580
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Impact of Empowering Leadership on Employee Improvisation: Roles of Challenge-Hindrance Stress and Psychological Availability

, , &
Pages 2783-2801 | Received 06 Jul 2022, Accepted 08 Sep 2022, Published online: 26 Sep 2022

References

  • Magni M, Palmi P, Salvemini S. Under pressure! Team innovative climate and individual attitudes in shaping individual improvisation. Eur Manag J. 2018;36:474–484. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.07.009
  • Singh SK, Vrontis D, Christofi M. What makes mindful self-initiated expatriates bounce back, improvise and perform: empirical evidence from the emerging markets. Eur Manag Rev. 2021;1–13. doi:10.1111/emre.12456
  • Magni M, Maruping LM. Sink or Swim: empowering Leadership and Overload in Teams’ Ability to Deal with the Unexpected. Human Resource Manage. 2013;52(5):715–739. doi:10.1002/hrm.21561
  • De Clercq D, Ul Haq I, Azeem MU. Unpacking the relationship between procedural justice and job performance. Manage Decision. 2021;59(9):2183–2199. doi:10.1108/MD-09-2019-1211
  • Liu J, Zhou X, Wang Q. The influence of entrepreneurial leadership on employee improvisation in new ventures: based on cognitive-affective processing system framework. Kybernetes. 2022;1–22. doi:10.1108/K-10-2021-0933
  • Rego A, Vitória A, Cunha MPE, et al. Employees’ improvisational behavior: exploring the role of leader grit and humility. Hum Perform. 2022;35:113–138. doi:10.1080/08959285.2022.2038171
  • Magni M, Proserpio L, Hoegl M, et al. The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation. Res Policy. 2009;38:1044–1053. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.004
  • Nisula AM, Kianto A. The role of knowledge management practices in supporting employee capacity for improvisation. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2016;27:1920–1937. doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1088885
  • Cunha MPE, Kamoche K, Cunha RCE. Organizational improvisation and leadership-a field study in two computer-mediated settings. Int Stud Manag Org. 2003;33:34–57. doi:10.1080/00208825.2003.11043677
  • Detert JR, Treviño LK. Speaking up to higher-ups: how supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organ Sci. 2010;21:249–270. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
  • Sharma PN, Kirkman BL. Leveraging leaders: a literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group Organ Manage. 2015;40:193–237. doi:10.1177/1059601115574906
  • Kim M, Beehr TA, Prewett MS. Employee responses to empowering leadership: a meta-analysis. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2018;25:257–276. doi:10.1177/1548051817750538
  • Gkorezis P. Principal empowering leadership and teacher innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. Int J Educ Manag. 2016;30:1030–1044. doi:10.1108/IJEM-08-2015-0113
  • Kim M, Beehr TA. Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2017;24:466–478. doi:10.1177/1548051817702078
  • Wang H, Zhang Y, Li P, et al. You raise me up and I reciprocate: linking empowering leadership to organizational citizenship behavior and unethical pro‐organizational behavior. Appl Psychol. 2022. doi:10.1111/apps.12398
  • Dennerlein T, Kirkman BL. The hidden dark side of empowering leadership: the moderating role of hindrance stressors in explaining when empowering employees can promote moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2022. doi:10.1037/apl0001013
  • Chen Y, Liu D, Tang G, et al. Workplace events and employee creativity: a multistudy field investigation. Pers Psychol. 2021;74:211–236. doi:10.1111/peps.12399
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer; 1984.
  • Cheong M, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, et al. A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. Leadersh Q. 2019;30:211–236. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.005
  • Cavanaugh MA, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, et al. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85:65–74. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.65
  • Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Lepine MA. A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: an explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Acad Manage J. 2005;48:764–775. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803921
  • Kamoche K, Cunha JVD. Towards a Theory of Organizational Improvisation: looking Beyond the Jazz Metaphor. J Manage Stud. 2003;40(8):2023–2051. doi:10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00410.x
  • Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manage J. 1990;33:692–724. doi:10.2307/256287
  • Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, et al. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Personality Soc Psychol. 1986;50(5):992–1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. Eur J Personality. 1987;1(3):141–169. doi:10.1002/per.2410010304
  • Ahearne M, Mathieu J, Rapp A. To Empower or Not to Empower Your Sales Force? An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Leadership Empowerment Behavior on Customer Satisfaction and Performance. J App Psychol. 2005;90(5):945–955. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
  • Hassan S, DeHart‐Davis L, Jiang Z. How empowering leadership reduces employee silence in public organizations. Public Admin. 2019;97(1):116–131. doi:10.1111/padm.12571
  • Li M, Liu W, Han Y, et al. Linking empowering leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the role of thriving at work and autonomy orientation. J Org Change Manage. 2016;29(5):732–750. doi:10.1108/JOCM-02-2015-0032
  • Cui Y, Yu G. A cross-level examination of team-directed empowering leadership and subordinates’ innovative performance: an AMO theory perspective. Int J Manpower. 2021;42(7):1257–1278. doi:10.1108/IJM-03-2020-0099
  • Guo Y, Peng Y, Zhu Y. How does empowering leadership motivate employee innovative behavior: a job characteristics perspective. Current Psychol. 2022;1–11. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03000-6
  • Li N, Chiaburu DS, Kirkman BL. Cross-level influences of empowering leadership on citizenship behavior: organizational support climate as a double-edged sword. J Manag. 2017;43:1076–1102. doi:10.1177/0149206314546193
  • Wang S, De Pater IE, Yi M, et al. Empowering leadership: employee-related antecedents and consequences. Asia Pacific J Manage. 2022;39(2):457–481. doi:10.1007/s10490-020-09734-w
  • Bauwens R, Denissen M, Van Beurden J, et al. Can leaders prevent technology from backfiring? Empowering leadership as a double-edged sword for technostress in care. Front Psychol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702648
  • Esteves T, Lopes MP. Leading to crafting: the relation between leadership perception and nurses’ job crafting. West J Nurs Res. 2017;39(6):763–783. doi:10.1177/0193945916659507
  • Zhang X, Bartol KM. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad Manage J. 2010;53(1):107–128. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
  • He HE, Wu WU, Zhao Z, et al. How to motivate employees for sustained innovation behavior in job stressors? A cross-level analysis of organizational innovation climate. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(23):4608–4622. doi:10.3390/IJERPH16234608
  • Wallace JC, Edwards BD, Arnold T, et al. Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. J App Psychol. 2009;94(1):254–262. doi:10.1037/a0013090
  • Lin CP, Xian J, Li B, et al. Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Thriving at Work: the Mediating Roles of Challenge-Hindrance Stressors. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1400. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01400
  • Zhang Y, LePine JA, Buckman BR, et al. It’s Not Fair Or Is It? The Role of Justice and Leadership in Explaining Work Stressor–Job Performance Relationships. Acad Manage J. 2014;57(3):675–697. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.1110
  • Sonnentag S, Tian AW, Cao J, et al. Positive work reflection during the evening and next-day work engagement: testing mediating mechanisms and cyclical processes. J Occupational Org Psychol. 2021;94(4):836–865. doi:10.1111/joop.12362
  • Li AN, Tan HH. What happens when you trust your supervisor? Mediators of individual performance in trust relationships. J Org Behav. 2013;34(3):407–425. doi:10.1002/job.1812
  • Qian J, Zhang W, Qu Y, et al. The enactment of knowledge sharing: the roles of psychological availability and team psychological safety climate. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2292. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551366
  • Saleem S, Humayun S, Latif B, et al. Identities hidden in challenges: the sequential mediation of thriving at work and employee investment. Front Psychol. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555420
  • Khliefat A, Chen H, Ayoun B, et al. The impact of the challenge and hindrance stress on hotel employees interpersonal citizenship behaviors: psychological capital as a moderator. Int J Hospitality Manage. 2021;94:102886. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102886
  • Rodell JB, Judge TA. Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. J Applied Psychol. 2009;94(6):1438–1451. doi:10.1037/a0016752
  • May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J Occupational Organizational Psychol. 2004;77(1):11–37. doi:10.1348/096317904322915892
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2012;63(1):539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage; 1991.
  • Hadida AL, Tarvainen W, Rose J. Organizational improvisation: a consolidating review and framework. Int J Management Rev. 2015;17(4):437–459. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12047
  • Cheong M, Spain SM, Yammarino FJ, et al. Two faces of empowering leadership: enabling and burdening. The Leadership Quarterly. 2016;27(4):602–616. doi:10.1037/apl0001013
  • Wang Y. Cross-Level Influence of Empowering Leadership on Constructive Deviance: the Different Roles of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Traditionality. Front Psychol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.810107
  • Jada UR, Mukhopadhyay S. Understanding the effects of empowering, transformational and ethical leadership on promotive and prohibitive voice: a moderated mediated examination. Pers Rev. 2019;48:707–730. doi:10.1108/PR-11-2017-0365
  • Mazzola JJ, Disselhorst R. Should we be ”challenging” employees?: a critical review and meta‐analysis of the challenge‐hindrance model of stress. J Organ Behav. 2019;40:949–961. doi:10.1002/job.2412
  • Abbas M, Raja U. Challenge-hindrance stressors and job outcomes: the moderating role of conscientiousness. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34:189–201. doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9535-z
  • Ma J, Peng Y, Wu B. Challenging or hindering? The roles of goal orientation and cognitive appraisal in stressor‐performance relationships. J Organ Behav. 2021;1–19. doi:10.1002/job.2503
  • Lepine M, Zhang Y, Crawford ER, et al. Turning their pain to gain: charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Acad Manage J. 2016;59:1036–1059. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0778
  • Binyamin G, Carmeli A. Does structuring of human resource management processes enhance employee creativity? The mediating role of psychological availability. Hum Resour Manage. 2010;49:999–1024. doi:10.1002/hrm.20397
  • Wang C, Wei Y, Zhao X, et al. Abusive supervision and creativity: investigating the moderating role of performance improvement attribution and the mediating role of psychological availability. Front Psychol. 2021;12:2222. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658743
  • Li J, Tong Y. Does narcissistic leadership enhance employee resilience? A moderated mediation model of goal-directed energy and psychological availability. Leadersh Org Dev J. 2021;42:819–836. doi:10.1108/LODJ-11-2020-0521
  • Arias-Pérez J, Cepeda-Cardona J. Knowledge management strategies and organizational improvisation: what changed after the emergence of technological turbulence caused by artificial intelligence? Balt J Manag. 2022;17:250–265. doi:10.1108/BJM-01-2021-0027
  • Evans MG, Monte A. Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1985;36:305–323. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0
  • Yang YC. High-involvement human resource practices, affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Serv Ind J. 2012;32:1209–1227. doi:10.1080/02642069.2010.545875