Effects of Background Fitting of e-Commerce Live Streaming on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: A Cognitive-Affective Perspective

References

• Hilvert-Bruce Z, Neill JT, Sjoblom M, Hamari J. Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Comput Human Behav. 2018;84:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen A, Lu Y, Wang B. Customers’ purchase decision-making process in social commerce: a social learning perspective. Int J Inf Manage. 2017;37(6):627–638. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter K. Playing the visibility game: how digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media Soc. 2019;21(4):895–913. doi:10.1177/1461444818815684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho RC, Rajadurai KG. Live streaming meets online shopping in the connected world: interactive social video in online marketplace. In: Strategies and Tools for Managing Connected Consumers. Vols. 130–142. IGI Global; 2020:chapter 8. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9697-4.ch008
   Google Scholar
• Chen -C-C, Lin Y-C. What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics Inf. 2018;35(1):293–303. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Chen C-D, Cheng H-W, Wang J-L. Determinants of live streamers’ continuance broadcasting intentions on Twitch: a self-determination theory perspective. Telematics Inf. 2018;35(2):406–420. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu M, Zhang M, Wang Y. Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Comput Human Behav. 2017;75:594–606. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd PR, Melancon J. Gender and live-streaming: source credibility and motivation. J Res Interact Mark. 2017;12(1):79–93. doi:10.1108/jrim-05-2017-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu E, Jung C, Kim H, Jung J. Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming. Telematics Inf. 2018;35(5):1450–1460. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Xiang Y, Hao L. Virtual gifting on China’s live streaming platforms: hijacking the online gift economy. Chin J Commun. 2019;12(3):340–355. doi:10.1080/17544750.2019.1583260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Zhou J, Ding Y, Wang H. The magic of danmaku: a social interaction perspective of gift sending on live streaming platforms. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2019;34100815. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2018.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Park HH, Jeon JO, Sullivan P. How does visual merchandising in fashion retail stores affect consumers’ brand attitude and purchase intention? The international review of retail. Distrib Consum Res. 2014;25(1):87–104. doi:10.1080/09593969.2014.918048
   Google Scholar
• Parboteeah DV, Valacich JS, Wells JD. The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Inf Syst Res. 2009;20(1):60–78. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi T. Mobile commerce website success: antecedents of consumer satisfaction and purchase intention. J Int Commer. 2018;17(3):189–215. doi:10.1080/15332861.2018.1451970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamdasani PN, Stanaland AJS, Tan J. Location, location, location: insights for advertising placement on the web. J Advert Res. 2001;41(4):7–21. doi:10.2501/jar-41-4-7-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar N, Aksoy L, Malkoc SA. Embedding Brands Within Media Content: The Impact of Message, Media, and Consumer Characteristics on Placement Efficacy. Erlbaum Psych Press; 2004:99–116.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick K. Celebrity endorsements: influence of a product-endorser match on millennials attitudes and purchase intentions. J Retail Consum Serv. 2016;32:39–45. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HJ, Lin LM. The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement. J Retail Consum Serv. 2020;52101934. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101934
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Wohn DY, Mittal A, Sureshbabu D. Utilitarian and hedonic motivations for live streaming shopping. Presented at: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video; 2018; Seoul, Republic of Korea. doi:10.1145/3210825.3210837
   Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Shao X, Li X, Guo Y, Nie K. How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: an IT affordance perspective. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2019;37:100886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian A, Russell JA. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. The MIT Press; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Adwan AS, Al-Debei MM, Dwivedi YK. E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: the driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Technol Soc. 2022;71:102083. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TKH, Cheung CMK, Lee ZWY. The state of online impulse-buying research: a literature analysis. Inf Manag. 2017;54(2):204–217. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-H, Chen C-W. Impulse buying behaviors in live streaming commerce based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Information. 2021;12(6):241. doi:10.3390/info12060241
   Google Scholar
• Liu D, Yu J. Impact of perceived diagnosticity on live streams and consumer purchase intention: streamer type, product type, and brand awareness as moderators. Inf Technol Manag. 2022;1–14. doi:10.1007/s10799-022-00375-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Li Y, Xu Y, Zeng K. How live streaming features impact consumers’ purchase intention in the context of cross-border E-commerce? A research based on SOR theory. Front Psychol. 2021;12:767876. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt H, Patrick VM. Art infusion: the influence of visual art on the perception and evaluation of consumer products. J Mark Res. 2008;45(3):379–389. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakimdjanova L, Park J. Online visual merchandising practice of apparel e-merchants. J Retail Consum Serv. 2005;12(5):307–318. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Vieira VA. Visual aesthetics in store environment and its moderating role on consumer intention. J Consum Behav. 2010;9(5):364–380. doi:10.1002/cb.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang Q, Jin J, Pei G, Wang C, Wang X, Qiu J. Low-order webpage layout in online shopping facilitates purchase decisions: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:29–39. doi:10.2147/prbm.S238581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Men J, Yang F, Gong X. Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: an investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;48:151–160. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López I, Ruiz S. Explaining website effectiveness: the hedonic–utilitarian dual mediation hypothesis. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2011;10(1):49–58. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine BJ, Pine J, Gilmore JH. The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Harvard Business Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin J. The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism. Penguin; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Schouten AP, Janssen L, Verspaget M. Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. Int J Adv. 2019;39(2):258–281. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu SA, Machleit KA, Davis LM. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: a conceptual model and implications. J Bus Res. 2001;54(2):177–184. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00087-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong A, Haque M. Understanding the brand and website effects of online loyalty: a mediation perspective. J Mark Manage. 2021;1–36. doi:10.1080/0267257x.2021.1949378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongkitrungrueng A, Assarut N. The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. J Bus Res. 2020;117:543–556. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufaris M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf Syst Res. 2002;13(2):205–223. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson D, Grayson K. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J Bus Res. 2005;58(4):500–507. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00140-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman C, Deshpandé R, Zaltman G. Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. J Mark. 1993;57(1):81–101. doi:10.1177/002224299305700106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang P. The Role of Affect in IS Research: A Critical Survey and a Research Model in Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems. Foundations Armonck, NY: ME Sharpe; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Floh A, Madlberger M. The role of atmospheric cues in online impulse-buying behavior. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2013;12(6):425–439. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh J-K, Hsieh Y-C, Chiu H-C, Yang Y-R. Customer response to web site atmospherics: task-relevant cues, situational involvement and PAD. J Interact Mark. 2014;28(3):225–236. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Ali R, Liao J. The effect of user experience in online games on word of mouth: a pleasure-arousal-dominance (PAD) model perspective. Comput Human Behav. 2017;75:329–338. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanwesenbeeck I, Ponnet K, Walrave M. Go with the flow: how children’s persuasion knowledge is associated with their state of flow and emotions during advergame play. J Consum Behav. 2016;15(1):38–47. doi:10.1002/cb.1529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso Vieira V, Vaz Torres C. The effect of motivational orientation over arousal-shopping response relationship. J Retail Consum Serv. 2014;21(2):158–167. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Chen W-K, Chen C-W, Lin Y-C. Understanding the influence of impulse buying toward consumers’ post-purchase dissonance and return intention: an empirical investigation of apparel websites. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2020;1–14. doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02333-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris YA, Muqaddam A, Miller S. The effects of the visual presentation of an influencer’s extroversion on perceived credibility and purchase intentions-moderated by personality matching with the audience. J Retail Consum Serv. 2021;59102347. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandodkar N, Singh R. The Impact of Webpage Visual Characteristics on Consumer’s Initial Trust in E-Vendors. Vol. 22. I: Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL); 2015. Available from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/sais2015/22. Accessed January 06, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Keen P, Ballance G, Chan S, Schrump S. Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design. Prentice Hall PTR; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem W, Khani AH, Schultz CD, Adam NA, Attar RW, Hajli N. How social presence drives commitment and loyalty with online brand communities? The role of social commerce trust. J Retail Consum Serv. 2020;55:102136. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LC, Goode MMH. The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics. J Retail. 2004;80(2):139–158. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas N. Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour. J Retail Consum Serv. 2016;29:92–103. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MKO, Turban E, Trust A. Model for consumer internet shopping. Int J Electron Commer. 2001;6(1):75–91. doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ramachandran V, Liu Sheng OR. Do fit opinions matter? The impact of fit context on online product returns. Inf Syst Res. 2021;32(1):268–289. doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toufaily E, Souiden N, Ladhari R. Consumer trust toward retail websites: comparison between pure click and click-and-brick retailers. J Retail Consum Serv. 2013;20(6):538–548. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Hackley C, Tiwsakul R. Entertainment marketing and experiential consumption. J Mark Commun. 2006;12(1):63–75. doi:10.1080/13527260500358608
   Google Scholar
• Argyris YA, Wang Z, Kim Y, Yin Z. The effects of visual congruence on increasing consumers’ brand engagement: an empirical investigation of influencer marketing on Instagram using deep-learning algorithms for automatic image classification. Comput Human Behav. 2020;112106443. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers TL, Carr CL, Peck J, Carson S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J Retail. 2001;77(4):511–535. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groß M. Mobile shopping loyalty: the salient moderating role of normative and functional compatibility beliefs. Technol Soc. 2018;55:146–159. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges E, Florsheim R. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: the online experience. J Bus Res. 2008;61(4):309–314. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore JH, Pine BJ. Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want. Harvard Business Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shrum L. The Psychology of Entertainment Media: Blurring the Lines Between Entertainment and Persuasion. Taylor & Francis; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian K, Patwardhan H, Pillai D, Coker K. Modeling attitude constructs in movie product placements. J Prod Brand Manage. 2014;23(7):516–531. doi:10.1108/JPBM-04-2014-0552
   Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Vol. 2. Stanford University Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Luo H, Cheng S, Zhou W, Yu S, Lin X. A study on the impact of linguistic persuasive styles on the sales volume of live streaming products in social e-commerce environment. Mathematics. 2021;9(13):1576. doi:10.3390/math9131576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu M-H, Chang C-M, Chuang L-W. Understanding the determinants of online repeat purchase intention and moderating role of habit: the case of online group-buying in Taiwan. Int J Inf Manage. 2015;35(1):45–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masri NW, You -J-J, Ruangkanjanases A, Chen S-C. The effects of customer learning and shopping value on intention purchase and reuse in a digital market: the institutional trust-commitment perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4318. doi:10.3390/su13084318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma VM, Klein A. Consumer perceived value, involvement, trust, susceptibility to interpersonal influence, and intention to participate in online group buying. J Retail Consum Serv. 2020;52:101946. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang -Y-Y, Lin S-C, Yen DC, Hung J-W. The trust model of enterprise purchasing for B2B e-marketplaces. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2020;70:103422. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2020.103422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Niehm LS. The impact of website quality on information quality, value, and loyalty intentions in apparel retailing. J Interact Mark. 2009;23(3):221–233. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Park H. Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. Int J Inf Manage. 2013;33(2):318–332. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml VA. Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth of customers: what we know and what we need to learn. J Acad Mark Sci. 2000;28(1):67. doi:10.1177/0092070300281007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin D-H. User experience in social commerce: in friends we trust. Behav Inf Technol. 2013;32(1):52–67. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2012.692167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhulahti V-M, Prank T. Gross and gore: performance issues in esport live-streaming. DiGRA/FDG. 2016;1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfinbarger M, Gilly MC. Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. Calif Manage Rev. 2001;43(2):34–55. doi:10.2307/41166074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE. Hedonic shopping motivations. J Retail. 2003;79(2):77–95. doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron F. Defining impulse purchasing. ACR North Am Adv. 1991:14:1.
   Google Scholar
• Hashmi HBA, Shu C, Haider SW. Moderating effect of hedonism on store environment-impulse buying nexus. Int J Retail Distrib Manage. 2020;48(5):465–483. doi:10.1108/ijrdm-09-2019-0312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad M, Metawie M. Store environment, personality factors and impulse buying behavior in Egypt: the mediating roles of shop enjoyment and impulse buying tendencies. J Bus Manage Sci. 2015;3(2):69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanein K, Head M. The impact of infusing social presence in the web interface: an investigation across product types. Int J Electron Commer. 2005;10(2):31–55. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin BJ, Hardesty DM, Suter TA. Color and shopping intentions. J Bus Res. 2003;56(7):541–551. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00246-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Wang L, Zhao K. Exploring determinants of consumers’ platform usage in “double eleven” shopping carnival in China: cognition and emotion from an integrated perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12(7):1–18. doi:10.3390/su12229625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu M, Chaudhry SS. Enhancing consumer engagement in e-commerce live streaming via relational bonds. Int Res. 2020;30(3):1019–1041. doi:10.1108/intr-03-2019-0082
   Google Scholar
• Mullen MR. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. J Int Bus Stud. 1995;26(3):573–596. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Chen Z. Live streaming commerce and consumers’ purchase intention: an uncertainty reduction perspective. Inf Manag. 2021;58(7):103509. doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan M, Huang Y, Qalati SA, Shah SMM, Ostic D, Pu Z. Effects of information overload, communication overload, and inequality on digital distrust: a cyber-violence behavior mechanism. Front Psychol. 2021;12643981. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2016;116(1):2–20. doi:10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Eur Bus Rev. 2014;26(2):106–121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
   Google Scholar
• Yang S, Lu Y, Chau PYK. Why do consumers adopt online channel? An empirical investigation of two channel extension mechanisms. Decis Support Syst. 2013;54(2):858–869. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MY-C, Nguyen TT, Cheng EY-L, Le ANH, Cheng JMS. Proximity marketing and bluetooth beacon technology: a dynamic mechanism leading to relationship program receptiveness. J Bus Res. 2022;141:151–162. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng TH, Hsieh SH, Lee CT. Capturing behavioural outcomes through branded applications: the perspective of the investment model. Int Res. 2021;32(5):1532–1561. doi:10.1108/INTR-08-2020-0452
   Google Scholar
• Shi S, Gong Y, Gursoy D. Antecedents of trust and adoption intention toward artificially intelligent recommendation systems in travel planning: a heuristic–systematic model. J Travel Res. 2021;60(8):1714–1734. doi:10.1177/0047287520966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko MC, Campbell JW. Social capital, person-organization fit and cynicism: a multi-stage mediation model of turnover intention in public organizations. Employ Relat. 2020;43(4):936–954. doi:10.1108/ER-05-2020-0237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y. Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Q. 2007;31(1):59–87. doi:10.2307/25148781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Edwards JR, Vandenberg RJ. Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. J Manage. 2003;29(6):903–936. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JJF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. saGe publications;; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory— 25 years ago and now. Educ Res. 1975;4(10):7–21. doi:10.3102/0013189X004010007
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci. 1988;16(1):74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rintamäki T, Kanto A, Kuusela H, Spence MT. Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions. Int J Retail Distrib Manage. 2006;34(1):6–24. doi:10.1108/09590550610642792
   Google Scholar
• Song K, Fiore AM, Park J. Telepresence and fantasy in online apparel shopping experience. J Fash Mark Manag. 2007;11(4):553–570. doi:10.1108/13612020710824607
   Google Scholar
• Wu C-S, Cheng -F-F, Yen DC. The atmospheric factors of online storefront environment design: an empirical experiment in Taiwan. Inf Manag. 2008;45(7):493–498. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nghia HT, Olsen SO, Trang NTM. Shopping value, trust, and online shopping well-being: a duality approach. Mark Intell Plan. 2020;38(5):545–558. doi:10.1108/mip-08-2019-0411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su L, Li Y, Li W. Understanding consumers’ purchase intention for online paid knowledge: a customer value perspective. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5420. doi:10.3390/su11195420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar