225
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Effect of Presentation Characteristics of “Quantified Self” Data on Consumers’ Continuance Participation Intention: An Empirical Study Based on Health-Related Apps

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 2859-2877 | Received 08 Jul 2022, Accepted 21 Sep 2022, Published online: 04 Oct 2022

References

  • Faraci P, Bottaro R, Valenti GD, Craparo G. Psychological well-being during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: the mediation role of generalized anxiety. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:695–709. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S354083
  • Almalki M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. Activity theory as a theoretical framework for health self-quantification: a systematic review of empirical studies. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):131–148. doi:10.2196/jmir.5000
  • Shin DH, Biocca F. Health experience model of personal informatics: the case of a Quantified Self. Comput Human Behav. 2017;69:62–74. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.019
  • Crawford K, Lingel J, Karppi T. Our metrics, ourselves: a hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. Eur J Cult Stud. 2015;18(4–5):479–496. doi:10.1177/1367549415584857
  • Zhang YD, Li DJ. Research on obstructive factors and the influencing mechanism of consumers’ involvement in Quantified-Self. Chin J Manage. 2018;15(1):74–83.
  • Van Berkel N, Luo C, Ferreira D, Goncalves J, Kostakos V, editors. The curse of Quantified-Self: an endless quest for answers. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers; 2015 Sep 07–11; Osaka, Japan. 2015; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Shen XL, Li YJ, Sun YQ. Wearable health information systems intermittent discontinuance: a revised expectation disconfirmation model. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2018;118(3):506–523. doi:10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0222
  • Lazar A, Koehler C, Tanenbaum J, Nguyen DH, editors. Why we use and abandon smart Devices. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; 2015 Sep 07–11; Osaka, Japan. 2015; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Zhang J, Lowry PB, editors. Designing Quantified-Self 2.0 running platform to ensure physical activity maintenance: the role of achievement goals and achievement motivational affordance. Proceedings of the 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems; 2016 Jun 27-Jul 1; 2018; Chiayi, Taiwan.
  • Li DJ, Zhang YD. Why consumers give up: the mechanism underlying the formation of willingness to continue participating in Quantified Self. Nankai Bus Rev. 2018;21(1):118–131.
  • Jin H, Yan JY, Zhang YD, Zhang HL. Research on the influence mechanism of users’ quantified-self immersive experience: on the convergence of mobile intelligence and wearable computing. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2020;3:1–12.
  • Shi HJ, Chen R. Goal specificity or ambiguity? Effects of self-quantification on persistence intentions. J Res Interact Mark. 2021. doi:10.1108/JRIM-07-2021-0181
  • Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol. 1989;44(9):1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
  • Zhu Z, Zhao J. The decision-making behavior of e-business adoption in organizational level: an empirical study from social cognitive theory. Nankai Bus Rev. 2011;14(3):151–160.
  • Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1986;4(3):359–373. doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
  • Locke EA. Social foundations of thought and action: a social-cognitive view. Acad Manage Rev. 1987;12(1):169–171.
  • Lin HC, Chang CM. What motivates health information exchange in social media? The roles of the social cognitive theory and perceived interactivity. Inform Manage. 2018;55(6):771–780. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.03.006
  • Lim JS, Choe MJ, Zhang J, Noh GY. The role of wishful identification, emotional engagement, and parasocial relationships in repeated viewing of live-streaming games: a social cognitive theory perspective. Comput Human Behav. 2020;108:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106327
  • Wu D, Gu H, Gu SY, You H. Individual motivation and social influence: a study of telemedicine adoption in China based on social cognitive theory. Health Policy Technol. 2021;10(3):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100525
  • Zhou JJ, Fan TT. Understanding the factors influencing patient e-health literacy in online health communities (OHCs): a social cognitive theory perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(14) :1–12.
  • Voskuil VR, Robbins LB. Youth physical activity self-efficacy: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(9):2002–2019. doi:10.1111/jan.12658
  • Zhao Y, Ni Q, Zhou RX. What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? A meta-analysis and the moderating role of age. Int J Inf Manage. 2018;43:342–350. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.006
  • Stiglbauer B, Weber S, Batinic B. Does your health really benefit from using a self-tracking device? Evidence from a longitudinal randomized control trial. Comput Human Behav. 2019;94:131–139. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.018
  • Brinson NH. Fit or Fail? Examining the Impact of Quantified Self Health and Fitness Tracking Technologies and Data Collection on College Youth [dissertation]. Asutin: The University of Texas; 2017.
  • Singelis TM. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1994;20(5):580–591. doi:10.1177/0146167294205014
  • Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98(2):224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  • Liu J. Internet-Based Knowledge Sharing Services: Investigations of Self-Construal and Sharing Behavior [dissertation]. Beijing: Tsinghua University; 2014.
  • Kim JH, Kim MS, Nam Y. An analysis of self-construals, motivations, facebook use, and user Satisfaction. Int J Hum-Comput Int. 2010;26(11–12):1077–1099. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.516726
  • Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, Chalmers M, editors. Personal tracking as lived informatics. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2014 Apr 26-May 1; Toronto, Canada. 2014; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Martinko MJ, Gundlach MJ, Douglas SC. Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: a causal reasoning perspective. Int J Select Assess. 2002;10(1/2):36–50. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00192
  • Li Y, Guo YK. Wiki-health: from quantified self to self-understanding. Future Gener Comp Sy. 2016;56:333–359. doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.08.008
  • Franque FB, Oliveira T, Tam C, Santini FD. A meta-analysis of the quantitative studies in continuance intention to use an information system. Internet Res. 2020;31(1):123–158. doi:10.1108/INTR-03-2019-0103
  • Swan M. The quantified self: fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data. 2013;1(2):85–99. doi:10.1089/big.2012.0002
  • Choe EK, Lee NB, Lee B, Pratt W, Kientz JA, editors. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2014 Apr 26-May 1; Toronto, Canada. 2014; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Pirzadeh A, He L, Stolterman E, editors. Personal informatics and reflection: a critical examination of the nature of reflection. CHI ‘13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2013 Apr 27-May 2; Paris, France. 2013; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Cho H, Yoon H, Kim KJ, Shin DH, editors. Wearable health information: effects of comparative feedback and presentation model. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2015 Apr 18–23; Seoul, Korea. 2015; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Petkov P, Köbler F, Foth M, Krcmar H, editors. Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies; 2011 Jun 29-Jul 2; Brisbane, Australia. 2011; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Fawcett T. Mining the quantified self: personal knowledge discovery as a challenge for data science. Big Data. 2015;3(4):249–266. doi:10.1089/big.2015.0049
  • Consolvo S, Everitt K, Smith I, Landay JA, editors. Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2006 Apr 22–27; Montréal, Canada. 2006; New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Cross SE, Hardin EE, GercekSwing B. The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(2):142–179. doi:10.1177/1088868310373752
  • Yao Q, Chen R, Zhao P. The influence of self-construals on the imagery advertising strategy. Acta Psychol Sin. 2011;43(6):674–683.
  • Afsar B, Badir YF, Saeed BB. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2014;114(8):1270–1300. doi:10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0152
  • Liu Y. Self-construal: review and prospect. Adv Psychol Sci. 2011;19(3):427–439.
  • Konrath S, Bushman BJ, Grove T. Seeing my world in a million little pieces: narcissism, self-construal, and cognitive-perceptual style. J Pers. 2009;77(4):1197–1228. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00579.x
  • Kang C, Zhou AB. The effect of the representational mode of information and learners’ cognitive style on learning in the multimedia environment. Psychol Sci. 2010;33(6):1397–1400.
  • Kühnen U, Hannover B, Schubert B. The semantic-procedural interface model of the self: the role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80(3):397–409. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.397
  • Kühnen U, Oyserman D. Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2002;38(5):492–499. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00011-2
  • Krishna A, Zhou RR, Zhang S. The effect of self-construal on spatial judgments. J Consum Res. 2008;35(2):337–348. doi:10.1086/588686
  • Xiong SH. A Impulse Buying Study Based on Personality Trait: The Roles of Regulatory Focus & Self-Contrual [dissertation]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology; 2009 .
  • Kim Y, Sundar SS. Visualizing ideal self vs. actual self through avatars: impact on preventive health outcomes. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(4):1356–1364. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.021
  • Guo L. Quantified-self 2.0: using context-aware services for promoting gradual behaviour change. Working Papers of Computers Society; 2016:1–18. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.00460. Accessed September 22, 2021.