How Parasocial Relationship and Influencer-Product Congruence Shape Audience’s Attitude Towards Product Placement in Online Videos: The Mediation Role of Reactance

References

• Gerhards C. Product placement on YouTube: an explorative study on YouTube creators’ experiences with advertisers. Converg Int J Res New Media Technol. 2019;25(3):516–533. doi:10.1177/1354856517736977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen L. Parasocial interaction in the digital age: an examination of relationship building and the effectiveness of youtube celebrities. J Soc Media Soc. 2018;7(1):280–294.
   Google Scholar
• Hudders L, De Jans S, De Veirman M. The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. Int J Advert. 2021;40(3):327–375. doi:10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FFY, Lowe B. Placing products in humorous scenes: its impact on brand perceptions. Eur J Mark. 2021;55(3):649–670. doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin SV, Muqaddam A. Product placement 2.0:“Do brands need influencers, or do influencers need brands? J Brand Manag. 2019;26(5):522–537. doi:10.1057/s41262-019-00151-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand A, Hennig-Thurau T, Best S. When James Bond shows off his Omega: does product placement affect its media host? Eur J Mark. 2015;49(9–10):1666–1685. doi:10.1108/EJM-09-2013-0474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessitore T, Geuens M. Arming consumers against product placement: a comparison of factual and evaluative educational interventions. J Bus Res. 2019;95:38–48. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farivar S, Wang F, Yuan Y. Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: key factors in influencer marketing. J Retail Consum Serv. 2021;59:102371. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang K, Zhang Q. Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;87:155–173. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Ko E, Kim J. SNS users’ para-social relationships with celebrities: social media effects on purchase intentions. J Glob Sch Mark Sci. 2015;25(3):279–294. doi:10.1080/21639159.2015.1043690
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé E. Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Commun Theory. 2008;18(3):407–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé E, Jain P, Chung AH. Reinforcement or reactance? Examining the effect of an explicit persuasive appeal following an entertainment-education narrative. J Commun. 2012;62(6):1010–1027. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01680.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé E, Nabi RL. Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: overcoming resistance to persuasion. Hum Commun Res. 2010;36(1):26–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra AS, Roy S, Bailey AA. Exploring brand personality–celebrity endorser personality congruence in celebrity endorsements in the Indian context. Psychol Mark. 2015;32(12):1158–1174. doi:10.1002/mar.20846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breves P, Liebers N, Abt M, Kunze A. The perceived fit between Instagram influencers and the endorsed brand: how influencer–brand fit affects source credibility and persuasive effectiveness. J Advert Res. 2019;59(4):440–454. doi:10.2501/JAR-2019-030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres P, Augusto M, Matos M. Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: an exploratory study. Psychol Mark. 2019;36(12):1267–1276. doi:10.1002/mar.21274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam S, van Reijmersdal EA. Insights in adolescents’ advertising literacy, perceptions and responses regarding sponsored influencer videos and disclosures. Cyberpsychology J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace. 2019;13(2). doi:10.5817/CP2019-2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlitz A. The Impact of Video Advertisement Placement and Video Advertisement Transparency on Video Advertisement Avoidance: Pre-Rolls, Mid-Rolls, and Psychological Reactance [Dissertation]. Ohio University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bang H, Choi D, Yoon S, Baek TH, Kim Y. Message assertiveness and price discount in prosocial advertising: differences between Americans and Koreans. Eur J Mark. 2021;55(6):1780–1802. doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2019-0791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Baek TH, Yoon S, Oh S, Choi YK. Assertive environmental advertising and reactance: differences between South Koreans and Americans. J Advert. 2017;46(4):550–564. doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1361878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J. The impact of self-construal and message frame valence on reactance: a cross-cultural study in charity advertising. Int J Advert. 2019;38(3):405–427. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1536506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FFY, Petrovici D, Lowe B. Antecedents of product placement effectiveness across cultures. Int Mark Rev. 2016;33(1):5–24. doi:10.1108/IMR-07-2014-0249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman S, van Reijmersdal E, Neijens P. Sponsorship disclosure: effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and brand responses. J Commun. 2012;62:1047–1064. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01677.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm JW. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm SS, Brehm JW. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard JP, Shen L. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr. 2005;72(2):144–168. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus T. Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: a review of the literature. Front Commun. 2019;4. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056
   Google Scholar
• Edwards SM, Li H, Lee JH. Forced exposure and psychological reactance: antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. J Advert. 2002;31(3):83–95. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reijmersdal EA, Tutaj K, Boerman SC. The effects of brand placement disclosures on skepticism and brand memory. Commun - Eur J Commun Res. 2013;38(2). doi:10.1515/commun-2013-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang S. Psychological Reactance and Branded Product Placement [Dissertation]. East Lansing: Michigan State University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Meeds R. Factors affecting information processing of internet advertisements: a test on exposure condition, psychological reactance, and advertising frequency. In: American Academy of Advertising. Conference. Proceedings (Online). American Academy of Advertising; 2007:93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian SK. Beyond advertising and publicity: hybrid messages and public policy issues. J Advert. 1994;23(4):29–46. doi:10.1080/00913367.1943.10673457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FFY. Product placement and its effectiveness: a systematic review and propositions for future research. Mark Rev. 2012;12(1):39–60. doi:10.1362/146934712X13286274424271
   Google Scholar
• Guo F, Ye G, Hudders L, Lv W, Li M, Duffy VG. Product placement in mass media: a review and bibliometric analysis. J Advert. 2019;48(2):215–231. doi:10.1080/00913367.2019.1567409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta PB, Gould SJ. Consumers’ perceptions of the ethics and acceptability of product placements in movies: product category and individual differences. J Curr Issues Res Advert. 1997;19(1):37–50. doi:10.1080/10641734.1997.10505056
   Google Scholar
• Quick BL, Kim DK. Examining reactance and reactance restoration with South Korean adolescents: a test of psychological reactance within a collectivist culture. Commun Res. 2009;36(6):765–782. doi:10.1177/0093650290346797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton D, Wohl RR. Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry. 1956;19(3):215–229. doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinikainen H, Munnukka J, Maity D, Luoma-aho V. ‘You really are a great big sister’ – parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. J Mark Manag. 2020;36(3–4):279–298. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble JL, Hartmann T, Rosaen SF. Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Hum Commun Res. 2016;42(1):21–44. doi:10.1111/hcre.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JE, Watkins B. YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. J Bus Res. 2016;69(12):5753–5760. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky R, Sangalang A. The effect of relational and interactive aspects of parasocial experiences on attitudes and message resistance. Commun Rep. 2016;29(3):175–188. doi:10.1080/08934215.2016.1148750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins MA. An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: when beauty may be only skin deep. J Advert. 1990;19(1):4–13. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till BD, Busler M. The match-up hypothesis: physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. J Advert. 2000;29(3):1–13. doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon MR, Ashmore RD, Longo LC. The beauty match-up hypothesis: congruence between types of beauty and product images in advertising. J Advert. 1992;21(4):23–34. doi:10.1080/00913367.1992.10673383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Wang K, Jhu W, Gao Y. The best match-up of airline advertising endorsement and flight safety message. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2016;28(11):2533–2552. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-03-2015-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen L, Schouten AP, Croes EA. Influencer advertising on Instagram: product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. Int J Advert. 2022;41(1):101–127. doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1994205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten AP, Janssen L, Verspaget M. Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. Int J Advert. 2020;39(2):258–281. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley HH, Michela JL. Attribution theory and research. Annu Rev Psychol. 1980;31(1):457–501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breves P, Amrehn J, Heidenreich A, Liebers N, Schramm H. Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers. Int J Advert. 2021;40(7):1209–1229. doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1881237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breves P, Liebers N, Motschenbacher B, Reus L. Reducing resistance: the impact of nonfollowers’ and followers’ parasocial relationships with social media influencers on persuasive resistance and advertising effectiveness. Hum Commun Res. 2021;47(4):418–443. doi:10.1093/hcr/hqab006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan S, Lou C. How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: the roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. J Interact Advert. 2020;20(2):133–147. doi:10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514
   Google Scholar
• Boerman S, van Reijmersdal EA. Disclosing influencer marketing on youtube to children: the moderating role of para-social relationship. Front Psychol. 2020;10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick BL. What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Commun. 2012;27(1):1–9. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.567446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleier A, Eisenbeiss M. The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. J Retail. 2015;91(3):390–409. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Nevarez C, Torres IM. Consumer attitudes toward social network advertising. J Curr Issues Res Advert. 2015;36(1):1–19. doi:10.1080/10641734.2014.912595
   Google Scholar
• Rubin AM, Perse EM. Audience activity and soap opera involvement a uses and effects investigation. Hum Commun Res. 1987;14(2):246–268. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian R. Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J Advert. 1990;19(3):39–52. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bond BJ. Following your “friend”: social media and the strength of adolescents’ parasocial relationships with media personae. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(11):656–660. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou C. Social media influencers and followers: theorization of a trans-parasocial relation and explication of its implications for influencer advertising. J Advert. 2022;51(1):4–21. doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DY, Kim HY. Influencer advertising on social media: the multiple inference model on influencer-product congruence and sponsorship disclosure. J Bus Res. 2021;130:405–415. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cicco R, Iacobucci S, Pagliaro S. The effect of influencer–product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponsorship transparency. Int J Advert. 2021;40(5):733–759. doi:10.1080/02650487.2020.1801198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins MA, Gupta K. Congruence between spokesperson and product type: a matchup hypothesis perspective. Psychol Mark. 1994;11(6):569–586. doi:10.1002/mar.4220110605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar