195
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Hierarchical Relationship Between the Relational-Self and the Collective-Self During Attention Processing

, , &
Pages 557-567 | Published online: 05 Mar 2022

References

  • Brewer MB, Chen YR. Where (Who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychol Rev. 2007;114(1):133–151. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.133
  • Zheng Y, Xiao Z, Chen H, Hu X, Zhou X. The hierarchical relationship between relational self and collective self in self-construal. J Psychol Sci. 2018;41(6):1403–1409.
  • Zheng Y, Xiao Z, Wei L, Chen H. The neural representation of relational-and collective-self: two forms of collectivism. Front Psychol. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02624
  • Nehrlich AD, Gebauer JE, Sedikides C, Abele AE. Individual self > relational self > collective self-but why? Processes driving the self-hierarchy in self- and person perception.. J Pers. 2018;87:212–230. doi:10.1111/jopy.12384
  • Wang F, Peng K, Chechlacz M, Humphreys GW, Sui J. The neural basis of independence versus interdependence orientations: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of brain volume. Psychol Sci. 2017;28(4):519–529. doi:10.1177/0956797616689079
  • Zhu X, Wu H, Yang S, Gu R. Motivational hierarchy in the Chinese brain: primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self? Front Psychol. 2016;7:877. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00877
  • Mamat M, Huang W, Shang R, et al. Relational self versus collective self: a cross-cultural study in interdependent self-construal between Han and Uyghur in China. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2014;45(6):959–970. doi:10.1177/0022022114530558
  • Sedikides C, Gaertner L, Luke MA, O’Mara EM, Gebauer JE. A three-tier hierarchy of self-potency: individual self, relational self, collective self. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;48:235–295. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407188-9.00005-3
  • Zajenkowska A, Kaźmierczak I, Bodecka M, Rajchert J, Batory-Ginda A. Demographic and contextual factors impact a three-tier hierarchy of self-potency among community adults and inmates. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;180:0–4. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110988
  • Czerniawska D, Czerniawska M, Szydło J. Between collectivism and individualism – analysis of changes in value systems of students in the period of 15 years. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:2015–2033. doi:10.2147/prbm.s330038
  • Oliveira V, Goulart M, Nobre JC, Lucion MK, Silveira PP, Bizarro L. Emotional interference of baby and adult faces on automatic attention in parenthood. Psychol Neurosci. 2017;10(2):144–153. doi:10.1037/pne0000085
  • Enock F, Sui J, Hewstone M, Humphreys GW. Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching: evidence for a shared representation. Acta Psychol. 2018;182:107–118. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.011
  • Macrae CN, Visokomogilski A, Golubickis M, Cunningham WA, Sahraie A. Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017;43(3):438–443. doi:10.1037/xhp0000361
  • Truong G, Roberts KH, Todd RM. I saw mine first: a prior-entry effect for newly acquired ownership. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017;43(1):192–205. doi:10.1037/xhp0000295
  • Devue C, Brédart S. Attention to self-referential stimuli: can I ignore my own face? Acta Psychol. 2008;128(2):290–297. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.004
  • Devue C, Van Der Stigchel S, Brédart S, Theeuwes J. You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer. Acta Psychol. 2009;111:114–122. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.003
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and bioMedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146
  • Gaertner L, Sedikides C, Luke M, et al. A motivational hierarchy within: primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self ? J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(5):997–1013. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.009
  • Yang H, Wang F, Gu N, Gao X, Zhao G. The cognitive advantage for one’s own name is not simply familiarity: an eye-tracking study. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20(6):1176–1180. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0426-z
  • Yang H, Huang X. Group-reference effect in Chinese. Acta Psychol Sin. 2007;39(2):235–241.
  • Kashima Y, Koval P, Kashima ES. Reconsidering culture and self. Psychol Stud. 2011;56:12–22. doi:10.1007/s12646-011-0071-4
  • Han S, Northoff G, Vogeley K, Wexler BE, Kitayama S, Varnum MEW. A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:335–359. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-071112-054629
  • Korn CW, Fan Y, Zhang K, Wang C, Han S, Heekeren HR. Cultural influences on social feedback processing of character traits Cultural influences on social feedback processing of character traits. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00192
  • Kujawa A, Proudfit GH, Klein DN. Neural reactivity to rewards and losses in offspring of mothers and fathers with histories of depressive and anxiety disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123(2):287–297. doi:10.1037/a0036285
  • Alexopoulos T, Muller D, Ric F, Marendaz C. I, me, mine: automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2012;42(6):770–779. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1882
  • Liu J, Chen H, Gao X, Meng R, Jackson T. Attention and recognition biases associated with stature dissatisfaction among young men in China. Body Image. 2014;11(4):562–569. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.08.011
  • Thigpen NN, Gruss LF, Garcia S, Herring DR, Keil A. What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity. Psychophysiology. 2018;55(6):1–16. doi:10.1111/psyp.13058
  • Moradi Z, Najlerahim A, Macrae CN, Humphreys GW. Attentional saliency and ingroup biases: from society to the brain. Soc Neurosci. 2020;15(3):324–333. doi:10.1080/17470919.2020.1716070
  • Stolte M, Humphreys G, Yankouskaya A, Sui J. Dissociating biases towards the self and positive emotion. Q J Exp Psychol. 2017;70(6):1011–1022. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1101477
  • Johnston RJ, Edmonds AJ. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review. Memory. 2009;17(5):577–596. doi:10.1080/09658210902976969
  • Wang J, Kitayama S, Han S. Sex difference in the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant social information: an event-related potential study of familiar face recognition. Brain Res. 2011;1408:41–51. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.060
  • Arsalidou M, Barbeau EJ, Bayless SJ, Taylor MJ. Brain responses differ to faces of mothers and fathers. Brain Cogn. 2010;74(1):47–51. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.003
  • Tacikowski P, Cygan HB, Nowicka A. Neural correlates of own and close-other’s name recognition: ERP evidence. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00194
  • Moradi Z, Sui J, Hewstone M, Humphreys GW. In-group modulation of perceptual matching. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015;22:1255–1277. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0798-8
  • Bennett M, Sani F. Children’s subjective identification with social groups: a self-stereotyping approach. Dev Sci. 2008;11(1):69–75. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00642.x
  • Moradi ZZ, Duta M, Hewstone M, Yankouskaya A, Enock F, Humphreys GW. The rival doesn’t catch my eyes: in-group relevance modulates inhibitory control over anti-saccades. Vis Cogn. 2017;25:1–15.
  • Moradi ZZ, Manohar S, Duta M, Enock F, Humphreys GW. In-group biases and oculomotor responses: beyond simple approach motivation. Exp Brain Res. 2018;236(5):1347–1355. doi:10.1007/s00221-018-5221-7
  • Fan W, Zhang Y, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhong Y. The temporal features of self-referential processing evoked by national flag. Neurosci Lett. 2011;505(3):233–237. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.10.017
  • Scott WD, Penningroth SL, Paup S, Li X, Adams D, Mallory B. The relational self-schema measure: assessing psychological needs in multiple self-with-other representations. J Pers Assess. 2022;104(1):74–85. doi:10.1080/00223891.2021.1900207