Does Servant Leadership Control Psychological Distress in Crisis? Moderation and Mediation Mechanism

References

• da Silva SJR, Pena L. Collapse of the public health system and the emergence of new variants during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. One Health. 2021;13:100287. doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrawashdeh HM, Al-Tammemi AB, Alzawahreh MK, et al. Occupational burnout and job satisfaction among physicians in times of COVID-19 crisis: a convergent parallel mixed-method study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–18. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10897-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzo V, Quattropani MC, Sardella A, et al. Depression, anxiety, and stress among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak and relationships with expressive flexibility and context sensitivity. Front Psychol. 2021;12:348. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman S, Lela U. Psychological aid to COVID-19 pandemic: a mental health response to crises management. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(2):262–265. doi:10.24869/psyd.2020.262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenliu A, Uka F, Weine S. Building online and telephone psychological first aid services in a low resource setting during covid-19: the case of Kosovo. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(3–4):570–576. doi:10.24869/psyd.2020.570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapolla P, Mingoli A, Lee R. Deaths from COVID-19 in healthcare workers in Italy—What can we learn? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021;42(3):364–365. doi:10.1017/ice.2020.241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem H, Lucey DR. Healthcare worker infections and deaths due to COVID-19: a survey from 37 nations and a call for WHO to post national data on their website. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;102:239. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao F, Ahmed F, Faraz NA. Caring for the caregiver during COVID-19 outbreak: does inclusive leadership improve psychological safety and curb psychological distress? A cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;110:103725. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizaha YN, Rijalb MK, Rumainurc UN, et al. Transformational or transactional leadership style: which affects work satisfaction and performance of Islamic university lecturers during COVID-19 pandemic. Sys Rev Pharm. 2020;11(7):577–588.
   Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Yao F, Lv H, Hu Y. Interaction between marine economic development and talent cultivation: the result of canonical correlation analysis. J Coastal Res. 2020. doi:10.2112/SI103-017.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Faraz NA, Ahmed F, et al. Curbing nurses’ burnout during COVID‐19: the roles of servant leadership and psychological safety. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(8):2383–2391. doi:10.1111/jonm.13414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton M, Murray E, Christian MD. Mental health care for medical staff and affiliated healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Heart J. 2020;9(3):241–247. doi:10.1177/2048872620922795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegney DG, Rees CS, Osseiran-Moisson R, et al. Perceptions of nursing workloads and contributing factors, and their impact on implicit care rationing: a Queensland, Australia study. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(2):371–380. doi:10.1111/jonm.12693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapum J, Nguyen M, Lai S, et al. “The little lights in this dark tunnel”: emotional support of nurses working in COVID-19 acute care hospital environments. Int Health Trends Perspect. 2021;1(1):29–43. doi:10.32920/ihtp.v1i1.1417
   Google Scholar
• van Mol MMC, Nijkamp MD, Bakker J, et al. Counterbalancing work-related stress? Work engagement among intensive care professionals. Aust Crit Care. 2018;31(4):234–241. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2017.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Liu Y. Impact of professional nursing practice environment and psychological empowerment on nurses’ work engagement: test of structural equation modelling. J Nurs Manag. 2015;23(3):287–296. doi:10.1111/jonm.12124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly J, Jackson D, Anders R, et al. Who speaks for nursing? COVID‐19 highlighting gaps in leadership. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(15–16):2751–2752. doi:10.1111/jocn.15305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen K, Taris TW. Leading well: challenges to researching leadership in occupational health psychology–and some ways forward. Work Stress. 2019;33(2):107–118. doi:10.1080/02678373.2019.1592263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen IA, McArthur PW, Jonassen JR. Informal leadership redundancy: balancing structure and flexibility in subsea operations. Scand J Manag. 2015;31(3):409–423. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson M, Jackson D. Transformational leadership in nursing: towards a more critical interpretation. Nurs Inq. 2013;20(1):11–22. doi:10.1111/nin.12006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CA. Connecting nursing leadership and patient outcomes: state of the science. J Nurs Manag. 2015;23(3):275–278. doi:10.1111/jonm.12307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowski P, Lim HJ. Mindfulness at work: positive affect, hope, and optimism mediate the relationship between dispositional mindfulness, work engagement, and well-being. Mindfulness. 2015;6(6):1250–1262. doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0388-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche M, Haar JM, Luthans F. The role of mindfulness and psychological capital on the well-being of leaders. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(4):476. doi:10.1037/a0037183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conversano C, Ciacchini R, Orrù G, et al. Mindfulness, compassion, and self-compassion among health care professionals: what’s new? A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1683. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, et al. Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol. 2004;11(3):230.
   Google Scholar
• Collier WG, Shi X. Mindfulness, meditation, and belief in free will/determinism. Psychol Rep. 2020;123(5):1724–1752. doi:10.1177/0033294119892884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani F, Setti I, Sommovigo V, et al. Who responds creatively to role conflict? Evidence for a curvilinear relationship mediated by cognitive adjustment at work and moderated by mindfulness. J Bus Psychol. 2020;35(5):621–641. doi:10.1007/s10869-019-09644-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conversano C, Di Giuseppe M, Miccoli M, et al. Mindfulness, age and gender as protective factors against psychological distress during Covid-19 pandemic. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1900. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Ma Y, Li J, et al. Mindfulness and psychological distress in kindergarten teachers: the mediating role of emotional intelligence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8212. doi:10.3390/ijerph17218212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer A, Sutton A, Medvedev ON. Mindfulness buffers the effect of inauthenticity on depression. Psychol Rep. 2021;00332941211012941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub J, Pattusamy M, Dust SB. Mindful multitasking: disentangling the effect of polychronicity on work–home conflict and life satisfaction. J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(4):497–502. doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.1523783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq D, Haq IU, Azeem MU, et al. The link between fear about COVID-19 and insomnia: mediated by economic concerns and psychological distress, moderated by mindfulness. J Manag Organ. 2021:1–19. doi:10.1017/jmo.2021.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian S, Yuan Q, Lim VKG, et al. Do job insecure leaders perform less transformational leadership? The roles of emotional exhaustion and trait mindfulness. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2020;27(4):376–388. doi:10.1177/1548051820938327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkeland MS, Nielsen MB, Knardahl S, et al. Time-lagged relationships between leadership behaviors and psychological distress after a workplace terrorist attack. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;89(4):689–697. doi:10.1007/s00420-015-1106-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhao N. Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112954. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Goetz T, Chen F, et al. The differential effects of anger on trust: a cross-cultural comparison of the effects of gender and social distance. Front Psychol. 2020:3744. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang L, Ma S, Chen M, et al. Impact on mental health and perceptions of psychological care among medical and nursing staff in Wuhan during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak: a cross-sectional study. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:11–17. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez AA, Shaw GP. Academic leadership in a time of crisis: the coronavirus and COVID-19. J Leadersh Stud. 2020;14(1):39–45. doi:10.1002/jls.21684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, He W, Zhou K. The mind, the heart, and the leader in times of crisis: how and when COVID-19-triggered mortality salience relates to state anxiety, job engagement, and prosocial behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(11):1218. doi:10.1037/apl0000620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngoma M, Namono R, Nangoli S, et al. Towards fighting COVID-19: can servant leadership behaviour enhance commitment of medical knowledge-workers. Continuity Resilience Rev. 2020;3:49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf RK. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Chiniara M, Bentein K. Linking servant leadership to individual performance: differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. Leadersh Q. 2016;27(1):124–141. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sendjaya S, Eva N, Robin M, et al. Leading others to go beyond the call of duty. Pers Rev. 2020;49(2):620–635. doi:10.1108/PR-08-2018-0285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JW. Servant-leadership in organizations: inspirational and moral. Leadersh Q. 1991;2(2):105–119. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90025-W
   Google Scholar
• Lee A, Lyubovnikova J, Tian AW, et al. Servant leadership: a meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2020;93(1):1–44. doi:10.1111/joop.12265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dierendonck D. Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. J Manage. 2011;37(4):1228–1261. doi:10.1177/0149206310380462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva N, Robin M, Sendjaya S, et al. Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research: the leadership quarterly yearly review for 2019. Leadersh Q. 2019;30:111–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Meuser JD, et al. Servant leadership: validation of a short form of the SL-28. Leadersh Q. 2015;26(2):254–269. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter EM, Neubert MJ, Perry SJ, et al. Servant leaders inspire servant followers: antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. Leadersh Q. 2013;24(2):316–331. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto JE, Wheeler DW. Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group Organ Manag. 2006;31(3):300–326. doi:10.1177/1059601106287091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amah OE. Determining the antecedents and outcomes of servant leadership. J Gen Manag. 2018;43(3):126–138. doi:10.1177/0306307017749634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain GA, Hameed I, Crawshaw J. Servant leadership and follower promotive & prohibitive voice behaviors: a moderated mediation model. In: Academy of Management Proceedings; 2019; Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
   Google Scholar
• Lapointe É, Vandenberghe C. Examination of the relationships between servant leadership, organizational commitment, and voice and antisocial behaviors. J Bus Ethics. 2018;148(1):99–115. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-3002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhof JG, Güldenberg S. Servant leadership: a systematic literature review—toward a model of antecedents and outcomes. Ger J Hum Resour Manag. 2020;34(1):32–68. doi:10.1177/2397002219869903
   Google Scholar
• Eva N, Robin M, Sendjaya S, et al. Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research. Leadersh Q. 2019;30(1):111–132. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chukwuere PC, Chukwuere JE, Adom D. The psychosocial effects of social media cyberbullying on students in selected African countries. Acta Informatica Malaysia. 2021;5(2):62–70.
   Google Scholar
• Breslin FC, Hepburn CG, Ibrahim S, et al. Understanding stability and change in psychological distress and sense of coherence: a four‐year prospective study 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;36(1):1–21. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge J, Dormann C. Why is my job so stressful? Characteristics, processes, and models of stress at work. In: An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology: An International Perspective. 2017:80–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings GG, Tate K, Lee S, et al. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;85:19–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman R. Shattered Assumptions. Simon and Schuster; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Thoresen S, Birkeland MS, Wentzel-Larsen T, et al. Loss of trust may never heal. Institutional trust in disaster victims in a long-term perspective: associations with social support and mental health. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1204. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir B. Leadership takes time: some implications of (not) taking time seriously in leadership research. Leadersh Q. 2011;22(2):307–315. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberly MB, Bluhm DJ, Guarana C, et al. Staying after the storm: how transformational leadership relates to follower turnover intentions in extreme contexts. J Vocat Behav. 2017;102:72–85. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkeland MS, Heir T. Making connections: exploring the centrality of posttraumatic stress symptoms and covariates after a terrorist attack. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017;8(sup3):1333387. doi:10.1080/20008198.2017.1333387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elovainio M, Linna A, Virtanen M, et al. Perceived organizational justice as a predictor of long-term sickness absence due to diagnosed mental disorders: results from the prospective longitudinal Finnish Public Sector Study. Soc Sci Med. 2013;91:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriedo A, Cecchini JA, Fernandez-Rio J, et al. COVID-19, psychological well-being and physical activity levels in older adults during the nationwide lockdown in Spain. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;28(11):1146–1155. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Towards a Model of Work. Engagement Career Development International. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Leiter MP. Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Oshio T, Inoue A, Tsutsumi A. Associations among job demands and resources, work engagement, and psychological distress: fixed-effects model analysis in Japan. J Occup Health. 2018;2017-0293-OA. doi:10.1539/joh.2017-0293-OA
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepe A, Addimando L, Dagdukee J, et al. Psychological distress, job satisfaction and work engagement: a cross-sectional mediation study with a sample of Palestinian teachers. Educ Stud. 2021;47(3):275–291. doi:10.1080/03055698.2019.1701990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed F, Zhao F, Faraz NA. How and when does inclusive leadership curb psychological distress during a crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 outbreak. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1898. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amor AM, Vázquez JPA, Faíña JA. Transformational leadership and work engagement: exploring the mediating role of structural empowerment. Eur Manag J. 2020;38(1):169–178. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova M, Lorente L, Chambel MJ, et al. Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra‐role performance: the mediating role of self‐efficacy and work engagement. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(10):2256–2266. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05652.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y-X, Yang Y-J, Wang Y, et al. The mediating role of inclusive leadership: work engagement and innovative behaviour among Chinese head nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(4):688–696. doi:10.1111/jonm.12754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanskanen J, Mäkelä L, Viitala R. Linking managerial coaching and leader–member exchange on work engagement and performance. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(4):1217–1240. doi:10.1007/s10902-018-9996-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau PM. Social exchange theory. 1964:62.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, et al. Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(3):565. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, et al. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, et al. Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J Manage. 2017;43(6):1854–1884. doi:10.1177/0149206315575554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C. Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study. J Organ Behav. 2003;24(3):251–270. doi:10.1002/job.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed F, Zhao F, Faraz NA, et al. How inclusive leadership paves way for psychological well‐being of employees during trauma and crisis: a three‐wave longitudinal mediation study. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(2):819–831. doi:10.1111/jan.14637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergin AJ, Jimmieson NL. The importance of supervisor emotion recognition for praise and recognition for employees with psychological strain. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2020;33(2):148–164. doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1716975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilal A, Siddiquei A, Asadullah MA, et al. Servant leadership: a new perspective to explore project leadership and team effectiveness. Int J Organ Anal. 2020. doi:10.1108/IJOA-12-2019-1975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Zhou L, Wang Z, et al. Humble leadership and innovative behaviour among Chinese nurses: the mediating role of work engagement. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(8):1801–1808. doi:10.1111/jonm.12879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook G, McPhetres J, Zhang Y, et al. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychol Sci. 2020;31(7):770–780. doi:10.1177/0956797620939054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanyu J, Xi Y, Huiqi T, et al. Meditation-based interventions might be helpful for coping with the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ardura I, Meseguer-Artola A. A PLS-neural network analysis of motivational orientations leading to Facebook engagement and the moderating roles of flow and age. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1869. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald JN, Atkins PWB, Parker PD, et al. Daily stress and the benefits of mindfulness: examining the daily and longitudinal relations between present-moment awareness and stress responses. J Res Pers. 2016;65:30–37. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu F, Xu Y, Yu Y, et al. Moderating effect of mindfulness on the relationships between perceived stress and mental health outcomes among Chinese intensive care nurses. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:260. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YN, Liu Z. Ecology mechanism of female talents social mobility. Ecofeminism Climate Change. 2021;2(2):103–108. doi:10.1108/EFCC-12-2020-0036
   Google Scholar
• Behan C. The benefits of meditation and mindfulness practices during times of crisis such as COVID-19. Ir J Psychol Med. 2020;37(4):256–258. doi:10.1017/ipm.2020.38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecore JL. Teaching mindfulness for pandemic times. Curric Teach Dialogue. 2020;22(1–2):163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):513. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu J-P, et al. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2018;5(1):103–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Google Scholar
• Sarwar H, Ishaq MI, Amin A, et al. Ethical leadership, work engagement, employees’ well-being, and performance: a cross-cultural comparison. J Sustain Tour. 2020;28(12):2008–2026. doi:10.1080/09669582.2020.1788039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(6):494–497. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00310.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being.. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(4):822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuke H, Bermpohl F. Which working conditions promote the development of depressive disorders? Psychiatr Prax. 2015;43(5):245–252. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1552769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen W, Tambs K, Knardahl S. Work factors and psychological distress in nurses’ aides: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TK. Understanding one-way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70(1):22. doi:10.4097/kjae.2017.70.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;885(879):10.1037.
   Google Scholar
• Li C-H. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016;48(3):936–949. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CY. Evaluating Cutoff Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Binary and Continuous Outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. sage; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Masood M, Afsar B. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior among nursing staff. Nurs Inq. 2017;24(4):e12188. doi:10.1111/nin.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkeland MS, Nielsen MB, Knardahl S, et al. Correction: associations between work environment and psychological distress after a workplace terror attack: the importance of role expectations, predictability and leader support. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124849. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smrdu M, Kuder A, Turk E, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown: associations with personality and stress components. Psychol Rep. 2021;00332941211043451. doi:10.1177/00332941211043451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetzel-Riggin MD, Swords BA, Tuang HL, et al. Work engagement and resiliency impact the relationship between nursing stress and burnout. Psychol Rep. 2020;123(5):1835–1853. doi:10.1177/0033294119876076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beer LT, Pienaar J, Rothmann S. Job burnout, work engagement and self‐reported treatment for health conditions in South Africa. Stress Health. 2016;32(1):36–46. doi:10.1002/smi.2576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker MK, Jimmieson NL, Bordia P. Employees’ perceptions of their own and their supervisor’s emotion recognition skills moderate emotional demands on psychological strain. Stress Health. 2020;36(2):191–202. doi:10.1002/smi.2919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripp J, Peccoralo L, Charney D. Attending to the emotional well-being of the health care workforce in a New York City health system during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med. 2020;95(8):1136–1139. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzold MB, Bendau A, Plag J, et al. Risk, resilience, psychological distress, and anxiety at the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Germany. Brain Behav. 2020;10(9):e01745. doi:10.1002/brb3.1745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babore A, Lombardi L, Viceconti ML, et al. Psychological effects of the COVID-2019 pandemic: perceived stress and coping strategies among healthcare professionals. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293:113366. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM. Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2006;11(2):142. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar