Perceived Organizational Support and Creativity of Science-Technology Talents in the Digital Age: The Effects of Affective Commitment, Innovative Self-Efficacy and Digital Thinking

References

• Zhou J, George JM. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Acad Manag J. 2001;44(4):682–696. doi:10.2307/3069410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YQ, Sun JP, Zhou XH. Research on the imperfection of creative work environment and its path——perspective on needs and preferences of the professional technicistss of China. Sci Technol Prog Pol. 2015;32(14):151–155.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Bu Q, Wee S. Effect of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: moderating role of job stressors. Int J Stress Manag. 2016;23(4):400–417. doi:10.1037/str0000025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen QQ, Fan Y, Xiao LC. A study on the impact of perceived organizational support on employee’s innovation behavior——the role of goal orientation and power motive. East China Econ Manage. 2018;43–50. doi:10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.170628007
   Google Scholar
• Yu CX, Frenkel SJ. Explaining task performance and creativity from perceived organizational support theory: which mechanisms are more important? J Organ Behav. 2013;34(8):1165–1181. doi:10.1002/job.1844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazanchi S, Masterson SS. Who and what is fair matters: a multi-foci social exchange model of creativity. J Organ Behav. 2011;32(1):86–106. doi:10.1002/job.682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Pecce R. Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity. J Organ Behav. 2007;28(6):661–685. doi:10.1002/job.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):698. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluss DM, Klimchak M, Holmes JJ. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73(3):457–464. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu YD, Peng JS. The affect mechanism of creative self-efficacy on employees’creative behavior. Sci Res Manag Rev. 2011;63–73. doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2011.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Huang J-C, Farh J-L. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad Manag J. 2009;52(4):765–778. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM. Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(2):277–293. doi:10.1037/a0020952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z-c LI, Y-h ZHU, X-j ZHAN. Creativity and workplace incivility: from the perspective of ego depletion theory. Contemp Fin Econ. 2019;72–81. doi:10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.2019.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Chua RYJ, Lim JH, Wiruchnipawan W, Papousek I. Unlocking the creativity potential of dialectical thinking: field investigations of the comparative effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles. J Creat Behav. 2021;55:710–722. doi:10.1002/jocb.528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo MJ, Zhang M, Li XR. Steal like an artist: connection between critical thinking and creativity of a future musician in a digital environment. Think Skills Creat. 2021;42100952. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inam A, Ho JA, Zafar H, Khan U, Sheikh AA, Najam U. Fostering creativity and work engagement through perceived organizational support: the interactive role of stressors. Sage Open. 2021;11(3):1–16. doi:10.1177/21582440211046937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldabbas H, Pinnington A, Lahrech A. The influence of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: the mediating role of work engagement. Curr Psychol. 2021. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01992-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Pratt MG. The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: making progress, making meaning. In: Brief AP, Staw BM, editors. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews. Vol. 36. 2016:157–183.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, Adis CS. Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J Manage. 2017;43(6):1854–1884. doi:10.1177/0149206315575554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B, Strange JM. Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadersh Q. 2002;13(6):705–750. doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00158-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans F, Youssef CM, Avolio BJ. Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. Vol. 198. Oxford university press Oxford; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• El-Kassar AN, Dagher GK, Lythreatis S, Azakir M. Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: the roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance. J Bus Res. 2022;140:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Han S, Byun G, Son SY. Social exchange relationships and exchange ideologies of employees and supervisors: a three-way interaction toward employee creativity. Appl Psychol. 2022;71(2):539–563. doi:10.1111/apps.12338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Jiang K, Shalley CE, Keem S, Zhou J. Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: a meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2016;137:236–263. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang L. How psychological resilience influence employees’ creativity: the role of psychological safety and creative self-efficacy. J Psychol Sci. 2018;41(1):118–124. doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180118
   Google Scholar
• Zhan XH, Yang DT, Luan ZZ, An YR, Business SO, University N. The relationship between proactive personality and employee creativity——the mediation effect of work engagement and personal learning. Soft Sci. 2018;82–85. doi:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.04.18
   Google Scholar
• Lu JH, Chen LL, Zhan XN. Relationship study on perceived organizational support organizational commitment support and engagement of knowledge employees. Int Jj Adv Sci Res Manag. 2013;34(1):147–153.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson N, Potocnik K, Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J Manage. 2014;40(5):1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Gilson LL, Blum TC. Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Acad Manag J. 2009;52(3):489–505. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41330806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 1991;1(1):61–89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ferris DL, Kwan HK, Yan M, Zhou M, Hong Y. Self-love’s lost labor: a self-enhancement model of workplace incivility. Acad Manag J. 2013;56(4):1199–1219. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi WS, Kang SW, Choi SB. Innovative behavior in the workplace: an empirical study of moderated mediation model of self-efficacy, perceived organizational support, and leader-member exchange. Behav Sci. 2021;11(12). doi:10.3390/bs11120182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Islam T, Khan MM, Khawaja FN, Ahmad Z. Nurses’ reciprocation of perceived organizational support: the moderating role of psychological contract breach. Int J Hum Rights Healthc. 2017;10(2):123–131. doi:10.1108/ijhrh-12-2016-0023
   Google Scholar
• De Stobbeleir KEM, Ashford SJ, Buyens D. Self-regulation of creativity at work: the role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Acad Manag J. 2011;54(4):811–831. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.64870144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary A, Islam T, Ali HF, Jamil S. Can paternalistic leaders enhance knowledge sharing? The roles of organizational commitment and Islamic work ethics. Glob Knowl Mem Com. 2021. doi:10.1108/gkmc-06-2021-0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riketta M. Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta-analysis. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(3):257–266. doi:10.1002/job.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JP, Maltin ER. Employee commitment and well-being: a critical review, theoretical framework and research agenda. J Vocat Behav. 2010;77(2):323–337. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin AJS, Vandenberghe C, Turmel M-J, Madore I, Maiano C. Probing into commitment’s nonlinear relationships to work outcomes. J Manag Psychol. 2013;28(1–2):202–223. doi:10.1108/02683941311300739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Agarwal UA, Khatri N. The relationships between perceived organizational support, affective commitment, psychological contract breach, organizational citizenship behaviour and work engagement. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(11):2806–2817. doi:10.1111/jan.13043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shantz A, Alfes K, Atham GPL. The buffering effect of perceived organizational support on the relationship between work engagement and behavioral outcomes. Hum Resour Manage. 2016;55(1):25–38. doi:10.1002/hrm.21653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL. The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):349–361. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakimian F, Farid H, Ismail MN, Nair PK. Importance of commitment in encouraging employees’ innovative behaviour. Asia-Pac J Bus Adm. 2016;8(1):70–83. doi:10.1108/APJBA-06-2015-0054
   Google Scholar
• Colla E, Ruiz-Molina ME, De Gery CC, Schultz M, Deparis M, Lemmet L. Understanding franchisee performance The role of the franchisee’s autonomy, affective commitment to the network and innovativeness. Int J Retail Distrib Manage. 2019;47(7):733–751. doi:10.1108/ijrdm-10-2017-0232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jatmiko B, Laras T, Rohmawati A. Budgetary participation, organizational commitment, and performance of Local Government Apparatuses. J Asian Finance Econ Bus. 2020;7(7):379–390. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no7.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauhari H, Singh S, Kumar M. How does transformational leadership influence proactive customer service behavior of frontline service employees? Examining the mediating roles of psychological empowerment and affective commitment. J Enterp Inf Manag. 2017;30(1):30–48. doi:10.1108/JEIM-01-2016-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong BN, Tung DD, Hoa ND, Chau NTN, Tushar H. An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: vietnam small and medium-sized enterprises. J Asian Finance Econ Bus. 2020;7(6):277–286. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro N, Duarte AP, Filipe R, de Oliveira RT. How authentic leadership promotes individual creativity: the mediating role of affective commitment. J Leadersh Organ. 2020;27(2):189–202. doi:10.1177/1548051819842796
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto RA. Creative self-efficacy: correlates in middle and secondary students. Creat Res J. 2006;18(4):447–457. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM. Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad Manag J. 2002;45(6):1137–1148. doi:10.2307/3069429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao H, Liu D, Loi R. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Acad Manag J. 2010;53(5):1090–1109. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Ahmed I. Mechanism between perceived organizational support and transfer of training. Manag Res Rev. 2018;41(3):296–313. doi:10.1108/mrr-02-2017-0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maan AT, Abid G, Butt TH, Ashfaq F, Ahmed S. Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment. Futures Mark J. 2020;6:21. doi:10.1186/s43093-020-00027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed I, Nawaz MM, Ali G, Islam T. Perceived organizational support and its outcomes. Manag Res Rev. 2015;38(6):627–639. doi:10.1108/mrr-09-2013-0220
   Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D. Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. J Manage. 2003;29(6):773–799. doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(03)00079-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Zheng Q. Uncertainty avoidance and Employee Innovation Behavior: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Sci Technol Soc. 2016;33(4):149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Kim T-Y, Lee D-R, Zhu J. A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Acad Manag J. 2013;56(3):827–851. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathisen GE, Bronnick KS. Creative self-efficacy: an intervention study. Int J Educ Res. 2009;48(1):21–29. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Maria AD, Yulianto H, Palupiningtyas D, Usodo H. Relationship between transformational leadership, proactive personality, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity at food processing SMEs in Indonesia. Evid-Based HRM. 2022;10(3):257–274. doi:10.1108/ebhrm-03-2021-0033
   Google Scholar
• Lu CQ, Ling WQ, Fang L. Effects of managerial self-efficacy on managers’ work-related attitudes and performances: an Exploratory Study in China. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin. 2006;42(2):276–280. doi:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2006.052
   Google Scholar
• Harun MFB, Yunhendri RB, Shaharudin MHB, Kanapathipillai K. The impact of self-efficacy and creative process engagement on innovative work behaviour in the Telecommunication Industry in Malaysia. Eur J Manag Bus Econ. 2022;6(2). doi:10.46827/ejefr.v6i2.1273
   Google Scholar
• Laar E, Deursen AJ, Dijk JA, Haan JD. Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: a systematic literature review. Sage Open. 2020;10(1):1–14. doi:10.1177/2158244019900176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SJ. Added benefits: the link between work-life benefits and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad Manag J. 2000;43(5):801–815. doi:10.2307/1556411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui AS, Pearce JL, Porter LW, Tripoli AM. Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: does investment in employees pay off? Acad Manag J. 1997;40(5):1089–1121. doi:10.2307/256928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun Z-L, Huang BB, Tang DD. Preliminary work for modeling questionnaire data. J Psychol Sci. 2018;(1):204. doi:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180130
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chen D, Wang Z. The effects of role overload on employee outcomes under organizational change: a moderated mediation model. J Zhejiang Univ. 2015;45:143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Islam T, Ahmed I, Ahmad UN. The influence of organizational learning culture and perceived organizational support on employees’ affective commitment and turnover intention. Nankai Bus Rev Int. 2015;6(4):417–431. doi:10.1108/nbri-01-2015-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan WJ, Tang XQ, Li YM, Cheng XF, Zhang H. Perceived organizational support and employee creativity: the mediation role of calling. Creat Res J. 2020;32(4):403–411. doi:10.1080/10400419.2020.1821563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar