The Effect of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Employees’ Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Start-Ups: A Moderated Mediation Model

References

• China Central Government Portal [homepage on the Internet]. The growth rate of the number of start-ups ranks first globally, and the hope of reengineering China’s talent and economy; 2015. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2015-12/14/content_5023515.htm. Accessed December 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• China Central Government Portal [homepage on the Internet]. There are more than 10000 newly registered enterprises every day, and the number of Chinese start-ups is the world leader; 2015. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2015-12/15/content_5024394.htm?gs_ws=tsina_635857979203970855. Accessed December 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Huren Report [homepage on the Internet]. Suzhou new district-Hurun global unicorn index 2020; 2020. Available from: https://www.hurun.net/zh-CN/Rank/HsRankDetails?pagetype=unicorn. Accessed December 14, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ. Building a foreign sales base: the roles of capabilities and alliances for entrepreneurial firms. J Bus Ventur. 2004;19(2):147–307. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, MacMillan IC, Surie G. Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. J Bus Ventur. 2004;19(2):241–260. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Ding D, Chen Z. Entrepreneurial leadership and performance in Chinese new ventures: a moderated mediation model of exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and environmental dynamism. Creativity Innov Manag. 2014;23(4):453–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza KC. Strategic contributions of game rooms to knowledge management: some prelimenary insights. Info Manag. 2004;41(1):63–74. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company. Harv Bus Rev. 1991;69(6):96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le PB, Lei H. Fostering knowledge sharing behaviors through ethical leadership practice: the mediating roles of disclosure-based trust and reliance-based trust in leadership. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2018;16(2):183–195. doi:10.1080/14778238.2018.1445426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong X, Fu Y, Wang T. Inclusive leadership, insider identity cognition and employee knowledge sharing: the moderating role of organizational innovation atmosphere. Res Dev Manag. 2019;31(03):109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Wu WL, Lee YC. Empowering group leaders encourages knowledge sharing: integrating the social exchange theory and positive organizational behavior perspective. J Knowl Manag. 2017;21(2):474–491. doi:10.1108/JKM-08-2016-0318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le PB, Lei H. The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. J Knowl Manag. 2018;22(3):521–537. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latif KF, Nazeer A, Shahzad F, Ullah M, Sahibzada UF, Sahibzada UF. Impact of entrepreneurial leadership on project success: mediating role of knowledge management processes. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2020;41(2):237–256. doi:10.1108/LODJ-07-2019-0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei H, Do NK, Le PB. Arousing a positive climate for knowledge sharing through moral lens: the mediating roles of knowledge-centered and collaborative culture. J Knowl Manag. 2019;23(8):1586–1604. doi:10.1108/JKM-04-2019-0201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson TA, Meyer JP, Wang XH. Leadership, commitment, and culture: a meta-analysis. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2013;20(1):84–106. doi:10.1177/1548051812466919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Q, Mcelroy JC, Morrow PC, Liu R. The relationship between career growth and organizational commitment. J Vocat Behav. 2010;77(3):391–400. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir MS, Haider S, Asadullah MA, Ahmed M, Sajjad M. Moderated mediation between transformational leadership and organizational commitment: the role of procedural justice and career growth opportunities. SAGE Open. 2020;10(2):1–19. doi:10.1177/2158244020933336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Bartlett CH. Rebuilding behavioral context: a blueprint for corporate renewal. Sloan Manage Rev. 1996;37(2):23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wei J, Xiong R, Hassan M, Mohamd SA, Fawzi AF, Khader JA. Entrepreneurship, corporate social responsibilities, and innovation impact on banks’ financial performance. Front Psychol. 2021;12:680661. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller D. The Correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manage Sci. 1983;29(7):770–791. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed I, Ali B. Impact of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial management and environmental dynamism on firm’s financial performance. J Econ Behav Stud. 2011;3(2):101–114. doi:10.22610/jebs.v3i2.260
   Google Scholar
• Renko M, Tarabishy AE, Carsrud AL, Brännback M. Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. J Small Bus Manag. 2015;53(1):54–74. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuratko DF. Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: guest editor’s perspective. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2007;13(4):1–11. doi:10.1177/10717919070130040201
   Google Scholar
• Rehman KU, Aslam F, Mata MN, et al. Impact of entrepreneurial leadership on product innovation performance: intervening effect of absorptive capacity, intra-firm networks, and design thinking. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7054. doi:10.3390/su13137054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahid MM, Zhang J, Gul GF. Entrepreneurial leadership and employee innovative behavior: intervening role of creative self-efficacy. Human Syst Manag. 2020;39(3):367–379. doi:10.3233/HSM-190783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Pu B, Guan Z. Entrepreneurial leadership and turnover intention of employees: the role of affective commitment and person-job fit. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13):2380. doi:10.3390/ijerph16132380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke JL, Ding Q. The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on employees’ attitude and innovation performance in start-ups: the mediating effect of workplace spirit and leader member exchange moderating effect. Econ Manag Res. 2020;41(01):91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Makhdoom HUR, Asim S. Impact of entrepreneurial leadership on innovative work behavior: examining mediation and moderation mechanisms. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:105–118. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S236876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang L, Yao N. The impact of self-sacrificing leadership on employees’ tacit knowledge sharing. Leadersh Sci. 2017;2007(32):40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang J, Liu Q. Research on the impact of abuse management on employees’ tacit knowledge sharing: mediated by psychological capital. Finan Account Commun. 2018;21:125–128.
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZJ, Davison RM, Mao JY, Wang ZH. When and how authoritarian leadership and leader Renqing orientation influence tacit knowledge sharing intentions. Info Manag. 2018;55:840–849. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandera C, Keshtkar F, Bartolacci MR, Neerudu S, Passerini K. Knowledge management and the entrepreneur: insights from Ikujiro Nonaka’s Dynamic Knowledge Creation model (SECI). Int J Innov Stud. 2017;1(3):163–174. doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2017.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Liu B, Zhao J, Yu SX. Influence of goal orientation on tacit knowledge sharing of new generation employees: a moderated mediation model. Finance Econ. 2020;2020(02):83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo CF, Crespo NF, Curado C. The effects of subsidiary’s leadership and entrepreneurship on international marketing knowledge transfer and new product development. Int Bus Rev. 2021;(10):101928. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Manag Rev. 1991;1(1):61–89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Pu B, Guan Z. Entrepreneurial leadership and turnover intention in startups: mediating roles of employees’ job embeddedness, job satisfaction and affective commitment. Sustainability. 2019;11(4):1101. doi:10.3390/su11041101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manag J. 1995;38(5):1442–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein HJ, Molloy JC, Brinsfield CT. Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Acad Manag Rev. 2012;37(1):130–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akturan A, Çekmecelioğlu HG. The Effects of knowledge sharing and organizational citizenship behaviors on creative behaviors in educational institutions. Procedia Social Behav Sci. 2016;235:342–350. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.042
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks P. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowl Process Manag. 1999;6(2):91–100. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199906)6:2<91::AID-KPM54>3.0.CO;2-M
   Google Scholar
• Mihalache M, Mihalache OR. How workplace support for the COVID-19 pandemic and personality traits affect changes in employees’ affective commitment to the organization and job-related well-being. Hum Resour Manage. 2021;(6):1–20. doi:10.1002/hrm.22082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshaabani A, Naz F, Magda R, Rudnák I. Impact of perceived organizational support on OCB in the time of COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary: employee engagement and affective commitment as mediators. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7800. doi:10.3390/su13147800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renkema M, Leede JD, Zyl L. High-involvement HRM and innovative behavior: the mediating roles of nursing staff’s autonomy and affective commitment. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29:2499–2514. doi:10.1111/jonm.13390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldhoven MV, Meijman TF. The Measurement of Psychosocial Strain at Work: The Questionnaire Experience and Evaluation of Work. Amsterdam: NIA (in Dutch); 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Yan L, Bai S. High-performance work system and employee innovation behavior: influence from personal perception. Sci Technol Progr Countermeasures. 2016;33(20):134–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee GN. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. Mis Quarter. 2005;29(1):87–111. doi:10.2307/25148669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo ML. Career growth opportunities, thriving at work and career outcomes: can COVID-19 anxiety make a difference? J Hospital Tour Manag. 2021;48:174–181. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min R, He J. Analysis of knowledge sharing based on leadership quality and employee status. Econ Jingwei. 2011;04:121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Qiao M. Study on the impact of delayed job satisfaction on employee overwork: the moderating role of career growth opportunities. Western Forum. 2018;28(01):109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM. New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: a study of psychological contracts. J Organ Behav. 1990;11(5):389–400. doi:10.1002/job.4030110506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Han XN. Firmness and wavering: a study on the professional commitment of journalists and its influencing factors. Int Press. 2020;310(08):66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Robert CM, Michael WB, Hazuki MS. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Wen ZL. Topic packaging strategy in structural equation modelling. Adv Psychol Sci. 2011;19(12):1859–1867.
   Google Scholar
• Yao T, Huang W, Fan X. Research on employee loyalty in service industry based on organizational commitment mechanism. Manage World. 2008;05:102–114+123.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Smith CA. Commitment to organizations and occupations: extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(4):538–551. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko JW, Price JL, Mueller CW. Assessment of Meyer and Allen’s three-component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(6):961–973. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang C, Ai S, Gong Z. The social function of positive emotion and its impact on Team Creativity: the mediating role of tacit knowledge sharing. Nankai Bus Rev. 2011;14(04):129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zhang D. An Empirical Study on the moderating effect of value variables in Price-Mueller turnover model. Manage Rev. 2006;9:46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal S, Toulson P, Tweed D. Employees as performers in knowledge intensive firms: role of knowledge sharing. Int J Manpow. 2015;36(7):1072–1094. doi:10.1108/IJM-10-2013-0241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. NY: the Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Market Theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Market Res. 1981;18(3):382–388. doi:10.1177/002224378101800313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccallum RC, Hong S. Power analysis in covariance structure modelling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behav Res. 1997;32(2):193–210. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br J Mathe Statis Psychol. 2014;67(3):450–472. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao SJ, Yi LF, Lian YL. Entrepreneurial leadership, organizational resilience and entrepreneurial performance. Foreign Econ Manag. 2021;43(03):42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ma F, Kong F, Sun H. Review of organizational commitment theory. Info Sci. 2010;28(11):1741–1745.
   Google Scholar
• Benaraba C, Bulaon N, Escosio S, Narvaez A, Suinan A, Roma M. A comparative analysis on the career perceptions of tourism management students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure. Sport Tour Educ. 2021;30:100361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie B, Xin X, Zhou W. Sense of mission: a recovering research topic. Prog Psychol Sci. 2016;2016(5):783–793.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H. Research on the construction of tacit knowledge sharing in informal organizations within enterprises. Info Theory Pract. 2012;35(07):69–73+108.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Xin X. Does the career orientation of borderless consciousness, and self-guidance improve or reduce employees’ organizational loyalty: intermediary and regulation of employability and career growth opportunities? Manag Sci. 2013;2013(09):5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe JP, Finkelstein LM. The “new career” and organizational commitment: do boundaryless and protean attitudes make a difference? Career Dev Int. 2009;14(3):242–260. doi:10.1108/13620430910966424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Q, McElroy JC. Organizational career growth. Affect Occup Commit Turnover Intent. 2012;80(2):256–265.
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed MI, Okumus F, Weng Q, Hameed Z, Nawaz MS. Career adaptability and employee turnover intentions: the role of perceived career opportunities and orientation to happiness in the hospitality industry. J Hospital Tour Manag. 2020;44:98–107. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Xie B, Cheng Y. How to improve the work input of knowledge workers: based on the dual perspective of resource conservation theory and social exchange theory. Econ Manag. 2016;38(02):81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Wayne SJ. Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(5):774–780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong P, Liu J, Wei H, Ma X. The influence of inclusive leadership on nurses’ sense of organizational support and tacit knowledge sharing. Nurs Res. 2018;32(06):938–940.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao SS. Research on the motivation model of employee knowledge sharing under Chinese culture background. Nankai Bus Rev. 2013;16(05):26–37.
   Google Scholar