Towards Examining the Link Between Workplace Spirituality and Workforce Agility: Exploring Higher Educational Institutions

References

• Trachsler T, Jong W. Crisis management in times of COVID‐19: game, set or match? J Contingenc Crisis Manage. 2020;28(4):485–486. doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney D, Varshney NK. Workforce agility and its links to emotional intelligence and workforce performance: a study of small entrepreneurial firms in India. Glob Bus Organ Excell. 2020;39(5):35–45. doi:10.1002/joe.22012
   Google Scholar
• Ali M, Zhang L, Zhang Z, et al. Can leaders’ humility enhance project management effectiveness? Interactive effect of top management support. Sustainability. 2021;13(17):9526. doi:10.3390/su13179526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jukic I, Calleja-González J, Cos F, et al. Strategies and Solutions for Team Sports Athletes in Isolation Due to COVID-19. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Muduli A. High performance work system, HRD climate and organisational performance: an empirical study. Eur J Train Dev. 2015;39:239–257. doi:10.1108/EJTD-02-2014-0022
   Google Scholar
• Munteanu I, Newcomer K. Leading and learning through dynamic performance management in government. Public Adm Rev. 2020;80(2):316–325. doi:10.1111/puar.13126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd P. Agile Manufacturing: forging New Frontiers. Wokingham, England: Reading, Massachussets, Addison-Wesley. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi H, Zhang Z. A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: an introduction. Int J Prod Econ. 1999;62(1–2):7–22. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00217-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highsmith J. History: the agile manifesto. Retrieved from January 10, 2019; 2021. Available from: http://agilemanifesto.org/history.html. Accessed December 24, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak SR, Saeed I, Rehman SU, Fayaz M. Impact of fear of COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of nurses in Pakistan. J Loss Trauma. 2020;2020:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Storme M, Suleyman O, Gotlib M, et al. Who is agile? An investigation of the psychological antecedents of workforce agility. Glob Bus Organ Excell. 2020;39(6):28–38. doi:10.1002/joe.22055
   Google Scholar
• Jena LK, Pradhan S. Workplace spirituality and employee commitment: the role of emotional intelligence and organisational citizenship behaviour in Indian organisations. J Enterpr Inform Manag. 2018;31:380–404. doi:10.1108/JEIM-10-2017-0144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul M, Jena LK, Sahoo K. Workplace spirituality and workforce agility: a psychological exploration among teaching professionals. J Relig Health. 2020;59(1):135–153. doi:10.1007/s10943-019-00918-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muduli A, Pandya G. Psychological empowerment and workforce agility. Psychol Stud (Mysore). 2018;63(3):276–285. doi:10.1007/s12646-018-0456-8
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Muduli A. Learning agility, culture and outcome: an empirical study. Int J Indian Culture Bus Manage. 2021;23(1):95–110. doi:10.1504/IJICBM.2021.115413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shephard K. Higher Education for sustainability: Seeking Affective Learning Outcomes. International journal of sustainability in Higher Education; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Qadir G, Saeed I, Khan SU. Relationship between motivation and employee performance, organizational goals: moderating role of employee empowerment. J Bus Tour. 2017;3(1):734–747 .
   Google Scholar
• Bakar BA. Integrating spirituality in tourism higher education: a study of tourism educators’ perspectives. Tour Manag Perspect. 2020;34:100653. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkathunnisha AB, Diane L, Price A, et al. Towards a spirituality-based platform in tourism higher education. Curr Issues Tour. 2019;22(17):2140–2156. doi:10.1080/13683500.2018.1424810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah R, Saeed I, Khan J, Shahbaz M, Vega-Muñoz A, Salazar-Sepúlveda G. Have you heard that—“GOSSIP”? Gossip spreads rapidly and influences broadly. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:13389. doi:10.3390/ijerph182413389
   Google Scholar
• Nazir S, Malik S. Workplace spirituality as predictor of workplace attitudes among Pakistani doctors. Sci J Psychol. 2013;2013. doi:10.7237/sjpsych/232
   Google Scholar
• Azmy A. The effect of employee engagement and job satisfaction on workforce agility through talent management in public transportation companies. Media Ekonomi Dan Manajemen. 2021;36(2):212–229. doi:10.24856/mem.v36i2.2190
   Google Scholar
• Mushtaq R, Shafqat T, Muddassar khan M, et al. Does psychological empowerment mediates the association of workplace spirituality with organizational citizenship behavior and employee burnout? Asia Proc Soc Sci. 2021;7(2):145–149. doi:10.31580/apss.v7i2.1795
   Google Scholar
• Jeon KS, Choi BK. Workplace spirituality, organizational commitment and life satisfaction: the moderating role of religious affiliation. J Organ Change Manage. 2021;34:1125–1143. doi:10.1108/JOCM-01-2021-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmos DP, Duchon D. Spirituality at work: a conceptualization and measure. J Manag Inquiry. 2000;9(2):134–145. doi:10.1177/105649260092008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laabs JJ. Balancing spirituality and work. Personn J. 1995;74(9):60–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wu YJ, Chen J-C. Stimulating innovation with an innovative curriculum: a curriculum design for a course on new product development. Int J Manag Educ. 2021;19(3):100561. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100561
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J. The convergence of social and technological networks. Commun ACM. 2008;51(11):66–72. doi:10.1145/1400214.1400232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul R, Pradhan S. Achieving student satisfaction and student loyalty in higher education: a focus on service value dimensions. Services Market Quarter. 2019;40(3):245–268. doi:10.1080/15332969.2019.1630177
   Google Scholar
• Soliman M, Di Virgilio F, Figueiredo R, et al. The impact of workplace spirituality on lecturers’ attitudes in tourism and hospitality higher education institutions. Tour Manag Perspect. 2021;38:100826. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junior GT, Saltorato P. Workforce agility: a systematic literature review and a research agenda proposal. Innovar. 2021;31:81.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Sharifi H. A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. Int J Operation Prod Manag. 2000;20:496–513. doi:10.1108/01443570010314818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonka FE. Developing a lean and agile work force. Human Factors Ergon Manuf Service Industr. 1997;7(1):11–20. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199724)7:1<11::AID-HFM2>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer L, Shafer RA. Dynamic organizations: achieving marketplace and organizational agility with people. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed I, Khan SU, Qadir G, Din JU. How workplace spirituality moderates the relation between job overload and job satisfaction: an empirical evidence. J Administr Bus Stud. 2007;65:83.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Bennett D. The relationship between higher education students’ perceived employability, academic engagement and stress among students in China. Educ Train. 2021;63:744–762. doi:10.1108/ET-07-2020-0219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakas F. Spirituality and performance in organizations: a literature review. J Bus Ethics. 2010;94(1):89–106. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0251-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkiewicz CL, Giacalone RA. A values framework for measuring the impact of workplace spirituality on organizational performance. J Bus Ethics. 2004;49(2):129–142. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015843.22195.b9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheep ML. Nurturing the whole person: the ethics of workplace spirituality in a society of organizations. J Bus Ethics. 2006;66(4):357–375. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0014-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan J, Usman M, Saeed I, et al. Does workplace spirituality influence knowledge-sharing behavior and work engagement in work? Trust as a mediator. Manag Sci Lett. 2022;12(1):51–66. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2021.8.001
   Google Scholar
• He P, Sun R, Zhao H, Zheng L, Shen C. Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: a psychological safety lens. Asian Bus Manag. 2020;2020:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marques J, Dhiman SK, Biberman J. Teaching the un-teachable: storytelling and meditation in workplace spirituality courses. J Manag Dev. 2014;33:196–217. doi:10.1108/JMD-10-2011-0106
   Google Scholar
• Petchsawang P, Duchon D. Measuring workplace spirituality in an Asian context. Human Resource Dev Int. 2009;12(4):459–468. doi:10.1080/13678860903135912
   Google Scholar
• Kinjerski VM, Skrypnek BJ. Defining spirit at work: finding common ground. J Organ Change Manag. 2004;17:26–42. doi:10.1108/09534810410511288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitroff II, Denton EA. A study of spirituality in the workplace. MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 1999;40(4):83.
   Google Scholar
• Giacalone RA, Jurkiewicz CL. Right from wrong: the influence of spirituality on perceptions of unethical business activities. J Bus Ethics. 2003;46(1):85–97. doi:10.1023/A:1024767511458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerald FC. Spirituality for managers: context and critique. J Organ Change Manage. 1999;12(3):186–199. doi:10.1108/09534819910273793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanungo RN. The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(1):119. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.1.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodahl TM, Kejnar M. The definition and measurement of job involvement. J Appl Psychol. 1965;49(1):24. doi:10.1037/h0021692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanungo RN. Measurement of job and work involvement. J Appl Psychol. 1982;67(3):341. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner TA, Bakalis S. The antecedents of organizational commitment: the case of Australian casual academics. Int J Educ Manag. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Choi Y, Choi JW. A study of job involvement prediction using machine learning technique. Int J Organ Anal. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose J, Panchanatham N. Influence of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on job involvement towards organizational effectiveness. Indian J Appl Res. 2014;4(1):280–282. doi:10.15373/2249555X/JAN2014/81
   Google Scholar
• Mudrack PE. Job involvement, obsessive‐compulsive personality traits, and workaholic behavioral tendencies. J Organ Change Manage. 2004;17:490–508. doi:10.1108/09534810410554506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen A. An examination of the relationships between work commitment and nonwork domains. Human Relations. 1995;48(3):239–263. doi:10.1177/001872679504800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen -C-C, Chiu S-F. The mediating role of job involvement in the relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior. J Soc Psychol. 2009;149(4):474–494. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.4.474-494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarros JC, Cooper BK, Santora JC. Leadership vision, organizational culture, and support for innovation in not‐for‐profit and for‐profit organizations. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2011;32:291–309. doi:10.1108/01437731111123933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paullay IM, Alliger GM, Stone-Romero EF. Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. J Appl Psychol. 1994;79(2):224. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath R, Yadav A, Saurabh S, Swami A. Influence of job satisfaction and job involvement of academicians with special reference to Tamil Nadu Universities. Int J Psychosoc Rehab. 2020;24(3):4296–4306.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn CE, Fichtner AR. An evaluation of state‐subsidized, firm‐based training: the workforce development partnership program. Int J Manpow. 2003;24. doi:10.1108/01437720310464990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takala J, Suwansaranyu U, Phusavat K. A proposed white‐collar workforce performance measurement framework. Industr Manag Data Syst. 2006;106:644–662. doi:10.1108/02635570610666421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papis J. Understanding the workforce: the key to success in a youth hostel in Scotland. Int J Contemp Hospital Manage. 2006;18:593–600. doi:10.1108/09596110610703020
   Google Scholar
• Avery K. Mapping the world’s youngest and oldest countries. Visual Capitalist. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cho E, Tay L. Domain satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between work–family spillover and subjective well-being: a longitudinal study. J Bus Psychol. 2016;31(3):445–457. doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9423-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky HL. Work, careers and social integration. Int Soc Sci J. 1960;12:543–560.
   Google Scholar
• Al Hassan S, Fatima T, Saeed I. A regional study on spillover perspective: analyzing the underlying mechanism of emotional exhaustion between family incivility, thriving and workplace aggression. Glob Region Rev. 2019;4(3):28–36. doi:10.31703/grr.2019(IV-III).04
   Google Scholar
• Müller C, Mildenberger T. Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: a systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educ Res Rev. 2021;100394. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humrickhouse E. Flipped classroom pedagogy in an online learning environment: a self-regulated introduction to information literacy threshold concepts. J Acad Librariansh. 2021;47(2):102327. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidin MS, Javed S, Liu B. Empirical study on spirituality, employee’s engagement and job satisfaction: evidence from China. Int J Public Admin. 2020;43(12):1042–1054. doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1665066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazu H, Demiralp D. Faculty members’ views on the effectiveness of teacher training programs to upskill life-long learning competence. Eur J Educ Res. 2016;63:205–224. doi:10.14689/ejer.2016.63.12
   Google Scholar
• Kazemipour F, Mohamad Amin S, Pourseidi B. Relationship between workplace spirituality and organizational citizenship behavior among nurses through mediation of affective organizational commitment. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012;44(3):302–310. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01456.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahipalan M, Sheena S. Mediating effect of engagement on workplace spirituality–job involvement relationship: a study among generation Y professionals. Asia Pacific J Manag Res Innov. 2018;14(1–2):1–9. doi:10.1177/2319510X18810995
   Google Scholar
• Milliman J, Czaplewski AJ, Ferguson J. Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes: an exploratory empirical assessment. J Organ Change Manag. 2003;16:426–447. doi:10.1108/09534810310484172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima T, Majeed M, Saeed I. Does participative leadership promote innovative work behavior: the moderated mediation model. Bus Econ Rev. 2017;9(4):139–156. doi:10.22547/BER/9.4.7
   Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky RW, Giacalone RA, Jurkiewicz CL. Workplace values and outcomes: exploring personal, organizational, and interactive workplace spirituality. J Bus Ethics. 2008;81(2):465–480. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9507-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz S, Hall DT. Organizational research on job involvement. Psychol Bull. 1977;84(2):265. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Word J. Engaging work as a calling: examining the link between spirituality and job involvement. J Manag Spiritual Religion. 2012;9(2):147–166. doi:10.1080/14766086.2012.688622
   Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manage J. 1990;33(4):692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali M, Zhang L, Shah SJ, et al. Impact of humble leadership on project success: the mediating role of psychological empowerment and innovative work behavior. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2020;41:349–367. doi:10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SP, Leigh TW. A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(4):358. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oyen MP, Gel EG, Hopp WJ. Performance opportunity for workforce agility in collaborative and noncollaborative work systems. Iie Transact. 2001;33(9):761–777. doi:10.1080/07408170108936871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muduli A. Workforce agility: examining the role of organizational practices and psychological empowerment. Glob Bus Organ Excell. 2017;36(5):46–56. doi:10.1002/joe.21800
   Google Scholar
• Sumukadas N, Sawhney R. Workforce agility through employee involvement. Iie Transact. 2004;36(10):1011–1021. doi:10.1080/07408170490500997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hormozi AM. Agile manufacturing: the next logical step. Benchmarking. 2001;8:132–143. doi:10.1108/14635770110389843
   Google Scholar
• Qin R, Nembhard DA, Barnes WL. Workforce flexibility in operations management. Surveys Operation Res Manag Sci. 2015;20(1):19–33. doi:10.1016/j.sorms.2015.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Sherehiy B, Karwowski W. The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014;44(3):466–473. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natapoera MP, Mangundjaya WL. The effect of employee involvement and work engagement on workforce agility. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• He P, Jiang C, Xu Z, et al. Knowledge hiding: current research status and future research directions. Front Psychol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon S, Suresh M. Enablers of workforce agility in engineering educational institutions. J Appl Res High Educ. 2020. doi:10.1108/JARHE-12-2019-0304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott DC. Spiritual Well-Being of Workers: An Exploratory Study of Spirituality in the Workplace. The University of Texas at Austin; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando M. Spirituality and leadership. A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fry LW. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadersh Q. 2003;14(6):693–727. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Naqvi F. Spirituality in organizational life: an empirical study of spirituality and job attitudes. Abhigyan. 2010;28(3):18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hopp WJ, Oyen MP. Agile workforce evaluation: a framework for cross-training and coordination. Iie Transact. 2004;36(10):919–940. doi:10.1080/07408170490487759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodarzi B, Shakeri K, Ghaniyoun A, et al. Assessment correlation of the organizational agility of human resources with the performance staff of Tehran Emergency Center. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7. doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_109_18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bahrami MA, Kiani MM, Montazeralfaraj R, et al. The mediating role of organizational learning in the relationship of organizational intelligence and organizational agility. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016;7(3):190–196. doi:10.1016/j.phrp.2016.04.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aghahosseini EM, Rezaie DH, Nilipour TSA. The impact of human resources agility on crisis management (case study: Blood transfusion organization of Isfahan and other Three accident-prone provinces throughout the country). 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;885(879):879–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiess HO, Bloomquist DW. Psychological Research Methods: A Conceptual Approach. Allyn & Bacon; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Sherehiy B. Relationships Between Agility Strategy, Work Organization and Workforce Agility. University of Louisville; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmos DP, Duchon D, McDaniel RR, et al. What a mess! Participation as a simple managerial rule to ‘complexify’organizations. J Manage Stud. 2002;39(2):189–206. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, et al. Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(3):331–337. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev. 2014;26:106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. New York: Guilford; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kline R. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guiford; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Shevlin M, Miles JN. Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Pers Individ Dif. 1998;25(1):85–90. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00055-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger JH. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42(5):893–898. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using Multivariate Statistics. Vol. 5. MA: Pearson Boston; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage publications; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56(2):81. doi:10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcón D, Sánchez JA, De Olavide U. Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: user-written commands for Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). In: Spanish STATA Meeting. Universidad Pablo de Olavide; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Sage CA; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudiro A, Adi A, Fakhri R. Engaging employees through compensation fairness, job Involvement, organizational commitment: the roles of employee spirituality. Manag Sci Lett. 2021;11(5):1499–1508. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2020.12.023
   Google Scholar
• Van der Walt F, Swanepoel H. The relationship between workplace spirituality and job involvement: a South African study. Afri J Bus Econ Res. 2015;10(1):95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Utami NM, Sapta I, Verawati Y, Astakoni I. Relationship between workplace spirituality, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. J Asian Finance Econom Bus. 2021;8(1):507–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantha T, Nayak U. The relation of workplace spirituality with employees’ innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. J Indian Bus Res. 2020. doi:10.1108/JIBR-03-2020-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar Bandyopadhyay S, Goyal V, Dutta S. Problems and solutions due to mental anxiety of it professionals work at home during COVID-19. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(3–4):604–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PTA. PTA annual report 2019. PTA official website; 2019. Available from: https://www.pta.gov.pk/en/annual-reports. Accessed September 25, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup Pakistan Survey. Digital learning and online education during COVID-19. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Zada S, Wang Y, Zada M, et al. Effect of mental health problems on academic performance among university students in Pakistan. Int J Ment Health Promot. 2021;23(3):395–408. doi:10.32604/IJMHP.2021.015903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber E, Sarajlic Vukovic I, Musovic M, et al. Personal wellbeing, work ability, satisfaction with life and work in psychiatrists who emigrated from Croatia. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(4):449–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar