The Interactive Effect of Stressor Appraisals and Personal Traits on Employees’ Procrastination Behavior: The Conservation of Resources Perspective

References

• Metin UB, Taris TW, Peeters MC, Korpinen M. Validation of the procrastination at work scale: a seven-language study. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2019;5(36):1–10. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000554
   Google Scholar
• Metin UB, Taris TW, Peeters MCW. Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;101:254–263. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel P. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychol Bull. 2007;1(133):65–94. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
   Google Scholar
• Svartdal F, Klingsieck KB, Steel P, Gamst-Klaussen T. Measuring implemental delay in procrastination: separating onset and sustained goal striving. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;156:109762. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari JR, Díaz-Morales JF, O’Callaghan J, Díaz K, Argumedo D. Frequent behavioral delay tendencies by adults. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2007;38(4):458–464. doi:10.1177/0022022107302314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyzi Behnagh R, Ferrari JR. Exploring 40 years on affective correlates to procrastination: a literature review of situational and dispositional types. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(2):1097–1111. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02653-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirois FM. Procrastination and stress: exploring the role of self-comparison. Self Identity. 2014;2(13):128–145. doi:10.1080/15298868.2013.763404
   Google Scholar
• Tice DM, Baumeister RF. Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: the costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychol Sci. 1997;6(8):454–458. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00460.x
   Google Scholar
• Hasnawi HHA, Abbas AA. Workplace Ostracism as a mediating variable in the relationship between paradoxical leader behaviours and organizational inertia. Organizacija. 2020;53(2):165–181. doi:10.2478/orga-2020-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pychyl TA, Sirois FM. Procrastination, Emotion Regulation, and Well-Being. Academic Press; 2016. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-802862-9.00008-6
   Google Scholar
• Prati LM, Douglas C, Ferris GR, Ammeter AP, Buckley MR. Emotional intelligence, leadership effectiveness, and team outcomes. Int J Organ Anal. 2003;1(11):21–40. doi:10.1108/eb028961
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey PW, Bowes-Sperry L, Klein HJ. The effects of perceived loafing and defensive impression management on group effectiveness. Small Group Res. 1998;3(29):394–415. doi:10.1177/104649649829300
   Google Scholar
• Chen XQH, Wang XY, Huang XM. The relationship between procrastination behavior and personality traits of college students: mediating role of emotional regulation. Adv Psychol. 2019;10(9):1685–1691. doi:10.12677/AP.2019.910204
   Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Gupta JND. Improving workers’ productivity and reducing internet abuse. J Comput Inf Syst. 2004;(44):74–78. doi:10.1080/08874417.2004.11647569
   Google Scholar
• Zhou M. Gender differences in procrastination: the role of personality traits. Curr Psychol. 2018;1–9. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9851-5
   Google Scholar
• Lay CH. Trait procrastination and the perception of person-task characteristics. Soc Behav Pers. 1992;3(7):483–494. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.168
   Google Scholar
• Van Eerder WA. Meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Pers Individ Dif. 2003;6(35):1401–1418. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00358-6
   Google Scholar
• De Armond S, Matthews RA, Bunk J. Workload and procrastination: the role of psychological detachment and fatigue. Int J Stress Manag. 2014;2(21):137–161. doi:10.1037/a0034893
   Google Scholar
• Van Eerde W, Klingsieck KB. Overcoming procrastination? A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Educ Res Rev. 2018;(25):73–85. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Milgram NA, Dangour W, Raviv A. Situational and personal determinants of academic procrastination. J Gen Psychol. 1992;2(119):123–133. doi:10.1080/00221309.1992.9921166
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan RS, MacDougall AE, Buckley MR, Howe DC, Crisostomo ME, Zeni T. Better late than early? Reviewing procrastination in organizations. Manag Res Rev. 2020;43(10):1289–1308. doi:10.1108/MRR-09-2019-0413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JR. Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. J Appl Psychol. 2006;5(91):1134–1145. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134
   Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JR, Harvey J, Bolino MC. Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. J Appl Psychol. 2009;6(94):1452–1465. doi:10.1037/a0017595
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;3(44):513–524. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JR, Bowler WM. Emotional exhaustion and job performance: the mediating role of motivation. J Appl Psychol. 2007;1(92):93–106. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh MA, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, Boundreau JW. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US Managers. J Appl Psychol. 2000;1(85):65–74. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.65
   Google Scholar
• Prem R, Ohly S, Kubicek B, Korunk C. Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. J Organ Behav. 2017;1(38):108–123. doi:10.1002/job.2115
   Google Scholar
• Liu F, Li P, Taris TW, Peeters MC. Creative performance pressure as a double-edged sword for creativity: the role of appraisals and resources. Hum Resour Manage. 2022;61:663–679. doi:10.1002/hrm.22116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W, Ma J, Wang L, Wang M. A double‐edged sword: the moderating role of conscientiousness in the relationships between work stressors, psychological strain, and job performance. J Organ Behav. 2015;1(36):94–111. doi:10.1002/job.1949
   Google Scholar
• Howell AJ, Watson DC. Procrastination: associations with achievement goal orientation and learning strategies. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;1(43):167–178. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.017
   Google Scholar
• Spector PE, Fox S. An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 2002;2(12):269–292. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari JR, Tice DM. Procrastination as a self-handicap for men and women: a task-avoidance strategy in a laboratory setting. J Res Pers. 2000;1(34):73–83. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2261
   Google Scholar
• Bruning PF, Campion MA. A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: a multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Acad Manage J. 2018;2(61):499–522. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0604
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben JR, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2018;1(5):103–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych032117-104640
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Krasiova DV, Harms PD. Avoiding or embracing social relationships? A conservation of resources perspective of leader narcissism, leader–member exchange differentiation, and follower voice. J Organ Behav. 2020;1(41):77–92. doi:10.1002/job.2423
   Google Scholar
• Deng H, Coyle-Shapiro J, Yang Q. Beyond reciprocity: a conservation of resources view on the effects of psychological contract violation on third parties. J Appl Psychol. 2018;5(103):561–577. doi:10.1037/apl0000272
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Diefendorff JM. The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: a diary study in Hong Kong. Pers Psychol. 2009;2(62):259–295. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01138.x
   Google Scholar
• Cooper CD, Kong DT, Crossley CD. Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: integrating three theoretical perspectives. Acad Manage J. 2018;2(61):769–796. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0358
   Google Scholar
• Alarcon GM, Edwards JM, Menke LE. Student burnout and engagement: a test of the conservation of resources theory. J Psychol. 2011;145(3):211–227. doi:10.1080/00223980.2011.555432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Zhang P. The influence of challenge-hindrance stressor on high-tech R&D staffs’ subjective career success: result of career self-efficacy and organizational career management. Manag Rev. 2018;12(30):175–186. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2018.12.017
   Google Scholar
• LePine JA, LePine MA, Jackson CL. Challenge and hindrance stress: relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. J Appl Psychol. 2004;5(89):391–883. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.883
   Google Scholar
• LePine MA, Zhang Y, Crawford ER, Rich BL. Turning their pain to gain: charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Acad Manage J. 2016;3(59):1036–1059. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0778
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Mayer DM, Hwang E. More is less: learning but not relaxing buffers deviance under job stressors. J Appl Psychol. 2018;2(103):123–136. doi:10.1037/apl0000264
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese PD, Edwards JR, Sonnentag S. Stress and well-being at work: a century of empirical trends reflecting theoretical and societal influences. J Appl Psychol. 2017;3(102):389–402. doi:10.1037/apl0000109
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu HQ, Wang MX, Qing P. The impact of challenge stress and hindrance stress on employee creativity: the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of justice. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2018;4(50):450–461. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00450
   Google Scholar
• Rodell JB, Judge TA. Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2009;6(94):1438–1451. doi:10.1037/a0016752
   Google Scholar
• Sirois FM, Kitner R. Less adaptive or more maladaptive? A meta–analytic investigation of procrastination and coping. Eur J Pers. 2015;4(29):433–444. doi:10.1002/per.1985
   Google Scholar
• Liu C, Li H. Stressor and stressor appraisals: the moderating effect of task efficacy. J Bus Psychol. 2018;(33):141–154. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9483-4
   Google Scholar
• Skinner N, Brewer N. The dynamics of threat and challenge appraisals prior to stressful achievement events. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;3(83):678. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.678
   Google Scholar
• Rosen CC, Dimotakis N, Cole MS, et al. When challenges hinder: an investigation of when and how challenge stressors impact employee outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(10):1181–1206. doi:10.1037/apl0000483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Pers Psychol. 1991;1(44):1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. J Pers. 1992;2(60):175–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
   Google Scholar
• Ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB. A resource perspective on the work–home interface: the work–home resources model. Am Psychol. 2012;7(67):545. doi:10.1037/a0027974
   Google Scholar
• Russell E, Woods SA, Banks AP. Examining conscientiousness as a key resource in resisting email interruptions: implications for volatile resources and goal achievement. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2017;3(90):407–435. doi:10.1111/joop.12177
   Google Scholar
• Fornes-Vives J, Garcia-Banda G, Frias-Navarro D, Pascual-Soler M. Longitudinal study predicting burnout in Spanish nurses: the role of neuroticism and emotional coping. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;138(138):286–291. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.014
   Google Scholar
• Witt LA, Burke LA, Barrick MR, Mount MK. The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2002;1(87):164–169. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.164
   Google Scholar
• Bowling NA, Eschleman KJ. Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010;1(15):91–103. doi:10.1037/a0017326
   Google Scholar
• Alhasnawi HH, Abbas AA. Narcissistic leadership and workplace deviance: a moderated mediation model of organizational aggression and workplace hostility. Organizacija. 2021;54(4):334–349. doi:10.2478/orga-2021-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Zhang K, Wang Y, Bodla AA, Zhu D. When is authoritarian leadership less detrimental? The role of leader capability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:707. doi:10.3390/ijerph20010707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME, Sonenshein S. Grand challenges and inductive methods: rigor without rigor mortis. Acad Manage J. 2016;59(4):1113–1123. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.4004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Chen CC, Sheldon OJ. Relaxing moral reasoning to win: how organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(8):1082–1096. doi:10.1037/apl0000111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataramani V, Bartol KM, Zheng X, Lu S, Liu X. Not very competent but connected: leaders’ use of employee social networks as prisms to make delegation decisions. J Appl Psychol. 2022;107(3):458–480. doi:10.1037/apl0000902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J. Essentials of business research: A guide to doing your research projects. SAGE Publication; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Taherdoost H. Sampling methods in research methodology: how to choose a sampling technique for research. Int J Acad Res Manag. 2016;5(2):18–27. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3205035
   Google Scholar
• Shi J, Lin H, Wang L, Wang M. Linking the big five personality constructs to organizational justice. Soc Behav Pers. 2009;2(37):209–222. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.209
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman BW. The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 1991;2(51):473–480. doi:10.1177/0013164491512022
   Google Scholar
• Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS, Goldsmith HH, Van Hulle CA. Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(132):33–72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF, Tice DM. Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Seibert SE, Crant JM, Kramer ML. Proactive personality and career success. J Appl Psychol. 1999;3(84):416–427. doi:10.1108/JMP-04-2014-0139
   Google Scholar
• Ilies R, Johnson MD, Judge TA, Keeney J. A within‐individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: dispositional and situational moderators. J Organ Behav. 2011;1(32):44–64. doi:10.1002/job.677
   Google Scholar
• Holtzman S, Vezzu S, Holtzman S, Vezzu S. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling of noncognitive assessments using PROC CALIS. NorthEast SAS Users Group. 2011;2011:11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Naseer S, Donia MBL, Syed F, Bashir F. Too much of a good thing: the interactive effects of cultural values and core job characteristics on hindrance stressors and employee performance outcomes. Hum Resour Manage. 2020;59(3):271–289. doi:10.1002/hrm.21993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhney G, Michel JS. Challenge and hindrance stressors and work outcomes: the moderating role of day-level affect. J Bus Psychol. 2022;37(2):389–405. doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09752-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Peng Y, Wu B. Challenging or hindering? The roles of goal orientation and cognitive appraisal in stressor‐performance relationships. J Organ Behav. 2021;42(3):388–406. doi:10.1002/job.2503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moin MF, Spagnoli P, Khan AN, Hameed Z. Challenge-hindrance stressors and service employees job outcomes. Curr Psychol. 2022. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03531-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao Y, Zhong W. Public service motivation matters: examining the differential effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on organizational identification and turnover intention. Public Manag Rev. 2021;23(4):545–566. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1699944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell MS, Greenbaum RL, Vogel RM, Mawritz MB, Keating DJ. Can you handle the pressure? The effect of performance pressure on stress appraisals, self-regulation, and behavior. Acad Manage J. 2019;2(62):5531–5552. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0646
   Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Shi Z. The first disease X is caused by a highly transmissible acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Virol Sin. 2020;35(3):263–265. doi:10.1007/s12250-020-00206-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews G, Derryberry D, Siegle GJ. Personality and emotion: cognitive science perspectives. Adv Personal Psychol. 2000;1(1):199–237. doi:10.4324/9781315812175
   Google Scholar
• Boswell WR, Olson-Buchanan JB, LePine MA. Relations between stress and work outcomes: the role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. J Vocat Behav. 2004;1(64):165–181. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00049-6
   Google Scholar
• Endler NS, Magnusson D. Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychol Bull. 1976;5(83):956–974. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.956
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell MS, Baer MD, Ambrose ML, Folger R, Palmer NF. Cheating under pressure: a self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2018;1(103):54–73. doi:10.1037/apl0000254
   Google Scholar
• Shin J, Grant AM. When putting work off pays off: the curvilinear relationship between procrastination and creativity. Acad Manage J. 2020. doi:10.5465/amj.2018.1471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar