368
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Exploring The Role of Guanxi in CSR performance and Knowledge Management of a Stakeholder Network: A Case of iStone, China

, &
Pages 1665-1687 | Published online: 06 Jul 2022

References

  • Aguinis H. Organizational responsibility: doing good and doing well. In: Zedeck S, editor. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Washington, DC: APA; 2011:855–953.
  • Preuss L, Co´rdoba-Pachon J. A knowledge management perspective of corporate social responsibility. Corp Gov Int J Bus Soc. 2009;9(4):517–527. doi:10.1108/14720700910985052
  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  • Barnett M. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev. 2007;32(3):794–816. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275520
  • Muller A, Kolk A. Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. J Manag Stud. 2010;47(1):1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00855.x
  • Lau C, Lu Y, Liang Q. Corporate social responsibility in China: a Corporate Governance Approach. J Bus Ethics. 2016;136(1):73–87. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2513-0
  • Child J, Lu Y, Tsai T. Institutional entrepreneurship in building and environmental protection system for the People’s Republic of China. Organ Stud. 2007;28:1103–1133. doi:10.1177/0170840607078112
  • Liao L, Lin T, Zhang Y. Corporate board and corporate social responsibility assurance: evidence from China. J Bus Ethics. 2018;150(1):211–225. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3176-9
  • Guo C, Miller JK. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Manag Organ Rev. 2010;6(2):267–291. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00180.x
  • Burt RS. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.
  • Heikkinen M, Tähtinen J. Managed formation process of R&D networks. Int J Innov Manag. 2006;10(3):271–298. doi:10.1142/S1363919606001508
  • Xiao Z, Tsui AS. When brokers may not work: the cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Adm Sci Q. 2007;52(1):1–31. doi:10.2189/asqu.52.1.1
  • Burt RS. The network structure of social capital. Res Organ Behav. 2000;22:345–423. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
  • Podolny JM, Baron JN. Relationships and resources: social networks and mobility in the workplace. Am Sociol Rev. 1997;62:673–693. doi:10.2307/2657354
  • Liu J, Nandhakumar J, Zachariadis M. When guanxi meets structural holes: exploring the guanxi networks of Chinese entrepreneurs on digital platforms. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2018;27(4):311–334. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2018.10.003
  • Liu J, Zhu Y. Promoting tacit knowledge application and integration through guanxi and structural holes. J Knowl Manag. 2010;25(5):1027–1058. doi:10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0090
  • Aguinis H, Glavas A. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J Manage. 2012;38(4):932–968. doi:10.1177/0149206311436079
  • Zaman R, Jain T, Samara G, Jamali D. Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: mapping the interface. Bus Soc. 2022;61(3):690–752. doi:10.1177/0007650320973415
  • Glavas A, Kelley K. The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Bus Ethics Q. 2014;24(2):165–202. doi:10.5840/beq20143206
  • Rupp DE, Mallory DB. Corporate social responsibility: psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2015;2(1):211–236. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111505
  • Gond JP, El Akremi A, Swaen V, Babu N. The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: a person-centric systematic review. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(2):225–246. doi:10.1002/job.2170
  • Chen CC. New trends in rewards allocation preferences: a Sino-U.S. comparison. Acad Manage J. 1995;38(2):408–428. doi:10.5465/256686
  • Carroll AB. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manage Rev. 1979;4:497–505. doi:10.2307/257850
  • Jones TM. Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. Calif Manage Rev. 1980;22(3):59–67. doi:10.2307/41164877
  • Carroll AB. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz. 1991;34(4):39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
  • McWilliams A, Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manage Rev. 2010;26:117–127. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
  • Waddock S. Parallel universes: companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Bus Soc Rev. 2004;109(1):5–42. doi:10.1111/j.0045-3609.2004.00002.x
  • Kakabadse NK, Rozuel C, Lee-Davis L. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review. Int J Bus Gov Ethics. 2005;1:277–302. doi:10.1504/IJBGE.2005.006733
  • Peloza J. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. J Manage. 2009;35(6):1518–1541. doi:10.1177/0149206309335188
  • Jones DA, Rupp D. Social responsibility in and oF organizations: the psychology of corporate social responsibility among organizational members. In: Anderson N, Ones DS, Sinangil HK, editors. Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
  • Dahlsrud A. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2008;15(1):1–13. doi:10.1002/csr.132
  • Pedersen ER. Making the corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: how companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Bus Soc Rev. 2006;111(2):137–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00265.x
  • Roloff J. Learning from multi-stakeholders networks: issue-focussed stakeholder management. J Bus Ethics. 2008;82(1):233–250. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9573-3
  • Hart SL. Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s Most Difficult Problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing; 2005.
  • Zou H, Xie X, Meng X, Yang M. The diffusion of corporate social responsibility through social network ties: from the perspective of strategic imitation. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2018;26(1):186–198. doi:10.1002/csr.1670
  • Shaner J, Maznevski M. The relationship between networks, institutional development, and performance in foreign investments. Strateg Manag J. 2011;32(5):556–568. doi:10.1002/smj.903
  • Sparrowe RT, Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Kraimer ML. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad Manage J. 2001;44:316–325.
  • Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ Sci. 1997;8(2):109–125. doi:10.1287/orsc.8.2.109
  • Galaskiewicz J. An urban grants economy revisited: corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities. Adm Sci Q. 1997;42:445–471. doi:10.2307/2393734
  • Burt RS. The contingency of social capital. Adm Sci Q. 1997;42(2):339–365. doi:10.2307/2393923
  • Burt RS. Bridge decay. Soc Networks. 2003;24(4):333–363. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00017-5
  • Anderson AR, Lee E. From tradition to modern: attitudes and applications of guanxi in Chinese entrepreneurship. J Small Bus Enterp Dev. 2008;15(4):775–787. doi:10.1108/14626000810917852
  • Yen DA, Barnes BR, Wang CL. The measurement of Guanxi: introducing the GRX scale. Ind Mark Manag. 2011;40(1):97–108. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.014
  • Hwang KK. Face and favor: the Chinese power game. Am J Sociol. 1987;92(4):944–974. doi:10.1086/228588
  • Yang M. The resilience of guanxi and its new deployments: a critique of some new guanxi scholarship. China Q. 2002;170:459–476. doi:10.1017/S000944390200027X
  • Wang CL. Guanxi vs. relationship marketing: exploring underlying differences. Ind Mark Manag. 2007;36:81–86. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.08.002
  • Zhang Y, Zhang ZG. Guanxi and organizational dynamics in China: a link between individual and organizational levels. J Bus Ethics. 2006;67(4):375–392. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9031-7
  • Baker WE. The social structure of a national securities market. Am J Sociol. 1984;89(4):775–811. doi:10.1086/227944
  • Batjargal B. The effects of network’s structural holes: polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia. Strateg Entrep J. 2010;4(2):146–163. doi:10.1002/sej.88
  • Wegner DM. Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Mullen B, Goethals GR, editors. Theories of Group Behavior. Springer-Verlag. New York, NY; 1986:185–208.
  • Schutz DM, Kim Y, Yoo Y, Pavlou PA. An empirical investigation on the role of IT materiality in multidisciplinary innovation. In: ICIS Proceeding. 2009:73.
  • Batjargal B. Internet entrepreneurship: social capital, human capital, and performance of Internet ventures in China. Res Policy. 2007;36(5):605–618. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.029
  • Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manage Rev. 2005;30(1):146–165. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445
  • Bizzi L. The dark side of structural holes: a multilevel investigation. J Manage. 2013;39(6):1554–1578. doi:10.1177/0149206312471385
  • Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius lungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Adm Sci Q. 2005;50(1):100–130. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
  • Gaur AS, Ma H, Ge B. MNC strategy, knowledge transfer context, and knowledge flow in MNCs. J Knowl Manag. 2019;23(9):1885–1900. doi:10.1108/JKM-08-2018-0476
  • Chen XP, Chen CC. On the intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi: a process model of Guanxi development. Asia Pacific J Manag. 2004;21(3):305–324. doi:10.1023/B:APJM.0000036465.19102.d5
  • Huang Q, Davison RM, Gu J. The impact of trust, guanxi orientation and face on the intention of Chinese employees and managers to engage in peer-to-peer tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Inf Syst J. 2011;21(6):557–577. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00361.x
  • Nooteboom B, van Haverbeke W, Duysters G, Gilsing V, van den Oord A. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Res Policy. 2007;36(7):1016–1034. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
  • Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud. 2005;39(1):61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Dyer JH, Singh H. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(4):660–679. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
  • Fu PP, Tsui AS, Dess GG. The dynamics of guanxi in Chinese hightech firms: implications for knowledge management and decision making. Manag Int Rev. 2006;46(3):1–29. doi:10.1007/s11575-006-0048-z
  • Dhanaraj C, Parkhe A. Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad Manage Rev. 2006;31(3):659–669. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
  • Major E, Asch D, Cordey-Hayes M. Foresight as a core competence. Futures. 2001;33(2):91–107. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00057-4
  • Zachariadis M, Scott S, Barrett M. Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quart. 2013;37(3):855–879. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.09
  • Leech NL, Dellinger AB, Brannagan KB, Tanaka H. Evaluating mixed research studies: a mixed methods approach. J Mix Methods Res. 2010;4(1):17–31. doi:10.1177/1558689809345262
  • Denscombe M. Communities of practice: a research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. J Mix Methods Res. 2008;2(3):270–283. doi:10.1177/1558689808316807
  • Doyle L, Brady AM, Byrne G. An overview of mixed methods research. J Res Nurs. 2009;14(2):175–185. doi:10.1177/1744987108093962
  • Armstrong S, Overton T. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res. 1977;14(3):396–402. doi:10.1177/002224377701400320
  • Matten D, Moon J. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev. 2008;33(2):404–424. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
  • Chapple W, Moon J. Corporate social responsibility in Asia, a seven-country study of CSR website reporting. Bus Soc. 2005;44:415–441. doi:10.1177/0007650305281658
  • Gugiu PC, Rodrı´guez-Campos L. Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models. Eval Program Plann. 2007;30:339–350. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.004
  • Nandhakumar J, Jones M. Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research. Inf Syst J. 1997;7(2):109–131. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.1997.00013.x
  • Hair J, Anderson R, Tatharn R, Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International; 1998.
  • Koufteros XA. Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modelling. J Oper Manag. 1999;17:467–488. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00002-9
  • Conway E, Fu N, Monks K, Alfes K, Bailey C. Demands or resources? The relationship between HR practices, employee engagement, and emotional exhaustion within a hybrid model of employment relations. Hum Resour Manage. 2015;55:1–17.
  • Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Homewood, IL: Irwin; 1990.
  • Reuber AR, Fischer E. The influence of the management team’s international experience on the internationalization behavior of SMEs. Int Bus Stud. 1997;28(4):807–825. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490120
  • Dunne M. Enhancing social capital in our stakeholder networks. Insights. 2000;33(1):27. doi:10.1629/uksg.530
  • Gouldner AW. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25(2):161–178. doi:10.2307/2092623
  • Farooq O, Payaud M, Merunka D, Valette-Florence P. The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: exploring multiple mediation. J Bus Ethics. 2013;125:563–580. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1928-3
  • Buckley PJ, Cross AR, Tan H, Voss H, Liu X An investigation of recent trends in Chinese outward direct investment and some implications for theory. Centre for International Business University of Leeds Working Paper; 2006.
  • Valeri M, Baggio R. Social network analysis: organizational implications in tourism management. Int J Organ Anal. 2021;29(2):342–353. doi:10.1108/IJOA-12-2019-1971
  • Holste J, Fields D. Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. J Knowl Manag. 2010;14(1):128–140. doi:10.1108/13673271011015615