Written Language Politeness (of Short Messages on Social Media) and Emotional Intelligence: A Study in Indonesia and Malaysia

References

• Nurrahmah N, Rukmini D, Yuliasri I. The use of politeness strategies by Indonesian vs Malaysian student debaters in the 2018 World Schools Debating Championship (WSDC). Engl Educ J. 2020;10(3):282–291. doi:10.15294/eej.v10i1.36310
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff R. Language and woman’s place. Lang Soc. 1973;1:45–80. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051
   Google Scholar
• Holmes J, Meyerhoff M. Different voices, different views: an introduction to current research in language and gender. In: The Handbook of Language and Gender. Wiley Online Library; 2003:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley MR. A model of inter-and intrateam situational awareness: implications for design, training and measurement. In: New Trends in Cooperative Activities. SA Technologies; 2001:46–68.
   Google Scholar
• SpringerLink. Tethered or mobile? Use of away messages in instant messaging by American college students. Available from: doi:10.1007/1-84628-248-9_20. Accessed November 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Ott AE, Kelly L, Politeness Theory A. Analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends. Comm Stud. 2017;68(2):190–207. doi:10.1080/10510974.2017.1299024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson SC. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Miller CA, Ott T, Wu P, Vakili V. Politeness effects in directive compliance: effects with power and social distance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Sage CA; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• NACSA. Agensi keselamatan siber negara. Malaysian Cyber Laws; 2012. Available from: https://www.nacsa.gov.my/legal.php. Accessed April, 3, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Politeness strategies used in text messaging: pragmatic competence in an asymmetrical power relation of teacher–student - Shahrzad Eshghinejad, M. Raouf Moini, 2016; 2016. Available from: doi:10.1177/2158244016632288. Accessed November 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Manipuspika YS, Sudarwati E. Politeness strategies in text messaging (A case study of students’ text messages to the lecturers in English study program Universitas Brawijaya). MALTESAS MultiDiscip Res J. 2017;2(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ambarwati R, Nurkamto J, Santosa R. Phatic and politeness on women’s communication in Facebook: humanistic teaching perspective of being polite in social media. IJELTAL. 2019;4(1):95–108. doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.326
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty Catat 84 Kasus Kriminalisasi Ekspresi Pakai UU ITE selama 2021; 2021. Available from: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20211213140639-12-733388/amnesty-catat-84-kasus-kriminalisasi-ekspresi-pakai-uu-ite-selama-2021. Accessed November 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Said Didu hingga Munarman. Mereka yang Dijerat UU ITE di 2020; 2020. Available from: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201224150640-12-586053/mereka-yang-dijerat-uu-ite-di-2020-said-didu-hingga-munarman. Accessed November 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Faiz H, Suhaila N. Use of greetings in SMS messages from students to lecturers at a Malaysian University. IJSSH. 2013;125–128. doi:10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.210
   Google Scholar
• Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR, Sitarenios G. Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence. Emotion. 2001;1:232–242. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goleman D. Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mun NK. Development of a self-rated Malaysian emotional intelligence scale. MOJPC. 2017;4(1):24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Routledge; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman WL. Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. PEARSON Education Inc, Publishing as Allyn and Bacon; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ardi H, Nababan MR, Djatmika D, Santosa R. Characters’ politeness strategies in giving command: should translators keep them? 3L. 2018;24(2):181–193. doi:10.17576/3L-2018-2402-14
   Google Scholar
• Saputra N, Lubis T, Setiawan F. Politeness strategies for the speech acts of Indonesian language education students in pidie regency. Trad Mod Hum. 2021;1(1):33–40. doi:10.32734/tmh.v1i1.7185
   Google Scholar
• Azman IN, Yusof A, Maros M, Bakar KA. Language politeness in Malay Culture in Malaysia. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2020;10(9):747–752. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7864
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi MA, Nadoushani SMM. Emotional intelligence as the predictor of pragmatic competence: a closer look at Iranian EFL learners’ politeness strategies. Read Matrix. 2016;16:12.
   Google Scholar
• Hartini N. Pola permainan sosial: upaya meningkatkan kecerdasan emosi anak. Anima Indones Psychol J. 2004;19(3):271–285.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff RT The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Leech GN. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Universitas Indonesia; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Yule G, Widdowson HG. Pragmatics. Oxford university press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lim BS. Malay sayings as politeness strategies. J Mod Lang. 2005;15(1):65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Tanto T, Tanto T. Request strategies in Indonesian: an analysis of politeness phenomena in text messages. J Lang Lit. 2018;18(2):137–145. doi:10.24071/joll.v18i2.1569
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud M. The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indones J Appl Linguist. 2019;8(3):597–606. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15258
   Google Scholar
• Van Olmen D Politeness in language; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yetty Y. Politeness strategy on social interaction used by munanese. ELS-JISH. 2018;1(1):59–65. doi:10.34050/els-jish.v1i1.4043
   Google Scholar
• Kesantunan R, Fakultas M, Uin H, et al. Wardoyo, Cipto.2014. realisasi kesantunan mahasiswa fakultas adab dan humaniora UIN sunan gunung djati bandung dalam berkomunikasi menggunakan short message service (SMS). Makalah prosiding; 2014.
   Google Scholar