Relationships Between Temporal Leadership, Transactive Memory Systems and Team Innovation Performance

References

• Ceryan O, Duenyas I, Sahin O. Dynamic pricing and replenishment with customer upgrades. Prod Oper Manag. 2018;27(4):663–679. doi:10.1111/poms.12816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Méndez JI, Davies G. Time pressure and time planning in explaining advertising avoidance behavior. J Promot Manag. 2017;23(4):481–503. doi:10.1080/10496491.2017.1297972
   Google Scholar
• Briker R, Walter F, Cole MS. The consequences of (not) seeing eye-to-eye about the past: the role of supervisor-team fit in past temporal focus for supervisors’ leadership behavior. J Organ Behav. 2020;41(3):244–262. doi:10.1002/job.2416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguay AM, Hoffmann MD, Guerrero MD, Loughead TM. An examination of the temporal nature of shared athlete leadership: a longitudinal case study of a competitive youth male ice hockey team. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020;18(5):672–686. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2019.1570535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerpott FH, Lehmann-Willenbrock N, Voelpel SC, Van Vugt M. It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: a temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Acad Manag J. 2019;62(3):717–738. doi:10.5465/amj.2017.0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell JN, Jang SJ, Chai S. Bridging temporal divides: temporal brokerage in global teams and its impact on individual performance. Organ Sci. 2021;32(3):731–751. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najam U, Inam A, Awan HM, Abbas M. The interactive role of temporal team leadership in the telecom sector of Pakistan: utilizing temporal diversity for sustainable knowledge sharing. Sustainability. 2018;10(5):1309. doi:10.3390/su10051309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos CM, Passos AM, Uitdewilligen S, Nubold A. Shared temporal cognitions as substitute for temporal leadership: an analysis of their effects on temporal conflict and team performance. Leadersh Q. 2016;27(4):574–587. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace DM, Torres EM, Zaccaro SJ. Just what do we think we are doing? Learning outcomes of leader and leadership development. Leaderh Q. 2021;32(5):101494. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Richard P, Edwards G, Hazlett SA. Leadership development outcomes research and the need for a time-sensitive approach. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2021;24(2):173–199. doi:10.1080/13678868.2020.1815155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao YC, Wu MH, Li SMCM. Elevated performance of the smart city-A case study of the IoT by innovation mode. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2021;68(5):1461–1475. doi:10.1109/TEM.2019.2908962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattarelli E, Bertolotti F, Prencipe A, et al. The effect of role-based product representations on individual and team coordination practices: a field study of a globally distributed new product development team. Org Sci. 2021;32(5):1149–1173. doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell R, Boyle B. Professional faultlines and interprofessional differentiation in multidisciplinary team innovation: the moderating role of inclusive leadership. Health Care Manage Rev. 2021;46(4):332–340. doi:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XC, Zhu Y, Qunchao W, et al. Every coin has two sides: the impact of time pressure on employees’ knowledge hiding. J Knowl Manag. 2021. doi:10.1108/JKM-02-2021-0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood MS, Jian Z, Akram U, et al. Entrepreneurial leadership and team creativity: the roles of team psychological safety and knowledge sharing. Pers Rev. 2021. doi:10.1108/PR-07-2020-0517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? J Manage. 2004;30(6):933–958. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha KK, Saunders C, Raby S, Dewald J. The moderating role of previous venture experience on breadth of learning and innovation and the impacts on SME performance. Int J Entrep Behav Res. 2021. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-02-2021-0159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZareRavasan A. Boosting innovation performance through big data analytics: an empirical investigation on the role of firm agility. J Inf Sci. 2021:016555152110474. doi:10.1177/01655515211047425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven S, Allen C. Amason assessing the state of top management teams research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia for Business Management; 2017. Available from: https://works.bepress.com/steven-stewart/26/. Accessed September 1, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• West MA. Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In: Beyerlein M, Johnson D, Beyerlein S, editors. Product Development Teams (Blz.1-29). (Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams; Vol. 5). JAI Press; 2000. Available from: https://www.acemap.info/paper/295555168. Accessed September 1, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kwahk KY, Park DH. Leveraging your knowledge to my performance: the impact of transactive memory capability on job performance in a social media environment. Comput Human Behav. 2018;80:314–330. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei W, Wang Y, Zhao H, Zhang Q. The influence of team time leadership on team creativity in the context of multiple time perspectives. Manage Rev. 2021;(04):92–101. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2021.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Singh V, Mirzaeifar S. Assessing transactions of distributed knowledge resources in modern construction projects-A transactive memory approach. Autom Constr. 2020;120:103386. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breugst N, Preller R, Patzelt H, Shepherd DA. Information reliability and team reflection as contingencies of the relationship between information elaboration and team decision quality. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(10):1314–1329. doi:10.1002/job.2298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang S, Richter AW, Nadkarni S. Subjective time in organizations: conceptual clarification, integration, and implications for future research. J Organ Behav. 2020;41(2):210–234. doi:10.1002/job.2421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathleen E. Five issues where groups meet time. Res Manag Groups Terms. 2004;6:267–283. doi:10.1016/S1534-0856(03)06012-2
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Harrison D. The clocks that time us are not the same: a theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2013;122(2):244–256. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Goodman PS, Lawrence BS, Tushman ML. Time: a new research lens. Acad Manag Rev. 2001;26(4):645–663. doi:10.2307/3560246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horila T, Siitonen M. A time to lead: changes in relational team leadership processes over time. Manag Commun Q. 2021;34(4):558–584. doi:10.1177/0893318920949700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalff Y. Managing projects as a mode of temporal ordering. Performative organising of time and temporality in projects. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 2021. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-05-2021-0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Suh MG. The key elements of strategic leadership capabilities to the latecomer firm: the case of RT Mart’s success in the Chinese retail industry. Asia Pac Bus Rev. 2021;27(1):29–52. doi:10.1080/13602381.2021.1846951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS. Learning and Performance in multidisciplinary teams: the importance of collective team identification. Acad Manag J. 2005;48(3):532–547. doi:10.2307/20159674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Nadkarni S. Temporal diversity and team performance: the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Acad Manag J. 2011;54(3):489–508. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.61967991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Alipour KK. It’s time for temporal leadership: individual, dyadic, team, and organizational effects. Ind Organ Psychol. 2014;7(2):178–182. doi:10.1111/iops.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Liu L. Reconciling temporal conflicts in innovation ambidexterity: the role of TMT temporal leadership. J Knowl Manag. 2020;24(8):1899–1920. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2019-0555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbin T. Enlivening the machinist perspective: humanising the information processing theory with social and cultural influences. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;197:2331–2338. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.263
   Google Scholar
• Peng J, Wang Z, Chen X. Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. J Bus Ethics. 2018;159(2):419–433. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3799-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Duan M, Liu J, Xu C. Overseas experience of executive team, R&D investment intensity and firm innovation performance. Sci Res Manag. 2018;(06):9–21. doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2018.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Wadei KA, Chen L, Frempong J, Appienti WA. The mediation effect of ethical leadership and creative performance: a social information processing perspective. J Creat Behav. 2021;55(1):241–254. doi:10.1002/jocb.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsz VB, Tindale RS, Vollrath DA. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychol Bull. 1997;121(1):43–64. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Liu X, Zhang X. How to solve the time dilemma? The influence of team temporal leadership on team innovation performance. Front Psychol. 2021;12:25–30. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao H, Zhang Z, Zhang L. Is temporal leadership always beneficial? The role of job passion and synchrony preference. Pers Rev. 2020. doi:10.1108/PR-02-2020-0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, van Eerde W, Gevers JM, Zhu W. How temporal leadership boosts employee innovative job performance. Eur J Innov Manag. 2020;24(1):23–42. doi:10.1108/EJIM-05-2019-0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(4):587–604. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin L, Shi J, Tang D. Research on knowledge sharing incentives for project teams considering knowledge hiding. Res Manage. 2015;(05):162–170. doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2015.05.018
   Google Scholar
• Rickley M. How composition and compilation of international experience in groups influences knowledge sharing: a theoretical model. J Glob Mobil. 2021;9(4):464–479. doi:10.1108/JGM-02-2021-0017
   Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi V, Hood AC. Communication in theory and research on transactive memory systems: a literature review. Top Cogn Sci. 2019;11(4):644–667. doi:10.1111/tops.12359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He H, Hu Y. The dynamic impacts of shared leadership and the transactive memory system on team performance: a longitudinal study. J Bus Res. 2021;130:14–26. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson CB. From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: cycles of collective cognition in work groups. J Organ Behav. 2001;22(2):121–134. doi:10.1002/job.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewettinck K, van Ameijde M. Linking leadership empowerment behaviour to employee attitudes and behavioural intentions Testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Pers Rev. 2011;40(3):284–305. doi:10.1108/00483481111118621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Zhang J, Du B. The impact of salary fairness and creative personality on employee creative performance. Manage Rev. 2017;11:106–115. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2017.11
   Google Scholar
• Shin SJ, Zhou J. When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(6):1709–1721. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Yan J. Research on the coordination mechanism of the coordination of the leadership time of the innovation team and the synchronization of the employees. Foreign Econ Manag. 2019;(10):141–152. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20190812.004
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Wu CS. Cross-level impact of employees’ knowledge management competence and team innovation atmosphere on innovation performance. Ann Oper Res. 2021;310(1):49–87. doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04328-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers JMP, Demerouti E. How supervisors’ reminders relate to subordinates’ absorption and creativity. J Manag Psychol. 2013;28(6):677–698. doi:10.1108/JPM-09-2011-0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zhang X, Cui T. Research on the relationship between time pressure and creativity: the cross-layer regulation of time leadership. Res Develop Manag. 2017;(05):13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L. Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: an integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Annals. 2011;5(1):189–229. doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590300
   Google Scholar
• Eckenwiler L. Displacement and solidarity: an ethic of place-making. Bioethics. 2018;32(9):562–568. doi:10.1111/bioe.12538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Carley KM, Argote L. The contingent effects of transactive memory: when is it more beneficial to know what others know? Manage Sci. 2006;52(5):671–682. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead AB. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(6):1080–1089. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heavey C, Simsek Z. Transactive memory systems and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective. Org Sci. 2015;26(4):941–959. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell JN, Van Knippenberg D, Van Ginkel WP. The impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance. Acad Manag J. 2014;57(4):1154–1173. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Q. 2007;31(4):783–808. doi:10.2307/25148820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Gilson LL, Blum TC. Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Acad Manag J. 2009;52(3):489–505. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41330806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barczak G, Lassk F, Mulki J. Antecedents of team creativity: an examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity Innov Manag. 2010;19(4):332–345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller MA, George JF, Valacich JS. Information Systems Project Management: A Process and Team Approach. 1st ed. Burlington, VT: Prospect Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ali A, Wang H, Bodla AA, Bahadur W. A moderated mediation model linking transactive memory system and social media with shared leadership and team innovation. Scand J Psychol. 2021;62(4):625–637. doi:10.1111/sjop.12733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Parboteeah KP. Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R D Manag. 2006;36(2):113–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW. Team innovation and effectiveness: the importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2002;11(3):285–298. doi:10.1080/13594320244000175
   Google Scholar
• Chen JH, Nadkarni S. It’s about time! CEOs’ temporal dispositions, temporal leadership, and corporate entrepreneurship. Adm Sci Q. 2017;62(1):31–66. doi:10.1177/0001839216663504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Choo A, Narayanan S, Sarkar S, Tenhiälä A. Knowledge sources, innovation objectives, and their impact on innovation performance: quasi-replication of Leiponen and Helfat. Strateg Manag J. 2010. doi:10.1002/smj.3287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang C, Shang J, Naumann SE, von Zedtwitz M. How team identification and expertise identification affect R&D employees’ creativity. Creativity Innov Manag. 2014;23(3):276–289. doi:10.1111/caim.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Huang X, Wu L. Experiencing meaningfulness climate in teams: how spiritual leadership enhances team effectiveness when facing uncertain tasks. Hum Resour Manage. 2018;58(2):155–168. doi:10.1002/hrm.21943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Vredenburgh D, Rogoff EG. Informational diversity and entrepreneurial team performance: moderating effect of shared leadership. Int Entrep Manag J. 2015;11(1):39–55. doi:10.1007/s11365-013-0274-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–880. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay CHH, Lin TC, Yoon J, Huang CC. Knowledge withholding intentions in teams: the roles of normative conformity, affective bonding, rational choice and social cognition. Decis Support Syst. 2014;67:53–65. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J Appl Psychol. 1984;69(1):85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar