Linkages Between Transformational Leadership, Work Meaningfulness and Work Engagement: A Multilevel Cross-Sectional Study

References

• Leiter MP, Bakker AB. Work engagement: introduction. In: Bakker AB, Leiter MP, editors. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Hove, New York: Psychology Press; 2010:1–9. doi:10.4324/9780203853047
   Google Scholar
• Mirvis P. Employee engagement and CSR: transactional, relational, and developmental approaches. Calif Manag Rev. 2012;54:93–117. doi:10.1525/cmr.2012.54.4.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W, Khan GF, Wood J, Mahmood MT. Employee engagement for sustainable organizations: keyword analysis using social network analysis and burst detection approach. Sustainability. 2016;8:631. doi:10.3390/su8070631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macey WH, Schneider B, Barbera KM, Young SA. Employee Engagement: Tools for Analysis, Practice, and Competitive Advantage. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Hakanen JJ. Work engagement among public and private sector dentists. In: Burke RJ, Noblet A, Cooper CL, editors. Human Resource Management in the Public Sector. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2013:109–131. doi:10.4337/9780857937322.00015
   Google Scholar
• Mubarak F, Noor A. Effect of authentic leadership on employee creativity in project-based organizations with the mediating roles of work engagement and psychological empowerment. Cogent Bus Manag. 2018;5:1429348. doi:10.1080/23311975.2018.1429348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB. A job demands–resources approach to public service motivation. Public Adm Rev. 2015;75(5):723–732. doi:10.1111/puar.12388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Albrecht S. Work engagement: current trends. Career Dev Int. 2018;23:4–11. doi:10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks AM. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. J Organ Eff. 2019;6:19–38. doi:10.1108/joepp-06-2018-0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard K. Employee engagement in the UK: meeting the challenge in the public sector. Dev Learn Organ. 2008;22:15–17. doi:10.1108/14777280810910302
   Google Scholar
• Agyemang CB, Ofei SB. Employee work engagement and organizational commitment: a comparative study of private and public sector organizations in Ghana. Eur J Bus Innov Res. 2013;1(4):20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ancarani A, Di Mauro C, Giammanco MD, Giammanco G. Work engagement in public hospitals: a social exchange approach. Public Adm. 2018;23(1):1–19. doi:10.1080/12294659.2017.1412046
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa AMS, Abed El-Motalib EA. Ethical leadership, work meaningfulness, and work engagement in the public sector. Rev Public Pers Adm. 2020;40(1):112–131. doi:10.1177/0734371X18790628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher PJ, O’Shea D, Igou ER. Social cognition in the workplace: the future of research on the meaning of work. In: O’Doherty KC, Hodgetts D, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Psychology. New York: Sage; 2019:255–277.
   Google Scholar
• Sagnak M, Kuruöz M. Authentic leadership and altruism: the mediating role of meaningfulness. Univers J Educ Res. 2017;5(3):447–452. doi:10.13189/ujer.2017.050316
   Google Scholar
• Di Fabio A. The psychology of sustainability and sustainable development for well-being in organizations. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1534. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Ashforth BE. Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In: Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, editors. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler; 2003:309–327.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK, Li N. The theory of purposeful work behavior: the role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Acad. 2013;38(1):132–153. doi:10.5465/amr.10.0479
   Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Gruman JA. What do we really know about employee engagement? Hum Resour Dev Q. 2014;25(2):155–182. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryee S, Walumbwa FO, Zhou Q, Hartnell CA. Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: test of mediation and moderation processes. Hum. 2012;25(1):1–25. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.631648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadi MY, Fernando M, Caputi P. Transformational leadership and work engagement: the mediating effect of meaning in work. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2013;34(6):532–550. doi:10.1108/lodj-10-2011-0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington JL, Meskelis S, Asare E, Beldona S. Enhancing Employee Engagement: An Evidence-Based Approach. Enabled. Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Han SJ, Kim J, Kim W. Structural relationships among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment, and job performance: the mediating role of employee engagement. Eur J Train Dev. 2021. doi:10.1108/EJTD-10-2020-0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):499–512. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balyer A. Transformational leadership behaviors of school principals: a qualitative research based on teachers’ perceptions. Int Online J Educ Sci. 2012;4(3):581–591.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong S, Hsiao YY, Song JH, Kim J, Bae SH. The moderating role of transformational leadership on work engagement: the influences of professionalism and openness to change. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2016;27(4):489–516. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XHF, Howell JM. Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(6):1134–1144. doi:10.1037/a0020754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengkey M, Saputra D, Sengkey S Moderation effect of meaningful work on the relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Surabaya, Indonesia, 17–18 October 2019. Paris: Atlantis Press; 2019:956–959.
   Google Scholar
• Meng F, Wang Y, Xu W, Ye J, Peng L, Gao P. The diminishing effect of transformational leadership on the relationship between task characteristics, perceived meaningfulness, and work engagement. Front Psychol. 2020;11:3299. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manag. 1990;33(4):692–724. doi:10.2307/256287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. To be fully there: psychological presence at work. Hum Relat. 1992;45(4):321–349. doi:10.1177/001872679204500402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Taris TW. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: implications for improving work and health. In: Bauer G, Hämmig O, editors. Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health. New York: Springer; 2014:43–68. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3-4
   Google Scholar
• Abbas RZ, Murad HS, Yazdani N, Asghar A. Extending “Kahn’s model of personal engagement and disengagement at work” with reference to existential attributes: a case study of HR managers in Pakistan. Int J Soc Econ. 2014;41(1):2–31. doi:10.1108/IJSE-10-2012-0143
   Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Petrou P, Op den Kamp EM, Tims M. Proactive vitality management, work engagement, and creativity: the role of goal orientation. Appl Psychol. 2020;69(2):351–378. doi:10.1111/apps.12173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Ahmad R, Ahmed I, Ahmer Z. Police work-family nexus, work engagement and turnover intention: moderating role of person-job-fit. Policing. 2019;42(5):739–750. doi:10.1108/PIJPSM-09-2018-0138
   Google Scholar
• Reina-Tamayo AM, Bakker AB, Derks D. The work engagement–performance link: an episodic perspective. Career Dev Int. 2018;23(5):478–496. doi:10.1108/CDI-10-2017-0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han S-H, Oh EG. The link between transformational leadership and work-related performance: moderated-mediating roles of meaningfulness and job characteristics. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2020;41(4):519–533. doi:10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkikangas A, Aunola K, Seppälä P, Hakanen J. Work engagement–team performance relationship: shared job crafting as a moderator. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2016;89(4):772–790. doi:10.1111/joop.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed U, Majid AHA, Zin MLM. Meaningful work and work engagement: a relationship demanding urgent attention. Int J Acad. 2016;6(8):116–122. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i8/2264
   Google Scholar
• Lee S-H, Shin Y, Kim M. Why work meaningfulness alone is not enough: the role of social identification and task interdependence as facilitative boundary conditions. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:1031–1047. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0027-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks AM. Workplace spirituality and employee engagement. J Manag Spiritual Relig. 2011;8(4):317–340. doi:10.1080/14766086.2011.630170
   Google Scholar
• Kahn WA, Heaphy ED. Relational contexts of personal engagement at work. In: Truss C, Delbridge R, Alfes K, Shantz A, Soane E, editors. Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge; 2013:96–110.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer S, Kozusznik MW, Meyers JH, Ganai O. Meaningfulness as a resource to mitigate work stress. In: Leka S, Sinclair RR, editors. Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology: Global Perspectives on Research and Practice. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014:114–130.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel RM, Rodell JB, Sabey TB. Meaningfulness misfit: consequences of daily meaningful work needs–supplies incongruence for daily engagement. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(7):760–770. doi:10.1037/apl0000464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker S, Serpe RT. Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: theory and research example. In: Lckes W, Knowles ES, editors. Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior. New York: Springer; 1982:199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1979:33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher L, Schofield K. Facilitating meaningfulness in the workplace: a field intervention study. Int J Hum Resour Mang. 2019:2975–3003. doi:10.1080/09585192.2019.1624590
   Google Scholar
• Burns JM. Leadership. New York: Harper and Row; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Bass BM. Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1999;8(1):9–32. doi:10.1080/135943299398410
   Google Scholar
• Grant AM. Leading with meaning: beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad Mang J. 2012;55(2):458–476. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Balkundi P. Chaper 9. A network approach to leader cognition and effectiveness. In: Bryman A, Collinson D, Grint K, Jackson B, Uhl-Bien M, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Leadership. London: Sage; 2011:118–135.
   Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ, Dimotakis N, Lambert LS, et al. Examining follower responses to transformational leadership from a dynamic, person–environment fit perspective. Acad Manag J. 2018;61(4):1343–1368. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naber AM, Moffett RGIII. Follower moral reasoning influences perceptions of transformational leadership behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2017;47:99–112. doi:10.1111/jasp.12427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau PM. Exchange and Power in Social Life. NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Banks GC, McCauley KD, Gardner WL, Guler CE. A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: a test for redundancy. Leadersh Q. 2016;27(4):634–652. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breevaart K, Zacher H. Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez–faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2019;92(2):384–409. doi:10.1111/joop.12253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands–resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115
   Google Scholar
• Demerouti E, Bakker AB. The job demands-resources model: challenges for future research. SA J Ind Psychol. 2011;37(2):1–9. doi:10.4102/sajip.v37i2.974
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-Ortiz V, Salanova M, Martínez IM. Transformational leadership and team performance: linked by teamwork engagement. Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2013;28(2):183–196. doi:10.1174/021347413806196762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza-Parra S, Molero F, Fuster-Ruizdeapodaca MJ. Transformational leadership and job satisfaction of police officers (carabineros) in Chile: the mediating effects of group identification and work engagement. Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2015;30(3):439–467. doi:10.1080/02134748.2015.1065087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo BK, Nam K. The effects of transformational leadership, learning goal orientation, and psychological empowerment on career satisfaction. New Horiz Adult Educ Hum Resour Dev. 2019;31(3):47–64. doi:10.1002/nha3.20247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan ABC, Van Dun DH, Wilderom CPM. Innovative work behavior in Singapore evoked by transformational leaders through innovation support and readiness. Creat Innov Manag. 2021;30:697–712. doi:10.1111/caim.12462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnot MJ. Relational-Interdependent self-construal with supervisor (RISCS): scale development and conditional model of meaningfulness at work. Psychol Manag J. 2016;19(2):61–90. doi:10.1037/mgr0000043
   Google Scholar
• Meijman T, Mulder G. Psychological aspects of workload. In: De Wolff C, Drenth PJD, Henk T, editors. Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology(Volume 2: Work Psychology). London: Psychology Press; 1998:5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Winwood PC, Bakker AB, Winefield AH. An investigation of the role of non–work–time behavior in buffering the effects of work strain. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(8):862–871. doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e318124a8dc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic books; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Meaningful connections: positive relationships and attachments at work. In: Dutton JE, Ragins BR, editors. Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007:189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-L, Lin Y-C, Chen W-H, Heng X-S. Determinants of cluster leadership and identification on cluster innovation model. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2018;39(4):538–553. doi:10.1108/LODJ-10-2017-0305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight LL. Transformational leadership in the context of punctuated change. J Leadersh Account Ethics. 2013;10(2):103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, de Vries JD. Job demands–resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021;34(1):1–21. doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez IM, Salanova M, Cruz-Ortiz V. Our boss is a good boss! Cross-level effects of transformational leadership on work engagement in service jobs. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2020;36(2):87–94. doi:10.5093/jwop2020a10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrek CJ, Apostel E, Antoni CH. Stress in highly demanding IT jobs: transformational leadership moderates the impact of time pressure on exhaustion and work–life balance. J Occup Health Psychol. 2013;18(3):252–261. doi:10.1037/a0033085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smircich L, Morgan G. Leadership: the management of meaning. J Appl Behav Sci. 1982;18(3):257–273. doi:10.1177/002188638201800303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Bracht E, Zhang X, Bradley B, Van Dick R. Creativity in non-routine jobs: the role of transformational leadership and organizational identification. Creat Innov Manag. 2021;30:129–143. doi:10.1111/caim.12419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Dreden C, Binnewies C. Choose your lunch companion wisely: the relationships between lunch break companionship, psychological detachment, and daily vigour. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2017;26(3):356–372. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2017.1301428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan T, Chen M, Zeng X, Liu T. The influence of job and individual resources on work engagement among Chinese police officers: a moderated mediation model. Front Psychol. 2020;11:497. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Zeng X, Chen M, Lan T. The harder you work, the higher your satisfaction with life? The influence of police work engagement on life satisfaction: a moderated mediation model. Front Psychol. 2019;10:826. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. 2005;1:86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
   Google Scholar
• Frieder RE, Wang G, Oh I-S. Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: a moderated mediation model. J Appl Psychol. 2018;103:324–333. doi:10.1037/apl0000274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S-J, Wang M-J, Lee S-H. Transformational leadership and voice behaviors: the mediating effect of employee perceived meaningful work. Pers Rev. 2018;47(3):694–708. doi:10.1108/PR-01-2017-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless SA, Wearing AJ, Mann L. A short measure of transformational leadership. J Bus Psychol. 2000;14(3):389–405. doi:10.1023/A:1022991115523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2004;77(1):11–37. doi:10.1348/096317904322915892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lips-Wiersma M, Wright S. Measuring the meaning of meaningful work: development and validation of the comprehensive meaningful work scale (CMWS). Group Organ Manag. 2012;37(5):655–685. doi:10.1177/1059601112461578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli W, Shimazu A, Hakanen J, Salanovam M, De Witte H. An ultra-short measure for work engagement: the UWES-3 validation across five countries. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2017;35(4):577–591. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Oh I-S, Courtright SH, Colbert AE. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group Organ Manag. 2011;36(2):223–270. doi:10.1177/1059601111401017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crede M, Jong J, Harms P. The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: a meta-analysis. J Manag Psychol. 2019;34(3):139–155. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar