341
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Understanding Users’ Continuance Usage Behavior Towards Digital Health Information System Driven by the Digital Revolution Under COVID-19 Context: An Extended UTAUT Model

&
Pages 2831-2842 | Received 10 May 2022, Accepted 27 Aug 2022, Published online: 30 Sep 2022

References

  • Hayden T, Webster T. The Mobile Commerce Revolution: Business Success in a Wireless World. Que Publishing; 2014.
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Maharoesman ZR, Wiratmadja II. Technology Acceptance Model of Internet banking service for student’s tuition fee payment (Case study: public government university). 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM); 2016: 616–620. doi: 10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797949.
  • Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):189–211. doi:10.2307/249688
  • Eastin MS, LaRose R. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2000;6(1):JCMC611.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Bruner GC, Kumar A. Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. J Bus Res. 2005;58(5):553–558. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.08.002
  • Bagozzi RP. The legacy of technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2007;8(4):244–254. doi:10.17705/1jais.00122
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis FD, Davis GB. User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540
  • Abu-Shanab E, Pearson J. Internet banking in Jordan: the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) perspective. J Syst Inf Technol. 2007;9(1):78–97.
  • Nysveen H, Pedersen PE. Consumer adoption of RFID-enabled services. Applying an extended UTAUT model. Inf Syst Front. 2016;18(2):293–314. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9531-4
  • Qasim H, Abu-Shanab E. Drivers of mobile payment acceptance: the impact of network externalities. Inf Sys Front. 2016;18(5):1021–1034. doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9598-6
  • Stiglbauer B, Weber S, Batinic B. Does your health really benefit from using a self-tracking device? Evidence from a longitudinal randomized control trial. Comput Human Behav. 2019;94(3):131–139. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.018
  • Yuan S, Ma W, Kanthawala S, et al. Keep using my health apps: discover users’ perception of health and fitness apps with the UTAUT2 model. Telemed e-Health. 2015;21(9):735–741. doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0148
  • Agrebi S, Jallais J. Explain the intention to use smartphones for mobile shopping. J Retail Consum Serv. 2015;22:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.09.003
  • Gross M. Exploring the acceptance of technology for mobile shopping: an empirical investigation among smartphone users. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res. 2015;25(3):215–235.
  • Hassan S, Rashid R, Li F. Utilising modified UTAUT to understand students’ online shopping behaviour: a case of E-Retail co-operative website in Malaysia. J Market Res. 2015;13(4):74–90. doi:10.4018/JECO.2015100104
  • Celik H. Customer online shopping anxiety within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pac J Market Logist. 2016;28(2):278–307. doi:10.1108/APJML-05-2015-0077
  • Beldad AD, Hegner SM. Expanding the technology acceptance model with the inclusion of trust, social influence, and health valuation to determine the predictors of German users’ willingness to continue using a fitness app: a structural equation modeling approach. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2018;34(7–9):882–893. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1403220
  • Gu D, Yang X, Li X, Jain HK, Liang C. Understanding the role of mobile internet-based health services on patient satisfaction and word-of-mouth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):1972. doi:10.3390/ijerph15091972
  • Gu D, Guo J, Liang C, Lu W, Long T. Social media-based health management systems and sustained health engagement: tpb perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(9):1495. doi:10.3390/ijerph16091495
  • Akroush MN, Mahadin B, ElSamen AA, et al. An empirical model of mobile shopping attitudes and intentions in an emerging market. Int J Web Based Communities. 2020;16(2):150–179. doi:10.1504/IJWBC.2020.107156
  • Huang G, Ren Y. Linking technological functions of fitness mobile apps with continuance usage among Chinese users: moderating role of exercise self-efficacy. Comput Human Behav. 2020;103:151–160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.013
  • Schomakers EM, Lidynia C, Vervier LS, et al. Applying an extended UTAUT2 model to explain user acceptance of lifestyle and therapy mobile health apps: survey study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2022;10(1):e27095. doi:10.2196/27095
  • Akinnuwesi BA, Uzoka F-ME, Fashoto SG, et al. A modified UTAUT model for the acceptance and use of digital technology for tackling covid-19. Sustain Operations Comput. 2022;3:118–135. doi:10.1016/j.susoc.2021.12.001
  • Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36(1):157–178. doi:10.2307/41410412
  • Im I, Hong S, Kang MS. An international comparison of technology adoption: testing the UTAUT model. Inf Manag. 2011;48(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.im.2010.09.001
  • Qasim H, Abu-Shanab E. Drivers of mobile payment acceptance: the impact of network externalities. Inf Sys Front. 2015;3:1–14.
  • Rocaa JC, Chiu C-M, Martı´neza FJ. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2006;64(8):683–696. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
  • Foon YS, Fah BCY. Internet banking adoption in Kuala Lumpur: an application of UTAUT model. Int J Bus Manag. 2011;6(4):161.
  • Attuquayefio S, Add OH. Review of studies with UTAUT as conceptual framework. Eur Sci J. 2014;10(8):249–258.
  • Lai IKW, Lai DCF. Understanding students’ continuance intention toward social networking e-learning. International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Continuing Education. Cham: Springer; 2014: 173–183.
  • Müller-Seitz G, Dautzenberg K, Creusen U, Stromereder C. Customer acceptance of RFID technology: evidence from the German electronic retail sector. J Retail Consum Behav. 2009;16(1):31–39. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.08.002
  • Wolfinbarger M, Gilly MC. eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality. J Retail. 2003;79(3):183–198. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00034-4
  • Lian J, Lin T-M. Effects of consumer characteristics on their acceptance of online shopping: comparisons among different product types. Comput Human Behav. 2008;24(1):48–65. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.002
  • Cox DF, Rich SU. Perceived risk and consumer decision-making: the case of telephone shopping. J Market Res. 1964;1(4):32–39.
  • Zhou T. Understanding user adoption of location-based services from a dual perspective of enablers and inhibitors. Inf Sys Front. 2015;17(2):413–422. doi:10.1007/s10796-013-9413-1
  • Forsythe S, Liu C, Shannon D, Gardner LC. Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. J Interact Mark. 2006;20(2):55–75. doi:10.1002/dir.20061
  • Torkzadeh G, Dillion G. Measuring factors that influence the success of internet commerce. Inf Syst Res. 2002;13(2):187–204. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.187.87
  • Bhattacherjee A. An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decis Support Syst. 2001;32(2):201–214. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00111-7
  • Luarn P, Lin H-H. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Comput Human Behav. 2005;21(6):873–891. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
  • Shang R-A, Chen Y-C, Shen L. Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Inf Manag. 2005;42(3):401–413. doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.01.009
  • Mathieson K, Peacock E, Chin WW. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. ACM SigMIS Database. 2001;32(3):86–112. doi:10.1145/506724.506730
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1992;22(14):1111–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  • Sun H, Zhang P. Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: an alternative approach. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;7(1):24. doi:10.17705/1jais.00100
  • Kim JU, Kim WJ, Park SC. Consumer perceptions on web advertisements and motivation factors to purchase in the online shopping. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26:1208–1222. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.032
  • Hong S, Thong JY, Tam KY. Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decis Support Syst. 2006;42(3):1819–1834. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009
  • Abd-El-Fattah SM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. J Appl Quant Methods. 2010;5(2):365–368.