Linking Leader’s Positive Humor and Employee Bootlegging: Empirical Evidence from China

References

• Al Halbusi H, Alhaidan H, Abdelfattah F, Ramayah T, Cheah JH. Exploring social media adoption in small and medium enterprises in Iraq: pivotal role of social media network capability and customer involvement. Technol Anal Strateg. 2022;1–18. doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2125374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Globocnik D, Peña HB, Salomo S. Organizational antecedents to bootlegging and consequences for the newness of the innovation portfolio. J Prod Innov Manage. 2022;717–746. doi:10.1111/jpim.12626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrou P, Vander LD, Salcecu OC. When breaking the rules relates to creativity: the role of creative problem-solving demands and organizational constraints. J Creat Behav. 2018;39:452–621.
   Google Scholar
• Nanyangwe CN, Wang H, Cui Z. Work and innovations: the impact of self-identification on employee bootlegging behavior. Creat Innov Manag. 2021;30(4):713–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsdorfer P. Bootlegging and path dependency. Res Policy. 2005;34(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C. Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Acad Manage Rev. 2010;35(4):558–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Xiang GP, Du YZ, Liu Y. Bootleg and individual innovation performance: the joint effect of status and creativity. Nankai Bus Rev. 2017;1:143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Wang ZH, Duan HX. The U-shaped impact of perceived over-qualification on employee creative deviance: the paradox perspective. Manag Rev. 2022;34(01):218–227.
   Google Scholar
• Wei L, Dang XH, Xiao Y. The impact of technology innovation network divisive faultiness on bootleg innovation: the moderated mediation effects. Sci Sci Manag S&T. 2021;42(07):106–120.
   Google Scholar
• Augsdorfer P. A diagnostic personality test to identify likely corporate bootleg researchers. Int J Innov Manag. 2012;16(1):125–133. doi:10.1142/S1363919611003532
   Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Gilson LL. What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quart. 2004;15(1):33–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia J, Liu Z, Zheng Y. How does paradoxical leadership promote bootlegging: a TPB-based multiple mediation model. Chin Manag Stud. 2021;15(4):919–939. doi:10.1108/CMS-09-2020-0418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooi LW, Nguyen NT. Agile leadership and bootlegging behavior: does leadership coping dynamics matter? In: Agile Coping in the Digital Workplace: Emerging Issues for Research and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021:187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Jia R, Seufert JH, et al. As the tree is, so is the fruit? Examining the effects of ethical leadership on bootlegging from the perspective of leader–follower gender similarity. Gend Manage Int J. 2021;36(7):785–800. doi:10.1108/GM-06-2020-0180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang X, Yin J, Feng ZJ. Research on the influencing mechanism of managerial pro‑social behaviour on deviance innovation: the roles of regulatory focus and work autonomy. Technol Econ. 2020;39(8):35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lyu L, Zhang H, Gao K. Why does distributed leadership foster or hamper bootlegging behavior of employees: the role of exploratory-exploitative learning tension and paradox mindset. Math Probl Eng. 2022;2022:13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper CD. Just joking around? Employee humor expression as an ingratiatory behavior. Acad Manage Rev. 2005;30(4):765–776. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.18378877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper CD, Kong DT, Crossley CD. Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: integrating three theoretical perspectives. Acad Manage J. 2018;61(2):769–796. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio BJ, Howell JM, Sosik JJ. A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Acad Manage J. 1999;42(2):219–227. doi:10.2307/257094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam KC, Christian MS, Wei W, Liao Z, Nai J. The mixed blessing of leader sense of humor: examining costs and benefits. Acad Manage J. 2018;61(1):348–369. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.1088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Lee DR, Wong N. Supervisor humor and employee outcomes: the role of social distance and affective trust in supervisor. J Bus Psychol. 2016;31(1):125–139. doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9406-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei HF, Gu JB, Zhang SL. Trust mechanism for influence of authorized leaders on knowledge workers’ innovation. Sc Res Manag. 2020;41(04):103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Jing BF, Zhou X. A literature review of leadership humor and prospects. Foreign Econ Manage. 2019;41(3):70–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gkorezis P, Bellou V. The relationship between leader self-deprecating humor and perceived effectiveness: trust in leader as a mediator. Leadership Org Dev J. 2016;37:882–898. doi:10.1108/LODJ-11-2014-0231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghe A, Fodor OC, Curșeu PL, Trif S, Cirebea L. The effect of humor and perceived social interdependence on teamwork engagement in student groups. Curr Psychol. 2022;2022:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay M. Humor in teams: multilevel relationships between humor climate, inclusion, trust, and citizenship behaviors. J Bus Psychol. 2017;32(4):363–378. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9445-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhungalia L. Laughing at power: humor, transgression, and the politics of refusal in Palestine. Environ Plan C-Polit. 2020;38(3):387–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker WH, Rotondo DM. Relationships among gender, type of humor, and perceived leader effectiveness. J Manage Issues. 2001;8(4):450–465.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Dai L, Chin T, Rafiq M. Understanding the role of psychological capital in humorous leadership-employee creativity relations. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1636–1646. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight KA. description model of the intra-firm innovation process. J Bus. 1967;40(4):478–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Abdalla AA, Mohammad T, Khassawneh O, Parveen M. Towards examining the link between green hrm practices and employee green in-role behavior: spiritual leadership as a moderator. Psychol Res Behav Ma. 2023;31:383–396.
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Salter A, Wal AL. Going underground: bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organ Sci. 2014;25(5):1287–1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw AP, Warren C. Benign violations: making immoral behavior funny. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(8):1141–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MS, Raja Ariffin RN, Mansor N, Al Halbusi H. An examination of street-level bureaucrats’ discretion and the moderating role of supervisory support: evidence from the field. Admin Sci. 2021;11(3):65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman BM. Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: an integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Pers Psychol. 2001;54(2):361–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford TE. Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2000;26:1094–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YC, Liu Y. New approach in workplace humor research: a multi-level perspective. Hum Resour Dev China. 2017;6:55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir B, House RJ, Arthur MB. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: a self concept based theory. Organ Sci. 1993;4(4):577–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du YS, Xu LG, Xi YM. Followers’ active action in leadership process: concept, relationship and mechanism. Manag Rev. 2021;33(10):208–221.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper CD. Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: a relational process model. Hum Relat. 2008;61(8):1087–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris MW, Hong YY, Chiu CY, Liu Z. Normology: integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2015;129:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi GF, Zheng X, Tang J. The influence mechanism of leader humor on employees’ interpersonal deviant behavior. J Cap Univ Econ Bus. 2021;23(4):77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ali H, Mahmood A, Ahmad A, Ikram A. Humor of the leader: a source of creativity of employees through psychological empowerment or unethical behavior through perceived power? The role of self-deprecating behavior. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford TE, Wentzel ER, Lorion J. Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2001;31:677–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson G, Rush J, MacInnis CC. A joke is just a joke (except when it isn’t: cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99:660–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Halbusi H. Who pays attention to the moral aspects? Role of organizational justice and moral attentiveness in leveraging ethical behavior. Int J Ethics Syst. 2022;38:357–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(3):393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveed RT, Alhaidan H, Al Halbusi H, Al-Swidi AK. Do organizations really evolve? The critical link between organizational culture and organizational innovation toward organizational effectiveness: pivotal role of organizational resistance. J Innov Knowl. 2022;7(2):100178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng B. The trust relationship between subordinates and subordinates in an enterprise organization. Sociol Res. 1999;2(2):22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jia MM, Zhang LT, Wang Q. Leadership style and employee voice: a perspective based on mutual trust. Sci Res Manage. 2020;41(03):238–246.
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Yan J, Jin MX. How does trust in organizations benefit task performance. Acta Psychol Sinica. 2006;38(5):770–777.
   Google Scholar
• Bali AO, Halbusi HA, Ahmad AR, Lee KY. Public engagement in government officials’ posts on social media during coronavirus lockdown. PLoS One. 2023;18(1):e0280889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khassawneh O, Mohammad T, Ben-Abdallah R. The impact of leadership on boosting employee creativity: the role of knowledge sharing as a mediator. Admin Sci. 2022;12(4):175.
   Google Scholar
• Wyer RS. Social Comprehension and Judgment: The Role of Situation Models, Narratives, and Implicit Theories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson JA, Powell FC. Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. J Clin Psychol. 1993;49(1):13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Finkenauer C, Gündemir S, Stamkou E. Breaking the rules to rise to power how norm violators gain power in the eyes of others. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2011;2(5):500–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Mossholder KW. Examining the effects of trust in leaders: a bases-and-foci approach. Leadership Quart. 2010;21(1):50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Window: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Montoya AK, Rockwood NJ. The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: process versus structural equation modeling. Australas Mark J. 2017;25(1):76–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abetti PA. Underground innovation in Japan: the development of Toshiba’s word processor and laptop computer. Creat Innov Manag. 1997;6(3):127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Globocnik D, Salomo S. Do formal management practices impact the emergence of bootlegging behavior. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2015;32(4):505–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus J, Glew DJ, Viswesvaran C. A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace. J Manage Psychol. 2012;27(2):155–190.
   Google Scholar
• Khassawneh O, Elrehail H. The effect of participative leadership style on employees’ performance: the contingent role of institutional theory. Admin Sci. 2022;12(4):195.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan MM, Jambulingam M, Narayan EA, Uzir MUH, Halbusi HA. Practising soft HRM for Generation Y employees against the turnover crisis of the 21st century. Int J Bus Excell. 2022;28(3):332–349.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang K, Huang WJ, Gao F, Lai Q. COVID-19 prevention in hotels: ritualized host-guest interactions. Ann Tourism Res. 2022;93:103376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar