Voice Contributes to Creativity via Leaders’ Endorsement Especially When Proposed by Extraverted High Performance Employees

References

• Bashshur MR, Oc B. When voice matters: a multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. J Manage. 2015;41(5):1530–1554. doi:10.1177/0149206314558302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farh CIC, Chen Z, Kozlowski SWJ, Chen G. Beyond the individual victim: multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99(6):1074–1095. doi:10.1037/a0037636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP. Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line? Pers Psychol. 2011;64(3):559–592. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01219.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris ER, Detert JR, Romney AC. Speaking up vs. being heard: the disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organ Sci. 2013;24(1):22–38. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin M, Newton DW, Lepine JA. A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Pers Psychol. 2017;70(1):11–71. doi:10.1111/peps.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry M, Wilkinson A. Employee voice, psychologisation and human resource management (HRM). Hum Resour Manag J. 2021. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER. Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Acad Manage J. 2007;50(4):869–884. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW. Employee voice behavior: integration and directions for future research. Acad Manag Ann. 2011;5(1):373–412. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.574506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Song Z, Li X, Liao Z. Why and when leader’s affective states influence employee upward voice. Acad Manage J. 2017;60(1):238–263. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.1082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter COLH, Ng KY. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:425–445. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JP, Whitman DS, Viswesvaran C. Employee proactivity in organizations: a comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. J Occup Organ Psych. 2010;83(2):275–300. doi:10.1348/096317910X502359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng TWH, Feldman DC. Employee voice behavior: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. J Organ Behav. 2012;33:216–234. doi:10.1002/job.754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Milliken FJ. Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad Manage Rev. 2000;25:706–725. doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Crant JM. What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Pers Psychol. 2001;54(4):845–874. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunton JE, Price KH, Hall TW. A field experiment examining the effects of membership in voting majority and minority subgroups and the ameliorating effects of postdecisional voice. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81:806–812. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JJ, Barnes CM, Yam KC, Guarana CL, Wang L. Do not like it when you need it the most: examining the effect of manager ego depletion on managerial voice endorsement. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(8):869–882. doi:10.1002/job.2370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaakyan S, Sherf E, Tangirala S, Guenter H. Keeping it between us: managerial endorsement of public versus private voice. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(7):1049–1066. doi:10.1037/apl0000816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao C, Liden RC, Liu Y, Wu J. Blessing or curse: the moderating role of political skill in the relationship between servant leadership, voice, and voice endorsement. J Organ Behav. 2021;42(8):987–1004. doi:10.1002/job.2544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan J, Zhou AJ, Yu L. A dual-process model of voice endorsement. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2021;1–23. doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1949624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CF, Lee C, Sui Y. Say it as it is: consequences of voice directness, voice politeness, and voicer credibility on voice endorsement. J Appl Psychol. 2019;104(5):642–658. doi:10.1037/apl0000358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris ER. The risks and rewards of speaking up: managerial responses to employee voice. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(4):851–875. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Beninger A. The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Res Organ Behav. 2011;31:73–98. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman AO. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Maynes TD, Podsakoff PM. Speaking more broadly: an examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2014;99(1):87–112. doi:10.1037/a0034284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Lepine JA. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad Manage J. 1998;41:108–119. doi:10.2307/256902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh J. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(1):71–92. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Ang S, Botero IC. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. J Manage Stud. 2003;40(6):1359–1392. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW. Employee voice and silence. Annu Rev Organ Psych. 2014;1:173–197. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting SxW, Maynes TD, Podsakoff NP, Podsakoff PM. Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(1):159–182. doi:10.1037/a0024871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciszke B. Multiple meanings of behavior: construing actions in terms of competence or morality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:222–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Higgins CA, Thoresen CJ, Barrick MR. The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Pers Psychol. 1999;52(3):621–652. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA. Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In: Hogan R, Johnson J, Briggs S, editors. Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1997:767–793.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TJ, Mowen JC, Donavan DT, Licata JW. The customer orientation of service workers: personality trait effects on self- and supervisor performance ratings. J Marketing Res. 2002;39(1):110–119. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.1.110.18928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham A, Petrides KV, Tsaousis I, Pappas K, Garrod D. A cross-cultural investigation into the relationships between personality traits and work values. J Psychol. 2005;139(1):5–32. doi:10.3200/JRLP.139.1.5-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Oh I, Berry CM, Li N, Gardner RG, Kozlowski SWJ. The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(6):1140–1166. doi:10.1037/a0024004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR, Zinko R, Arnell B, James M. Reputation as a moderator of political behavior-work outcomes relationships: a two-study investigation with convergent results. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(2):567–576. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. Toward a behavioral theory linking trust, reciprocity, and reputation. In: Ostrom E, Walker J, editors. Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2003:19–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland CI, Weiss W. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opin Quart. 1951;15(4):635–650. doi:10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanat-Maymon Y, Yaakobi E, Roth G. Motivating deference: employees’ perception of authority legitimacy as a mediator of supervisor motivating styles and employee work-related outcomes. Eur Manag J. 2018;36(6):769–783. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, He H. Exploring role of personal sense of power in facilitation of employee creativity: a dual mediation model based on the derivative view of self-determination theory. Psychol Res Behav Ma. 2020;13:517–527. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S257201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan W, Sun L, Lam LW. Employee-organization exchange and employee creativity: a motivational perspective. Int J Hum Resour Man. 2020;31(3):385–407. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1331368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee J, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instrument. In: Lonner W, Berry J, editors. Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: Sage; 1986:137–164.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE, Strauss ME. The mini-ipip scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychol Assess. 2006;18(2):192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: Mervielde I, Deary IJ, De Fruyt F, Ostendorf F, editors. Personality Psychology in Europe. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press; 1999:7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw Hill; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Tierney P, Kung-Mcintyre K. Employee creativity in Taiwan: an application of role identity theory. Acad Manage J. 2003;46(5):618–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sauzend Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications Inc; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar