Exchange Relationships and Helping Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Data from CGSS2015

References

• Van Dyne L, LePine JA. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad Manag J. 1998;41(1):108–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Akhtar S. How transformational leadership influences follower helping behavior: the role of trust and prosocial motivation. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(3):373–392. doi:10.1002/job.1884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walz SM, Niehoff BP. Organizational citizenship behaviors: their relationship to organizational effectiveness. J Hosp Tour Res. 2000;24(3):301–319. doi:10.1177/109634800002400301
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Blume BD. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(1):122–141. doi:10.1037/a0013079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape E, Redman T. HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: a multi-level analysis. J Manag Stud. 2010;47(7):1219–1247. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00911.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamdar D, van Dyne L. The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(5):1286–1298. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Kamdar D, Joireman J. In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(6):1195–1207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.6.1195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Peng KZ, Wong C-S. Indigenous research on Asia: in search of the emic components of guanxi. Asia Pacific J Manag. 2012;29(4):1143–1168. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9317-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Lam CF, Deng Y. Leader-member exchange and guanxi are not the same: differential impact of dyadic relationships on fit perceptions, helping behavior, and turnover intention. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2017;28(7):1005–1030. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1128469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q. 1995;6(2):219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seers A. Team-member exchange quality: a new construct for role-making research. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1989;43:118–135. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou W-C, Tian Q, Liu J. Servant leadership, social exchange relationships, and follower’s helping behavior: positive reciprocity belief matters. Int J Hosp Manag. 2015;51:147–156. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik GJ, Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm Sci Q. 1978;23(2):224–253. doi:10.2307/2392563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Dorsey Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Piccolo RF, Colquitt JA. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: the mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad Manag J. 2006;49(2):327–340. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohe C, Hertel G. Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analytic test of underlying mechanisms. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1364. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre LM, Hackett RD. Trait conscientiousness, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour: a test of an integrative model. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2007;80(3):539–554. doi:10.1348/096317906X154892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Woo B, Kim Y. Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: mediating role of affective commitment. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2018;13(3):373–382. doi:10.1177/1747954117725286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Gu Q. How abusive supervision and abusive supervisory climate influence salesperson creativity and sales team effectiveness in China. Manag Decis. 2016;54(2):455–475. doi:10.1108/MD-07-2015-0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Wang Z, Chen X. Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. J Bus Ethics. 2019;159:419–433. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3799-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekhorst JA. The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: a social information processing perspective. Hum Resour Manage. 2015;54(2):241–264. doi:10.1002/hrm.21669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadei KA, Chen L, Frempong J, Appienti W. The mediation effect of ethical leadership and creative performance: a social information processing perspective. J Creat Behav. 2021;55(1):241–254. doi:10.1002/jocb.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Liao C, Meuser JD. Servant leadership and serving culture: influence on individual and unit performance. Acad Manag J. 2014;57(5):1434–1452. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiniara M, Bentein K. The servant leadership advantage: when perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(2):333–345. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Anthony EL, Daniels SR, Hall AV. Social exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad Manag Ann. 2017;11(1):479–516. doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Liden RC. Antecedents of coworker trust: leaders’ blessings. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(5):1130–1138. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang K. Face and favor: the Chinese power game. Am J Sociol. 1987;92(4):944–974. doi:10.1086/228588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Soetjipto BW, Kraimer ML. Do leaders’ influence tactics relate to members’ helping behavior? It depends on the quality of the relationship. Acad Manag J. 2006;49(6):1194–1208. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, van Dyne L, Kamdar D. The contextualized self: how team-member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(2):583–595. doi:10.1037/a0037660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford LR, Seers A. Relational leadership and team climates: pitting differentiation versus agreement. Leadersh Q. 2006;17(3):258–270. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui AS, Farh J-L-L. Where Guanxi matters. Work Occup. 2016;24(1):56–79. doi:10.1177/0730888497024001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MS, Fooret M. Exchange relationships at work: an examination of the relationship between team-member exchange and supervisor reports of organizational citizenship behavior. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2008;14(4):342–352. doi:10.1177/1548051808315558
   Google Scholar
• Zalesny MD, Ford JK. Extending the social information processing perspective: new links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1990;47:205–246. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90037-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Zhang Z, Jia M. Does servant leadership affect employees’ emotional labor? A social information-processing perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2019;159:507–518. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3816-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani F, Courcy F, Vandenberghe C. Innovating under stress: the role of commitment and leader-member exchange. J Bus Res. 2017;77:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks GC, Batchelor JH, Seers A, Pollack JM, Gower K, Gower K. What does team–member exchange bring to the party? A meta-analytic review of team and leader social exchange. J Organ Behav. 2014;35:273–295. doi:10.1002/job.188510.1002/job
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhave DP, Kramer A, Glomb TM. Work–family conflict in work groups: social information processing, support, and demographic dissimilarity. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(1):145–158. doi:10.1037/a0017885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(3):407–416. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen NJ, Meyer JP. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1990;63(1):1–18. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh R, Reio TG, Haynes RK. Mentoring and organizational citizenship behavior: estimating the mediating effects of organization‐based self‐esteem and affective commitment. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2012;23(1):41–63. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Hospital nurses’ job satisfaction: a literature review. J Nurs Manag. 2009;17(8):1002–1010. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01028.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung MFY, Wu W. Leader-member exchange and employee work outcomes in Chinese firms: the mediating role of job satisfaction. Asia Pacific Bus Rev. 2012;18(1):65–81. doi:10.1080/13602381.2010.535346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R, Thomas G, Legood A, Dello Russo S. Leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: conceptual clarification and critical review. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(2):151–168. doi:10.1002/job.2202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson DJ, Liden RC, Glibkowski BC, Chaudhry A. LMX differentiation: a multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadersh Q. 2009;20(4):517–534. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe RT, Liden RC. Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22(2):522–552. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707154068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal UA, Datta S, Blake-Beard S, Bhargava S. Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions. Career Dev Int. 2012;17(3):208–230. doi:10.1108/13620431211241063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar J, Budhwar PS. Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: key to retention. Empl Relations. 2007;29(6):640–663. doi:10.1108/01425450710826122
   Google Scholar
• Aryee S, Chen ZX. Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. J Bus Res. 2006;59(7):793–801. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Loi R, Lam LW. Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: the moderating role of team-member exchange. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2011;22(5):3187–3201. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.560875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karolidis D, Vouzas F. From PSM to helping behavior in the contemporary Greek public sector: the roles of organizational identification and job satisfaction. Public Perform Manag Rev. 2019;42(6):1418–1447. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1592762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(5):1332–1356. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantareli P, Belardinelli P, Belle N. A meta-analysis of job satisfaction correlates in the public personnel administration. Rev Public Pers Adm. 2015;36(2):115–144. doi:10.1177/0734371X15578534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Martocchio JJ. Chinese and American managers’ compensation award decisions: a comparative policy-capturing study. Pers Psychol. 2001;54(1):115–145. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Wang J. Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviour: is supervisor–subordinate guanxi a mediator? Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24(7):1471–1489. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.725082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahong W, Khan S. A cross-sectional analysis of employment returns to education and health status in China: moderating role of gender. Front Psychol. 2021;12:129. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2021.638599/BIBTEX
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li Z, Feng X. Does the happiness of contemporary women in China depend on their husbands’ achievements? J Fam Econ Issues. 2019;40:710–728. doi:10.1007/s10834-019-09638-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su B, Li Y, Li L, Wang Y. How does nonfarm employment stability influence farmers’ farmland transfer decisions? Implications for China’s land use policy. Land Use Policy. 2018;74:66–72. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Geng L. Effects of socioeconomic status on physical and psychological health: lifestyle as a mediator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(2):281. doi:10.3390/ijerph16020281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SJ, Van Witteloostuijn A, Eden L. From the Editors: common method variance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud. 2010;41(2):178–184. doi:10.1057/JIBS.2009.88/FIGURES/1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;885(879):10–1037. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Choi L, Knutson BJ, Borchgrevink CP. Hotel employees’ organizational behaviors from cross-national perspectives. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2017;29(12):3082–3100. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-05-2016-0280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler WM, Halbesleben JR, Paul JR. If you’re close with the leader, you must be a brownnose: the role of leader–member relationships in follower, leader, and coworker attributions of organizational citizenship behavior motives. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20(4):309–316. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulebohn JH, Bommer WH, Liden RC, Brouer RL, Ferris GR. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader−member exchange: integrating the past with an eye toward the future. J Manage. 2012;38(6):1715–1759. doi:10.1177/0149206311415280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse HHM, Dasborough MT, Ashkanasy NM. A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work. Leadersh Q. 2008;19(2):195–211. doi:10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2008.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yammarino FJ, Dansereau F. Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership. Leadersh Q. 2008;19(2):135–141. doi:10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camps J, Clarke R, Oltra V, Buenaventura-Vera G. Triggering employee innovative behavior through team leader psychological capital. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor; 2017. doi10.5465/AMBPP.2017.16786ABSTRACT
   Google Scholar