Enhancing Organizational Citizenship Behaviors for the Environment: Integrating Social Identity and Social Exchange Perspectives

References

• He J, Kim H. The effect of socially responsible hrm on organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: a proactive motivation model. Sustainability. 2021;13:7958. doi:10.3390/su13147958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiral O, Raineri N, Talbot D. Managers’ citizenship behaviors for the environment: a developmental perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(2):1–15. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3098-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ones DS, Dilchert S. Employee green behaviors. In: Jackson SE, Ones DS, Dilchert S, editors. Managing Human Resources for Environmental Sustainability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2012:85–116.
   Google Scholar
• Paille´ P, Mejı´a-Morelos JH, Marche´-Paille´ A, et al. Corporate greening, exchange process among co-workers, and ethics of care: an empirical study on the determinants of pro-environmental behaviors at coworkers-level. J Bus Ethics. 2015;136:655–673. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2537-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyankara H, Luo F, Saeed A, et al. How does leader’s support for environment promote organizational citizenship behaviour for environment? A multi-theory perspective. Sustainability. 2018;10(1):271. doi:10.3390/su10010271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiral O, Paillé P. Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: measurement and validation. J Bus Ethics. 2012;109(4):431–445. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1138-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lülfs R, Hahn R. Corporate greening beyond formal programs, initiatives, and systems: a conceptual model for voluntary pro-environmental behavior of employees. Eur Manag Rev. 2013;10(2):83–98. doi:10.1111/emre.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raineri N, Paillé P. Linking corporate policy and supervisory support with environmental citizenship behaviors: the role of employee environmental beliefs and commitment. J Bus Ethics. 2016;137(1):211. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3170-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Mei S, Guo Y. Green human resource management, green organization identity and organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: the moderating effect of environmental values. Chin Manag Stud. 2020;15(2):290–304. doi:10.1108/CMS-10-2019-0366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TW, Chen FF, Luan HD, et al. Effect of green organizational identity, green shared vision, and organizational citizenship behavior for the environment on green product development performance. Sustainability. 2019;11(3):617. doi:10.3390/su11030617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah I, Wisetsri W, Wu H, et al. Leadership styles and organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: the mediating role of self-efficacy and psychological ownership. Front Psychol. 2021;12:683101. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Islam T, Sadiq M, et al. Promoting green behavior through ethical leadership: a model of green human resource management and environmental knowledge. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2021;42(4):531–547. doi:10.1108/LODJ-01-2020-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Ahmad S, Ahmed I, et al. Linking environment specific servant leadership with organizational environmental citizenship behavior: the roles of CSR and attachment anxiety. Rev Manag Sci. 2022. doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00547-3
   Google Scholar
• Islam T, Hussain D, Ahmed I, et al. Ethical leadership and environment specific discretionary behaviour: the mediating role of green human resource management and moderating role of individual green values. Canad J Administrat Sci. 2021;38:442–459. doi:10.1002/cjas.1637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Khan MM, Ahmed I, et al. Promoting in-role and extra-role green behavior through ethical leadership: mediating role of green HRM and moderating role of individual green values. Int J Manpow. 2020;42:54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares SM, Knippenberg DV, Dick RV. Organizational identification and “currencies of exchange”: integrating social identity and social exchange perspectives. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2016;46(1):34–45. doi:10.1111/jasp.12329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S. Green identity, green living? The role of proenvironmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. J Environ Psychol. 2010;30(3):305–314. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermody J, Koenig-Lewis N, Zhao AL, et al. Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: evidence from China and Poland. J Bus Res. 2017;86:333–343. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamm E, Tosti-Kharas J, King CE. Empowering employee sustainability: perceived organizational support toward the environment. J Bus Ethics. 2015;128(1):207–220. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2093-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, van Dick R, Tavares S. Social Identity and social exchange: identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;37:457–477. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He H, Pham HQ, Baruch Y, et al. Perceived organizational support and organizational identification: joint moderating effects of employee exchange ideology and employee investment. Int J Human Res Manag. 2014;25(20):2772–2795. doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.908315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers N, De Gilder D, Haslam SA. Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Acad Manag Rev. 2004;29(3):459–478. doi:10.2307/20159054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchinson S, et al. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500–507. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Armeli S, Rexwinkel B, et al. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:42–51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd D, Henry RA. Helping coworkers and helping the organization: the role of support perceptions, exchange ideology, and conscientiousness. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30(10):2028–2049. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orpen C. The effects of exchange ideology on the relationship between perceived organizational support and job performance. J Soc Psychol. 1994;134(3):407–408. doi:10.1080/00224545.1994.9711749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt LA. Exchange ideology as a moderator of the job attitudes-organizational citizenship behaviors relationships. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1991;21:1490–1501. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ DW. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar J, Aggarwal P. Meaningful work as a mediator between perceived organizational support for environment and employee eco-initiatives, psychological capital and alienation. Empl Relat. 2020;42:1487–1511. doi:10.1108/ER-04-2019-0187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ. Identity and forms of orientations in organizations social exchange. Acad Manag Rev. 2005;30(4):737–750. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.18378875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluss DM, Klimchak M, Holmes JJ. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(3):457–464. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YS. Green organizational identity: sources and consequence. Manag Decision. 2011;49(3):384–404. doi:10.1108/00251741111120761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soewarno N, Tjahjadi B, Fithrianti F. Green innovation strategy and green innovation: the roles of green organizational identity and environmental organizational legitimacy. Manag Decision. 2019;25(2):135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael FA. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;14:20–39. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL. The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;7:349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Peccei R. Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity. J Organ Behav. 2007;28(6):661–685. doi:10.1002/job.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel H. Social categorization. In: Moscovici S, editor. Introduction to Social Psychology. Vol. 1. Paris: Larousse; 1972:272–302.
   Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manage. 2005;31(6):874–900. doi:10.1177/0149206305279602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):698–714. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC. Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Pers Psychol. 2005;58(2):281–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp DE, Williams CA, Aguilera RV. Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance): an application of organizational justice, self-determination, and social influence theories. In: Schminke M, editor. Managerial Ethics: Managing the Psychology of Morality. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Scott BA, Colquitt JA. Are organizational justice effects bounded by individual differences? An examination of equity sensitivity, exchange ideology, and the big five. Group Organ Manag. 2007;32(3):290–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun G, Lee S, Karau SJ, et al. Sustaining collaborative effort in work teams: exchange ideology and employee social loafing. Sustainability. 2020;12(15):6241. doi:10.3390/su12156241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt LA, Andrews K, Andrews MC. The interactive effects of procedural justice and exchange ideology on supervisor‐rated commitment. J Organ Behav. 2010;22(5):505–515. doi:10.1002/job.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Z, Gu Q. Exchange ideology and employee creativity: a moderated mediation analysis. Manag Decision. 2020;58(7):1375–1395. doi:10.1108/MD-09-2017-0866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JW, Im T. Exchange ideology, performance pay, and pay satisfaction: evidence from South Korean central government. Public Pers Manage. 2019;48(4):584–607. doi:10.1177/0091026019832632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Hussain M. How consumer uncertainty intervene country of origin image and consumer purchase intention? The moderating role of brand image. Int J Emerg Markets. 2022. doi:10.1108/IJOEM-08-2021-1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2012;63(1):539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Montoya AK, Rockwood NJ. The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: process versus structural equation modeling. Australas Market J. 2017;25(1):76–81. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Coxe S, Baraldi AN. Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. J Bus Psychol. 2012;27(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9248-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropaki O, Martin R. From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader–member exchanges and employee outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(4):659–676. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan B, Enders J. Support from the top: supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader–member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(2):321–330. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loi R, Chan KW, Lam LW. Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: a social identity perspective. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2014;87(1):42–61. doi:10.1111/joop.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Dyne LV, Kamdar D. The contextualized self: how team-member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(2):583–595. doi:10.1037/a0037660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews C, Witt LA, Michele Kacmar K. The interactive effects of organizational politics and exchange ideology on manager ratings of retention. Journal of Vocational Behavior. J Vocat Behav. 2003;62(2):357–369. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor DE, Morrow PC, Montabon F. Engagement in environmental behaviors among supply chain management employees: an organizational support theoretical perspective. J Supply Chain Manag. 2012;48(3):33–51. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton TA, Zacher H, Ashkanasy NM. Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: the mediating role of work climate perceptions. J Environ Psychol. 2014;38:49–54. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paille´ P, Boiral O, Chen Y. Linking environmental management practices and organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: a social exchange perspective. Int J Human Res Manag. 2013;24(18):3552–3575. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.777934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang JY, Law KS. Two parallel mechanisms of the relationship between justice perceptions and employees’ citizenship behaviour: a comparison of the organizational identification and social exchange perspective. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2013;22(4):423–435. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.658157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Loi R, Lam LW. Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: the moderating role of team-member exchange. Int J Human Res Manag. 2011;22(15):3187–3201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar