Effects of Professional Virtual Community Attributes and Flow Experience on Information Sharing Among Chinese Young Netizens: A Fuzzy-Set QCA

References

• Tamjidyamcholo A, Baba MSB, Shuib NLM, Rohani VA. Evaluation model for knowledge sharing in information security professional virtual community. Comput Security. 2014;43:19–34. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2014.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagel J. Net gain: expanding markets through virtual communities. J Interact Market. 1999;13(1):55–65. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199924)13:1<55::AID-DIR5>3.0.CO;2-C
   Google Scholar
• Lin M-J-J, Hung S-W, Chen C-J. Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Comput Human Behav. 2009;25(4):929–939. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Lores S, Crespo-Tejero N, Fernández-Hernández R. Driving traffic to the museum: the role of the digital communication tools. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2022;174:121273. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajvidi M, Richard M-O, Wang Y, Hajli N. Brand co-creation through social commerce information sharing: the role of social media. J Bus Res. 2020;121:476–486. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Wang X. Examining gender differences in people’s information-sharing decisions on social networking sites. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;50:45–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Jun M, Han J. The relationship between needs, motivations and information sharing behaviors on social media: focus on the self-connection and social connection. Asia Pacific J Market Logist. 2022. doi:10.1108/APJML-01-2021-0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood A, Zhang Q, Ali M, Cappiello G, Dhir A. Linking enterprise social media use, trust and knowledge sharing: paradoxical roles of communication transparency and personal blogging. J Knowl Manage. 2022. doi:10.1108/JKM-11-2021-0880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Weber I. State, power and mobile communication: a case study of China. N Media Soc. 2016;9(6):925–944. doi:10.1177/1461444807082640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNNIC. The 49th statistical report on China’s internet development. Available from: http://www.cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202204/P020220424336135612575.pdf. Accessed November 25, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Liao S-H, Widowati R, Hsieh Y-C. Investigating online social media users’ behaviors for social commerce recommendations. Technol Soc. 2021;66:101655. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Xu P, Ye Y. Trust in social media brands and perceived media values: a survey study in China. Comput Human Behav. 2022;127:107024. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Ma J, Tong Y. Livestreaming in tourism: what drives tourism live streamers to share their travel experiences? Tour Rev. 2022. doi:10.1108/TR-09-2021-0420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Zhang L, Zeng C, Liu X. Rethinking value co-creation and loyalty in virtual travel communities: how and when they develop. J Retail Consumer Services. 2022;69:103097. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priharsari D, Abedin B. What facilitates and constrains value co-creation in online communities: a sociomateriality perspective. Inform Manage. 2021;58(6):103433. doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He D, Yao Z, Tang P, Ma Y. Impacts of different interactions on viewers’ sense of virtual community: an empirical study of live streaming platform. Behav Inf Technol. 2022;1–21. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2022.2053884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Zhong Z, Xie J, Zhang Q, Li S. The effects of information-seeking behaviors on risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional correlational survey. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:1707–1719. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S368537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaaa SL, Staplesb DS. The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants. J Strat Inform Syst. 2000;9(2–3):129–154. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolls K, Hansen M, Jackson D, Elliott D. How health care professionals use social media to create virtual communities: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6):e166. doi:10.2196/jmir.5312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra NV, Hsiao R, Shapiro H, et al. Women in cardiology twitter network: an analysis of a global professional virtual community from 2016 to 2019. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(5):e019321. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.019321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z. Relationship between social exchanges and financial performance: examining a virtual community sponsored by a cloud provider. Int J Electron Commerce. 2022;26(3):355–387. doi:10.1080/10864415.2022.2076198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo C, Lan Y, Luo X, Li H. The effect of commitment on knowledge sharing: an empirical study of virtual communities. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;163:120438. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock G-W, Ahuja MK, Suh A, Yap LX. Sustainability of a virtual community: integrating individual and structural dynamics. J Assoc Inform Syst. 2015;16(6):418–447. doi:10.17705/1jais.00400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Anta B, Orengo V, Zornoza A, Peñarroja V, Martínez-Tur V. Understanding the sense of community and continuance intention in virtual communities: the role of commitment and type of community. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2021;39(3):335–352. doi:10.1177/0894439319859590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong L, Huang L, Hou JJ, Liu Y. Continuous content contribution in virtual community: the role of status-standing on motivational mechanisms. Decis Support Syst. 2020;132:113283. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh J, Kim Y-G, Kim Y-G. Sense of virtual community: a conceptual framework and empirical validation. Int J Electron Commerce. 2014;8(2):75–94. doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Kishore R, Zuo M, Liao R, Tang X. Older adults in virtual communities: understanding the antecedents of knowledge contribution and knowledge seeking through the lens of socioemotional selectivity and social cognitive theories. J Knowl Manage. 2021;26(4):972–992. doi:10.1108/jkm-02-2021-0087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong L, Sachau D, Lassiter A. Developing a measure of virtual community citizenship behavior. Knowl Manag E-Learn. 2011;3(4):682–696.
   Google Scholar
• Deng X, Gao B, Chen L. Support while control: the influence of embeddedness on virtual community participation. Library Hi Tech. 2019;38(3):625–637. doi:10.1108/lht-09-2018-0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DJ, Salvacion M, Salehan M, Kim DW. An empirical study of community cohesiveness, community attachment, and their roles in virtual community participation. Eur J Inf Syst. 2022;1–28. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2021.2018364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung N, Nam K, Koo C. Examining information sharing in social networking communities: applying theories of social capital and attachment. Telemat Inform. 2016;33(1):77–91. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang C, Chang -C-C, Rothwell W, Shu K-M. Influences of organizational culture on knowledge sharing in an online virtual community. J Organ End User Comput. 2016;28(4):15–32. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2016100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Wan M, Li Z. Understanding the health information sharing behavior of social media users: an empirical study on WeChat. J Organ End User Comput. 2021;33(5):180–203. doi:10.4018/JOEUC.20210901.oa9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Shi W. The influence of the community climate on users’ knowledge-sharing intention: the social cognitive theory perspective. Behav Inf Technol. 2020;41(2):307–323. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1808704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N, Yin J, Ma Z, Liao M. The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities. J Knowl Manage. 2021;26(3):485–505. doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ma J, Wei J, Yang S. The role of perceived integration in WeChat usages for seeking information and sharing comments: a social capital perspective. Inform Manage. 2021;58(1):103280. doi:10.1016/j.im.2020.103280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Guo G, Hong L. Impact of professionally facilitated peer support for family carers of people with dementia in a WeChat virtual community. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(1):68–76. doi:10.1177/1357633x20910830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, John N. The concept of “sharing” in Chinese social media: origins, transformations and implications. Inform Commun Soc. 2022;25(3):359–375. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1791216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Xiong L, Wang C, Chen N. Understanding Chinese mobile social media users’ communication behaviors during public health emergencies. J Risk Res. 2022;25(7):874–891. doi:10.1080/13669877.2022.2049621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Zhou Q, Chiu DKW, Wang Y. Exploring the factors influencing continuous usage intention of academic social network sites. Online Inform Rev. 2022;46(7):1225–1241. doi:10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Li Y, Zhang D. Identifying women’s entrepreneurial barriers and empowering female entrepreneurship worldwide: a fuzzy-set QCA approach. Int Entrepren Manage J. 2019;15(3):905–928. doi:10.1007/s11365-019-00570-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee C, Elias T. Factors affecting information sharing in social networking sites amongst university students: application of the knowledge-sharing model to social networking sites. Online Inform Rev. 2015;39(3):290–309. doi:10.1108/OIR-01-2015-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Zhang M, Kang K, Hu M. Transforming followers into fans: a study of Chinese users of the WeChat official account. Online Inform Rev. 2017;41(7):1029–1045. doi:10.1108/oir-01-2016-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu C-M, Hsu M-H, Wang ETG. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis Support Syst. 2006;42(3):1872–1888. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun H, Thavisay T, Lee SH. Enhancing the role of flow experience in social media usage and its impact on shopping. J Retail Consumer Services. 2022;65:102492. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece J. Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. Behav Inf Technol. 2010;20(5):347–356. doi:10.1080/01449290110084683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C-J, Hung S-W. To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Inform Manage. 2010;47(4):226–236. doi:10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee FSL, Vogel D, Limayem M. Virtual Community Informatics: What We Know and What We Need to Know. IEEE; 2002:2863–2872.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner C, Liu L, Schneider C, Prasarnphanich P, Chen H. Creating a Successful Professional Virtual Community: A Sustainable Digital Ecosystem for Idea Sharing. IEEE; 2009:163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Fu K-W, Chan C-H, Chau M. Assessing censorship on microblogs in China: discriminatory keyword analysis and the real-name registration policy. IEEE Internet Comput. 2013;17(3):42–50. doi:10.1109/MIC.2013.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece J. Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Socialbilty. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J. Ontology-based empirical knowledge verification for professional virtual community. Behav Inf Technol. 2011;30(5):555–586. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2010.549512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichheld FF, Schefter P. E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web. Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(4):105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster MK, Abbey A, Callow MA, Zu X, Wilbon AD. Rethinking virtuality and its impact on teams. Small Group Res. 2015;46(3):267–299. doi:10.1177/1046496415573795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G-L, Yang S-C, Tang S-M. Sense of virtual community and knowledge contribution in a P3 virtual community. Internet Res. 2013;23(1):4–26. doi:10.1108/10662241311295755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberg F, Engeser S. Intrinsic motivation and flow. In: Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H, editors. Motivation and Action. Springer International Publishing; 2018:579–622.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Jossey-Bass; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Perennial; 1997:39.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Vol. 1990. Harper & Row New York; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Pelet J-É, Ettis S, Cowart K. Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: evidence from social media use. Inform Manage. 2017;54(1):115–128. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman DL, Novak TP. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. J Mark. 1996;60(3):50–68. doi:10.1177/002224299606000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrando C, Jimenez-Martinez J, Hoyos MJ. From sPassion to sWOM: the role of flow. Online Inform Rev. 2018;42(2):191–204. doi:10.1108/OIR-09-2016-0243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarter. 2000;24(4):665–694. doi:10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufaris M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inform Syst Res. 2002;13(2):205–223. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SA, Marsh HW. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1996;18(1):17–35. doi:10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Browne GJ, Wetherbe JC. Why do internet users stick with a specific web site? A relationship perspective. Int J Electron Commerce. 2006;10(4):105–141. doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, Lin S, Turel O, Xu F. The buffering effect of flow experience on the relationship between overload and social media users’ discontinuance intentions. Telemat Inform. 2020;49:101374. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H. Flow on the net–detecting Web users’ positive affects and their flow states. Comput Human Behav. 2006;22(2):221–233. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procci K, Singer AR, Levy KR, Bowers C. Measuring the flow experience of gamers: an evaluation of the DFS-2. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(6):2306–2312. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi IS. Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson SA, Eklund RC. Assessing flow in physical activity: the flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2002;24(2):133–150. doi:10.1123/jsep.24.2.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang -C-C, Hsu M-C. An exploratory study using inexpensive electroencephalography (EEG) to understand flow experience in computer-based instruction. Inform Manage. 2014;51(7):912–923. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SM, Chen L. The impact of flow on online consumer behavior. J Comput Inf Syst. 2010;50(4):1–10. doi:10.1080/08874417.2010.11645425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu C-M, Wang ETG, Shih F-J, Fan Y-W. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of expectancy disconfirmation and justice theories. Online Inform Rev. 2011;35(1):134–153. doi:10.1108/14684521111113623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SK, Ishman M, Sanders GL. An empirical investigation of socio-cultural factors of information sharing in China. Inform Manage. 2007;44(2):165–174. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J, You Y, Wang Y, Sheng D, Xin B. Understanding the complexity of business information dissemination in social media: a meta-analysis of empirical evidence from China. Complexity. 2021;2021:1–13. doi:10.1155/2021/7647718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung CMK, Lee MKO, Rabjohn N. The impact of electronic word‐of‐mouth. Internet Res. 2008;18(3):229–247. doi:10.1108/10662240810883290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen R. Information sharing and knowledge sharing as communicative activities. Inform Res. 2017;22(3):20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Huang H, Su B, Zhao J, Zhang B. Information dissemination analysis of different media towards the application for disaster pre-warning. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98649. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leimeister JM, Ebner W, Krcmar H. Design, implementation, and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. J Manag Inform Syst. 2014;21(4):101–131. doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh J, Kim YG. Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective. Expert Syst Appl. 2004;26(2):155–166. doi:10.1016/s0957-4174(03)00116-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPC Central Committee and the State Council. The middle- and long-term youth development plan (2016–2025). Available from: http://english.www.gov.cn/policies/latest_releases/2017/04/14/content_281475626290850.htm. Accessed November 25, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang F, Zheng X, Fan D, Zhang P, Li S. The sharing economy and business model design: a configurational approach. J Manag Stud. 2021;58(4):949–976. doi:10.1111/joms.12711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Greckhamer T, Furnari S, Fiss PC, Crilly D, Aguilera R. Embracing causal complexity: the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. J Manage. 2017;43(1):255–282. doi:10.1177/0149206316679252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro S, Llinares C, Garzon D. Exploring the relationship between co-creation and satisfaction using QCA. J Bus Res. 2016;69(4):1336–1339. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin CC. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss PC. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32(4):1180–1198. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin CC. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin CC. Fuzzy sets: calibration versus measurement. Methodology volume of Oxford handbooks of political science. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ong WJ, Johnson MD. Towards a configural theory of job demands and resources. Acad Manage J. 2021. doi:10.5465/amj.2020.0493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider MR, Schulze-Bentrop C, Paunescu M. Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: a fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. J Int Bus Stud. 2010;41(2):246–266. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Kim PH. One size does not fit all: strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies. J Bus Res. 2021;124:272–285. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorkavoos M, Duan Y, Edwards JS, Ramanathan R. Identifying the configurational paths to innovation in SMEs: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. J Bus Res. 2016;69(12):5843–5854. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greckhamer T, Furnari S, Fiss PC, Aguilera RV. Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: best practices in strategy and organization research. Strat Organ. 2018;16(4):482–495. doi:10.1177/1476127018786487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus S, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Schüssler M. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method. Int Entrepren Manage J. 2018;14(1):15–33. doi:10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menshikova A. Evaluation of expertise in a virtual community of practice: the case of stack overflow. Digit Transform Glob Soc. 2018;483–491:chapChapter 40. Communications in Computer and Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lee G, Suzuki A. Motivation for information exchange in a virtual community of practice: evidence from a Facebook group for shrimp farmers. World Dev. 2020;125:104698. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J-C, Hwang M-Y, Tai K-H, Lin P-H. The effects of intrinsic cognitive load and gameplay interest on flow experience reflecting performance progress in a Chinese remote association game. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2019;34(3):358–378. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1614068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse DCK, Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. Living well by “flowing” well: the indirect effect of autotelic personality on well-being through flow experience. J Posit Psychol. 2020;16(3):310–321. doi:10.1080/17439760.2020.1716055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar