Advanced search
Publication Cover
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Volume 15, 2022 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
56
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Formulation of a Mapping Formula to Estimate Well-Being Utility from Clinical Subjective Well-Being Scales

Akihiro Koreki1 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;2 Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital Organization Shimofusa Psychiatric Medical Center, Chiba, Japan;3 Center for Stress Research, Keio University, Tokyo, JapanORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0132-9724
ORCID Icon,
Maki Nagaoka1 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;3 Center for Stress Research, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Akira Ninomiya1 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;3 Center for Stress Research, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Masaru Mimura1 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;3 Center for Stress Research, Keio University, Tokyo, JapanORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-5273
ORCID Icon &
Mitsuhiro Sado1 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;3 Center for Stress Research, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan;4 Health Center, Keio University, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 3233-3241 | Received 21 Jul 2022, Accepted 10 Sep 2022, Published online: 04 Nov 2022

References

  • Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines-CHEERS good reporting practices task force. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(2):231–250.
  • Gafni A, Birch S. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): the silence of the lambda. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(9):2091–2100.
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance G, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  • Tsuchiya A, Williams A. Welfare economics and economic evaluation. In: Drummond M, McGuire A, editors. Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Merging Theory with Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001:22–45.
  • EuroQol G. EuroQol--A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.
  • Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, et al. Scoring the Icecap-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015;24(3):258–269. doi:10.1002/hec.3014
  • Oliver A, Healey A, Donaldson C. Choosing the method to match the perspective: economic assessment and its implications for health-services efficiency. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1771–1774.
  • Coast J. Is economic evaluation in touch with society’s health values? BMJ. 2004;329(7476):1233–1236.
  • Ryan M, Netten A, Skåtun D, Smith P. Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome--an application to social care for older people. J Health Econ. 2006;25(5):927–944.
  • Al-Janabi H, Flynn T, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:167–176.
  • Sen A. Inequality Reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1992.
  • Sen A. Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum MC, editor. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993.
  • Ryff CD. Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83:10–28.
  • Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra Psychol. 2018;4(1):15.
  • Keyes CL, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD. Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022;82:1007–1022.
  • Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–75.
  • Diener E, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2010;97:143–156.
  • Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(2):215–225.
  • OECD. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013.
  • Sirgy MJ. Positive balance: a hierarchical perspective of positive mental health. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(7):1921–1930.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.