M, Bentein K. The servant leadership advantage: when perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. Leadership Q. 2018;29(2):333–345. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002