“Who Knows Me Understands My Needs”: The Effect of Home-Based Telework on Work Engagement

References

• Aguilera A, Lethiais V, Rallet A, Proulhac L. Home-based telework in France: characteristics, barriers and perspectives. Transport Res A Pol. 2016;92:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(6):1524–1541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajendran RS, Harrison DA, Delaney‐Klinger K. Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting’s effects on performance via i‐deals and job resources. Pers Psychol. 2015;68(2):353–393. doi:10.1111/peps.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakrošienė A, Bučiūnienė I, Goštautaitė B. Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. Int J Manpower. 2019;40(1):87–101. doi:10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden TD, Veiga JF. The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. Leadership Quart. 2008;19(1):77–88. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SA, Patmos A, Pitts MJ. Communication and teleworking: a study of communication channel satisfaction, personality, and job satisfaction for teleworking employees. Int J Bus Commun. 2018;55(1):44–68. doi:10.1177/2329488415589101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley D. Good to be home? Time-use and satisfaction levels among home-based teleworkers. New Tech Work Employ. 2012;27(3):224–241. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden TD. The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(3):319–340. doi:10.1002/job.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musson G, Tietze S. Feelin’ groovy?: appropriating time in home‐based telework. Cult Organ. 2004;10(3):251–264. doi:10.1080/14759550412331297174
   Google Scholar
• Peters P, Poutsma E, Van der Heijden BI, Bakker AB, de Bruijn T. Enjoying new ways to work: an HRM‐process approach to study flow. Hum Resour Manag Us. 2014;53(2):271–290. doi:10.1002/hrm.21588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M, Germeys L. Boundary role transitions: a day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Hum Relat. 2019;72(12):1843–1868. doi:10.1177/0018726718823071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockery AM, Bawa S. When two worlds collude: working from home and family functioning in Australia. Int Labour Rev. 2018;157(4):609–630. doi:10.1111/ilr.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre LM, Van Steenbergen EF, Peeters MC, Kluwer ES. Juggling work and family responsibilities when involuntarily working more from home: a multiwave study of financial sales professionals. J Organ Behav. 2016;37(6):804–822. doi:10.1002/job.2075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen SR. The effects of home‐based teleworking on work‐family conflict. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2003;14(1):35–58. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1049
   Google Scholar
• Madsen SR. Work and family conflict: can home-based teleworking make a difference? Int J Organ Theory Behav. 2006;9(3):307–350. doi:10.1108/IJOTB-09-03-2006-B002
   Google Scholar
• Peters P, den Dulk L. Cross cultural differences in managers’ support for home-based telework: a theoretical elaboration. Int J Cross Cult Man. 2003;3(3):329–346. doi:10.1177/1470595803003003005
   Google Scholar
• Moretti A, Menna F, Aulicino M, Paoletta M, Liguori S, Iolascon G. Characterization of home working population during COVID-19 emergency: a cross sectional analysis. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2020;17(17):62–84. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamovic M. How does employee cultural background influence the effects of telework on job stress? The roles of power distance, individualism, and beliefs about telework. Int J Inform Manag. 2002;62:102437. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102437
   Google Scholar
• Barnes SJ. Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. Int J Inform Manag. 2020;55:102175. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamakiotis P, Panteli N, Davison RM. Reimagining e-leadership for reconfigured virtual teams due to Covid-19. Int J Inform Manag. 2021;60:102381. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi YK, Hughes DL, Coombs C, Constantiou I, Duan Y, Upadhyay N. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: transforming education, work and life. Int J Inform Manag. 2020;55:102211. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagiannidis S, Harris J, Morton D. WHO led the digital transformation of your company? A reflection of IT related challenges during the pandemic. Int J Inform Manag. 2020;55:102166. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Sasser T, Gonzalez ES, Vander Stoep A, Myers K. Implementation of home-based telemental health in a large child psychiatry department during the COVID-19 crisis. J Child Adol Psychop. 2020;30(7):404–413. doi:10.1089/cap.2020.0062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Impacts of COVID-19: a research agenda to support people in their fight. Int J Inform Manag. 2020;55:102197. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanoeije J, Verbruggen M. Between-person and within-person effects of telework: a quasi-field experiment. Eur J Work Organ Psy. 2020;29(6):795–808. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2020.1774557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lott Y, Abendroth AK. Affective commitment, home‐based working and the blurring of work–home boundaries: evidence from Germany. New Tech Work Employ. 2022;21:1–21. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12255
   Google Scholar
• Sousa-Uva M, Sousa-Uva A, Serranheira F. Telework during the COVID-19 epidemic in Portugal and determinants of job satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Bmc Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12295-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Hadi S, Bakker AB, Häusser JA. The role of leisure crafting for emotional exhaustion in telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021;34(5):530–544. doi:10.1080/10615806.2021.1903447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanti T, Guidetti G, Mazzei E, Zappalà S, Toscano F. Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: the impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(7):426–432. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiden M, Widar L, Wiitavaara B, Boman E. Telework in academia: associationswith health and well-being among staff. Internet High Educ. 2021;81(4):707–722. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00569-4
   Google Scholar
• Kazekami S. Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommun Policy. 2020;44(2):101868. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagata T, Nagata M, Ikegami K, Hino A, Mori K. Intensity of home-based telework and work engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(11):907–912. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Gao J. Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. J Happiness Stud. 2020;21(7):2649–2668. doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00196-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt JB, Wulf T, Breuer J. From cognitive overload to digital detox: psychological implications of telework during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Comput Hum Behav. 2021;124:106899. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Becerik‑Gerber B, Lucas G, Roll SC. Impacts of working from home during COVID‑19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(3):181. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardeshmukh SR, Sharma D, Golden TD. Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: a job demands and job resources model. New Tech Work Employ. 2012;27(3):193–207. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerards R, de Grip A, Baudewijns C. Do new ways of working increase work engagement? Pers Rev. 2018;47(2):517–534. doi:10.1108/PR-02-2017-0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Cropanzano R. Affective events theory. Res Organ Behav. 1996;18(1):1–74. doi:10.1177/030639689603700317
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard TA, Basile KA, Canónico E. Telework: outcomes and facilitators for employees. In: Landers RN, editor. The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2019:511–543.
   Google Scholar
• Shockley KM, Allen TD, Dodd H, Waiwood AM. Remote worker communication during COVID-19: the role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(10):1466–1482. doi:10.1037/apl0000970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambier R, Vlerick P. You’ve got mail: does workplace telepressure relate to email communication? Cogn Technol Work. 2020;22(3):633–640. doi:10.1007/s10111-019-00592-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber LK, Santuzzi AM. Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery. J Occup Health Psych. 2015;20(2):172. doi:10.1037/a0038278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burić I, Macuka I. Self-efficacy, emotions and work engagement among teachers: a two wave cross-lagged analysis. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19(7):1917–1933. doi:10.1007/s10902-017-9903-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo JK, Harrison DA, Gray SM. The ties that cope? Reshaping social connections in response to pandemic distress. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(9):1267–1282. doi:10.1037/apl0000955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgari S. The influence of varied levels of received stress and support on negative emotions and support perceptions. Curr Psychol. 2016;35(3):386–396. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9305-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer LB, Kossek EE, Yragui NL, Bodner TE, Hanson GC. Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). J Manag. 2009;35(4):837–856. doi:10.1177/0149206308328510
   Google Scholar
• Matthews RA, Mills MJ, Trout RC, English L. Family-supportive supervisor behaviors, work engagement, and subjective well-being: a contextually dependent mediated process. J Occup Health Psych. 2014;19(2):168–181. doi:10.1037/a0036012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollo-López A, Goñi-Legaz S, Erro-Garcés A. Home-based telework: usefulness and facilitators. Int J Manpower. 2021;42(4):644–660. doi:10.1108/IJM-02-2020-0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neirotti P, Paolucci E, Raguseo E. Mapping the antecedents of telework diffusion: firm‐level evidence from Italy. New Tech Work Employ. 2013;28(1):16–36. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo M, Gomez-Mejia L, Firfiray S, Berrone P, Villena VH. Leader beliefs and CSR for employees: the case of telework provision. Leadership Org Dev J. 2016;37(5):609–634. doi:10.1108/LODJ-09-2014-0177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Cho YJ. Does telework status affect the behavior and perception of supervisors? Examining task behavior and perception in the telework context. Int J Hum Resour Man. 2022;33(7):1326–1351. doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1777183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigini C, Staffolani S. Teleworkers in Italy: who are they? Do they make more? Int J Manpower. 2019;40(2):265–285. doi:10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Wan W, Fan Q. How and when telework improves job performance during COVID-19? Job crafting as mediator and performance goal orientation as moderator. Psychol Res Behav Ma. 2021;14:2181–2195. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S340322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham M, Weale V, Lambert KA, Kinsman N, Stuckey R, Oakman J. Working at home: the impacts of COVID 19 on health, family-work-life conflict, gender, and parental responsibilities. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(11):938–943. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meulen N, van Baalen P, van Heck E, Mülder S. No teleworker is an island: the impact of temporal and spatial separation along with media use on knowledge sharing networks. J Inf Technol Uk. 2019;34(3):243–262. doi:10.1177/0268396218816531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert C, Maier C, Laumer S. Why are teleworkers stressed? An empirical analysis of the causes of telework-enabled stress. Wirtschaftsinformatik Proc. 2015;2015:1407–1421.
   Google Scholar
• Suh A, Lee J. Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Res. 2017;27(1):140–159. doi:10.1108/IntR-06-2015-0181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butts MM, Becker WJ, Boswell WR. Hot buttons and time sinks: the effects of electronic communication during nonwork time on emotions and work-nonwork conflict. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(3):763–788. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong S, Huang Y, Chang D. Supporting interdependent telework employees: a moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(12):1408–1422. doi:10.1037/apl0000843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall GW, Michaels CE, Mulki JP. Workplace isolation: exploring the construct and its measurement. Psychol Mark. 2007;24(3):195–223. doi:10.1002/mar.20158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orhan MA, Castellano S, Khelladi I, Marinelli L, Monge F. Technology distraction at work. Impacts on self-regulation and work engagement. J Bus Res. 2021;126:341–349. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson A, Dey S, Nguyen H, Groth M, Harvey SB. A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being. Aust J Manag. 2020;45(3):402–424. doi:10.1177/0312896220922292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenidge D, Coyne I. Job stress or sand voluntary work behaviors: mediating effect of emotion and moderating roles of personality and emotional intelligence. Hum Resour Manag J. 2014;24(4):479–495. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns SM, Creaven AM. Individual differences in positive and negative emotion regulation: which strategies explain variability in loneliness? Personal Ment Health. 2016;11(1):64–74. doi:10.1002/pmh.1363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Shi W. The effect of work-leisure conflict on front-line employees’ work engagement: a cross-level study from the emotional perspective. Asia Pac J Manag. 2020;39:1–23. doi:10.1007/s10490-020-09722-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Xie J, Zhou ZE, et al. Family-supportive supervisor behaviors and employees’ life satisfaction: the roles of work-self facilitation and generational differences. Int J Stress Manag. 2020;27(3):262–272. doi:10.1037/str0000152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan SY, Chuang A, Yeh YJ. Linking supervisor and subordinate’s negative work–family experience: the role of family supportive supervisor behavior. J Leadersh Org Stud. 2021;28(1):17–30. doi:10.1177/1548051820950375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi J, Kim A, Han K, Ryu S, Park JG, Kwon B. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction with work–family balance: a moderating role of perceived insider status. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(1):1–11. doi:10.1002/job.2205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rofcanin Y, Las Heras M, Bakker AB. Family supportive supervisor behaviors and organizational culture: effects on work engagement and performance. J Occup Health Psych. 2017;22(2):207–217. doi:10.1037/ocp0000036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryee S, Chu CW, Kim TY, Ryu S. Family-supportive work environment and employee work behaviors: an investigation of mediating mechanisms. J Manage. 2013;39(3):792–813. doi:10.1177/0149206311435103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch AR, Binnewies C. Setting a good example: supervisors as work-life-friendly role models within the context of boundary management. J Occup Health Psych. 2015;20(1):82–92. doi:10.1037/a0037890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Qing T, Jin J. Does inconsistent social support matter? The effects of social support on work absorption through relaxation at work. Front Psychol. 2020;11:555501. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer LB, Ernst Kossek E, Bodner T, Crain T. Measurement development and validation of the Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior Short-Form (FSSB-SF). J Occup Health Psych. 2013;18(3):285–296. doi:10.1037/a0032612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Spector PE, Shi L. Cross‐national job stress: a quantitative and qualitative study. J Organ Behav. 2007;28(2):209–239. doi:10.1002/job.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breevaart K, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Hetland J. The measurement of state work engagement: a multilevel factor analytic study. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28(4):305–312. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giménez-Nadal JI, Molina JA, Velilla J. Work time and well-being for workers at home: evidence from the American Time Use Survey. Int J Manpower. 2020;41(2):184–206. doi:10.1108/IJM-04-2018-0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curzi Y, Pistoresi B, Poma E, Tasselli C. The home-based teleworking: the implication on workers’ wellbeing and the gender impact. Rev Iberoam Econ. 2021;31:80–102.
   Google Scholar
• Buomprisco G, Ricci S, Perri R, De Sio S. Health and telework: new challenges after COVID-19 pandemic. J Environ Public Health. 2021;5:2. doi:10.21601/ejeph/9705
   Google Scholar