The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Paradoxical Leadership to Organizational Citizenship Behavior

References

• Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: antecedents and consequences. Acad Manag J. 2015;58(2):538–566. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walumbwa FO, Hartnell CA, Oke A. Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(3):517–529. doi:10.1037/a0018867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng W, Li H. The influence mechanism of paradoxical leadership on employees’ proactive behavior: the role of team internal network strength and supervisor-subordinate guanxi. Foreign Econ Manag. 2018;40(7):142–154. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.07.011
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Blume BD. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(1):122–141. doi:10.1037/a0013079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou RY, Feng B, Xiong C, Wu Q. Influence of self-sacrificial leadership on employees organizational citizenship behavior from the perspective of role theory. Chin J Manage. 2019;16(7):997–1005. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Lepine JA, Erez A, Johnson DE. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: a critical review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(1):52–65. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Beehr TA. Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. J Leadersh Organ Studies. 2017;24(4):466–478. doi:10.1177/1548051817702078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadersh Q. 1990;1(2):107–142. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
   Google Scholar
• Wu ZM, Wu X. Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: mediating role of psychological empowerment. J Manag Sci China. 2007;10(5):40–47. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1007-9807.2007.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Zellars KL, Tepper BJ, Duffy MK. Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(6):1068–1076. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Huai MY. Study on the relationship between authoritarian leadership behavior and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior——the moderating role of subordinates’ power distance. Manage Rev. 2012;24(11):97–105. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2012.11.017
   Google Scholar
• Walumbwa FO, Wu C, Orwa B. Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: the role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength. Leadersh Q. 2008;19(3):251–265. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan SC, Mak W. Benevolent leadership and follower performance: the mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX). Asia Pac J Manag. 2012;29(2):285–301. doi:10.1007/s10490-011-9275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XY, Yan D, Wang L. The influence of paradoxical leadership on employees’ advocacy behavior: the role of psychological security and regulating focus. Enterp Eco. 2018;3:102–109. doi:10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2018.03.015
   Google Scholar
• Zhao HD, Tang XP. A literature review of perceived insider status. Foreign Econ Manag. 2015;37(4):56–65. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2015.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Ma B, Hu B, Wang ZS. Effect of perceived overqualification on organizational citizenship behavior——the mediating role of perceived insider status. Soft Sci. 2019;33(3):137–140. doi:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2019.03.28
   Google Scholar
• Li SW, Luo JL, Liang F. Speaking your mind freely to insiders: the influencing path and boundary of ambidextrous leadership on employee voice. Foreign Econ Manag. 2020;42(6):99–110. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20190926.005
   Google Scholar
• Zhong X, Fu Y, Wang T. Inclusive leadership, perceived insider status and employee knowledge sharing——moderating role of organizational innovation climate. R D Manage. 2019;31(3):109–120. doi:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2019.03.010
   Google Scholar
• Wang MM, Zhang J. The impact of authentic leadership on new generation employee creativity: the mediating role of perceived insider status. Sci Manage S T. 2019;40(3):127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Shen YM, Zhou WR, Zhang QL, Zhang Q. Benevolent leadership and subordinate innovative behavior: the mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of leader-member exchange differentiation. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2017;49(8):1100–1112. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01100
   Google Scholar
• Jia J, Yan J, Cai Y, Liu Y. Paradoxical leadership incongruence and Chinese individuals’ followership behaviors: moderation effects of hierarchical culture and perceived strength of human resource management system. Asian Bus Manag. 2018;17(5):313–338. doi:10.1057/s41291-018-0043-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk GM. “I want it all and I want it now!” An examination of the etiology, expression, and escalation of excessive employee entitlement. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20(2):102–114. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SW, Luo JL, Liang F. The effect of leader-follower value congruence in power distance and perceived insider status on on employee voice under the perspective of leader-follower gender combination. Chin J Manage. 2020;17(3):365–373. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2020.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Yin J, Wang H, Huang MP. Empowering leadership behavior and perceived insider status: the moderating role of organization based self-esteem. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2013;44(10):1371–1382. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01371
   Google Scholar
• Stamper CL, Masterson SS. Insider or outsider? how employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(8):875–894. doi:10.1002/job.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui C, Lee C, Wang H. Organizational inducements and employee citizenship behavior: the mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of collectivism. Hum Resour Manage. 2015;54(3):439–456. doi:10.1002/hrm.21620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Long YF, Peng J. The dark side of positive leadership: a review and prospect. Adv Psychol Sci. 2019;27(6):1123–1140. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01123
   Google Scholar
• Cai YH, Jia LD, Wan GG. Transformational leadership and employee creativity—The mediating role of pressure. Sci Res Manage. 2015;36(4):112–119. doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2015.08.015
   Google Scholar
• Wong SI, Giessner SR. The thin line between empowering and laissez-faire leadership: an expectancy-match perspective. J Manage. 2018;44(2):757–783. doi:10.1177/0149206315574597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Rubenstein AL, Lin W, Wang M, Chen X. The curvilinear effect of benevolent leadership on team performance: the mediating role of team action process and the moderating role of team commitment. Pers Psychol. 2018;71(3):369–397. doi:10.1111/peps.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley HH, Michela JL. Attribution theory and research. Ann Rev Psychol. 1980;31(1):457–501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman AM, Steil JM. Adolescent attachment and entitlement in a world of wealth. J Infant Child Adolesc Psychother. 2012;11(1):53–65. doi:10.1080/15289168.2012.650002
   Google Scholar
• Campbell WK, Bonacci AM, Shelton J, Exline JJ, Bushman BJ. Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. J Pers Assess. 2004;83(1):29–45. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummel BJ, Parker KN. Obligation and entitlement in society and the workplace. Appl Psychol. 2015;64(1):127–160. doi:10.1111/apps.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandura TA, Graen GB. Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. J Appl Psychol. 1984;69(3):428–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey P, Martinko MJ. An empirical examination of the role of attributions in psychological entitlement and its outcomes. J Organ Behav. 2009;30(4):459–476. doi:10.1002/job.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin X, Chen C, Yam KC, Huang M, Ju D. The double-edged sword of leader humility: investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(7):693–712. doi:10.1037/apl0000456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann SE, Minsky BD, Sturman MC. The use of the concept “entitlement” in management literature: a historical review, synthesis, and discussion of compensation policy implications. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2002;12(1):145–166. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00055-9
   Google Scholar
• Bai BY, Sun RS, Hu Q, Zhang YJ. Psychological entitlement: concept, measurements and related research. Adv Psychol Sci. 2017;25(6):1025–1035. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01025
   Google Scholar
• Triandis HC. The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. Am Psychol. 1996;51(4):407–415. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan B, Liden RC. Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(1):1–17. doi:10.1002/job.365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu LZ, Liu J, Xu J. Workplace ostracism and organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of organizational identification and collectivism. Nankai Bus Rev. 2010;13(3):38–46. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2010.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Moorman RH, Blakely GL. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. J Organ Behav. 1995;16(2):127–142. doi:10.1002/job.4030160204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Lu G, Liu Y. Ethical leadership and loyalty to supervisor in china: the roles of interactional justice and collectivistic orientation. J Bus Ethics. 2017;146(3):529–543. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2916-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo SH, Xiao MZ. Is encouraging employees’ belonging really a good thing? collectivism-oriented HRM, perceived insider status and the withdrawal behavior under moral identification’s moderation. Foreign Econ Manag. 2017;39(8):40–55. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2017.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Cox TH, Lobel SA, McLeod PL. Effects of ethnic group cultural differentiation on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Acad Manag J. 1991;34(4):827–847. doi:10.2307/256391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XM, Yao J, Chen C. Study on the cross-level effect of humble leadership on employee creativity. Soft Sci. 2019;33(5):81–86. doi:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2019.05.16
   Google Scholar
• Boies K, Howell JM. Leader–member exchange in teams: an examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadersh Q. 2006;17(3):246–257. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper DT, Martin R. Beyond personal Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) quality: the effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadersh Q. 2008;19(1):20–30. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson DJ, Liden RC, Glibkowski BC, Chaudhry A. LMX differentiation: a multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadersh Q. 2009;20(4):517–534. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhlbien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q. 1995;6(2):219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Legood A, Newman A, Legood A. Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2019;154(1):109–126. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farh J, Zhong C, Organ DW. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China. Organiz Sci. 2004;15(2):241–253. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam KC, Klotz AC, He W, Reynolds SJ. From good soldiers to psychologically entitled: examining when and why citizenship behavior leads to deviance. Acad Manag J. 2017;60(1):373–396. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis HC, Bontempo R, Villareal MJ, Asai M, Lucca N. Individualism and collectivism: cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(2):323–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus L, Reuber A, Vogel D, Vogel R. Giving sense about paradoxes: paradoxical leadership in the public sector. Public Manag Rev. 2021;1–21. doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1906935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar