How Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors Enhance Employees’ Work-Family Enrichment? Thriving at Work as Mediator and Intrinsic Motivation as Moderator

References

• Rothbard N, Beetz A, Harari D. Balancing the scales: a configurational approach to work-life balance. Annu Rev Organ Psych. 2021;8:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus J, Powell G. When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Acad Manage Rev. 2006;31:72–92. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xu S, Jin J, Ford MT. The within and cross-domain effects of work-family enrichment: a meta-analysis. J Vocat Behav. 2018;104:210–227. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre LM, Li YH, Kwan HK, Greenhaus JH, DiRenzo MS, Shao P. A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work-family enrichment. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(4):385–401. doi:10.1002/job.2234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Sanchez A, Perez-Perez M, Vela-Jimenez MJ, Abella-Garces S. Job satisfaction and work-family policies through work-family enrichment. J Manage Psychol. 2018;33(4–5):386–402. doi:10.1108/JMP-10-2017-0376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson C, Sugiyama K, Ladge J. The value of 21st century work‐family supports review and cross‐level path forward. J Organ Behav. 2020;42:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock R, Strecker M, Gerlach G. Organizational work-family support as universal remedy? A cross-cultural comparison of China, India and the USA. Hum Resour Manag J. 2015;2015:1192–1216.
   Google Scholar
• Russo M, Buonocore F, Carmeli A, Guo L. When family supportive supervisors meet employees’ need for caring: implications for work-family enrichment and thriving. J Manage. 2018;44(4):1678–1702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain T, Stevens S. Family-supportive supervisor behaviors: a review and recommendations for research and practice. J Organ Behav. 2018;2018:39.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer L, Kossek E, Zimmerman K, Daniels R. Clarifying the construct of Family-Supportive Supervisory Behaviors (FSSB): a multilevel perspective. Res Occup Stress Well-Being. 2007;6:165–204.
   Google Scholar
• Clark M, Rudolph C, Zhdanova L, Michel J, Baltes B. Organizational support factors and work-family outcomes. J Fam Issues. 2014;2014:38.
   Google Scholar
• Lu L, Chang -T-T, Kao S-F, Cooper CL. Testing an integrated model of the work-family interface in Chinese employees: a longitudinal study. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2015;18(1):12–21. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu A, Pichler S, Russo M, Hammer L. Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB) and work-family conflict: the role of stereotype content, supervisor gender, and gender role beliefs. J Occup Organ Psych. 2022;95(2):275–304. doi:10.1111/joop.12379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer LB, Kossek EE, Yragui NL, Bodner TE, Hanson GC. Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB). J Manage. 2009;35(4):837–856. doi:10.1177/0149206308328510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G, Sutcliffe K, Dutton J, Sonenshein S, Grant A. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organ Sci. 2005;16(5):537–549. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Q, Wang S, Weadon H. Thriving at work as a mediator of the relationship between workplace support and life satisfaction. J Manage Organ. 2017;26:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Li Z, Liang L, Zhang X. Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: thriving at work and psychological safety. Curr Psychol. 2021;2021:40.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Brummelhuis L, Resource A. Perspective on the Work-home interface the work-home resources model. Am Psychol. 2012;67(7):545–556. doi:10.1037/a0027974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM, Porath C. Self-determination as nutriment for thriving: building an integrative model of human growth at work. Oxford Handbook Work Engage, Motiv, Self-Determ Theor. 2014;90:245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine AK, Rudolph CW, Zacher H. Thriving at work: a meta‐analysis. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(9–10):973–999. doi:10.1002/job.2375
   Google Scholar
• Hildenbrand K, Sacramento CA, Binnewies C. Transformational leadership and burnout: the role of thriving and followers’ openness to experience. J Occup Health Psych. 2018;23(1):31–43. doi:10.1037/ocp0000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okros N, Virga D. Impact of workplace safety on well-being: the mediating role of thriving at work. Pers Rev. 2022;2022:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile T. Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Hum Resour Manage R. 1993;3:185–201. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
   Google Scholar
• Deci E, Olafsen A, Ryan R. Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annu Rev Organ Psych. 2017;4(1):19–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant A. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93:48–58. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Brummelhuis L, Hoeven C, Peper B, Peper B. Breaking through the loss cycle of burnout: the role of motivation. J Occup Organ Psych. 2011;84:268–287. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z. No pain, no gain? A resource-based model of work-to-family enrichment and conflict. Dissertations Collection for University of Connecticut; 2012:81.
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll S. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol. 2002;6:307–324. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuvel M, Demerouti E, Schaufeli W Personal resources and work engagement in the face of change; 2010:124–150.
   Google Scholar
• Tement S. The role of personal and key resources in the family-to-work enrichment process. Scand J Psychol. 2014;55(5):489–496. doi:10.1111/sjop.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Tu Y. Cross-domain effects of ethical leadership on employee family and life satisfaction: the moderating role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors. J Bus Ethics. 2018;152(4):1085–1097. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3306-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath C, Spreitzer G, Gibson C, Garnett FG. Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(2):250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson TA, Luthans F, Jeung W. Thriving at work: impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(3):434–446. doi:10.1002/job.1907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore C, Mayer DM, Chiang FFT, Crossley C, Karlesky MJ, Birtch TA. Leaders matter morally: the role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct. article. J Appl Psychol. 2019;104(1):123–145. doi:10.1037/apl0000341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin J, Grant A. Bored by interest: intrinsic motivation in one task can reduce performance on other tasks. Acad Manage J. 2018;2018:62.
   Google Scholar
• Grant A, Nurmohamed S, Ashford S, Dekas K. The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: the interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2011;116:241–251. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey B, Amabile T. Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;61:569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X-A, Liao H, Li N, Colbert A. Playing it safe for my family: exploring the dual effects of family motivation on employee productivity and creativity. Acad Manage J. 2019;2019:63.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin R. The wording and translation of research instrument. Field Methods Cross Cult Res. 1986;1986:8.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne J, Musisca N, Fleeson W. Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience: relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. J Vocat Behav. 2004;64:108–130. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00035-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieler I, Scheibe S, Stamov Roßnagel C. Keeping work and private life apart: age-related differences in managing the work-nonwork interface. J Organ Behav. 2018;2018:39.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson H, Simmering M, Sturman M. A tale of three perspectives. Organ Res Methods. 2009;12:762–800. doi:10.1177/1094428109332834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P, Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage. 2016;12(4):531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman H. Modern factor analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1961;1961:56.
   Google Scholar
• Syed F, Naseer S, Akhtar M, Kashif M, Husnain M. Frogs in boiling water: a moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors. J Knowl Manag. 2021;25:2067–2087. doi:10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Xie J, Zhou Z, Hanying T, Ma H. Family supportive supervisor behaviors and work engagement: a social information processing perspective. Curr Psychol. 2022;41:1–13. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00574-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes A. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivar Behav Res. 2015;50:1–22. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rofcanin Y, De Jong JP, Heras ML, Kim S. The moderating role of prosocial motivation on the association between family-supportive supervisor behaviours and employee outcomes. J Vocat Behav. 2018;107:153–167. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behson S. The relative contribution of formal and informal organizational work-family support. J Vocat Behav. 2005;66:487–500. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed M, Iqbal S, Mustafa F. Work-family conflict and female employees’ turnover intentions. Gend Manag. 2018;2018:33.
   Google Scholar
• Halbesleben J, Neveu J-P, Paustian‐Underdahl S, Westman M. Getting to the ”COR”: understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J Manage. 2014;40:1334–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psych. 2018;2018:227–232.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman C, Stanko T. It takes three: relational boundary work, resilience, and commitment among navy couples. Acad Manage J. 2020;63:411–439. doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Liao H, Liu Y. For the sake of my family: understanding unethical pro‐family behavior in the workplace. J Organ Behav. 2020;2020:41.
   Google Scholar
• Menges J, Tussing D, Wihler A, Grant A. When job performance is all relative: how family motivation energizes effort and compensates for intrinsic motivation. Acad Manage J. 2017;60(2):695–719. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar