Negative Influences of Differentiated Empowering Leadership on Team Members’ Helping Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Envy and Contempt

References

• Zhou X, Rasool SF, Ma D. The relationship between workplace violence and innovative work behavior: the mediating roles of employee wellbeing. Healthcare. 2020;8(3):332. doi:10.3390/healthcare8030332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong M, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, Spain SM, Tsai CY. A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. Leadersh Q. 2019;30(1):34–58. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma PN, Kirkman BL. Leveraging leaders: a literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group Organ Manage. 2015;40(2):193–237. doi:10.1177/1059601115574906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundsen S, Martinsen ØL. Empowering leadership: construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. Leadersh Q. 2014;25(3):487–511. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub S, Robert C. Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Hum Relat. 2010;63(11):1743–1770. doi:10.1177/0018726710365092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao P, He W, Long L-R. Why and when empowering leadership has different effects on employee work performance: the pivotal roles of passion for work and role breadth self-efficacy. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2018;25(1):85–100. doi:10.1177/1548051817707517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humborstad SW, Nerstad CGL, Dysvik A. Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance: a competing hypothesis approach. Pers Rev. 2014;43(2):246–271. doi:10.1108/PR-01-2012-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S-L, Huo Y, Long LR. Chinese traditionality matters: effects of differentiated empowering leadership on followers’ trust in leaders and work outcomes. J Bus Ethics. 2017;145(1):81–93. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2900-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manag. 2008;34(3):410–476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Chiaburu DS, Kirkman BL. Cross-level influences of empowering leadership on citizenship behavior: organizational support climate as a double-edged sword. J Manag. 2017;43(4):1076–1102. doi:10.1177/0149206314546193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills P, Ungson G. Reassessing the limits of structural empowerment: organizational constitution and trust as controls. Acad Manage Rev. 2003;28(1):143–153. doi:10.2307/30040694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW. From micro to meso: critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3(3):211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS, Oosterhof A. Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Acad Manage J. 2006;49(5):877–893. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22798169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Beehr TA, Prewett MS. Employee responses to empowering leadership: a meta-analysis. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2018;25(3):257–276. doi:10.1177/1548051817750538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Cropanzano R. Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL, editors. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews. US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press; 1996:1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Li S-L, He W, Yam KC, Long LR. When and why empowering leadership increases followers’ taking charge: a multilevel study in China. Asia Pac J Manag. 2015;32(3):645–670. doi:10.1007/s10490-015-9424-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JB, Tsui AS, Kinicki AJ. Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Acad Manage J. 2010;53(1):90–106. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48037079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Erdogan B, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT. Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(6):723–746. doi:10.1002/job.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger LA. Theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat. 1954;7(2):117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins RL. For better or worse: the impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychol Bull. 1996;119(1):51–69. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills TA. Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychol Bull. 1981;90(2):245–271. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Murnighan JK. Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(2):325–340. doi:10.2307/259377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li AN, Liao H. How do leader–member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99(5):847–866. doi:10.1037/a0037233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley; 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Chiniara M, Bentein K. The servant leadership advantage: when perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(2):333–345. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Rasool SF, Yang J, Asghar MZ. Exploring the relationship between despotic leadership and job satisfaction: the role of self efficacy and leader–member exchange. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5307. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Zhang C. What happens to a black sheep? Exploring how multilevel leader–member exchange differentiation shapes the organizational altruism behaviors of low leader–member exchange minority. Group Organ Manage. 2021;46(6):1073–1105. doi:10.1177/1059601121998584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Giesler RB, Morris KA. When comparisons arise. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(2):227–236. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y, Mueller JS. Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to Envy? J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(3):666–680. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelled LH. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organ Sci. 1996;7:615–631. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J. Leader-member exchange, perceived organizational justice, and cooperative communication. Manage Commun Q. 2001;14(4):574–589. doi:10.1177/0893318901144002
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman MD, Eisenberger NI. Pains and pleasures of social life. Science. 2009;323(5916):890–891. doi:10.1126/science.1170008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Scott KL, Shaw JD, Tepper BJ, Aquino K. A social context model of envy and social undermining. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(3):643–666. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector PE, Fox S. The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In: Fox S, Spector PE, editors. Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of Actors and Targets. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2005:151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS. Work groups and teams in organizations. In: Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, editors. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2003:333–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, O’Neill JW, Cho HM. When does an employee not help coworkers? The effect of leader–member exchange on employee envy and organizational citizenship behavior. Int J Hosp Manag. 2010;29(3):530–537. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Li W-D, Li Y, Liden RC, Li S, Zhang X. Unintended consequences of being proactive? Linking proactive personality to coworker envy, helping, and undermining, and the moderating role of prosocial motivation. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(2):250–267. doi:10.1037/apl0000494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer AH, Roseman IJ. Beat them or ban them: the characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;93(1):103–115. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melwani S, Mueller JS, Overbeck JR. Looking down: the influence of contempt and compassion on emergent leadership categorizations. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(6):1171–1185. doi:10.1037/a0030074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Giner-Sorolla R. Contempt: derogating others while keeping calm. Emot Rev. 2016;8(4):346–357. doi:10.1177/1754073915610439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sias PM, Jablin FM. Differential superior–subordinate relations, perceptions of fairness, and coworker communication. Hum Commun Res. 1995;22(5):38. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00360.x
   Google Scholar
• Tse HHM, Lam CK, Lawrence SA, Huang X. When my supervisor dislikes you more than me: the effect of dissimilarity in leader–member exchange on coworkers’ interpersonal emotion and perceived help. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98(6):974–988. doi:10.1037/a0033862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzmuller M, Van Dyne L. Proactive and reactive helping: contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping. J Organ Behav. 2013;34(4):560–580. doi:10.1002/job.1848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriber RA, Chung JM, Sorensen KS, Robins RW. Dispositional contempt: a first look at the contemptuous person. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017;113(2):280–309. doi:10.1037/pspp0000101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasool SF, Samma M, Wang M, Zhao Y, Zhang Y. How human resource management practices translate into sustainable organizational performance: the mediating role of product, process and knowledge innovation. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:1009–1025. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S204662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: Triandis HC, Berry JW, editors. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1980:389–444.
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZX, Aryee S. Delegation and employee work outcomes: an examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(1):226–238. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24162389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Ahearne M, Mackenzie SB. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(2):262–270. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Hadi AS, Price B. Regression Analysis by Examples. 3rd Edition. New York: Wiley VCH; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Griffin MA, Gavin MB. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, editors. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:467–511.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen‐Charash Y. Episodic envy. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39(9):2128–2173. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Anderson SE, Satisfaction J. Organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J Manag. 1991;17(3):601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: quantification, inference, and interpretation. Commun Monogr. 2018;85(1):4–40. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO, Weber TJ. Leadership: current theories, research, and future directions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60(1):421–449. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong M, Spain SM, Yammarino FJ, Yun S. Two faces of empowering leadership: enabling and burdening. Leadersh Q. 2016;27(4):602–616. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MH, Sun PYT. The downside of transformational leadership when encouraging followers to network. Leadersh Q. 2015;26(5):790–801. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wan J, Liu Z, Ma X. Shared leadership and team effectiveness: the examination of LMX differentiation and servant leadership on the emergence and consequences of shared leadership. Hum Perform. 2017;30(4):155–168. doi:10.1080/08959285.2017.1345909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson G, Buch R, Glasø L. Follower jealousy at work: a test of Vecchio’s model of antecedents and consequences of jealousy. J Psychol. 2018;152(1):60–74. doi:10.1080/00223980.2017.1407740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasool SF, Wang M, Tang M, Saeed A, Iqbal J. How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: the mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2294. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal J, Qureshi N, Ashraf MA, Rasool SF, Asghar MZ. The effect of emotional intelligence and academic social networking sites on academic performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:905–920. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S316664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar