Exploring the Underlying Mechanism Between Perceived Injustice and Knowledge Hiding: An Empirical Investigation

References

• Koon V-Y. The role of organisational compassion in knowledge hiding and thriving at work. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2022;20:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Tian AW, Soo C, Zhang B, Ho KSB, Hosszu K. Different motivations for knowledge sharing and hiding: the role of motivating work design. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(7):783–799. doi:10.1002/job.2364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong PS, Men C, Luo J, Jia R. Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence. Manag Decision. 2018;56(2):329–343. doi:10.1108/MD-11-2016-0778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly CE, Zweig D, Webster J, Trougakos JP. Knowledge hiding in organizations. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(1):64–88. doi:10.1002/job.737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semerci AB. Examination of knowledge hiding with conflict, competition and personal values. Int J Conflict Manag. 2019;30(1):111–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H. Why and when do people hide knowledge? J Knowl Manag. 2013;17(3):398–415. doi:10.1108/JKM-12-2012-0380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Černe M, Hernaus T, Dysvik A, Škerlavaj M. The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior. Hum Resour Manag J. 2017;27(2):281–299. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Han MS, Xiang D, Hampson DP. The double-edged effects of perceived knowledge hiding: empirical evidence from the sales context. J Knowl Manag. 2018;23(2):279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain GA, Bhatti ZA, Ashraf N, Fang Y-H. Top-down knowledge hiding in organizations: an empirical study of the consequences of supervisor knowledge hiding among local and foreign workers in the Middle East. J Bus Ethics. 2020;164(3):611–625. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira M, Curado C, de Garcia PS. Knowledge hiding and knowledge hoarding: a systematic literature review. Knowl Process Manag. 2021;28(3):277–294. doi:10.1002/kpm.1671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Škerlavaj M, Connelly CE, Cerne M, Dysvik A. Tell me if you can: time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding. J Knowl Manag. 2018;22(7):1489–1509. doi:10.1108/JKM-05-2017-0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen T-M, Malik A, Budhwar P. Knowledge hiding in organizational crisis: the moderating role of leadership. J Bus Res. 2022;139:161–172. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Xia Q, He P, Sheard G, Wan P. Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations. Int J Hospital Manag. 2016;59:84–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock P. Shedding light on knowledge management. HR Magazine. 2004;49(5):46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pan W, Zhang Q, Teo TS, Lim VK. The dark triad and knowledge hiding. Int J Inf Manage. 2018;42:36–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panopto. Panopto workplace knowledge and productivity report; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Issac AC, Bednall TC, Baral R, Magliocca P, Dhir A. The effects of expert power and referent power on knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding. J Knowl Manag. 2022. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Wang Z, Chen X. Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. J Bus Ethics. 2019;159(2):419–433. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3799-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serenko A, Bontis N. Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. J Knowl Manag. 2016;20(6):1199–1224. doi:10.1108/JKM-05-2016-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernaus T, Cerne M, Connelly C, Vokic NP, Škerlavaj M. Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate. J Knowl Manag. 2018;23(4):597–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand P, Jain KK. Big five personality types & knowledge hiding behaviour: a theoretical framework. Arch Bus Res. 2014;2(5):47–56. doi:10.14738/abr.25.355
   Google Scholar
• Webster J, Brown G, Zweig D, Connelly CE, Brodt S, Sitkin S. Beyond knowledge sharing: withholding knowledge at work. In: Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Demirkasimoglu N. Knowledge hiding in academia: is personality a key factor? Int J Higher Educ. 2016;5(1):128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay LJ, Saldanha MF. Facilitating forgiveness in organizational contexts: exploring the injustice gap, emotions, and expressive writing interventions. J Bus Ethics. 2016;137(4):699–720. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2750-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanzeb S, De Clercq D, Fatima T. Organizational injustice and knowledge hiding: the roles of organizational dis-identification and benevolence. Manag Decision. 2020;59(2):446–462. doi:10.1108/MD-05-2019-0581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahling JJ. Exhausted, mistreated, or indifferent? Explaining deviance from emotional display rules at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2017;26(2):171–182. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2016.1229307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rus D, van Knippenberg D, Wisse B. Leader power and self-serving behavior: the moderating role of accountability. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(1):13–26. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau P. Power and Exchange in Social Life. New York: J Wiley & Sons; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Abubakar AM, Behravesh E, Rezapouraghdam H, Yildiz SB. Applying artificial intelligence technique to predict knowledge hiding behavior. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;49:45–57. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Anthony EL, Daniels SR, Hall AV. Social exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad Manag Ann. 2017;11(1):479–516. doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams JS. Inequity in social exchange. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Elsevier; 1965:267–299.
   Google Scholar
• Camps J, Decoster S, Stouten J. My share is fair, so i don’t care. J Person Psychol. 2012;11(1):49–59. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino F, Moore DA, Bazerman MH. No Harm, No Foul: The Outcome Bias in Ethical Judgments. Citeseer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Xie Y, Cooke FL. Unethical leadership and employee knowledge-hiding behavior in the Chinese context: A moderated dual-pathway model. Asian Bus Manag. 2021:1–25. doi:10.1057/s41291-021-00154-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershcovis MS, Turner N, Barling J, et al. Predicting workplace aggression: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psycho. 2007;92(1):228. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Harrell-Cook G, Dulebohn JH. Organizational politics: the nature of the relationship between politics perceptions and political behavior. In: Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris GR, Kacmar KM. Perceptions of organizational politics. J Manage. 1992;18(1):93–116. doi:10.1177/014920639201800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Park H-H, Paik Y. Individual and organizational antecedents of knowledge hiding behavior. Korean J Bus Administr. 2016;29(8):1215–1239.
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychologist. 1989;44(3):513. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Song L, Huang J. How peer abusive supervision affects sales employees’ customer knowledge hiding: the roles of rivalry and schadenfreude. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:1067. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S359360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq D, Kundi YM, Sardar S, Shahid S. Perceived organizational injustice and counterproductive work behaviours: mediated by organizational identification, moderated by discretionary human resource practices. Person Rev. 2021;50(7/8):1545–1565. doi:10.1108/PR-06-2020-0469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Bell C, Li Y. How and when intragroup relationship conflict leads to knowledge hiding: the roles of envy and trait competitiveness. Int J Conflict Manag. 2020. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-03-2020-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modem R, Lakshminarayanan S, Pattusamy M, Prabhu N. Is knowledge hiding in higher education a political phenomenon? An explanatory sequential approach to explore non-linear and three-way interaction effects. J Knowl Manag. 2022. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi M, Leidner DE. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarter. 2001;25(1):107–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartol KM, Srivastava A. Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. J Leader Organ Stud. 2002;9(1):64–76. doi:10.1177/107179190200900105
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed K, Mukhtar U, Anwar S, Hayat N. Workplace knowledge hiding among front line employees: moderation of felt obligation. VINE J Informat Knowl Manag Syst. 2020. doi:10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2020-0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heizmann H, Olsson MR. Power matters: the importance of Foucault’s power/knowledge as a conceptual lens in KM research and practice. J Knowl Manag. 2015;19(4):756–769. doi:10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao M, Cooke FL. Why and when knowledge hiding in the workplace is harmful: a review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific J Human Res. 2019;57(4):470–502. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK. Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding. J Bus Res. 2019;97:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Cobb AT, Lusch RF. The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships. J Bus Res. 2006;59(2):166–175. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Liu Y, Yang Q, Maksimov V, Hou J. Improving performance and reducing cost in buyer–supplier relationships: the role of justice in curtailing opportunism. J Bus Res. 2015;68(3):607–615. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouazzaoui M, Wu H-J, Roehrich JK, Squire B, Roath AS. Justice in inter-organizational relationships: a literature review and future research agenda. Industr Market Manag. 2020;87:128–137. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Huang Y, Luo Y, Zhao Y. How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance? J Operat Manag. 2012;30(5):355–367. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimhan R, Narayanan S, Srinivasan R. An investigation of justice in supply chain relationships and their performance impact. J Operat Manag. 2013;31(5):236–247. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Sivadas E, Kang B, Oh S. Dissolution intention in channel relationships: an examination of contributing factors. Industr Market Manag. 2012;41(7):1106–1113. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies RJ. Interactional justice: looking backward, looking forward. In: The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace. Oxford University Press; 2015:89.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J. Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Manage. 1990;16(2):399–432. doi:10.1177/014920639001600208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut JW, Walker L. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Konovsky MA. Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. J Manage. 2000;26(3):489–511. doi:10.1177/014920630002600306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay C-H-H, Lin T-C, Yoon J, Huang C-C. Knowledge withholding intentions in teams: the roles of normative conformity, affective bonding, rational choice and social cognition. Decis Support Syst. 2014;67:53–65. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagenczyk TJ, Cruz KS, Woodard AM, et al. The moderating effect of Machiavellianism on the psychological contract breach–organizational identification/disidentification relationships. J Bus Psychol. 2013;28(3):287–299. doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9278-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Liu W, Li J, Yu X. Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and knowledge hiding: the moderating role of relative leader–member exchange. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(7):834–848. doi:10.1002/job.2359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak MN, Zolin R, Muhammad N. The combined effect of perceived organizational injustice and perceived politics on deviant behaviors. Int J Conflict Manag. 2020. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-12-2019-0220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manage. 2005;31(6):874–900. doi:10.1177/0149206305279602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro JA, Conway N. The employment relationship through the lens of social exchange; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Cleveland JN, Goldberg CB. Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. J Appl Psycho. 2003;88(3):529. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp DE, Cropanzano R. The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2002;89(1):925–946. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson H. Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization. Adm Sci Q. 1965;9(4):370. doi:10.2307/2391032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell MS, Ambrose ML. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. J Appl Psycho. 2007;92(4):1159. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Chiang JT-J, Fehr R, Xu M, Wang S. How do leaders react when treated unfairly? Leader narcissism and self-interested behavior in response to unfair treatment. J Appl Psycho. 2017;102(11):1590. doi:10.1037/apl0000237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DA. Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organization: relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors. J Organ Behav. 2009;30(4):525–542. doi:10.1002/job.563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trada S, Goyal V. The dual effects of perceived unfairness on opportunism in channel relationships. Industr Market Manag. 2017;64:135–146. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoster S, Stouten J, Tripp TM. Followers’ reactions to self-serving leaders: the influence of the organization’s budget policy. Am J Bus. 2014;29(3/4):202–222. doi:10.1108/AJB-12-2013-0076
   Google Scholar
• Černe M, Nerstad CG, Dysvik A, Škerlavaj M. What goes around comes around: knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Acad Manag J. 2014;57(1):172–192. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siachou E, Trichina E, Papasolomou I, Sakka G. Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? A systematic literature review. J Bus Res. 2021;135:195–213. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulistiawan J, Moslehpour M, Diana F, Lin P-K. Why and when do employees hide their knowledge? Behav Sci. 2022;12(2):56. doi:10.3390/bs12020056
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emerson RM. Social Exchange Theory. Annu Rev Sociol. 1976;2(1):335–362. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molm LD, Collett JL, Schaefer DR. Building solidarity through generalized exchange: a theory of reciprocity. Am J Sociol. 2007;113(1):205–242. doi:10.1086/517900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serenko A. Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the perspective of the target. J Knowl Manag. 2020;24(4):737–773. doi:10.1108/JKM-06-2019-0337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarlicki DP, Folger R. Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J Appl Psycho. 1997;82(3):434. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz S, Xu Y, Hussain S. Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding: the mediating role of job tension. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):5547. doi:10.3390/su11205547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simha A, Elloy DF, Huang H-C. The moderated relationship between job burnout and organizational cynicism. Manag Decision. 2014;52(3):482–504. doi:10.1108/MD-08-2013-0422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacmar KM, Ferris GR. Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): development and construct validation. Educ Psychol Meas. 1991;51(1):193–205. doi:10.1177/0013164491511019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacmar KM, Baron RA. Organizational politics: the state of the field, links to related processes, and an agenda for future research. In: Research in Human Resources Management. Vol. 17. US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press; 1999:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Malik OF, Shahzad A, Raziq MM, Khan MM, Yusaf S, Khan A. Perceptions of organizational politics, knowledge hiding, and employee creativity: the moderating role of professional commitment. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;142:232–237. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-H, Rosen CC, Levy PE. The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee attitudes, strain, and behavior: a meta-analytic examination. Acad Manag J. 2009;52(4):779–801. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Chen T, Wang M, Jin Y, Wang Y. Rivals or allies: how performance‐prove goal orientation influences knowledge hiding. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(7):849–868. doi:10.1002/job.2372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Mazzucchelli A, Vessal SR, Solidoro A. Knowledge-based HRM practices and innovation performance: role of social capital and knowledge sharing. J Int Manag. 2021;27(1):100830. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2021.100830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrontis D, Thrassou A, Melanthiou Y. A contemporary higher education student-choice model for developed countries. J Bus Res. 2007;60(9):979–989. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhou F. Managing uncertainty inherent in prohibitive voice: how leadership interacts with employee political skill. Front Psychol. 2021:5710. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Lee RT. Defensive behavior in organizations: a preliminary model. Hum Relat. 1990;43(7):621–648. doi:10.1177/001872679004300702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacmar KM, Zivnuska S, White CD. Control and exchange: the impact of work environment on the work effort of low relationship quality employees. Leadersh Q. 2007;18(1):69–84. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt AS. Determinants of top-down knowledge hiding in firms: an individual-level perspective. Asian Bus Manag. 2021;20(2):259–279. doi:10.1057/s41291-019-00091-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedi A, Schat AC. Perceptions of organizational politics: a meta-analysis of its attitudinal, health, and behavioural consequences. Can Psychol. 2013;54(4):246. doi:10.1037/a0034549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan K, Abbas M, Gul A, Raja U. Organizational justice and job outcomes: moderating role of Islamic work ethic. J Bus Ethics. 2015;126(2):235–246. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1937-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja U, Javed Y, Abbas M. A time lagged study of burnout as a mediator in the relationship between workplace bullying and work–family conflict. Int J Stress Manag. 2018;25(4):377. doi:10.1037/str0000080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowne DP, Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol. 1960;24(4):349. doi:10.1037/h0047358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niehoff BP, Moorman RH. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad Manag J. 1993;36(3):527–556. doi:10.2307/256591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rus D, Van Knippenberg D, Wisse B. Leader power and leader self-serving behavior: the role of effective leadership beliefs and performance information. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010;46(6):922–933. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacmar KM, Carlson DS. Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): a multiple sample investigation. J Manage. 1997;23(5):627–658. doi:10.1177/014920639702300502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Noe RA. Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20(2):115–131. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus B, Schuler H. Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: a general perspective. J Appl Psycho. 2004;89(4):647. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J Appl Psycho. 2010;95(1):1. doi:10.1037/a0017103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Janssen O, Vriend T, van der Linden D. How self-construals relate to employee incremental and radical creativity: a behavioral strategy perspective. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2022;1–13. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2022.2104716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, O’Boyle EH. Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: a review of human resource management research using parcels. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2008;18(4):233–242. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman DL, MacCallum RC. Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behav Res. 2005;40(2):235–259. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little TD. Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Zuo Y, Zhao Y. The relationship between subjective social class and aggression: a serial mediation model. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;131:174–179. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam LW. Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. J Bus Res. 2012;65(9):1328–1334. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C-C, Wang Y-M, Wu T-W, Wang P-A. An empirical analysis of the antecedents and performance consequences of using the moodle platform. Int J Informat Educ Technol. 2013;3(2):217. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.267
   Google Scholar
• Farasat M, Azam A. Supervisor bottom-line mentality and subordinates’ unethical pro-organizational behavior. Person Rev. 2020. doi:10.1108/PR-03-2020-0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng W-T, Dörnyei Z, Schmitt N. A new approach to assessing strategic learning: the case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Appl Linguist. 2006;27(1):78–102. doi:10.1093/applin/ami046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Agerström J, Björklund F, Allwood C, Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage; 1991:305–307.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. J Educ Meas. 2013;53(3):335–337.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE. The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001;86(2):278–321. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid M, Bashir S, Khan AK, Abbas N. When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors: an Islamic work ethics perspective. Leader Organ Dev J. 2018;39(6):794–806. doi:10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bari MW, Khan Q, Waqas A. Person related workplace bullying and knowledge hiding behaviors: relational psychological contract breach as an underlying mechanism. J Knowl Manag. 2022. doi:10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle JJ, Harris CM, Rupp DE, et al. Multifoci effects of injustice on counterproductive work behaviors and the moderating roles of symbolization and victim sensitivity. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(8):1022–1039. doi:10.1002/job.2280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houwelingen G, Van Dijke M, De Cremer D. Fairness enactment as response to higher level unfairness: the roles of self-construal and spatial distance. J Manage. 2017;43(2):319–347. doi:10.1177/0149206314530166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Tripp TM, Bies RJ. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. J Appl Psycho. 2006;91(3):653. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hootegem A, Van Hootegem A, Selenko E, De Witte H. Work is political: distributive injustice as a mediating mechanism in the relationship between job insecurity and political cynicism. Polit Psychol. 2022;43(2):375–396. doi:10.1111/pops.12766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoreva V, Wechtler H. Exploring the consequences of knowledge hiding: an agency theory perspective. J Manage Psychol. 2020;35(2):71–84. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SI, Afsar B, Shahjehan A. Unique contextual conditions affecting coworker knowledge sharing and employee innovative work behaviors. J Work Organ Psychol. 2020;36(2):125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Wang Z, Chen K, Feng J. Double-edged sword of perceived mastery climate on evasive knowledge hiding: the mediating roles of perceived status and perceived social support. J Manage Psychol. 2022;37(8):729–745. doi:10.1108/JMP-09-2021-0490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmeister A, Fasbender U, Gerpott FH. Consequences of knowledge hiding: the differential compensatory effects of guilt and shame. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2019;92(2):281–304. doi:10.1111/joop.12249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar