Prism of Employee Performance Through the Means of Internal Support: A Study of Perceived Organizational Support

References

• Suazo MM, Turnley WH. Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relations between individual differences and psychological contract breach. J Manag Psychol. 2010;25(6):620–648. doi:10.1108/02683941011056969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moh’d Al-adaileh R, Dahou K, Hacini I. The impact of knowledge conversion processes on implementing a learning organization strategy. Learn Organ. 2012;19(6):482–496. doi:10.1108/09696471211266947
   Google Scholar
• Arnold KA, Dupré KE. Perceived organizational support, employee health and emotions. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2012;5(2):139–152. doi:10.1108/17538351211239171
   Google Scholar
• Taleghani GR, Divandari A, Shir MM. Impact of perceived organizational support on organizational commitment and performance: a study of Mellat Bank branches in Tehran; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Perryer C, Jordan C, Firns I, Travaglione A. Predicting turnover intentions: the interactive effects of organizational commitment and perceived organizational support. Manage Res Rev. 2010;33(9):911–923. doi:10.1108/01409171011070323
   Google Scholar
• Shanock LR, Eisenberger R. When supervisors feel supported: relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):689. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen DG, Shore LM, Griffeth RW. The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. J Manage. 2003;29(1):99–118. doi:10.1177/014920630302900107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield J, Mayfield M. The creative environment’s influence on intent to turnover: a structural equation model and analysis. Manag Res News. 2007;31(1):41–56. doi:10.1108/01409170810845949
   Google Scholar
• Stamper CL, Johlke MC. The impact of perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work outcomes. J Manage. 2003;29(4):569–588. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00025-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggle RJ, Edmondson DR, Hansen JD. A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research. J Bus Res. 2009;62(10):1027–1030. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne ZS, Hochwarter WA. I get by with a little help from my friends: the interaction of chronic pain and organizational support on performance. J Occup Health Psychol. 2006;11(3):215. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch PD, Eisenberger R, Armeli S. Perceived organizational support: inferior versus superior performance by wary employees. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(4):467. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau P. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson H. Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization. Adm Sci Q. 1965;9(4):370–390. doi:10.2307/2391032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manag j. 1990;33(4):692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro JA, Conway N. Exchange relationships: examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(4):774. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao H, Toya K, Lepak DP, Hong Y. Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):371. doi:10.1037/a0013504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settoon RP, Bennett N, Liden RC. Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(3):219. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacher H, Winter G. Eldercare demands, strain, and work engagement: the moderating role of perceived organizational support. J Vocat Behav. 2011;79(3):667–680. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne SJ, Shore LM, Bommer WH, Tetrick LE. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(3):590. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George JM, Reed TF, Ballard KA, Colin J, Fielding J. Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: effects of organizational and social support. Acad Manag J. 1993;36(1):157–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):698. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson MC, Timo N, Wang Y. How much does labour turnover cost? A case study of Australian four-and five-star hotels. Int J Contemp Hosp Manage. 2010;22(4):451–466. doi:10.1108/09596111011042686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballinger GA, Lehman DW, Schoorman FD. Leader–member exchange and turnover before and after succession events. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2010;113(1):25–36. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, Sucharski IL, Rhoades L. Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(3):565. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluss DM, Klimchak M, Holmes JJ. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(3):457–464. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalidass A, Bahron A. The relationship between perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and employee turnover intention. Int j Bus Adm. 2015;6(5):82. doi:10.5430/ijba.v6n5p82
   Google Scholar
• Lee J. Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment. Leadersh Organ Develop J. 2005;26(8):655–672. doi:10.1108/01437730510633728
   Google Scholar
• DeConinck JB. The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees’ level of trust. J Bus Res. 2010;63(12):1349–1355. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley D, Houghton JD, Bucklew NS. Perceived organizational support and turnover intention: the mediating effects of personal sacrifice and job fit. J Soc Psychol. 2010;150(3):238–257. doi:10.1080/00224540903365463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades L, Eisenberger R, Armeli S. Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(5):825. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25(2):161–178. doi:10.2307/2092623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter L, Lawler E, Hackman J. Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(3):497. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn JG. Trust and the Health of Organizations. Springer Science & Business Media; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Doney PM, Cannon JP, Mullen MR. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Acad Manag Rev. 1998;23(3):601–620. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Tetrick LE, Lynch P, Barksdale K. Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;36(4):837–867. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara K, Bilge S. Perceived organizational support and organizational trust in primary schools. Int J Human Sci. 2015;4:54.
   Google Scholar
• Fink M, Kraus S. Mutual trust as a key to internationalization of SMEs. Manag Res News. 2007;30(9):674–688. doi:10.1108/01409170710779980
   Google Scholar
• Dineen BR, Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson EC. Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(3):622. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham GR. The impact of supervisory characteristics on goal acceptance. Acad Manag J. 1975;18(3):461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum SH, Hébert D, Leroux S. Empowerment: power, culture and leadership–a strategy or fad for the millennium? J Workplace Learn. 1999;11(7):233–254. doi:10.1108/13665629910291929
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Conger JA, Kanungo RN. The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 1988;13(3):471–482. doi:10.2307/258093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch S. The Reader’s Digest Oxford Complete Wordfinder. Reader’s Digest Association Lit; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig JE. Symmetrical systems of internal communication. In: Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Routledge; 1992: 531–576.
   Google Scholar
• Asif M, Jameel A, Hussain A, Hwang J, Sahito N. Linking transformational leadership with nurse-assessed adverse patient outcomes and the quality of care: assessing the role of job satisfaction and structural empowerment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13):2381. doi:10.3390/ijerph16132381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell JE, Adams DM. The changing nature of mentoring in organizations: an introduction to the special issue on mentoring in organizations. J Vocat Behav. 1997;51(1):1–14. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1997.1602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter RM. The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation. Touchstone Book; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Parker CP, Baltes BB, Young SA, et al. Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta‐analytic review. J Organ Behav. 2003;24(4):389–416. doi:10.1002/job.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Rhoades L, Cameron J. Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(5):1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal S, Hashmi MS. Impact of perceived organizational support on employee retention with mediating role of psychological empowerment. PJCSS. 2015;9(1):18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, Schaufeli WB, de Vet Henrica C. van der Beek AJ. Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: a systematic review. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(8):856–866. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui SH, Zhiqiang M, Weijun H, Mingxing L. “Who champions or mentors others”? The role of personal resources in the perceived organizational politics and job attitudes relationship. Front Psychol. 2021;12:657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R. Employee involvement and total quality management: practices and results in fortune 1000 companies. Pers Psychol. 1993;46(4):890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagenson EA. The mentor advantage: perceived career/job experiences of protégés versus non‐protégés. J Organ Behav. 1989;10(4):309–320. doi:10.1002/job.4030100403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher GF, Ash RA. A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. J Appl Psychol. 1990;75(5):539. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher GF, Cox TH Jr. Race, gender, and opportunity: a study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(3):297. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandura TA, Williams EA. An investigation of the moderating effects of gender on the relationships between mentorship initiation and protégé perceptions of mentoring functions. J Vocat Behav. 2001;59(3):342–363. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandura TA. Mentorship and career mobility: an empirical investigation. J Organ Behav. 1992;13(2):169–174. doi:10.1002/job.4030130206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Cotton JL. Easier said than done: gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Acad Manag J. 1991;34(4):939–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(1):127. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baugh SG, Scandura TA. The effect of multiple mentors on protégé attitudes toward the work setting. J Soc Behav Pers. 1999;14(4):503.
   Google Scholar
• Whitely WT, Coetsier P. The relationship of career mentoring to early career outcomes. Organ Stud. 1993;14(3):419–441. doi:10.1177/017084069301400305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher AB. A concept analysis of motivation. J Cult Divers. 1999;6(4):130.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen PP, De Jonge J, Bakker AB. Specific determinants of intrinsic work motivation, burnout and turnover intentions: a study among nurses. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(6):1360–1369. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds PS. Inducing a definition of “hope” through the use of grounded theory methodology. J Adv Nurs. 1984;9(4):357–362. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1984.tb00384.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshua-Amadi M. Recruitment and retention: a study in motivation: in the first of two articles, Mabel Joshua-Amadi looks at what is sometimes needed to stop staff leaving the NHS. (applied management)(Cover Story). Nurs Manag. 2002;9(8):17–22. doi:10.7748/nm2002.12.9.8.17.c2134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baard PP, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and well‐being in two work settings 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34(10):2045–2068. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Connell JP, Ryan RM. Self-determination in a work organization. J Appl Psychol. 1989;74(4):580. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Guardia JG, Ryan RM, Couchman CE, Deci EL. Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(3):367. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Reid G. On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: a test of cognitive evaluation theory. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1984;6(1):94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Thrash TM. Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(5):804. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. Am Psychol. 1986;41(12):1389–1391. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.12.1389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley D, Megginson L, Pietri P. Supervisory Management: The Art of Inspiring. Empowering, and Developing People, International Student Edition. USA: Thomson South western; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Deci EL. Self‐determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(4):331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Forest J, Gilbert M-H, Aubé C, Morin E, Malorni A. The motivation at work scale: validation evidence in two languages. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(4):628–646. doi:10.1177/0013164409355698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay MA, Blanchard CM, Taylor S, Pelletier LG, Villeneuve M. Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian J Behav Sci. 2009;41(4):213. doi:10.1037/a0015167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardy R, Leonard B. Performance Management: Concepts. Skills, and Exercises. Vol. 163. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Delery JE, Doty DH. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad Manag J. 1996;39(4):802–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JP. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Anderson SE. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J Manage. 1991;17(3):601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qing M, Asif M, Hussain A, Jameel A. Exploring the impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in public sector organizations: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Rev Manag Sci. 2019;14:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jamal M. Job stress and job performance controversy revisited: an empirical examination in two countries. Int J Stress Manag. 2007;14(2):175. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Eby LT, Freeman DM, Rush MC, Lance CE. Motivational bases of affective organizational commitment: a partial test of an integrative theoretical model. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1999;72(4):463–483. doi:10.1348/096317999166798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell JI, Gagné M, Beaudry A, Dyer L. The role of perceived organizational support, distributive justice and motivation in reactions to new information technology. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(2):729–738. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhiqiang M, Siddiqui SH, Khan MAS. Be aware not reactive: testing a mediated-moderation model of dark triad and perceived victimization via self-regulatory approach. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2141. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett KR. The relationship between training and organizational commitment: a study in the health care field. Human Res Develop Quart. 2001;12(4):335–352. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1001
   Google Scholar
• Asif M, Qing M, Hwang J, Shi H. Ethical leadership, affective commitment, work engagement, and creativity: testing a multiple mediation approach. Sustainability. 2019;11(16):4489. doi:10.3390/su11164489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan B, Enders J. Support from the top: supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(2):321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Res Manag Rev. 1993;3(3):185–201. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
   Google Scholar
• Patterson M, Warr P, West M. Organizational climate and company productivity: the role of employee affect and employee level. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2004;77(2):193–216. doi:10.1348/096317904774202144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortridge-Baggett LM. The theory and measurement of the self-efficacy construct. Self-Efficacy Nurs. 2000;4:9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jaiswal D, Dhar RL. Impact of perceived organizational support, psychological empowerment and leader member exchange on commitment and its subsequent impact on service quality. Int J Produc Perform Manag. 2016;65(1):58–79. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-03-2014-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F. Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees. American Psychological Association; 2011.
   Google Scholar