Leader Phubbing and Employee Job Performance: The Effect of Need for Social Approval

References

• China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). The 49st statistical report on internet development in China. China: Cyberspace Administration of China; 2022. Available from: http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202202/P020220407403488048001.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ranie L, Zickuhr K. Americans’ Views on Mobile Etiquette. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2015. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/. Accessed July 23, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Farber M. Smartphones are making you slack off at work; 2016. Available from: http://fortune.com/2016/06/09/smartphones-making-you-slack-at-work-survey/. Accessed January 1, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, David ME. Boss phubbing, trust, job satisfaction and employee performance. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;155:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, David ME. Put down your phone and listen to me: how boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Comput Human Behav. 2017;75:206–217. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MN, Shahzad K, Bartels J. Examining boss phubbing and employee outcomes through the lens of affective events theory. Aslib J Inf Manag. 2021. doi:10.1108/AJIM-07-2021-0198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasin RM, Bashir S, Abeele MV, Bartels J. Supervisor phubbing phenomenon in organizations: determinants and impacts. Int J Bus Commun. 2020;232948842090712. doi:10.1177/2329488420907120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousaf S, Rasheed MI, Kaur P, Islam N, Dhir A. The dark side of phubbing in the workplace: investigating the role of intrinsic motivation and the use of enterprise social media (ESM) in a cross-cultural setting. J Bus Res. 2022;143:81–93. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Smith PK. The social distance theory of power. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013;17(2):158–186. doi:10.1177/1088868312472732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson Y, Halevy N, Shamir B, Erez M. Leading from different psychological distances: a construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation. Leadersh Q. 2015;26(2):143–155. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Xu L, Xi YM, Ge J. Chinese leader-follower flexible interactions at varying leader distances: an exploration of the effects of followers in school cases. Chin Manag Stud. 2019;13(1):191–213. doi:10.1108/CMS-03-2018-0461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir B. Social distance and charisma: theoretical notes and an exploratory study. Leadersh Q. 1995;6(1):19–47. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Lazarova MB, Liao H. Getting everyone on board: the role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organ Sci. 2009;20(1):240–252. doi:10.1287/Orsc.1080.0383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CY, Lin CP. Enhancing performance of contract workers in the technology industry: mediation of proactive commitment and moderation of need for social approval and work experience. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2016;112:320–328. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowne DP, Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol. 1960;24(4):349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sosik JJ, Dinger SL. Relationships between leadership style and vision content: the moderating role of need for social approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. Leadersh Q. 2007;18(2):134–153. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçak ÖE. Being phubbed in the workplace: a new scale and implications for daily work engagement. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(12):6212–6226. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01635-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, David ME. My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Comput Human Behav. 2016;54:134–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T. The action of looking at a mobile phone display as nonverbal behavior/communication: a theoretical perspective. Comput Human Behav. 2015;43:68–75. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Acar A, Ng M. Cultural comparison for the action of looking at a mobile phone display focusing on independent/interdependent self. Bioceram Dev Appl. 2016;6(2):1–9. doi:10.4172/2090-5025.1000095
   Google Scholar
• Harms P, Credé M, Tynan M, Leon M, Jeung W. Leadership and stress: a meta-analytic review. Leadersh Q. 2017;28(1):178–194. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Hale JL. Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Commun Monogr. 1987;54(1):19–41. doi:10.1080/03637758709390214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeele MMV, Antheunis ML, Schouten AP. The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Comput Human Behav. 2016;62:562–569. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylski AK, Weinstein N. Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. J Soc Pers Relat. 2013;30(3):237–246. doi:10.1177/0265407512453827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH. The effect of performance appraisal system on trust for management: a field quasi-experiment. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(1):123–136. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron A-F, Webster J. Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organ Sci. 2011;22(3):754–771. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill H, Boies K, Mcnally FJ, McNally J. Antecedents of trust: establishing a boundary condition for the relation between propensity to trust and intention to trust. J Bus Psychol. 2005;19(3):287–302. doi:10.1007/s10869-004-2229-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang N, Qiu S, Yang S, Deng R. Ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: mediation of trust and psychological well-being. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:655–664. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S311856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulki JP, Caemmerer B, Heggde GS. Leadership style, salesperson’s work effort and job performance: the influence of power distance. J Pers Sell Sales Manag. 2015;35(1):3–22. doi:10.1080/08853134.2014.958157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau D. The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Res. 2005;36(6):746–771. doi:10.1177/1046496405281776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbarra DA, Briskin JL, Slatcher RB. Smartphones and close relationships: the case for an evolutionary mismatch. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019;14(4):596–618. doi:10.31234/OSF.IO/RQU6F
   Google Scholar
• Howell JM, Hall-Merenda KE. The ties that bind: the impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(5):680–694. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(3):497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-P, Hung W-T, Chiu C-K. Being good citizens: understanding a mediating mechanism of organizational commitment and social network ties in OCBs. J Bus Ethics. 2008;81(3):561–578. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9528-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grams WC, Rogers RW. Power and personality: effects of machiavellianism, need for approval, and motivation on use of influence tactics. J Gen Psychol. 1990;117(1):71–82. doi:10.1080/00221309.1990.9917774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooty J, Connelly S, Griffith J, Gupta A. Leadership, affect and emotions: a state of the science review. Leadersh Q. 2010;21(6):979–1004. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In: Methodology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1980:389–444.
   Google Scholar
• Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63(4):596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadersh Q. 1990;1(2):107–142. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
   Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Anderson SE. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J Manage. 1991;17(3):601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker J, Luhtanen RK, Cooper ML, Bouvrette A. Contingencies of self-worth in college students: theory and measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85(5):894–908. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeele MV. The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim, Y, Li (Eds): The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Communication and Society. Oxford University Press; 2020. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190864385.013.11
   Google Scholar
• Xie X, Chen W, Zhu X, He D. Parents’ phubbing increases adolescents’ mobile phone addiction: roles of parent-child attachment, deviant peers, and gender. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;105:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2013. doi:10.1111/jedm.12050
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastardoz N, Vugt MV. The nature of followership: evolutionary analysis and review. Leadersh Q. 2019;30(1):81–95. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede GH. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2001. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5
   Google Scholar