Understanding the Link Between Work-Related and Non-Work-Related Supervisor–Subordinate Relationships and Affective Commitment: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Psychological Safety

References

• Zhang B, Cao J. Are employees’ organizational commitment always consistent? An empirical analysis of enterprises in the new era of internet economy. China Collect Econ. 2017;2017(35):53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Acad Manag J. 2012;55(1):71–92. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Weng Q, Jiang Y. When does affective organizational commitment lead to job performance? Integration of resource perspective. J Career Dev. 2020;47(4):380–393. doi:10.1177/0894845318807581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert EG, Pasupuleti S, Cluse-Tolar T, Srinivasa SR, Jiang S. Research note: the effects of organizational trust on the work attitudes of U.S. social workers. J Soc Serv Res. 2022;48(1):120–133. doi:10.1080/01488376.2021.1976350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker HS. Notes on the concept of commitment. Am J Sociol. 1960;66:32–42. doi:10.1086/222820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 1991;1(1):61–89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
   Google Scholar
• Mercurio ZA. Affective commitment as a core essence of organizational commitment: an integrative literature review. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2015;14(4):389–414. doi:10.1177/1534484315603612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu JY, Zhang LX, Zhang YY. The influence mechanism of family supportive supervisor behavior on female knowledge worker’s affective commitment. Technol Econ. 2020;39(10):165–172, 188. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2020.10.021
   Google Scholar
• Ahsan N, Fie DYG, Foong YP, Alam SS. Relationship between retention factors and affective organisational commitment among knowledge workers in Malaysia. J Bus Econ Manag. 2013;14(5):903–922. doi:10.3846/16111699.2012.701226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guang X, Charoensukmongkol P. The effects of cultural intelligence on leadership performance among Chinese expatriates working in Thailand. Asian Bus Manag. 2022;21(1):106–128. doi:10.1057/s41291-020-00112-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattanawit P, Charoensukmongkol P. Benefits of workplace spirituality on real estate agents’ work outcomes: the mediating role of person-job fit. Manag Res Rev. 2022. doi:10.1108/MRR-06-2021-0482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang WS, Yang SL, Yang X. Proactive-reactive innovation behavior of the employee: based on the mechanism of distributed leadership. Chinese J Manag Sci. 2020;28(6):182–192. doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.06.017
   Google Scholar
• Meng H, Luo Y, Huang L, Wen J, Ma J, Xi J. On the relationships of resilience with organizational commitment and burnout: a social exchange perspective. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;30(15):2231–2250. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1381136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Lam CF, Deng Y. Leader–member exchange and guanxi are not the same: differential impact of dyadic relationships on fit perceptions, helping behavior, and turnover intention. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2017;28(7):1005–1030. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1128469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He P, Sun R, Zhao H, Zheng L, Shen C. Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: a psychological safety lens. Asian Bus Manag. 2020;1–22. doi:10.1057/s41291-020-00137-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao C, Qian S, Banks GC, Seers A. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi: a meta-analytic review and future research agenda. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2020;30(2):100702. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LQ, Liang QZ. Research on the mechanism of supervisor-subordinate relationship to leadership effectiveness. Soft Sci. 2019;33(9):53–59. doi:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2019.09.09
   Google Scholar
• Gara Bach Ouerdian E, Mansour N, Gaha K, Gattoussi M. Linking emotional intelligence to turnover intention: LMX and affective organizational commitment as serial mediators. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2021;42(8):1206–1221. doi:10.1108/LODJ-01-2021-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert V, Vandenberghe C. Laissez-faire leadership and affective commitment: the roles of leader-member exchange and subordinate relational self-concept. J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(4):533–551. doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09700-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou MJ, Shi SS. Leader-member exchange differentiation and team relationship conflict: the moderating role of ethical leadership. Nankai Bus Rev. 2013;16(2):26–35. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2013.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Lee A, Gerbasi A, Schwarz G, Newman A. Leader–member exchange social comparisons and follower outcomes: the roles of felt obligation and psychological entitlement. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2019;92(3):593–617. doi:10.1111/joop.12245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Wu W, Hao S, Lu X, Zhang Y, Liu Y. On-work or off-work relationship? An engagement model of how and when leader–member exchange and leader–member guanxi promote voice behavior. Chinese Manag Stud. 2017;11(3):441–462. doi:10.1108/cms-03-2017-0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay M, Hill K, Aubé C. A time-lagged investigation of the mediating role of person–organization fit in the relationship between leader–member exchange and employee affective organizational commitment. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2017;26(1):53–65. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2016.1203306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal UA, Bhargava S. The role of social exchange on work outcomes: a study of Indian managers. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2014;25(10):1484–1504. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.870316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousaf A, Sanders K, Torka N, Ardts J. Having two bosses: considering the relationships between LMX, satisfaction with HR practices, and organizational commitment. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2011;22(15):3109–3126. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.606124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loi R, Mao Y, Ngo H. Linking leader-member exchange and employee work outcomes: the mediating role of organizational social and economic exchange. Manag Organ Rev. 2009;5(3):401–422. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00149.x
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Karagonlar G, Stinglhamber F, et al. Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: the contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(6):1085–1103. doi:10.1037/a0020858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casimir G, Ngee Keith Ng Y, Yuan Wang K, Ooi G. The relationships amongst leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and in-role performance. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2014;35(5):366–385. doi:10.1108/LODJ-04-2012-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Liao J, Wen P. Why does formal mentoring matter? The mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of power distance orientation in the Chinese context. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2014;25(8):1112–1130. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.816861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Shen J, Yuan C. How decent work affects affective commitment among Chinese employees: the roles of psychological safety and labor relations climate. J Career Assess. 2022;30(1):157–180. doi:10.1177/10690727211029673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Jian L, Guo Q, Zhang H, Liu W. Narcissistic supervision and employees’ change-oriented OCB. Manag Decis. 2021;59(9):2164–2182. doi:10.1108/MD-01-2020-0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm Sci Q. 1978;23(2):224–253. doi:10.2307/2392563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalesny MD, Ford JK. Extending the social information processing perspective: new links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1990;47(2):205–246. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90037-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):23–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
   Google Scholar
• Xu XF, Gao RG. The influence of leader integrity on employees’ affective commitment: a moderated-mediation model. Forecasting. 2019;38(3):1–8. doi:10.11847/fj.38.3.1
   Google Scholar
• Attar-Schwartz S. Emotional closeness to parents and grandparents: a moderated mediation model predicting adolescent adjustment. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015;85(5):495–503. doi:10.1037/ort0000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng S, Niu GF, Wang X, Zhang HP, Hu XE. Parental autonomy support and adolescents’ positive emotional adjustment: mediating and moderating roles of basic need satisfaction. Psychol Dev Educ. 2021;37(2):240–248. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.02.11
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Liu HY. How supervisor-subordinate guanxi influence employee innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:2001–2014. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S342875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu J-P, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2018;5(1):103–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Google Scholar
• Duan J, Lapointe É, Xu Y, Brooks S. Why do employees speak up? Examining the roles of LMX, perceived risk and perceived leader power in predicting voice behavior. J Manag Psychol. 2019;34(8):560–572. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Xie J, Zhou ZE, Tang H, Ma H. Family supportive supervisor behaviors and work engagement: a social information processing perspective. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(1):347–359. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00574-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):513–524. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Ma E, Cabrera V, Jiao M. Keep your mood up: a multilevel investigation of hospitality employees’ positive affect and individual creativity. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2021;48:451–459. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill NS, Zhang H, Zhang X, Ziwei Y. The impact of surface and deep acting on employee creativity. Creat Res J. 2020;32(3):287–298. doi:10.1080/10400419.2020.1821564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan X, Frenkel SJ. Explaining supervisor–subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens. Hum Relations. 2019;72(11):1752–1775. doi:10.1177/0018726718813718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoensukmongkol P. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and emotional exhaustion: the moderating effect of supervisor job autonomy and workload levels in organizations. Asia Pacific Manag Rev. 2022;27(1):40–49. doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HJ, Jiang L, Xu X, Zhou K, Bauer TN. Dynamic relationships between leader–member exchange and employee role-making behaviours: the moderating role of employee emotional ambivalence. Hum Relations. 2022;001872672210752. doi:10.1177/00187267221075253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng YL, Wu J, Da QL. The influencing mechanisms of different forms of superior-subordinate relationship on employees innovation behaviors: a perspective of multiple institutional logics. Chinese J Manag Sci. 2021;29(9):236–248. doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1317
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Deng Y, Wang Q. An exploratory study of Chinese motives for building supervisor–subordinate guanxi. J Bus Ethics. 2014;124:659–675. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1899-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XA, Li N, Brad Harris T. Putting non-work ties to work: the case of guanxi in supervisor-subordinate relationships. Leadersh Q. 2015;26(1):37–54. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce JL, Branyiczki I, Bigley GA. Insufficient bureaucracy: trust and commitment in particularistic organizations. Organ Sci. 2000;11(2):148–162. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.2.148.12508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali H, Mahmood A, Ahmad A, Ikram A. Humor of the leader: a source of creativity of employees through psychological empowerment or unethical behavior through perceived power? The role of self-deprecating behavior. Front Psychol. 2021;12:635300. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q. 1995;6(2):219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicekli E, Kabasakal H. The opportunity model of organizational commitment. Int J Manpow. 2017;38(2):259–273. doi:10.1108/IJM-06-2015-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Tsaras K. Predictors and outcomes of nurse professional autonomy: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019;25(1):e12711. doi:10.1111/ijn.12711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoensukmongkol P. How Chinese expatriates’ cultural intelligence promotes supervisor-subordinate guanxi with Thai employees: the mediating effect of expatriates’ benevolence. Int J Cross Cult Manag. 2021;21(1):9–30. doi:10.1177/1470595821996735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson H. Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization. Adm Sci Q. 1965;9(4):370–390. doi:10.2307/2391032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frear KA, Donsbach J, Theilgard N, Shanock LR. Supported supervisors are more supportive, but why? A multilevel study of mechanisms and outcomes. J Bus Psychol. 2018;33(1):55–69. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9485-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong XP. Chinese Allusions. Jilin: Jilin Literature and History Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Blau PM. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Wong Y. Affective commitment, loyalty to supervisor and guanxi: Chinese employees in joint ventures and reformed state-owned enterprises. J Chinese Hum Resour Manag. 2017;8(2):77–93. doi:10.1108/JCHRM-04-2017-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Yang A, Wang D, Lin Y. Structure models of leader-member relationship (LMR) from the perspectives of cultural differences between China and the West. Acta Psychol Sin. 2014;(9):1355–1377. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01355
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(2):350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman BM. Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: an integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Pers Psychol. 2001;54(2):361–386. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00096.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walumbwa FO, Schaubroeck J. Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(5):1275–1286. doi:10.1037/a0015848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark R, Carmeli A. Alive and creating: the mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. J Organ Behav. 2009;30(6):785–804. doi:10.1002/job.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farh JL, Tsui AS, Xin K, Cheng BS. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: the Chinese case. Organ Sci. 1998;9:471–488. doi:10.2307/2640274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Xie B, Tang B. Guanxi HRM practice and employees’ occupational well-being in China: a multi-level psychological process. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2403. doi:10.3390/ijerph17072403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Zhu L, Zhou M, et al. Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: how leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to speak out. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1718. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2011;84(1):116–122. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M-J, Kim B-J. Analysis of the importance of job insecurity, psychological safety and job satisfaction in the CSR-performance link. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3514. doi:10.3390/su12093514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li W. Ethical leadership, organizational trust and knowledge sharing behavior: the moderation role of psychological safety. Sci Technol Prog Policy. 2017;34(17):143–147. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2017050540
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Overton TS. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res. 1977;14(3):396–402. doi:10.2307/3150783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau WL, Yuan Y, Pu X, Ray S, Chen CC. Understanding fintech continuance: perspectives from self-efficacy and ECT-IS theories. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2020;120(9):1659–1689. doi:10.1108/IMDS-02-2020-0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Maslyn JM. Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development. J Manage. 1998;24(1):43–72. doi:10.1177/014920639802400105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law KS, Wong CS, Wang D, Wang L. Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: an empirical investigation. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2000;11(4):751–765. doi:10.1080/09585190050075105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Rooney RM, Kane RT, Hassan S, Nesa M. The enhanced Aussie optimism positive thinking skills program: the relationship between internalizing symptoms and family functioning in children aged 9–11 years old. Front Psychol. 2015;6:504. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay M. Understanding the dynamic relationship between career plateauing, organizational affective commitment and citizenship behavior. J Vocat Behav. 2021;129:103611. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tonidandel S, LeBreton JM. RWA web: a free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. J Bus Psychol. 2015;30(2):207–216. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng D, Ji L, Yin Z. Personality, perceived occupational stressor, and health-related quality of life among Chinese judges. Appl Res Qual Life. 2014;9(4):911–921. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9277-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang GJ, Xi YM. China’s cultural basis of relationship marketing. Manage World. 2003;(10):98–109. doi:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2003.10.012
   Google Scholar
• Fan Y. Guanxi’s consequences: personal gains at social cost. J Bus Ethics. 2002;38(4):371–380. doi:10.1023/A:1016021706308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broeck A, Sulea C, Vander ET, Fischmann G, Iliescu D, De Witte H. The mediating role of psychological needs in the relation between qualitative job insecurity and counterproductive work behavior. Career Dev Int. 2014;19(5):526–547. doi:10.1108/CDI-05-2013-0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector PE. Do not cross me: optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34:125–137. doi:10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu B, Peng J, Chen Z. The formation and prevention of unethical pro-supervisor behavior from the perspective of Chinese bao culture. Chinese J Manag. 2021;18(11):1629–1639.
   Google Scholar