How Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi Influence Employee Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model

References

• Bos-Nehles AC, Veenendaal AAR. Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: the moderating effect of an innovative climate. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;30(18):2661–2683. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1380680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratasuk A, Charoensukmongkol P. Does cultural intelligence promote cross-cultural teams’ knowledge sharing and innovation in the restaurant business? Asia Pacific J Bus Adm. 2020;12(2):183–203. doi:10.1108/APJBA-05-2019-0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhu Y. Promoting innovative behavior in employees: the mechanism of leader psychological capital. Front Psychol. 2021;11:598090. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Hao Q, Song H. Linking supervisor support to innovation implementation behavior via commitment: the moderating role of coworker support. J Manag Psychol. 2020;35(3):129–141. doi:10.1108/JMP-04-2018-0171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng C, Hu C, Chang J. Triggering creative self-efficacy to increase employee innovation behavior in the hospitality workplace. J Creat Behav. 2019;54(1):1–14. doi:10.1002/jocb.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv M, Yang S, Lv XY, Zhang L, Chen ZQ, Zhang SX. Organisational innovation climate and innovation behaviour among nurses in China: a mediation model of psychological empowerment. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29:1–9. doi:10.1111/jonm.13381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Qin Y, Zhou W. The effects of leaders’ prosocial orientation on employees’ organizational citizenship behavior-the roles of affective commitment and workplace ostracism. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1171–1185. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S324081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermuly CC, Meyer B, Dämmer L. Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. J Pers Psychol. 2013;12(3):132–142. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Li Z, Liang L, Zhang X. Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: thriving at work and psychological safety. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(5):1911–1922. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0095-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law KS, Wong CS, Wang D, Wang L. Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: an empirical investigation. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2000;11(4):751–765. doi:10.1080/09585190050075105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao C, Qian S, Banks GC, Seers A. Human resource management review supervisor-subordinate guanxi: a meta-analytic review and future research agenda. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2019;30(2):100702. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung M, Wu WP, Chan A, Wong M. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and employee work outcomes: the mediating role of job satisfaction. J Bus Ethics. 2009;88:77–89. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9830-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoensukmongkol P. How Chinese expatriates’ cultural intelligence promotes supervisor-subordinate guanxi with Thai employees: the mediating effect of expatriates’ benevolence. Int J Cross Cult Manag. 2021;21(1):9–30. doi:10.1177/1470595821996735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Peng Z, Zhu Y. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and trust in supervisor: a qualitative inquiry in the People’s Republic of China. J Bus Ethics. 2011;108(3):313–324. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1092-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Liang J, Zhang J. The relationship between person-team fit with supervisor-subordinate guanxi and organizational justice in a Chinese state-owned enterprise. Int J Sel Assess. 2019;27(1):31–42. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Wang J. Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviour: is supervisor-subordinate guanxi a mediator? Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24(7):1471–1489. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.725082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoensukmongkol P. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and emotional exhaustion: the moderating effect of supervisor job autonomy and workload levels in organizations. Asia Pacific Manag Rev. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Koo DW. Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job performance in hotel employees. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2017;29(12):3044–3062. doi:10.1108/ijchm-06-2016-0319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao S. Study on the relationship of leader-member exchange and employees’ innovation behavior in high-tech enterprises. Technol Innov Manag. 2015;36(2):147–153. doi:10.14090/j.cnki.jscx.2015.0209
   Google Scholar
• Miller L, Miller AF. Innovative work behavior through high-quality leadership. Int J Innov Sci. 2020;12(2):219–236. doi:10.1108/IJIS-04-2019-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Huang J, Chu X, Wang X. A multilevel study on antecedents of manager voice in Chinese context. Chinese Manag Stud. 2010;4(3):212–230. doi:10.1108/17506141011074110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Liu J, Shang X. Gain without pay causes lazybones’ loss: the influence of formal and informal leader-member relationships on customer service performance. Chinese Manag Stud. 2018;12(3):634–657. doi:10.1108/CMS-03-2017-0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau PM. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1964. doi:10.2307/2091154
   Google Scholar
• Niu HJ. Is innovation behavior congenital? Enhancing job satisfaction as a moderator. Pers Rev. 2014;43(2):288–302. doi:10.1108/PR-12-2012-0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2018;5:103–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moin MF, Omar MK, Wei F, Rasheed MI, Hameed Z. Green HRM and psychological safety: how transformational leadership drives follower’s job satisfaction. Curr Issues Tour. 2021;24(16):2269–2277. doi:10.1080/13683500.2020.1829569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao F, Zhang H. Workplace friendship, psychological safety and innovative behavior in China: a moderated-mediation model. Chinese Manag Stud. 2020;14(3):661–676. doi:10.1108/CMS-09-2019-0334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;33:309–328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115
   Google Scholar
• Homans GC. Social behavior as exchange. Am J Sociol. 1958;63(6):597–606. doi:10.1086/222355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manage. 2005;31(6):874–900. doi:10.1177/0149206305279602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Anthony EL, Daniels SR, Hall AV. Social exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad Manag Ann. 2017;11(1):479–516. doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):513–524. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JRB, Neveu JP, Paustian-Underdahl SC, Westman M. Getting to the “COR”: understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J Manage. 2014;40(5):1334–1364. doi:10.1177/0149206314527130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen O. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2000;73(3):287–302. doi:10.1348/096317900167038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Hoever I. Research on workplace creativity: a review and redirection. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):333–359. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226
   Google Scholar
• Charoensukmongkol P, Puyod JV. Influence of transformational leadership on role ambiguity and work-life balance of Filipino University employees during COVID-19: does employee involvement matter? Int J Leadersh Educ. 2021;1–20. doi:10.1080/13603124.2021.1882701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guang X, Charoensukmongkol P. The effects of cultural intelligence on leadership performance among Chinese expatriates working in Thailand. Asian Bus Manag. 2020;1–23. doi:10.1057/s41291-020-00112-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Nicholas JP, Daus CS. An examination of the joint effects of affective experiences and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experiences over time. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999;78(1):1–24. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1976;16(2):250–279. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung MFY, Wu W. Participatory management and employee work outcomes: the moderating role of supervisor-subordinate guanxi. Asia Pacific J Hum Resour. 2011;49(3):344–364. doi:10.1177/1038411111413528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang W, Sun G, Jiang Z, Cheng Z. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and job satisfaction among migrant workers in China. Soc Indic Res. 2018;139:293–307. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1471-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anser MK, Ali M, Anwar F, Usman M. Subjective age and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of job burnout and chronological age. Front Public Health. 2020;8:62. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Shao YF, Chen YJ, Ma Y. How to keep sustainable development between enterprises and employees? Evaluating the impact of person-organization fit and person-job fit on innovative behavior. Front Psychol. 2021;12:653534. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung YW, Kim T. Impact of using social network services on workplace ostracism, job satisfaction, and innovative behaviour. Behav Inf Technol. 2017;36(12):1235–1243. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2017.1369568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-complement conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 1991;1(1):61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tse HHM, Huang X, Lam W. Why does transformational leadership matter for employee turnover? A multi-foci social exchange perspective. Leadersh Q. 2013;24(5):763–776. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong YT, Ngo HY, Wong CS. Antecedents and outcomes of employees’ trust in Chinese joint ventures. Asia Pacific J Manag. 2003;20(4):481–499. doi:10.1023/A:1026391009543
   Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Shao YF, Chen YJ. Assessing the mediation mechanism of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on innovative behavior: the perspective of psychological capital. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2699. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaskheli A, Jiang Y, Raza SA, Qureshi MA, Salam J, Salam J. Do CSR activities increase organizational citizenship behavior among employees? Mediating role of affective commitment and job satisfaction. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2020;27(6):2941–2955. doi:10.1002/csr.2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang QJ, Wei YF, Li XL. Research on the influence of workplace exclusion on employees’ innovative behavior: based on the dual mediation of organizational commitment and organizational identity. Sci Technol Prog Policy. 2020;37(22):134–141. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2019080564
   Google Scholar
• Liu C, Wang N, Liang H. Motivating information security policy compliance: the critical role of supervisor-subordinate guanxi and organizational commitment. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;54(28):102152. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MAS, Jianguo D, Hameed AA, Mushtaq TUL, Usman M. Affective commitment foci as parallel mediators of the relationship between workplace romance and employee job performance: a cross-cultural comparison of the People’s Republic of China and Pakistan. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:267–278. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S168542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman M, Javed U, Shoukat A, Bashir NA. Does meaningful work reduce cyberloafing? Important roles of affective commitment and leader-member exchange. Behav Inf Technol. 2021;40(2):206–220. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2019.1683607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu H, Duverger P, Yu L. Can innovative behavior be led by management? A study from the lodging business. Tour Manag. 2017;63:144–157. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal A, Nazir T, Ahmad MS. Entrepreneurial leadership and employee innovative behavior: an examination through multiple theoretical lenses. Eur J Innov Manag. 2020. doi:10.1108/EJIM-06-2020-0212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter LW, Steers RM, Mowday RT, Boulian PV. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. J Appl Psychol. 1974;59(5):603–609. doi:10.1037/h0037335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukder AK. Supervisor support and organizational commitment: the role of work-family conflict, job satisfaction, and work-life balance. J Employ Couns. 2019;56(3):98–116. doi:10.1002/joec.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):23–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2011;84(1):116–122. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li W. Ethical leadership, organizational trust and knowledge sharing behavior: the moderation role of psychological safety. Sci Technol Prog Policy. 2017;34(17):143–147. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2017050540
   Google Scholar
• Chen XH, Ma HL. Impact of tech-innovation on growth: are high-tech SMEs different from non-high-tech SMEs? Stud Sci Sci. 2012;30(11):1749–1760.
   Google Scholar
• Dong JJ, Chen GJ. Motivation and mechanism of innovation behavior decision-making in scientific and technological enterprises: verification of traceability and fuzzy set qualitative comparison analysis based on grounded theory. Forum Sci Technol China. 2020;(7):111–119. doi:10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2020.07.018
   Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Work Redesign. Massachussetts: Addison-Wesley; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Rooney RM, Kane RT, Hassan S, Nesa M. The enhanced Aussie optimism positive thinking skills program: the relationship between internalizing symptoms and family functioning in children aged 9–11 years old. Front Psychol. 2015;6:504. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Makhdoom HUR, Asim S. Impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovative work behavior: examining mediation and moderation mechanisms. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:105–118. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S236876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedkovski V, Guerci M. When homophilous ties matter: social network brokerage and individuals’ innovative behavior. Eur Manag J. 2021;39:755–767. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng D, Ji L, Yin Z. Personality, perceived occupational stressor, and health-related quality of life among Chinese judges. Appl Res Qual Life. 2014;9(4):911–921. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9277-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res. 1977;14(3):396–402. doi:10.1177/002224377701400320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie HC, Rueegg CS, Fosså SD, Loge JH, Ruud E, Kiserud CE. Limited evidence of non-response bias despite modest response rate in a nationwide survey of long-term cancer survivors: results from the NOR-CAYACS study. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(3):353–363. doi:10.1007/s11764-019-00757-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau WL, Yuan Y, Pu X, Ray S, Chen CC. Understanding FinTech continuance: perspectives from self-efficacy and ECT-IS theories. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2020;120(9):1659–1689. doi:10.1108/IMDS-02-2020-0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Yang A, Wang D, Lin Y. Structure models of leader-member relationship (LMR) from the perspectives of cultural differences between China and the West. Acta Psychol Sin. 2014;(9):1355–1377. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01355
   Google Scholar
• Erkutlu H, Chafra J. Benevolent leadership and psychological well-being: the moderating effects of psychological safety and psychological contract breach. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2016;37(3):369–386. doi:10.1108/LODJ-07-2014-0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC. Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. Trust Distrust Organ Dilemmas Approach. 2004;(12):239–282. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Google Scholar
• Spector PE. Do not cross me: optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34:125–137. doi:10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. Examining the causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. J Manage. 1992;18(1):153–167. doi:10.1177/014920639201800110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PB, Wasti SA, Grigoryan L, et al. Are guanxi-type supervisor-subordinate relationships culture-general? An eight-nation test of measurement invariance. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2014;45(6):921–938. doi:10.1177/0022022114530496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar